V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

doward, dale, anyone else w/ the MTC-5 cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2006, 06:17 PM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
drdave88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Waterford, MI
Posts: 2,470
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1998 Camaro Z28
Engine: 6.0L
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73
doward, dale, anyone else w/ the MTC-5 cam

granted from the time i drove my car w/ a stock 3.4 cam till i drove it w/ the MTC-5 cam was a good 5 months, but i feel that its lost some power, not a ton, but some. and thats just going by SOTP feel. from what i read, there was a lil torque loss, but upper end pulled like hell, mine does not seem to do that. i did also do a lil work on the heads. all i did was grind out any sharp edges to make air flow better and match the lower intake to the intake side on the heads. this shouldnt affect my power at all. so does anyone have any ideas for me? and i havent run at the strip yet to get 1/4 times to compare to, but i just dont feel like its where it should be, or even was.

this may not be comparing apples to apples, but a few guys w/ a 3.4 in a 4th gen w/ less mods than me are running close to 1 sec faster than i am. whether theyre honest or not is up for grabs, but my times have never sounded right to me.
Old 07-04-2006, 09:15 AM
  #2  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (12)
 
Dale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Mine still has a vac leak that I havent tackled. So untill I do that, I really shouldnt judge it.

Now, the first one I had for that 100 miles, no vac leak. It seemed like it had some major top end pull. But I also rarely drive in them rpms, so I'm a little disappointed, but whatever.
Old 07-04-2006, 01:13 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member
 
Doward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
The MTC-5 and the stock 3.4 cam, IIRC, are almost identical.
Old 07-04-2006, 06:57 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
urbanhunter44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Originally Posted by Doward
The MTC-5 and the stock 3.4 cam, IIRC, are almost identical.
Why would anyone buy the MTC-5 cam then? Why not go to a bigger aftermarket cam?
Old 07-05-2006, 05:39 AM
  #5  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (12)
 
Dale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Originally Posted by Doward
The MTC-5 and the stock 3.4 cam, IIRC, are almost identical.
Nope, more lift. Stock is .394, mtc5 is .420. I belive the degrees are slightly different too.
Old 07-07-2006, 09:54 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,119
Received 428 Likes on 368 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
The MTC5 pulls better everywhere. I ran my 3.4 TBI with the stock 3.4 cam, then switched it to a MTC5 looking for more pulling power (a joke even with a 3.4 and 3.73s). I had a MTC1 in my otherwise stock 305 TBI at the time and it ran much better and pulled better all through the powerband than the stock 305 cam did. The MTC5 did a better job than the stock 3.4 cam pulling my 3,500# boat. I would have to say that it made more power from off-idle all the way to redline than the stock 3.4 cam with most of the improvement from 1,200-4,500.

FWIW, this was in my 1987 GMC Jimmy 4x4 (originally a TBI 2.8/700r4/3.73s).
Old 07-07-2006, 10:46 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
drdave88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Waterford, MI
Posts: 2,470
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1998 Camaro Z28
Engine: 6.0L
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73
mine does not seem to pull harder, especially in the lower end. id say even at best. i dont really notice any difference anywhere in the power band.
Old 07-08-2006, 12:43 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,119
Received 428 Likes on 368 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally Posted by drdave88
mine does not seem to pull harder, especially in the lower end. id say even at best. i dont really notice any difference anywhere in the power band.
What is your timing advance at? I think that on my lame factory TBI tuning, I was running 12* BTDC with the set timing wire disconnected. The MTC5 likes a little more timing than stock.

On my TBI 305/350 builds I typically run 6*
Old 07-08-2006, 07:49 AM
  #9  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
drdave88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Waterford, MI
Posts: 2,470
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1998 Camaro Z28
Engine: 6.0L
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73
im at 12 or 13, i dont remember which.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cattiveria665
Camaros for Sale
21
04-15-2014 07:26 AM
drdave88
V6
1
04-26-2006 05:42 AM
Dale
V6
6
04-11-2004 11:04 PM



Quick Reply: doward, dale, anyone else w/ the MTC-5 cam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 AM.