EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
#1
EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
I would like for those who are in the know with BOTH systems to go over the pro's and con's of each individual system. I DO NOT want this to turn out into a "bashing" contest, I'm asking for realistic benefits of the individual systems.....
For those unaware, I'm building a hihgly modded 3.1 V6 Chevy for my '92 Pontiac Trans Am. Serious weight reduction has already started, including a fiberglass Ram Air I hood, notchback, and doors (approximately 3000-lbs, w/out driver, give or take a hundred). Plenum, lower intake, heads will soon be obtained from Dave. Trans will employ a 3500-4000 TCI stall speed, stock driveshaft, posi rear w/3.42 cogs out back.....
In the process of obtaining a GT66 turbo, w/the wastegate and BOV already being decided on. Tube routing is still being contemplated, but should be decided on very shortly. All that's left is the ECM. I'm calling for very thorough opinions here. The engine will be running on methanol in the very near future, for boost being well beyond 20-psi....
I'm honestly leaning toward the EBL, but am constantly being made aware of limitations, as well as various features of the two....
Discuss.
- Rob
For those unaware, I'm building a hihgly modded 3.1 V6 Chevy for my '92 Pontiac Trans Am. Serious weight reduction has already started, including a fiberglass Ram Air I hood, notchback, and doors (approximately 3000-lbs, w/out driver, give or take a hundred). Plenum, lower intake, heads will soon be obtained from Dave. Trans will employ a 3500-4000 TCI stall speed, stock driveshaft, posi rear w/3.42 cogs out back.....
In the process of obtaining a GT66 turbo, w/the wastegate and BOV already being decided on. Tube routing is still being contemplated, but should be decided on very shortly. All that's left is the ECM. I'm calling for very thorough opinions here. The engine will be running on methanol in the very near future, for boost being well beyond 20-psi....
I'm honestly leaning toward the EBL, but am constantly being made aware of limitations, as well as various features of the two....
Discuss.
- Rob
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sayreville NJ
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
lol ill start this one
ms +
high or low impedance injectors
boost levels of upto 44 psi
on the fly tunning
no need to burn chips
easy tunning with wideband
ability to run dis/dizzy
nitrous/methanol control
shift lights
+ alot of other optional functions
down side is wiring it which isnt all to hard
and u already know my thoughts on the ebl
ms +
high or low impedance injectors
boost levels of upto 44 psi
on the fly tunning
no need to burn chips
easy tunning with wideband
ability to run dis/dizzy
nitrous/methanol control
shift lights
+ alot of other optional functions
down side is wiring it which isnt all to hard
and u already know my thoughts on the ebl
#3
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
The MegaSquirt is considered to be an excellent product by everyone who's installed the unit, and people have had tremendous success with it. There are people on this board though who have had the very same success with the EBL units as well, and from what I'm reading on the dynamicefi website, is constantly being upgraded on and improved. I'm hoping some of the people using the system will chime in on this thread, as I need to finalize this very very soon.....
Originally Posted by daves12secV6
lol ill start this one
ms +
high or low impedance injectors
boost levels of upto 44 psi
on the fly tunning
no need to burn chips
easy tunning with wideband
ability to run dis/dizzy
nitrous/methanol control
shift lights
+ alot of other optional functions
down side is wiring it which isnt all to hard
and u already know my thoughts on the ebl
ms +
high or low impedance injectors
boost levels of upto 44 psi
on the fly tunning
no need to burn chips
easy tunning with wideband
ability to run dis/dizzy
nitrous/methanol control
shift lights
+ alot of other optional functions
down side is wiring it which isnt all to hard
and u already know my thoughts on the ebl
#5
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Toehead....? LMMFAO!
I can only imagine what the guy looks like LOL.....
Yeah, I read a few testimonials about the Mega-Squirt from other websites, but I would like some comparisons from the fellow board-members on Thirdgen.org....
I can only imagine what the guy looks like LOL.....
Yeah, I read a few testimonials about the Mega-Squirt from other websites, but I would like some comparisons from the fellow board-members on Thirdgen.org....
#7
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Originally Posted by daves12secV6
btw how many ebl applications are under boost?
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sayreville NJ
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
i would find out id ebl can run more then 6 injectors as well, with ms u can have a second set of injectors that run on there own seperate table etc
#9
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Website indicates that the system is being used on port injected engines, so I'd have to assume that it does. Also, before anyone mentions, having a '7730 ECM wouldn't be an issue for me, as I have about twenty different ECM's from various builds lying around....
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
While EBL fires the injectors more often (2x more then a batch fire system), it seems to work ok. There may be some issues if the ECM goes into P + H firings with saturated injectors. All and all, it seems to work ok, though, and should run fine on boosted PFI apps. If you plan to wind the snot out of the motor, though, firing the injectors 2x as often may cause some issues at high RPMs.
Last edited by dimented24x7; 05-25-2007 at 12:07 PM.
#11
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sayreville NJ
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
While EBL fires the injectors more often (2x more then a batch fire system), it seems to work ok. There may be some issues if the ECM goes into P + H firings with saturated injectors. All and all, it seems to work ok, though, and should run fine on boosted PFI apps. If you plan to wind the snot out of the motor, though, firing the injectors 2x as often may cause some issues at high RPMs.
#12
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Dimented, although this is a tad off topic, what are your thoughts on keeping the '7730, albeit going with the syclone code. Any benefits to this....?
Yes, the engine should see close to 7000-RPM's on a consistent basis. Have a couple of 7165's lying around, would you recommend switching to one, if I decide to go with the EBL, and how much of a headache am I going to have re-pinning/re-soldering the stock wiring....
Yes, the engine should see close to 7000-RPM's on a consistent basis. Have a couple of 7165's lying around, would you recommend switching to one, if I decide to go with the EBL, and how much of a headache am I going to have re-pinning/re-soldering the stock wiring....
#13
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
There have also been a number of boosted apps with EBL. V8astrocaptain and Fast355 have run it under boost.
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sayreville NJ
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Dimented, although this is a tad off topic, what are your thoughts on keeping the '7730, albeit going with the syclone code. Any benefits to this....?
Yes, the engine should see close to 7000-RPM's on a consistent basis. Have a couple of 7165's lying around, would you recommend switching to one, if I decide to go with the EBL, and how much of a headache am I going to have re-pinning/re-soldering the stock wiring....
Yes, the engine should see close to 7000-RPM's on a consistent basis. Have a couple of 7165's lying around, would you recommend switching to one, if I decide to go with the EBL, and how much of a headache am I going to have re-pinning/re-soldering the stock wiring....
#16
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Dimented, although this is a tad off topic, what are your thoughts on keeping the '7730, albeit going with the syclone code. Any benefits to this....?
Yes, the engine should see close to 7000-RPM's on a consistent basis. Have a couple of 7165's lying around, would you recommend switching to one, if I decide to go with the EBL, and how much of a headache am I going to have re-pinning/re-soldering the stock wiring....
Yes, the engine should see close to 7000-RPM's on a consistent basis. Have a couple of 7165's lying around, would you recommend switching to one, if I decide to go with the EBL, and how much of a headache am I going to have re-pinning/re-soldering the stock wiring....
#18
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
How many cylinders will this engine have? Im not entirely sure about the V6 apps. as they require a firing every 3 DRPs rather then 4.
----------
Actually, w/ a V6 I think the the ty/cyclone ECM + code would be perfect. That would be my choice.
----------
Actually, w/ a V6 I think the the ty/cyclone ECM + code would be perfect. That would be my choice.
Last edited by dimented24x7; 05-25-2007 at 12:40 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#19
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Originally Posted by dimented24x7
Actually, w/ a V6 I think the the ty/cyclone ECM + code would be perfect. That would be my choice....
Opinions...?
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sayreville NJ
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
yeah i would feel the sy/ty on the 7730 would be better over the ebl,but from what ive read as u run higher and higher boost the map resolution becomes really crappy.
does sy/ty have antilag features???
im sure the sy/ty code would be just fine,but the ms has so many more useful features built into it out of the box.
and the cost is only slightly more of buying the chip burner,chips.zif adapter.
does sy/ty have antilag features???
im sure the sy/ty code would be just fine,but the ms has so many more useful features built into it out of the box.
and the cost is only slightly more of buying the chip burner,chips.zif adapter.
#21
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Originally Posted by daves12secV6
yeah i would feel the sy/ty on the 7730 would be better over the ebl....
#25
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
EBL is based on the older early generation computers, and is different then the later ECMs. The EBL is a whole package. Comes with ECM, add-on board, and software. Conversely, the ty/cy ECM will also be a stand alone afair. Just need the comptuer and new map sensor. I beleive there has also been some work on going to the 3-bar MAP.
#26
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Originally Posted by daves12secV6
u need at min a 3bar map...
-G
#27
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Originally Posted by dimented24x7
EBL is based on the older early generation computers, and is different then the later ECMs....
Going the Syclone route is also beneficial, but the MegaSquirt is even superior to that one as well. I'm voting MegaSquirt here, simply for the ease of tuning for higher boost on the fly. I'm sure the EBL is more than capable, but it's too time consuming, especially at the track.
Gaspar
#28
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sayreville NJ
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
maf is not an option at all, the programing in the ecm does not allow for more then 255 gmsec. which u will blow right past @ 5-7 psi.
my car was a maf car there was no point in ecm tunning once u maxed the maf,there was nothig u could do about it
im really trying to get him to steer clear of the stock/stockish ecm all together.
its to much of a hassel to make it work right,specially with this combo.
with the t61/t66 hes deff gonna need antilag features,among being able to run aux injectors on a completly seperate map(if needed).and time based boost control, is also a huge + to the ms
my car was a maf car there was no point in ecm tunning once u maxed the maf,there was nothig u could do about it
im really trying to get him to steer clear of the stock/stockish ecm all together.
its to much of a hassel to make it work right,specially with this combo.
with the t61/t66 hes deff gonna need antilag features,among being able to run aux injectors on a completly seperate map(if needed).and time based boost control, is also a huge + to the ms
#29
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
maf is not an option at all, the programing in the ecm does not allow for more then 255 gmsec. which u will blow right past @ 5-7 psi.
my car was a maf car there was no point in ecm tunning once u maxed the maf,there was nothig u could do about it
im really trying to get him to steer clear of the stock/stockish ecm all together.
its to much of a hassel to make it work right,specially with this combo.
with the t61/t66 hes deff gonna need antilag features,among being able to run aux injectors on a completly seperate map(if needed).and time based boost control, is also a huge + to the ms
my car was a maf car there was no point in ecm tunning once u maxed the maf,there was nothig u could do about it
im really trying to get him to steer clear of the stock/stockish ecm all together.
its to much of a hassel to make it work right,specially with this combo.
with the t61/t66 hes deff gonna need antilag features,among being able to run aux injectors on a completly seperate map(if needed).and time based boost control, is also a huge + to the ms
#30
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Originally Posted by daves12secV6
maf is not an option at all, the programing in the ecm does not allow for more then 255 gmsec. which u will blow right past @ 5-7 psi....
Gaspar
#32
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sayreville NJ
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
I'm in no way referring to a stock L98 MAF sensor. If this route is being considered, simple installation of a translator will allow him to step up to a more modern MAF sensor (preferrably an 82mm ZO6 piece), which would also allow him to increase the size of the inlet piping, quite substantially. From there, it's all in the PROM. Did this very thing on my buddy's Grand National, a MAF oriented system, and he has absolutely no problem at all running close to 30-psi, with a 3 Bar MAP, of course....
Gaspar
Gaspar
#33
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Originally Posted by daves12secV6
a GN is a whole diff ecm all together...
^ But I only brought up the prior point just in case anyone considered going that route. I'm still in favor of the MegaSquirt for the 3.1, first and foremost....
Gaspar
#34
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 226 Likes
on
211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Street Lethal, if you were planning on 15 psi of maximum boost, I'd say EBL hands down. Shortly there will be another version that has Flash on board, no more chips. And, an inexpensive true port conversion will be available. This has the injectors firing in the proper order for a batch fire port setup (it will actually be bank fire).
However, going North of 20 psi you are getting into some serious boost levels. With this I recommend setting the sights higher for an ECM. A good aftermarket (but pricey) would be the way to go.
A sequential system will help a lot. This cuts the injector firing to once every 2 revolutions. The net affect is that the PW is doubled. When running 60#/hr injectors this helps with low speed operation, and reduces the duty cycle constraints at high speed.
You mentioned methanol, even if it won't be for a while. When enough methanol to make a difference is sprayed the injector fuel needs to be cut back. To do this properly it needs to be a function within the ECM. The ECM needs to turn on the methanol and at almost the same time reduce the PW to the injectors. I say 'almost' as the ECM has to delay in order for the methanol to start flowing before reducing the PW.
(These are some of the reasons I left the EBL at a 2-bar maximum. I could drop in 3-bar support, but it is the whole picture that needs to be looked at.)
A lot of the Sy/Ty guys have moved on to the FAST XFI systems. There are other systems that can be considered. Another item to consider is whether a catalytic convertor is going to be run (being FL, I don't believe there will be). If there is then closed loop fueling is required. Otherwise you can run open loop fueling all of the time.
Food for thought.
RBob.
However, going North of 20 psi you are getting into some serious boost levels. With this I recommend setting the sights higher for an ECM. A good aftermarket (but pricey) would be the way to go.
A sequential system will help a lot. This cuts the injector firing to once every 2 revolutions. The net affect is that the PW is doubled. When running 60#/hr injectors this helps with low speed operation, and reduces the duty cycle constraints at high speed.
You mentioned methanol, even if it won't be for a while. When enough methanol to make a difference is sprayed the injector fuel needs to be cut back. To do this properly it needs to be a function within the ECM. The ECM needs to turn on the methanol and at almost the same time reduce the PW to the injectors. I say 'almost' as the ECM has to delay in order for the methanol to start flowing before reducing the PW.
(These are some of the reasons I left the EBL at a 2-bar maximum. I could drop in 3-bar support, but it is the whole picture that needs to be looked at.)
A lot of the Sy/Ty guys have moved on to the FAST XFI systems. There are other systems that can be considered. Another item to consider is whether a catalytic convertor is going to be run (being FL, I don't believe there will be). If there is then closed loop fueling is required. Otherwise you can run open loop fueling all of the time.
Food for thought.
RBob.
#36
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Originally Posted by RBob
Street Lethal, if you were planning on 15 psi of maximum boost, I'd say EBL hands down. Shortly there will be another version that has Flash on board, no more chips. And, an inexpensive true port conversion will be available. This has the injectors firing in the proper order for a batch fire port setup (it will actually be bank fire)....
Originally Posted by RBob
However, going North of 20 psi you are getting into some serious boost levels. With this I recommend setting the sights higher for an ECM. A good aftermarket (but pricey) would be the way to go....
Thanks for responding Bob.
Originally Posted by Six_Shooter
What is EBL?
I myself have two third gen's that I'm building. The '92 six banger above, and a recently aquired '91 Formy that I picked up from one of Dave's buddy's. The EBL system is going in the Formula, I'll just go over the best possible scenario (in reference to which ECM to utilize) with some of the users, until the Flash version is released, but that's a whole other thread, and a whole other forum....
Will now start considering MegaSquirt for the V6, and will update this thread accordingly with the results....
-Rob
#37
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
I've been planning to run the sy/ty code on my turbo motor.
#38
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Originally Posted by AM91Camaro_RS
I've been planning to run the sy/ty code on my turbo motor....
#39
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
i'll let ya know...probably gonna be a while though. its been a slow project
#40
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 226 Likes
on
211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Bob, does this mean if I installed the EBL as it sits now, then deciding later on to step up to the Flash version when it's released, it won't require an entirely new setup, I can simply upgrade/adapt it to the existing EBL unit that I originally installed....?
Yeah, the engine will definitely see these boost levels. I've considered some of the more expensive units, but I'm always being told by racers that, although these systems do what they say their supposed to do, a lot of guys always seem to revert back to a more enhanced version of the stock system, so long as it get's the job done....
Thanks for responding Bob.
Click here....
I myself have two third gen's that I'm building. The '92 six banger above, and a recently aquired '91 Formy that I picked up from one of Dave's buddy's. The EBL system is going in the Formula, I'll just go over the best possible scenario (in reference to which ECM to utilize) with some of the users, until the Flash version is released, but that's a whole other thread, and a whole other forum....
Will now start considering MegaSquirt for the V6, and will update this thread accordingly with the results....
-Rob
Yeah, the engine will definitely see these boost levels. I've considered some of the more expensive units, but I'm always being told by racers that, although these systems do what they say their supposed to do, a lot of guys always seem to revert back to a more enhanced version of the stock system, so long as it get's the job done....
Thanks for responding Bob.
Click here....
I myself have two third gen's that I'm building. The '92 six banger above, and a recently aquired '91 Formy that I picked up from one of Dave's buddy's. The EBL system is going in the Formula, I'll just go over the best possible scenario (in reference to which ECM to utilize) with some of the users, until the Flash version is released, but that's a whole other thread, and a whole other forum....
Will now start considering MegaSquirt for the V6, and will update this thread accordingly with the results....
-Rob
The EBL Flash will be a different board. To go from the current EBL setup (with a chip) to the Flash will require the new board. The reason is that the Flash setup is integrated into the EBL/ECM for control. This allows for features that otherwise could not be done.
RBob.
#41
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Originally Posted by RBob
The EBL Flash will be a different board. To go from the current EBL setup (with a chip) to the Flash will require the new board. The reason is that the Flash setup is integrated into the EBL/ECM for control. This allows for features that otherwise could not be done. RBob.
Need to get you up here racing w/us one weekend Bob!
#42
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Originally Posted by RBob
Street Lethal, if you were planning on 15 psi of maximum boost, I'd say EBL hands down. Shortly there will be another version that has Flash on board, no more chips. And, an inexpensive true port conversion will be available. This has the injectors firing in the proper order for a batch fire port setup (it will actually be bank fire)....
Heads are having some work done to them, as well as the LIM/UIM and TB. Haven't decided on any cam specifications as of yet, but am more than likely going with a reverse split grind (on the stock engine). Can you do anything with the stock '7730, or would you recommend I switch to another ECM entirely. Once the ECM is sent to you, then sent back to me, what would you then recommend, in reference to tuning. Have a pretty good idea of what's needed, but for the other's, as well as myself, could you kindly delve into what is needed, as well as what you would recommend (software, hardware, etc.). I've recently seen the Mega-Squirt, what comes with it, and what it entails (in reference to installation, and how to begin), and was hoping you could elaborate for everyone on how to get started w/EBL (again, for a comparison reasoning)....
#43
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Casselberry, FLA
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 88 V6 'bird/89TBI bird/85 T/A
Engine: 2.8/TBI/TPI
Transmission: V8 T-5/700R4 x2
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open/2.73 open/ 3.27 9 bolt
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
I'm in no way referring to a stock L98 MAF sensor. If this route is being considered, simple installation of a translator will allow him to step up to a more modern MAF sensor (preferrably an 82mm ZO6 piece), which would also allow him to increase the size of the inlet piping, quite substantially. From there, it's all in the PROM. Did this very thing on my buddy's Grand National, a MAF oriented system, and he has absolutely no problem at all running close to 30-psi, with a 3 Bar MAP, of course....
Gaspar
Gaspar
I am wearing out the search function, please help!!
#45
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Casselberry, FLA
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 88 V6 'bird/89TBI bird/85 T/A
Engine: 2.8/TBI/TPI
Transmission: V8 T-5/700R4 x2
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open/2.73 open/ 3.27 9 bolt
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Thanks a bunch! I just LOVE turbo Buicks, anyway, so that is great.
#46
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: right behind you
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 maro
Engine: In the works...
Transmission: TH700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
Re: EBL vs MegaSquirt w/boosted V6 applications....
Mmmm, Z06 MAF with a translator. Sweet.
$350 for MAF parts.
$350 for MAF parts.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
28l, ebl, engine, flash, grand, mega, megasquirt, megasqurit, national, pro, sequential, sfi6, squirt, testimonials, v6