V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

TPS callibration

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-2005, 03:47 AM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
Xophertony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Or-eh-gun
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 2012 Nissan Leaf
Engine: 80-kW AC synchronous electric motor
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: n/a
TPS callibration

yes i searched.

i installed new TPS. now car has surges at low rpm worse then before. when i installed the tps it seemed fine (car was warm when i tested it)

what do i do? how to i alighn it properly? is there a method, or is it guess and check? the sensor came with no instructions.
Old 06-27-2005, 06:56 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
87blueracr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: jacksonville, fla
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 camaro & 70 mustang
Engine: 2.8l & built 351C
Transmission: borg warner T-5
take a multimeter, and use that til you get .37V you got to play with it for a little with it being just loose enough to move but not fall when you let go of it. remember red is positive and black is negative.
Old 06-27-2005, 03:46 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
Xophertony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Or-eh-gun
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 2012 Nissan Leaf
Engine: 80-kW AC synchronous electric motor
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: n/a
so at idle it should be at .37v ? is that resistance? where do i set the multimeter? can i use a digital one for this?
Old 06-27-2005, 04:45 PM
  #4  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
LinuxGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0L TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Um, 0.37v is way to low for the idle TPS setting. 0.54v to 0.56v is where it should be at. At wide open throttle it should be over 4.0v (or was it over 4.2v?).

You can use a digital multimeter. There are three wires connected to the TPS. You will have to cut some pieces of wire to go between the pins in the connector and the pins on the TPS itself so that you can clip onto the wires with the multimeter. I can't remember which wire is which. I usually just hook the multimeter up to the top two, and most of the time I get negative voltage readings instead of positive, so I swap the wires around.
Old 06-28-2005, 06:44 AM
  #5  
Banned
 
87blueracr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: jacksonville, fla
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 camaro & 70 mustang
Engine: 2.8l & built 351C
Transmission: borg warner T-5
maybe it is.45, but i know at wot it should read about 4.5v. you can't set a multimeter for voltages, you must read the voltage on the multimeter, and yes a Dmm is recommended as it is very easily read and used
Old 06-28-2005, 10:18 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
2_point8_boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
A DMM is REQUIRED because if you use an analog meter it'll load the circuit and you'll get a false reading. Also, you COULD damage the computer because analog meters have a very low internal resistance and pull extra current through the circuit that the ECM might not have protection for.

Unless you are specifically told to use an analog meter by a factory service manual, use a Digital one just to be safe.

But you should be able to backprobe the harness (that's what I do) at the top 2 pins. you should get 0.55v at idle and >4v at WOT.


Jeff
Old 06-28-2005, 10:52 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
87blueracr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: jacksonville, fla
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 camaro & 70 mustang
Engine: 2.8l & built 351C
Transmission: borg warner T-5
it doesn't specify voltage reading on the haynes manual(atleast not that i could find today. i am a electrician as well as a machinist, i think that if the navy found me safe to work on electrical components on ea-6b's, f-14's, and f-18's to name a few, that i know a litttle about electricity. there is no difference as to how the multimeters work, the only difference is that one is digital the other is analog. to take a voltage reading, you need to have it hooked up, therefore you are only monitoring the voltage and amperage not sending a current from the multimeter. both are safe for that aplication, so someone needs to go back to college and learn about electricity as i had to do(the only reason that i don't have a college degreein electrical engineering is that i need to go take the general courses needed for all degrees)
Old 06-28-2005, 06:18 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
Xophertony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Or-eh-gun
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 2012 Nissan Leaf
Engine: 80-kW AC synchronous electric motor
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: n/a
to cut the pissing contest short i will be UNPLUGING the sensor from the harness as to isolate it from any posible damage. also i will have no need to strip wires that way.

thanks for the input guys.
Old 06-29-2005, 05:31 AM
  #9  
Banned
 
87blueracr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: jacksonville, fla
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 camaro & 70 mustang
Engine: 2.8l & built 351C
Transmission: borg warner T-5
that is what i thought that you were gonna do to begin with. if you can isolate something from unneeded risk, do it. if not, try to make the risk the least you can that way the numbers are always in your favor
Old 06-29-2005, 10:21 AM
  #10  
Supreme Member

 
2_point8_boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
How are you planning to get voltage to it and from it with it unplugged? You have to have it plugged in to set it. there's just no other way to do it accuratly and quickly. You'll spend all day unplugging it, moving it, plugging it back in and testing it over and over again until it's right. Plus, you have to have it plugged in and powered to get the reading from it.
Old 06-29-2005, 10:26 AM
  #11  
Banned
 
87blueracr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: jacksonville, fla
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 camaro & 70 mustang
Engine: 2.8l & built 351C
Transmission: borg warner T-5
not if you know the incoming voltage and amperage, you can find the propper resistance and set it by that. anything that changes the voltage like that so variably like that normally is a variable resistor. that voltage will have a corresponding resistance, use the ohmmeter to find that correct resistance!
Old 06-29-2005, 11:43 AM
  #12  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
molopaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 83' Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: T5
No offense blueracr, but if you really are an electrician in the navy and work on different aircraft, then I wouldn't want to be a pilot in the US navy.

I mean it's basic stuff, the difference between an old analog meter and a digital meter. The old one's have very little internal resistance and the will draw lots of current. Focus on the word DRAW. They will not feed any current into the circuit when measuring voltage, that's true, but that's not the issue. The will put a signifigant load on the circuit being measured and when dealing with modern circuits, they can be damaged. The digital meters have internal resistances probably measured in mega ohms and put little stress on ciruicts.

Have you ever wondered why you should't use an analog meter to take readings from an oxygen sensor?
Old 06-29-2005, 12:20 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member
 
kretos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: surrey b.c. canada
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
search around the boards, everyone is tild to use a analog multimeter, unplug the tps, then use the analog on the ohm resistance settings to figure it out
Old 06-29-2005, 12:43 PM
  #14  
Banned
 
87blueracr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: jacksonville, fla
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 camaro & 70 mustang
Engine: 2.8l & built 351C
Transmission: borg warner T-5
first why would you even want to take a reading on the o2 sensor, they are like 16$. second i deal with only digital multimeters because they are more accurate, and when dealing with aircraft, .01 volts tells the difference between a good circuit and a bad one. in school we were always taught that both work the same way and that eithor one is good to use, just that the digital is alot nicer and more accurate. nothing to do with internal resistance. by the way if you are worried about internal resistance, try a different scale!
Old 06-29-2005, 12:54 PM
  #15  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
molopaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 83' Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: T5
You're missing the point, but no point in arguing.

The reason you would measure the voltage off of an oxygen sensor is: The fuel ratio is determined by the voltage generated by the sensor -> A multimeter can be used as a display, when wanting to know if you are running lean/rich. It's a crappy way of doing it, since the reading changes so rapidly, but.....
Old 06-29-2005, 03:15 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
Xophertony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Or-eh-gun
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 2012 Nissan Leaf
Engine: 80-kW AC synchronous electric motor
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: n/a
so does anyone know the resistance it should be set for?
Old 06-29-2005, 07:15 PM
  #17  
Supreme Member

 
TomP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Resistance? Nah man, you need to measure the voltage. A digital meter is $12 at Radio Shack- oops well they used to have a $12 one, now it's a $20 one - http://www.radioshack.com/product.as...D810&hp=search (or search for part 22-810 at radioshack.com if that link wont work) but you could probably find a $12 one somewhere.

While you're at Radio Shack, pick up a set of their alligator clip jumper cables- http://www.radioshack.com/product.as...Fid=278%2D1157 (or search for part 278-1157 on radioshack.com).

Then, engine off. Unplug the TPS. Wedge the alligator clip jumpers between the TPS sensor and the TPS connector, so the sensor acts like it's still connected to the harness- but thru your jumper cables.

Then put your meter on DC volts. Stick one lead from the meter to the middle terminal of the connector. Then stick the other lead to the "upper-most" terminal of the connector.

Turn the key to on (don't start the engine, no need to). The meter will show a number. Loosen the torx screws of the sensor and swivel the sensor back and forth until you're at 0.55 volts, plus/minus 0.05 volts.

That's from the GM Service Manual. I'd NEVER use a Haynes book for anything like this.

Find more info in thirdgen.org's techcentral area, here's the link to make things quick: https://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/tech/tpimod2.shtml Roll down the page until you see the paragraph for TPS adjustment- and don't follow the spec listed, it's for v8 tpi and not for our v6's.

And I'll attach one of my infamous quick-pictures of how you'd do the hookup. AND I'll even give you a link to the original "quick picture" message https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=180325

HarborFreight.com used to have cheapie $8 digital meters; I bought one and used it for years; it did OK for a cheapie!
Attached Thumbnails TPS callibration-tps-jumpers.jpg  

Last edited by TomP; 06-29-2005 at 07:18 PM.
Old 06-29-2005, 09:23 PM
  #18  
Supreme Member

 
2_point8_boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
Originally posted by molopaa
I mean it's basic stuff, the difference between an old analog meter and a digital meter. The old one's have very little internal resistance and the will draw lots of current. Focus on the word DRAW. They will not feed any current into the circuit when measuring voltage, that's true, but that's not the issue. The will put a signifigant load on the circuit being measured and when dealing with modern circuits, they can be damaged. The digital meters have internal resistances probably measured in mega ohms and put little stress on ciruicts.
Glad someone else knows how they work and the dangers of using an analog meter on vehicles.

first why would you even want to take a reading on the o2 sensor, they are like 16$
Because on some cars the sensor is like $150.

Anyway, TomP, good picture on how to do it.
Old 06-30-2005, 04:33 AM
  #19  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
Xophertony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Or-eh-gun
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 2012 Nissan Leaf
Engine: 80-kW AC synchronous electric motor
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: n/a
i used an analog meter today, simply because i know bugger-all about how the digital one i have works. i got it to .55v but i am still getting a code 22. car seems to be running spot-on. i think i will pick up those aligator clips from radio shack tomorow and do it properly. thanks for the idea tom.
Old 07-01-2005, 02:28 PM
  #20  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
Xophertony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Or-eh-gun
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 2012 Nissan Leaf
Engine: 80-kW AC synchronous electric motor
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: n/a
well, finaly figured out that digital one. and the sensor, when its adgusted as far as it can go in the right direction gets a range of .26v-3.xxv. so i ordered a new one from napa (free of course) and will pick it up at 4pm today and give this another go.
Old 07-01-2005, 03:29 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
87blueracr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: jacksonville, fla
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 camaro & 70 mustang
Engine: 2.8l & built 351C
Transmission: borg warner T-5
remember wot should be above 4V and idle should be about .5V
Old 07-01-2005, 05:59 PM
  #22  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
Xophertony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Or-eh-gun
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 2012 Nissan Leaf
Engine: 80-kW AC synchronous electric motor
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: n/a
yes, that is why i ordered a new one. to correct that little problem. i am taking off to the napa now, i will let you all know how it goes.
Old 07-01-2005, 06:00 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
87blueracr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: jacksonville, fla
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 camaro & 70 mustang
Engine: 2.8l & built 351C
Transmission: borg warner T-5
sounds good to me man, keep us up to date!
Old 07-01-2005, 09:00 PM
  #24  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
Xophertony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Or-eh-gun
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 2012 Nissan Leaf
Engine: 80-kW AC synchronous electric motor
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: n/a
update.
well i picked up the new one and put it on in the parkinglot. i just eyeballed it so i could drive three blocks to my dad's house, get the tools out and do it for real. well i get home and it was at .47V dang i was close, i teeked it for a few seconds until i had it at the optimal .55V.

current range .55V - 4.38V. perfection. car runs like a champ too. no afterfireing. seems to have a good mixture. the next cold start will be the surefire test.

thankyou everyone for the help.
Old 07-02-2005, 02:13 AM
  #25  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
Xophertony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Or-eh-gun
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 2012 Nissan Leaf
Engine: 80-kW AC synchronous electric motor
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: n/a
well. did a cold strart. waited till around 11pm, car had not run in 4 hrs and shazam! fired right up with a smooth even idle. i am thrilled.
Old 07-02-2005, 03:48 AM
  #26  
Banned
 
87blueracr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: jacksonville, fla
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 camaro & 70 mustang
Engine: 2.8l & built 351C
Transmission: borg warner T-5
that's what i like to hear! good job man!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
92camaro350cci
TBI
8
10-14-2015 09:29 AM
Fred SS
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
10-12-2015 11:27 AM
HoosierinWA
Tech / General Engine
5
10-07-2015 10:15 AM
racereese
Tech / General Engine
14
10-03-2015 03:46 PM



Quick Reply: TPS callibration



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 AM.