Wheels and Tires Need help with wheels or tires? Got fitment issues? Have questions about tire performance and handling? Ask all of those questions here!

11" Rear Wheel Fit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-2009, 07:00 PM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
11" Rear Wheel Fit

Ok.....I know that this has been covered many times, but it always end the same way...."Use a BFH.".....Not exactly overly helpful.

I'm ready to do it, but I'm really not seeing how a simple BFH is gonna help me, despite what I've been told.

My goal is to fit 315s.

I currently have 17" x 9" ROH Snypers, 5" bs/0 offset. To fir 315s, I need a 10"-12" wheel. Goal was 11" then. I was going to add 2" & end up with 6" bs.

I mounted up a tireless wheel & after a bit of SFH (my bigest H is just a SFH ), I had this....



It looks like I'm still 1/2" short of room & that would be with the wheel physically TOUCHING the car. Not even any clearance. No way a simple BFH is gonna move the metal 1/2" in!

Am I measuring wrong? Am I misinterpreting what I'm seeing?

I finally have the $ I need, go to check it all out & now.........HELP!

Last edited by Stephen; 11-03-2009 at 08:26 AM. Reason: fixed missing pic
Old 04-24-2009, 07:15 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,655
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 45 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

is the axle at ride height or is it hanging in the pic?

people usually have the bump stop area sitting inside the wheel, and say "oh, it fits great!" but let the axle drop and it hangs up on the bumpstop, like it would in your pic

You need to cut the bumpstop area off. There are 2 main layers of sheet metal there, you need to remove the outed layer, then box it back in so that its flat instead of sticking out into the wheel.

the BFH or SFM is more for the front of the wheel well.

Your figuring the 315 to be 12.5" in width right?
Old 04-24-2009, 07:18 PM
  #3  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Here's another part of the mystery.....

The light streak is the e-brake shield reflecting the flash of the camera......Only 1.5" from the rim edge to the e-brake cable.....2" widening would me the wheel 1/2" into it!

Old 04-24-2009, 07:22 PM
  #4  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by //<86TA>\\
is the axle at ride height or is it hanging in the pic?

people usually have the bump stop area sitting inside the wheel, and say "oh, it fits great!" but let the axle drop and it hangs up on the bumpstop, like it would in your pic

You need to cut the bumpstop area off. There are 2 main layers of sheet metal there, you need to remove the outed layer, then box it back in so that its flat instead of sticking out into the wheel.

the BFH or SFM is more for the front of the wheel well.

Your figuring the 315 to be 12.5" in width right?
The axle is at ride height. Jackstand under the axle.

I pretty much figured on the bumpstop needed to be cut anyways, but I haven't gotten to that part yet, and already having fitment problems!

I'm trying to move/clear than inner stiffening "ridge".
Old 04-24-2009, 07:22 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,655
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 45 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

so move the cable? is hsould move out of the way.

my panhard mount is inside my wheel....

do you have rear drums or discs?
Old 04-24-2009, 07:25 PM
  #6  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by //<86TA>\\
so move the cable? is hsould move out of the way.

my panhard mount is inside my wheel....
My Panhard is not the problem....My bumpstop is not the problem...My INNER FENDERWHEEL is.

Please......Lets address one problem at a time, before we worry about the others.......Wheel fitment.

That end of the cable won't simply move, that close to the caliper. It is STIFF metal sheathing and just barely out of the caliper, before it starts turning.
Old 04-24-2009, 07:32 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,655
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 45 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by Stephen
That end of the cable won't simply move, that close to the caliper. It is STIFF metal sheathing and just barely out of the caliper, before it starts turning.
sorry for the confusion, the panhard comment was just a side note, like "you think you have problems?, look what i had to deal with!"

as for the cable, i forgot the old factory ones are quite stiff.
I have have the 4th gen cables for my ls1 style rear brakes, while they are pretty stiff too, i was able to flex it enough to clear the wheel, i dont have the original cables to compare with.

Aside from that, the cable should be able to move enough to clear the wheel, i wouldn't worry too much about the cable at this time.
Old 04-24-2009, 07:38 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,655
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 45 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

this thread has the pics for the bempstop area cutting, you've posted in it, but here it is if you need it

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/susp...od-17x11s.html
Old 04-24-2009, 07:45 PM
  #9  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

OK.....I *THINK* I have 1/8" clearance now. Not that I'll settle for just 1/8" (I want 1/4"), but at least it is some progress! The bright streak is the metal e-brake cable & camera flash off it.



Maybe MORE hammering to the ridge will give me to room I want. All I have to work with is a roofing hammer...... Or a deadblow rubber mallet.

I do have a 700R4, & have NO plans to go T56, so do I NEED a e-brake? Not really. So no BIG loss if I disconnect it & lose it. Not sure if they even check it at inspection time. I'll look into that.

Now......If I put in a 4th gen rear axle, all my problems would be solved, but new "problems" would arise. My tires sit in about 1/2" right now, which means they'd be about 1" OUT, past the fender.
Old 04-24-2009, 07:49 PM
  #10  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by Stephen
I do have a 700R4, & have NO plans to go T56, so do I NEED a e-brake? Not really. So no BIG loss if I disconnect it & lose it. Not sure if they even check it at inspection time. I'll look into that.
Yep....Required & inspected........ TX Parking Brake Inspect Requirements link
Old 04-24-2009, 07:55 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,655
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 45 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

I would shoot for 1/2" clearnance minumum. Thats what i need or my tires will rub occasionally.

I didnt mean remove the cables, not sure if you were thinking i meant that.

Sounds like you need to invest is a bigger hammer

looks like your getting somewhere.
Old 04-24-2009, 08:32 PM
  #12  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

I moved the jackstand from the axle to the body & let the axle drop.

Yep.....EXACTLY 1", rim edge to the bumpstop and the wheel drooped below the bumpstop, so it'll interfere & will need cutting off.

I beat in the upper wheel well some, but can only guess at how much I'll need for the tire sidewall bulge, until I actually have a tire mounted on the wheel to see it.

From the rim edge to the stock LCA is EXACTLY 2" (which is what I'm gettung them widened by), so that is an issue, right? NOPE!

I already anticipated that problem & got a set of UMI Performance Tubular LCAs w/spherical Rod Ends & Offset Bushings, so I'm good there.
Old 04-24-2009, 08:33 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
xpndbl3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orland Park, IL
Posts: 13,622
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Cut out and box the bump stop area, that alone will get you 3/4" at least. I am running a 13.1" section width tire with a 15x10 on 6.5bs rim. It all fits fine, I posted a thread with pics a long time ago, feel free to search for it. I think it was 15x10 with 6.5bs in the title.
Old 04-24-2009, 08:37 PM
  #14  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by //<86TA>\\
I would shoot for 1/2" clearnance minumum. Thats what i need or my tires will rub occasionally.
What PHB do you have? Poly Bushings?

I have a UMI Performance Double Adjustable Rod Ended Panhard Bar so I doubt I have ANY side-to-side deflection.
Old 04-25-2009, 12:16 AM
  #15  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

OK.....Everything is looking like it can be pretty easily "fixed", EXCEPT.....the e-brake cable problem.

The rim would just touch it at 1" more bs, so 2" would be a BIG problem. And it isn't very flexible at all so.......

Any ideas?

I can't eliminate the e-brake cable. It can't be easily just twisted to the side & make room for the rim so.....

Last edited by Stephen; 04-25-2009 at 12:27 AM.
Old 04-25-2009, 05:42 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,655
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 45 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by Stephen
What PHB do you have? Poly Bushings?

I have a UMI Performance Double Adjustable Rod Ended Panhard Bar so I doubt I have ANY side-to-side deflection.
no, i have the double adjustable one as well.

The rear of the car will still move a little side to side, but i think my rubbing is happening when the suspension is loaded in a turn, the body rolls a little and causes a rub.
Old 04-27-2009, 02:33 PM
  #17  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

No "easy" fit exists, if you wanna keep the tires under the fenders. Otherwise, I'd just get some spacers & stick them out. As it is, I'm gonna use my brand-new, used, OEM aluminum factory aluminum drum spacers. Which are just under 1/4", IIRC..

Well, I did discover that the e-brake cable ran through that flimsy "bracket" on top of the axle tube & was actually being held "out" & it could possibly move in more. After releasing it from the bracket, it swung inwards a little more, and that gave me the room for the wheel to clear the cable. I'll make a new bracket to hold it in farther.

After recalculating, I was gonna end up with 7"bs........A 17" x 11" & 7" bs, with ONLY some BFH work......NOT POSSIBLE! (Some CLAIM 6.5" bs to have done just a BFH, yet no pics from them......not surprised at pics showing off their lies)

I challenge those who say it is possible & have done it (6.5"bs), to pop a wheel off their car, take a pic, show the wheel bs & PROVE IT! I've been researching this for over 6 months now, & of those who "claimed" to have done it? They are obviously full of it & leaving something out, that they don't want to admit to.

It is obviously going to require some cutting & re-welding, to even fit 6.5" (much less 7")bs.

5"bs? Yes, direct fit.....
5.5"bs + BFH?.....Yes, but not just simple MINOR BFH work
6" bs + BFH only? (like some claim to have done).....NOT IN YOUR DREAMS! (much less the 7"BS I was going to end up with)

I can get 2" of clearance (9" wide/5"bs wheel), wheel edge to body metal, but NO MORE, with only BFH work. Meaning the (widened) rim would be TOUCHING the body metal. Then there would be the tire bulge on top of that! And that doesn't even take the bumpstop section into account that sticks out even further.....

It looks like I'm going to end up with a 1.5" widened, 10.5" (10"-12" is the recommended size)/6.5" bs wheel, if not just a 1" widened 10"/6" bs wheel.
Old 04-27-2009, 10:25 PM
  #18  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
xpndbl3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orland Park, IL
Posts: 13,622
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by Stephen
(Some CLAIM 6.5" bs to have done just a BFH, yet no pics from them......not surprised at pics showing off their lies)

I challenge those who say it is possible & have done it (6.5"bs), to pop a wheel off their car, take a pic, show the wheel bs & PROVE IT! I've been researching this for over 6 months now, & of those who "claimed" to have done it? They are obviously full of it & leaving something out, that they don't want to admit to.

It is obviously going to require some cutting & re-welding, to even fit 6.5" (much less 7")bs.
i made a huge thread on the drag board or fabrication board about MY 6.5" backspacing....sorry you can't believe me. 28x12.50 slick with 13.1" section width, cut out the bumpstop run offset LCAs and it's not too difficult to fit.


https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/orga...28x12-50s.html

just in case u need to see the pics at the bottom of the thread
screw it....here u go

Name:  DSCN2007.jpg
Views: 204
Size:  147.5 KB
Name:  DSCN2010.jpg
Views: 207
Size:  159.6 KB
Name:  DSCN2001.jpg
Views: 173
Size:  154.0 KB
Name:  DSCN2002.jpg
Views: 294
Size:  164.8 KB
Name:  DSCN2006.jpg
Views: 187
Size:  166.9 KB

Last edited by xpndbl3; 04-27-2009 at 10:32 PM.
Old 04-27-2009, 11:04 PM
  #19  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by xpndbl3
i made a huge thread on the drag board or fabrication board about MY 6.5" backspacing....sorry you can't believe me. 28x12.50 slick with 13.1" section width, cut out the bumpstop run offset LCAs and it's not too difficult to fit.


https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/orga...28x12-50s.html

just in case u need to see the pics at the bottom of the thread
screw it....here u go
#1...I have 5" with NO mods & room to spare. Sounds like you did a lot more than BFH work to get 6.5". Where are the pics of it?
#2....NO inner fender pics. So we can't tell from the outside if it just messed with or back-halfed & tubbed.
#3...Only 15" wheels. I have 17" & the problem the wheel to metal problem.

Not surprised that, as usual, no wheels off pics of the inner sheet metal.

Last edited by Stephen; 04-27-2009 at 11:30 PM. Reason: Misread & responded to the misreading
Old 04-28-2009, 12:45 PM
  #20  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
xpndbl3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orland Park, IL
Posts: 13,622
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

you sure are sounding crabby





obviously the pics are with a 295 street tire but it's all the same. Your rim is no where near as large as my 28" tires, so that 15" vs 17" argument is pointless. My slicks are wider than your rim would be up there.
Old 04-28-2009, 01:07 PM
  #21  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by xpndbl3
you sure are sounding crabby
obviously the pics are with a 295 street tire but it's all the same. Your rim is no where near as large as my 28" tires, so that 15" vs 17" argument is pointless. My slicks are wider than your rim would be up there.
Crabby? Maybe. I get tired of the "just a BFH" claims I kept reading, yet nobody can back it up any. I might as well say I have 33" wide Pro Streeters..."Take my word for it.....I cut nothing to get them to tuck."

Your pics only reinforce my point.....

You cut & welded exactly what I expected to see. Not "just BFH" like some claim.

Tire sidewalls end up in a totally different area than rims do, so the argument of rim vs tire width is pointless.

The area tires would rub, is way thinner, easier to move and wider to begin with, than where a rim "intrudes" upon. Yes, the sidewall & bumpstop area still might present an obstruction, but that is another issue to be dealt with later & easily addressed with limiting straps, if nothing else.
Old 04-28-2009, 01:47 PM
  #22  
Supreme Member

 
Shagwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: projects.......
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

17x11, 4th gen rear, 8" bs, 315/35/17:

rolled the fender lip, trimmed the corners of the bump stop/mounts, and tapped the spring hump slightly with a BFH.

There is a drivers' side straight-on rear shot of it that has been posted up on here for a few years now. You should be able to find it in one of the wheels threads by searching my name and the word pics.
Old 04-28-2009, 01:54 PM
  #23  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by Shagwell
17x11, 4th gen rear, 8" bs, 315/35/17
rolled the fender lip, trimmed the corners of the bump stop/mounts, and tapped the spring hump slightly with a BFH.

There is a drivers' side straight-on rear shot of it that has been posted up on here for a few years now. You should be able to find it in one of the wheels threads by searching my name and the word pics.
What sized adapters did you use? 8"bs on a direct fit wheel, without serious cutting & welding, is not even remotely possible.

I have 5" bs right now...There is physically 2.125" from the rim edge to the body metal & that doesn't even include the bumpstop sticking out.

You'd have had to cut a full 2" out, or have the rims sticking out. Pics like that show nothing. Lets see it without the wheel in place.
Old 04-28-2009, 04:14 PM
  #24  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,655
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 45 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by Stephen
What sized adapters did you use? 8"bs on a direct fit wheel, without serious cutting & welding, is not even remotely possible.

I have 5" bs right now...There is physically 2.125" from the rim edge to the body metal & that doesn't even include the bumpstop sticking out.

You'd have had to cut a full 2" out, or have the rims sticking out. Pics like that show nothing. Lets see it without the wheel in place.
he did say he is using a 4th gen rear, so its what, 1.75 wider on each side? so the 8" of BS that the wheels have would be more like 6.25 on a 3rd gen offset.
Old 04-28-2009, 04:52 PM
  #25  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by //<86TA>\\
he did say he is using a 4th gen rear, so its what, 1.75 wider on each side? so the 8" of BS that the wheels have would be more like 6.25 on a 3rd gen offset.
OK.....I missed the 4th gen part, but even so......That doesn't help my fit in any way.

If I had a 4th gen rear end, I'd have minimal inner clearance problems, but then my tires would stick out about 1.5"!
Old 04-29-2009, 10:38 AM
  #26  
Supreme Member

 
Shagwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: projects.......
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

As 86TA noted, I run an 8" bs due to the 4th gen rear that is currently under it.

For note, the only reason I trimed the corners off the bump stops and thier mounts was for clearance when the suspension is fully extended.

If you add 2" to a 4.5" backspaced wheel, then you will have a 6.5" backspace, thus making the roughly 1/2" difference we have in fitment. - Basically, my wheels stick out approximately 1/2" more than your's currently do. I don't have any pics with the wheels off, however there are some rear shots on this board that show where mine sit in relation to the fender lip, which would probably verify this. - I would re-post them, but I don't have those shots on my photobucket account and I don't often get on-line from home.
Old 04-29-2009, 04:41 PM
  #27  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Passenger side was much quicker, since I already learned what was going to be a waste of time, doing the drivers side.

The bumpstop is now gone, just need to address that center "ridge/bump".
Attached Thumbnails 11&quot; Rear Wheel Fit-p4290027.jpg  

Last edited by Stephen; 04-30-2009 at 10:30 AM. Reason: rewording
Old 05-03-2009, 09:33 PM
  #28  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

The problem originates from your insistence that your backspacing is 4.5" and that the number is going to be the same on every other wheel out there. I was going to reply last week, but things came up and I had to leave so all the bookmarks I looked up are not here. In any case, feel free to look up any of the following manufacturers and how THEY measure backspace:

American Racing
Bonspeed
Boyd
Budnik
Centerline
Cragar
Weld
Wheel Vintiques
US Wheel

I may have forgotten some and some dont say, not to mention I did not look up everyone, but I'm sure a phone call would resolve the question. So what you're doing is wrong, telling people that have already done this that what they did is not possible, and calling them out and whatnot. Stop.

You are not using a backspace dimension that is equivalent to what everyone else uses. Its about a 1/2" different, because everyone else measures from the mounting flange to the back of the rim, not to the bead like you insist. So forgetting what you say yours are, start with EQUIVALENT measurements. If you consider that measuring your rims backspace the way that any of the above do, and what those vehicle owners are telling you they are running on their cars, it might make some more sense. You're talking about adding 2" to a wheel that is not 4.5" backspace but 5" backspace measured in the manner everyone else on this board was told to measure and how the manufacturers they got their wheels from measured it, putting you at 7" backspace the way everyone else measures theirs. Now maybe it will make sense to you how a bunch of people are running 6 to 6.5" with a BFH and you cant, its because you are trying to run 7".
Old 05-03-2009, 09:59 PM
  #29  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
tony_cogliandro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: sunny so cal.
Posts: 1,531
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1990
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by xpndbl3
i made a huge thread on the drag board or fabrication board about MY 6.5" backspacing....sorry you can't believe me. 28x12.50 slick with 13.1" section width, cut out the bumpstop run offset LCAs and it's not too difficult to fit.


https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/orga...28x12-50s.html

just in case u need to see the pics at the bottom of the thread
screw it....here u go





i have seen your camaro pics before and that is what a camaro should look like. no empty wheel wells - everything full of rubber - big *** buldging American Muscle rubber to let people know you need it or you sit in one place and just spin those tires. and none of that chrome wagon wheel stuff for rims.
i love your car. when mine grows up i want it to be like that.
Old 05-03-2009, 11:20 PM
  #30  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by madmax
The problem originates from.....
......YOU, not fully reading before you Post!


I already posted that I made the MISTAKE of calling the bs wrong in the beginning.

Try READING a whole thread before you mouth off!

Originally Posted by madmax
You are not using a backspace dimension that is equivalent to what everyone else uses.
I fully understand, and already posted about it. And I AM using edge to wheel seat measurements. And yes.....I WAS using one that is equal.....

Last edited by Stephen; 05-03-2009 at 11:26 PM.
Old 05-05-2009, 02:22 PM
  #31  
Supreme Member

 
Shagwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: projects.......
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

I don't seem to have any shot with of the wheel wells with the tire's off. Like I said though, less BFH work than you, but approximately 1/2" less backspace.

Here's a rear shot of the car, should help to show fitment vs the lip:
Name:  GTA3.jpg
Views: 161
Size:  52.2 KB
Old 05-05-2009, 02:31 PM
  #32  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by Shagwell
I don't seem to have any shot with of the wheel wells with the tire's off. Like I said though, less BFH work than you, but approximately 1/2" less backspace.
But you have a 4th gen rear, so your fit is pointless to me, since I'm still using the 9-bolt, since it is stronger than the 10-bolt rears.

Yeah...we could play with the #s all day long, but no one can ever make up their minds if a 4th gen rear is 2", 1.75", or 1.5" wider per side, so we can't trust their judgment in what they say about cutting/hammering etc.

I gave up & just cut mine out yesterday, so it doesn't matter anymore. My bumpstops & the vertical bump are GONE now.
Old 05-05-2009, 02:52 PM
  #33  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by Stephen
......YOU, not fully reading before you Post!


I already posted that I made the MISTAKE of calling the bs wrong in the beginning.

Try READING a whole thread before you mouth off!
Fine, and I will keep note of this and your attitude.
Old 05-05-2009, 02:57 PM
  #34  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by madmax
Fine, and I will keep note of this and your attitude.
Like I'm supposed to care?

You mouthed off without reading. Had you READ, you would have already known that I was aware of my mistake in the beginning.
Old 05-06-2009, 03:43 PM
  #35  
Supreme Member

 
Shagwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: projects.......
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by Stephen
But you have a 4th gen rear, so your fit is pointless to me, since I'm still using the 9-bolt, since it is stronger than the 10-bolt rears.

Yeah...we could play with the #s all day long, but no one can ever make up their minds if a 4th gen rear is 2", 1.75", or 1.5" wider per side, so we can't trust their judgment in what they say about cutting/hammering etc.

I gave up & just cut mine out yesterday, so it doesn't matter anymore. My bumpstops & the vertical bump are GONE now.
The 9-bolt is marginally stronger than a stock 10-bolt, it is no stronger than my 10-bolt. I have broken both to know.

I do understand what you are saying, just noting that since the 4th gen rear is almost 2" per side wider, I am running 2" more bs than what you would need. That said, the difference in fitment was due to how you were measuring it; thus the 1/2"difference in clearance.

Sorry to have tried to help. I'll leave you to your own choices.
Old 08-16-2009, 02:31 AM
  #36  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
quickkris2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: jackson new jersey
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 camaro vert
Engine: ls1 soon
Transmission: t56 soon
Axle/Gears: moser 12bolt 4.10 soon!
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by Shagwell
I don't seem to have any shot with of the wheel wells with the tire's off. Like I said though, less BFH work than you, but approximately 1/2" less backspace.

Here's a rear shot of the car, should help to show fitment vs the lip:
love the wood behind the wheel... 1in wood block vs. 3000lbs car lol this transam vert also has camaro vert side spoilers.. nice car tho sorry its off topic
Old 08-16-2009, 09:29 AM
  #37  
Member
 
LarryL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 84 TA,69 camaro,81 vet 92 vet
Engine: 400
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

I just got mine on yesterday, 17 front 18 back. 285- 40-18 rear tire. Stock rear w/ 2 inch adapters. I have 2.25" of space from the tire wall.

Last edited by LarryL; 08-17-2009 at 09:44 AM.
Old 08-16-2009, 06:55 PM
  #38  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,655
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 45 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by LarryL
I just got mine on yesterday, 17 front 18 back. 285- 40-18 rear tire. Stock rear w/ 2 inch adapters. I have 2.5" of space from the tire wall.
congrats! so what does it have to do with this thread?
Old 10-29-2009, 06:56 PM
  #39  
Member
 
jag327's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 82 Camaro
Engine: 327/30 over 1965 block
Transmission: 4 speed M22 trany
Axle/Gears: 373
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by xpndbl3
you sure are sounding crabby





obviously the pics are with a 295 street tire but it's all the same. Your rim is no where near as large as my 28" tires, so that 15" vs 17" argument is pointless. My slicks are wider than your rim would be up there.
Man need I help with getting wider tires under my 82 camaro.. man can you email me specs pics rim size back pacing and tires size... if you can... man the car spins all most, all the way down the strack the way it is now...
Old 10-29-2009, 07:06 PM
  #40  
Member
 
jag327's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 82 Camaro
Engine: 327/30 over 1965 block
Transmission: 4 speed M22 trany
Axle/Gears: 373
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

I was told that you can fit, 28 x 11.50 tires with a rim of 15 x 10 back spicing 5.1/2
is this right.
Old 11-03-2009, 12:02 AM
  #41  
Junior Member
 
gill9228's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro Iroc
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

What front wheel and tire size are you running?
Old 11-03-2009, 08:27 AM
  #42  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 11" Rear Wheel Fit

Originally Posted by gill9228
What front wheel and tire size are you running?
The info has always been in my sig.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992rs/ss
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
12
05-19-2020 07:02 PM
1992rs/ss
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
01-28-2016 09:58 PM
B_Dubya
Transmissions and Drivetrain
3
08-26-2015 05:09 PM
kah992
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
08-19-2015 02:55 PM
aaron7
Exterior Parts Wanted
5
08-18-2015 05:47 PM



Quick Reply: 11" Rear Wheel Fit



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:28 PM.