tire width...15x7?
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
tire width...15x7?
ok, well i'm running a set of 215-65-R15, and i'm thinking that those are 15 x 7 inch. rims. IF this is true, what's the widest tires i can wear on the back of my car? Thanx in advance.
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: LaFayette, NY
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '10 Subaru Forester
Engine: 2.5 Boxer
Transmission: 4EAT
Axle/Gears: 4.44
Most popular size for 15x7 seems to be 225/60R15 Max I'd go is 235/55R15... after that you'll probably see some balooning.
#5
235/60R15 is the widest you SHOULD go. you can put wider on, but it's useless. I'd go with 235/60R15, since it was an optional size one year, only 4 actually had them though. '86? i can't remember now, either way go for it.
#7
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
I had P245/60r15's as my "first" larger rear tires, on the stock 15x7 rim. The sidewall wasn't too "ballooney", either. I then put P255/70r15's on that 15x7 rim, and that sidewall was Very bulged! In fact I needed to "modify" the inner rear quarter panel with a sledgehammer to get that one to fit. It looked much better when I moved it to a 15x8 rim, and now I've got P275/60r15's back there.
As to fronts, the current size is P225/60r15, on a 15x7 rim, so I don't have too much useful info about the fronts.
------------------
-Tom P (Hot rodded 1986 Firebird 2.8l)
As to fronts, the current size is P225/60r15, on a 15x7 rim, so I don't have too much useful info about the fronts.
------------------
-Tom P (Hot rodded 1986 Firebird 2.8l)
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: LaFayette, NY
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '10 Subaru Forester
Engine: 2.5 Boxer
Transmission: 4EAT
Axle/Gears: 4.44
you know why the 255/70's didn't fit? Because those are ridiculously tall tires.
Running 255's you should keep the aspect ratio down to 50 or so...
Running 255's you should keep the aspect ratio down to 50 or so...
#9
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bayville NJ and Newark at NJIT.
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
It has nothing to do with rim height, it's all about width.
7" wide rims the widest safest you should go is 235.
8" and you can run 245's
ect...
These arn't hard fast rules... simply a safe guideline to follow.
------------------
1985 Camaro SC - 2.8L, auto.
C'mon, spin 'em for papa...
http://www.xenodrgn.f2s.com/Frontright.jpg
7" wide rims the widest safest you should go is 235.
8" and you can run 245's
ect...
These arn't hard fast rules... simply a safe guideline to follow.
------------------
1985 Camaro SC - 2.8L, auto.
C'mon, spin 'em for papa...
http://www.xenodrgn.f2s.com/Frontright.jpg
#10
Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Southwest Ohio
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 Firebird, 2000 WS6
Engine: 2.8, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, T-56
Axle/Gears: Stock, Stock
I've got 255/60/R15 on the back of ny car and it looks fine. I like them.
------------------
2.8 mpfi
My only mod: Flowmaster 40 series
http://www.geocities.com/pita_j2000/MyFirebird.html?1002261961590
PICS ARE UP!!
------------------
2.8 mpfi
My only mod: Flowmaster 40 series
http://www.geocities.com/pita_j2000/MyFirebird.html?1002261961590
PICS ARE UP!!
#11
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by ChillPhatCat:
you know why the 255/70's didn't fit? Because those are ridiculously tall tires.</font>
you know why the 255/70's didn't fit? Because those are ridiculously tall tires.</font>
But, they weren't too tall for my car, they were too wide. I knew that before I bought them (I measured, comparing the old P245/60's to the new tire's stats). The tire fit fine on the passenger side. The problem was on the driver's side, at the bottom inside of the wheel well, forwards of the axle. There was about a 5" area that needed to be bent back, and a sledge helped out perfectly!
If it makes you feel better, the P275/60r15's are 28 inches tall, and the P255/70's were 29 inches. So, I still have a "ridiculously large tire" on the back.
------------------
-Tom P (Hot rodded 1986 Firebird 2.8l)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LiquidBlue
Wheels and Tires
32
12-10-2019 04:06 PM