V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

K&N Air Filter vs. Wix

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2009, 10:21 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
moogletized's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L MPFI V6
K&N Air Filter vs. Wix

I'm looking for any quick and easy gain in HP that I can get. The 140 just ain't cutting it. Since the K&N will run me $40, has anyone gotten noticeable gains? Also, does anyone have any experience with Wix filters (Napa's gold brand I think)? Pros and cons vs. the K&N?
Old 06-10-2009, 05:19 AM
  #2  
Member

 
sloick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dayton OH
Posts: 266
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Many
Engine: Several
Transmission: Automatics
Re: K&N Air Filter vs. Wix

wix makes good stuff, but its a normal paper filter. if you want a performance filter then you are naturally going to pay more. k&n is the best of the best if you ask me.

in these v6's the most you will see is better throttle response and maybe a little better fuel mileage.
Old 06-10-2009, 03:06 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
K-slice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Traverse City, MI
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91' Firebird
Engine: 3.1 LH0 V6
Transmission: Auto 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 limited slip
Re: K&N Air Filter vs. Wix

Replacing your stock intake setup will be the only thing that'll made a difference. The place where air enters the filter can is such a small bottle neck that any filter outflows that hole.
http://thirdgenmods.firebirdv6.com/coldair.html
Something like this will get you a lil more hp and, as mentioned before, better response and fuel economy.
Old 06-10-2009, 07:03 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
Smoke_Jaguar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Camaro T-Top
Engine: 2.8L V6 (MPFI)
Transmission: 5 Speed
Re: K&N Air Filter vs. Wix

The cold air mod plus a Wix is cheaper and better in my experience, also you don't sacrifice filtration in the process as you would with a K&N. K&N's filter decently, but if you drive in dusty areas, dirt roads, and such, the difference is visibly noticable when you change the oil.
Old 06-11-2009, 12:00 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
V6F1R3BRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: N. Virginia
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird - 1998 Z28
Engine: 2.8 - LS1
Re: K&N Air Filter vs. Wix

Originally Posted by sloick
in these v6's the most you will see is better throttle response and maybe a little better fuel mileage.
That's exactly what i got. I haven't tried a K&N but i have an APC filter (very cheap) and it was a noticeable improvement.
Old 06-11-2009, 08:25 AM
  #6  
TGO Supporter
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
luvofjah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PNW
Posts: 2,478
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Car: 91 Black Formula KR
Engine: 305 TPI R69/G92
Transmission: Astro A5-Pro 5.0-McCleod
Axle/Gears: US Gear 3.42 Eaton True Trac
Re: K&N Air Filter vs. Wix

But you can clean / reuse the K&N (If I read correctly, the others are paper / throw away?

As for more power, blown or bottle

Raf
Old 06-11-2009, 09:19 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
Smoke_Jaguar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Camaro T-Top
Engine: 2.8L V6 (MPFI)
Transmission: 5 Speed
Re: K&N Air Filter vs. Wix

You can reuse K&N filters, but it requires a filter charger kit that is essentially a cleaning agent and some kind of oil. However, the filters do wear out as it's essentially cotton guaze sandwhiched between metal screens. After a while the cotton will begin to deteriorate.
Old 06-12-2009, 07:10 AM
  #8  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
PURPLEFORMULA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dumfries, Va
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 Formula Firebird
Engine: LSX-451 / 705HP
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser Ford 9" with 4.30
Re: K&N Air Filter vs. Wix

Years ago a couple of my friends and I got together to make vaccum test for air filters, we tested K&N, AC delco, and wix, and out of all, K&N took less than 1/2 the vaccum power than a wix filter and even the AC delco did better than it too. I own a trucking company and use to use wix products in them until we did this test and since than I never will use their products again. In my opinion its just a cheap product.

Eric
Old 06-12-2009, 10:59 AM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
Smoke_Jaguar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Camaro T-Top
Engine: 2.8L V6 (MPFI)
Transmission: 5 Speed
Re: K&N Air Filter vs. Wix

As you increase filtration, you decrease airflow. Personally, I'd go for better protection for my engine over letting a bunch of crud in for marginal performance gains. Technically, you could just use a larger filter box than stock and use a lower flow filter and get the same results without sacrificing the filtration.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
05-10-2023 07:19 PM
specialized
TPI
27
06-18-2022 09:26 AM
Brinkkl2000
Tech / General Engine
5
08-04-2018 08:29 AM
Thornburg
Tech / General Engine
9
09-01-2015 03:39 AM



Quick Reply: K&N Air Filter vs. Wix



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 AM.