how can i get a 15 second car?
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: southern maryland
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2012 Ram express
Engine: 5.7 hemi
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 3.55
how can i get a 15 second car?
i want a 15 second car on just valvetrain, drivetrain, and other bolt ons like pulleys, ignition, and stuff like that. I dont wont to do a engine swap or engine rebuild. I want no power adders or p&p or transmission rebuild. just a all motor 3.1 if its possible help me out with a list of things to do
what i have now
-custom cai
-dynomax super turbo catback
-jet 180 t-stat
-accel dist cap/rotor
-high flow cat
what will i run with just those 5 mods on a 125,000 mile 3.1 with a auto 700r4
what i have now
-custom cai
-dynomax super turbo catback
-jet 180 t-stat
-accel dist cap/rotor
-high flow cat
what will i run with just those 5 mods on a 125,000 mile 3.1 with a auto 700r4
#2
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: surrey b.c. canada
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
no p&p or anything like that? not gonna happen
you will not get a 3.1 to 15 without any internal engine work
you will not get a 3.1 to 15 without any internal engine work
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by kretos
no p&p or anything like that? not gonna happen
you will not get a 3.1 to 15 without any internal engine work
no p&p or anything like that? not gonna happen
you will not get a 3.1 to 15 without any internal engine work
#4
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: cleanest '86 sport coupe around!!
Engine: 355ci twin 66mm turbos on e85
Transmission: built rmvb th400 w/ t-brake
Axle/Gears: 3.23
I duuno man, from a v6 thats kinda tough without spending some cash.
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: BFE, MD
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
It could be done. Weight reduction
ditch the slushbox for a stick, gut interior. BUy a lightweight racing seat. Look into fiberglass hood. carbon fiber ds, lightweight tires & rims. Good clutch set for the stick. use all synthetic fluids. lower the car, have a belly pan made, see some posts on bumper support removal. you only need 1 side view mirror. etc, etc, etc,
Tranny swap doesn't equal rebuild
many posts on ignition upgrades & cai/ram air. gold race full roller roclers.
ditch the slushbox for a stick, gut interior. BUy a lightweight racing seat. Look into fiberglass hood. carbon fiber ds, lightweight tires & rims. Good clutch set for the stick. use all synthetic fluids. lower the car, have a belly pan made, see some posts on bumper support removal. you only need 1 side view mirror. etc, etc, etc,
Tranny swap doesn't equal rebuild
many posts on ignition upgrades & cai/ram air. gold race full roller roclers.
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: surrey b.c. canada
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
i still don't think that would get a 15 second car, especially with an older 3.1
#7
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
I'll say this, it took me a 3.4, cam swap, and complete valvetrain to get into the 15's (calculated 15's...Ran a 10.02 1/8th). I would suggest doing a camswap (somthing beefy), and a full P&P on your heads. You will probably dip into the 15's with that....maybe.
There's always weight reduction too, by reduction I mean GUTTING the car. Passenger seat, backseats, carpet, console, spare tire, jack, 12lbs of cd's, 40 lbs of stereo equipment, A/C compressor, dryer, evap core. Ripping that much weight from the INTERIOR. To lose weight on the car itself: removing swaybars, making aluminum LCA's, swapping that 200lb back glass for a lexan replacement, and buying the lighteset tire/rim combo you can find. Adding some 3.73 gears and an aluminum driveshaft would help too.
That was my goal too wehn I first bought my car. I realized that it wasn't possible with bolt-ons alone. I took the shurefire route and swapped froma 2.8 to a 3.4. THAT got me into the mid 16's... A few more things (headers, dumps) got me lower 16's. The cam swap worked with everything else to get me high 15's. I still plan on swapping some ported heads and a modified intake to the mix. I want as low a number possible on motor alone, THEN I spray the crap out of the combo and hope she hits a 13.XX
There's always weight reduction too, by reduction I mean GUTTING the car. Passenger seat, backseats, carpet, console, spare tire, jack, 12lbs of cd's, 40 lbs of stereo equipment, A/C compressor, dryer, evap core. Ripping that much weight from the INTERIOR. To lose weight on the car itself: removing swaybars, making aluminum LCA's, swapping that 200lb back glass for a lexan replacement, and buying the lighteset tire/rim combo you can find. Adding some 3.73 gears and an aluminum driveshaft would help too.
That was my goal too wehn I first bought my car. I realized that it wasn't possible with bolt-ons alone. I took the shurefire route and swapped froma 2.8 to a 3.4. THAT got me into the mid 16's... A few more things (headers, dumps) got me lower 16's. The cam swap worked with everything else to get me high 15's. I still plan on swapping some ported heads and a modified intake to the mix. I want as low a number possible on motor alone, THEN I spray the crap out of the combo and hope she hits a 13.XX
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: surrey b.c. canada
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
Originally posted by FbodTrek
I'll say this, it took me a 3.4, cam swap, and complete valvetrain to get into the 15's (calculated 15's...Ran a 10.02 1/8th). I would suggest doing a camswap (somthing beefy), and a full P&P on your heads. You will probably dip into the 15's with that....maybe.
There's always weight reduction too, by reduction I mean GUTTING the car. Passenger seat, backseats, carpet, console, spare tire, jack, 12lbs of cd's, 40 lbs of stereo equipment, A/C compressor, dryer, evap core. Ripping that much weight from the INTERIOR. To lose weight on the car itself: removing swaybars, making aluminum LCA's, swapping that 200lb back glass for a lexan replacement, and buying the lighteset tire/rim combo you can find. Adding some 3.73 gears and an aluminum driveshaft would help too.
That was my goal too wehn I first bought my car. I realized that it wasn't possible with bolt-ons alone. I took the shurefire route and swapped froma 2.8 to a 3.4. THAT got me into the mid 16's... A few more things (headers, dumps) got me lower 16's. The cam swap worked with everything else to get me high 15's. I still plan on swapping some ported heads and a modified intake to the mix. I want as low a number possible on motor alone, THEN I spray the crap out of the combo and hope she hits a 13.XX
I'll say this, it took me a 3.4, cam swap, and complete valvetrain to get into the 15's (calculated 15's...Ran a 10.02 1/8th). I would suggest doing a camswap (somthing beefy), and a full P&P on your heads. You will probably dip into the 15's with that....maybe.
There's always weight reduction too, by reduction I mean GUTTING the car. Passenger seat, backseats, carpet, console, spare tire, jack, 12lbs of cd's, 40 lbs of stereo equipment, A/C compressor, dryer, evap core. Ripping that much weight from the INTERIOR. To lose weight on the car itself: removing swaybars, making aluminum LCA's, swapping that 200lb back glass for a lexan replacement, and buying the lighteset tire/rim combo you can find. Adding some 3.73 gears and an aluminum driveshaft would help too.
That was my goal too wehn I first bought my car. I realized that it wasn't possible with bolt-ons alone. I took the shurefire route and swapped froma 2.8 to a 3.4. THAT got me into the mid 16's... A few more things (headers, dumps) got me lower 16's. The cam swap worked with everything else to get me high 15's. I still plan on swapping some ported heads and a modified intake to the mix. I want as low a number possible on motor alone, THEN I spray the crap out of the combo and hope she hits a 13.XX
#9
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: BFE, MD
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
My GPGT does mid 15's, so the same engien in the Firebird, w/bigger gears, lighter weight, transgo in tranny, should produce some nice numbers. But then you said no engine swapping
#10
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
How do you get a 15 sec V6 Camaro?
Give me $20,000 and I'll hand you the pink slip.
Give me another $5000 and It'll be doing low 14's naturally asperated.
But, its not for sale because I like it so much I'd built it to keep.
EDIT: I will also add that I didn't build it to do 15's, I have only built it for maximum handling so far and as a result of the lightweight high dollar componants, it is already doing aprox 15.8's on a motor that is probably putting out around 165HP at the flywheel.
Give me $20,000 and I'll hand you the pink slip.
Give me another $5000 and It'll be doing low 14's naturally asperated.
But, its not for sale because I like it so much I'd built it to keep.
EDIT: I will also add that I didn't build it to do 15's, I have only built it for maximum handling so far and as a result of the lightweight high dollar componants, it is already doing aprox 15.8's on a motor that is probably putting out around 165HP at the flywheel.
Last edited by vsixtoy; 11-10-2004 at 10:41 PM.
#11
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: surrey b.c. canada
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
Originally posted by vsixtoy
How do you get a 15 sec V6 Camaro?
Give me $20,000 and I'll hand you the pink slip.
Give me another $5000 and It'll be doing low 14's naturally asperated.
But, its not for sale because I like it so much I'd built it to keep.
EDIT: I will also add that I didn't build it to do 15's, I have only built it for maximum handling so far and as a result of the lightweight high dollar componants, it is already doing aprox 15.8's on a motor that is probably putting out around 165HP at the flywheel.
How do you get a 15 sec V6 Camaro?
Give me $20,000 and I'll hand you the pink slip.
Give me another $5000 and It'll be doing low 14's naturally asperated.
But, its not for sale because I like it so much I'd built it to keep.
EDIT: I will also add that I didn't build it to do 15's, I have only built it for maximum handling so far and as a result of the lightweight high dollar componants, it is already doing aprox 15.8's on a motor that is probably putting out around 165HP at the flywheel.
i love what you've done with your car
#12
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Thank you Kretos. There is some top secret stuff coming real soon I hope and its not motor related. I will say that for a few weeks I will be the envy of all on these boards
Teaser? Hell yes.
But sorry, I can't say for now. I am not allowed yet.
Teaser? Hell yes.
But sorry, I can't say for now. I am not allowed yet.
#13
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
Originally posted by vsixtoy
Thank you Kretos. There is some top secret stuff coming real soon I hope and its not motor related. I will say that for a few weeks I will be the envy of all on these boards
Teaser? Hell yes.
But sorry, I can't say for now. I am not allowed yet.
Thank you Kretos. There is some top secret stuff coming real soon I hope and its not motor related. I will say that for a few weeks I will be the envy of all on these boards
Teaser? Hell yes.
But sorry, I can't say for now. I am not allowed yet.
#14
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Originally posted by FbodTrek
Dangit.... Yeah, I just WISH i had your setup, Maybe I'd already be running 14's NA
Dangit.... Yeah, I just WISH i had your setup, Maybe I'd already be running 14's NA
#16
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
Originally posted by vsixtoy
No you don't, You really should wish you had a Ferrari instead- this car is just the wifes grocery getter that I have been finding myself saying more and more that I have grown addicted to by accident. I never intended on building it this radical, but the handling suprized me that I can't stop with it.
No you don't, You really should wish you had a Ferrari instead- this car is just the wifes grocery getter that I have been finding myself saying more and more that I have grown addicted to by accident. I never intended on building it this radical, but the handling suprized me that I can't stop with it.
#17
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
To me, This is the perfect car to build for everyday enjoyment. Its a full size American sports car (Not some small import) yet it is lightweight enough to be agile and is very much easier to drive than a V8 Camaro (For the record: I have driven many including an 11.5 sec one an old neighbor of mine Sterling had- haven't seen him in years now, gotta be 10+).
I don't want a car faster than low 14's for everyday street driving and milage. I have a 10 sec Vette that sits in storage and my wife has only ridden in it twice when I used to keep it in the garage up to about 4 years ago (For the record I have been married to my wife for 13years now- and yes I said twice) The second time she brunt the crap out of her leg climbing out over the Hooker sidepipes, her back hurt from the mainhole covers we hit, we had to yell to eachother to talk, couldn't leave it anywhere and go shopping (I might have BS her on this one) and when we got home from about a 3 hr excursion down the 5, across the coast on PCH for breakfast, then back up the 55fwy home, we were both beat and glad to stuff it back into the garage.(My clutch foot was killing me from the beach traffic) Memorable- but not enjoyable. Hence why this car will remain much more tame. The Camaro V6 is a perfect daily driver to build moderately and still be functional as a family transporter- its serving its purpose to us well.
I don't want a car faster than low 14's for everyday street driving and milage. I have a 10 sec Vette that sits in storage and my wife has only ridden in it twice when I used to keep it in the garage up to about 4 years ago (For the record I have been married to my wife for 13years now- and yes I said twice) The second time she brunt the crap out of her leg climbing out over the Hooker sidepipes, her back hurt from the mainhole covers we hit, we had to yell to eachother to talk, couldn't leave it anywhere and go shopping (I might have BS her on this one) and when we got home from about a 3 hr excursion down the 5, across the coast on PCH for breakfast, then back up the 55fwy home, we were both beat and glad to stuff it back into the garage.(My clutch foot was killing me from the beach traffic) Memorable- but not enjoyable. Hence why this car will remain much more tame. The Camaro V6 is a perfect daily driver to build moderately and still be functional as a family transporter- its serving its purpose to us well.
#18
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Originally posted by kretos
i look forward to seeing what your coming up with now
i look forward to seeing what your coming up with now
Theres your hint- I'll say nothing further on this subject though.
#19
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
dean, you said you'll say nothing further but surely you can answer this question... is it going to be a production item or is it being custom built for you?
#20
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: surrey b.c. canada
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
if hes not allowed to talk about it, i'd say its a production item we might all be seeing sometime down the road
good luck dean
good luck dean
#21
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: southern maryland
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2012 Ram express
Engine: 5.7 hemi
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 3.55
v6
ok if i cant get 15 seconds out of the v6 that what will i be running with valvetrain upgrades and bolt-ons. also this is a street car not a drag car i just what a car that can beat imports at my high school. If i was aloud i would have a v8 but parents wont let me so im trying to make this car fast but i cant have p&p and rebuild, just my 3.1 how it is. so how fast can i make it with the 3.1?
#23
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
Yeah, most intelligent import owners are much faster than people believe. Your average swapped Civic will run 14's all day long. You either need to spray with about a 75 shot (probably more to beat them), or go ahead and build an engine on a stand over time, and drop it in when the time comes. You're still in HS, so nows the time for you to start building your first motor (wish I had a car in HS...). Go the for sure route, buy a used 3.4L, port the heads, build a nice valvetrain, add a beefy cam, modify the manifold, and add a pair of Headers. If you pick the right cam, and port the haeds the right way, I could see a 14 second motor easily (people have done it many times). Build the bottom end strong enough to hold about a 150 shot, and you'll see some NICE numbers (and none of the HS kids will ba able to touch you at the local drags) .
#24
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: southern maryland
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2012 Ram express
Engine: 5.7 hemi
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 3.55
thank you
thanks for the reply, i would like to keep my 3.1 and p&p the heads, and intake plenum, runner, manifold. what will i run with p&p heads, intake plenum, runner, and melling mtc-5 cam, crane gold racing roller rockers 1.5 ratio, and all the other bolt ons, (headers, igntion upgrades, and pulleys and tranny mods?
Last edited by 91greenbird; 11-12-2004 at 04:56 PM.
#25
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Go 1.6 roller rockers, and you'd need some good chip tuning. Toss the automatic, get a WC T5 with a short throw shifter, LCAs, LCARBs, and a zexel torson posi in the back, you should be able to get 15s.
Of course, you could go my route - turbo kit, and be running 15s at almost 100 mph (I REALLY need the LCAs, LCARBs, and posi unit in!!)
And just how much would you be spending for all that? $2500 or so? A little more, you'll be there on the STOCK motor - and then those upgrades will mean SO MUCH MORE on the turbocharged motor!
Of course, you could go my route - turbo kit, and be running 15s at almost 100 mph (I REALLY need the LCAs, LCARBs, and posi unit in!!)
And just how much would you be spending for all that? $2500 or so? A little more, you'll be there on the STOCK motor - and then those upgrades will mean SO MUCH MORE on the turbocharged motor!
#27
Re: how can i get a 15 second car?
Originally posted by 91greenbird
i want a 15 second car on just valvetrain, drivetrain, and other bolt ons like pulleys, ignition, and stuff like that. I dont wont to do a engine swap or engine rebuild. I want no power adders or p&p or transmission rebuild. just a all motor 3.1 if its possible help me out with a list of things to do
what i have now
-custom cai
-dynomax super turbo catback
-jet 180 t-stat
-accel dist cap/rotor
-high flow cat
what will i run with just those 5 mods on a 125,000 mile 3.1 with a auto 700r4
i want a 15 second car on just valvetrain, drivetrain, and other bolt ons like pulleys, ignition, and stuff like that. I dont wont to do a engine swap or engine rebuild. I want no power adders or p&p or transmission rebuild. just a all motor 3.1 if its possible help me out with a list of things to do
what i have now
-custom cai
-dynomax super turbo catback
-jet 180 t-stat
-accel dist cap/rotor
-high flow cat
what will i run with just those 5 mods on a 125,000 mile 3.1 with a auto 700r4
16.5, if your lucky! I used to have a 3.1L w/auto and did
same exact mods you have there. It ran mid to high 16s
in the 1/4. Next step for you to get into the 15s is:
1.) Nitrous kit
DO NOT go any more than a 75hp shot!
You willl have a lesser chance of blowing the thing up
with just a 50-75 shot.
2.) More bolt ons
Get the underdrive pullies ( or just crank pulley),
headers, 3.73 gears for the rear end, and you should
get custom PROM tuning.
With about $1,000.00-$1,500.00 later and NO turbo or internal
parts you should get a full second off!
Only drawback: to insure good traction for those times
is suspension! Like they said here before: LCAs, LCA
relocation brackets, panhard rod, good tires and either
a limited slip or locker unit.
The suspension IS necessary to get good "bite" when
launching out of the hole! Otherwise, plan on a burnout
everytime!
Last edited by Camaro_nut; 11-13-2004 at 05:18 PM.
#28
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Just to put that in perspective - I ran a 16.7 on a stock 3.1 with a 5 speed. The weight savings + lower % drivetrain loss makes a big difference in our V6s!
#29
Originally posted by Doward
Just to put that in perspective - I ran a 16.7 on a stock 3.1 with a 5 speed. The weight savings + lower % drivetrain loss makes a big difference in our V6s!
Just to put that in perspective - I ran a 16.7 on a stock 3.1 with a 5 speed. The weight savings + lower % drivetrain loss makes a big difference in our V6s!
17.2 stock. But only doing those 5 mods he did on
an auto will only get to about 16.5-16.9. I ran 16.5
in my car with those same mods. But that's with
the auto.
So, with that said, add T-5 manual trans swap to the
list! Just my 2 cents, I am GLAD to go from that slow
slush box to a T-56! Never been happier.
Last edited by Camaro_nut; 11-13-2004 at 05:15 PM.
#30
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: surrey b.c. canada
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
best mod for your buck
wc t-5 with pro 5.0 shifter
shouldn't cost you more then 600-800 bucks to do
wc t-5 with pro 5.0 shifter
shouldn't cost you more then 600-800 bucks to do
#31
Originally posted by kretos
best mod for your buck
wc t-5 with pro 5.0 shifter
shouldn't cost you more then 600-800 bucks to do
best mod for your buck
wc t-5 with pro 5.0 shifter
shouldn't cost you more then 600-800 bucks to do
motor, but I didn't take the chance, and went with
a T-56 with Pro 5.0 shifter. Costs more than double
the T-5 setup.
NOTE: DO NOT buy an aftermarket manual for
a thirdgen! It WILL NOT fit right. The driveline
angles WILL be altered severely.
#32
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: surrey b.c. canada
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
Originally posted by Camaro_nut
Yes I agree. I wish a WC T-5 can hold up a 400hp
motor, but I didn't take the chance, and went with
a T-56 with Pro 5.0 shifter. Costs more than double
the T-5 setup.
NOTE: DO NOT buy an aftermarket manual for
a thirdgen! It WILL NOT fit right. The driveline
angles WILL be altered severely.
Yes I agree. I wish a WC T-5 can hold up a 400hp
motor, but I didn't take the chance, and went with
a T-56 with Pro 5.0 shifter. Costs more than double
the T-5 setup.
NOTE: DO NOT buy an aftermarket manual for
a thirdgen! It WILL NOT fit right. The driveline
angles WILL be altered severely.
you could beef up a wc t-5 enough but it was probably cheaper to go the way you did, stick with 88 up v6 trannys (they are wc)
#34
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
Originally posted by Jerriko 3.4
Forgive my ignorance, but what is LCARBs?
Forgive my ignorance, but what is LCARBs?
#35
Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Firebird Formula
Engine: 3.4L 207 V6
Transmission: T5 W/C
Originally posted by FbodTrek
Lower control arm relocation brackets (not necessary if you're at stock ride height).
Lower control arm relocation brackets (not necessary if you're at stock ride height).
#36
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Actually, they will help, no matter what your ride height A little more angle than stock will help with the takeoff!
#37
Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Firebird Formula
Engine: 3.4L 207 V6
Transmission: T5 W/C
Originally posted by Doward
Actually, they will help, no matter what your ride height A little more angle than stock will help with the takeoff!
Actually, they will help, no matter what your ride height A little more angle than stock will help with the takeoff!
#38
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
the front of the LCAs will stay in their stock location, the back of them is dropped down with the LCARBs.
#39
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Correct, you want the rear of the LCA angled downward, for a better bite.
#40
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
I have to chime in here.
You want yor LCA angles as close to parallel to the chassis as pssible without any wheel hop. Setting the rears any lower is only raising the instant center of the car and hurting weight transfeer front to rear. Straightline traction is only as good as weight transfer onto that tire.
By loering the angle any futher than this will also promote massive oversteer in the rearend making the car dangerous in corners.
You want yor LCA angles as close to parallel to the chassis as pssible without any wheel hop. Setting the rears any lower is only raising the instant center of the car and hurting weight transfeer front to rear. Straightline traction is only as good as weight transfer onto that tire.
By loering the angle any futher than this will also promote massive oversteer in the rearend making the car dangerous in corners.
#41
Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Firebird Formula
Engine: 3.4L 207 V6
Transmission: T5 W/C
Originally posted by vsixtoy
I have to chime in here.
You want yor LCA angles as close to parallel to the chassis as pssible without any wheel hop. Setting the rears any lower is only raising the instant center of the car and hurting weight transfeer front to rear. Straightline traction is only as good as weight transfer onto that tire.
By loering the angle any futher than this will also promote massive oversteer in the rearend making the car dangerous in corners.
I have to chime in here.
You want yor LCA angles as close to parallel to the chassis as pssible without any wheel hop. Setting the rears any lower is only raising the instant center of the car and hurting weight transfeer front to rear. Straightline traction is only as good as weight transfer onto that tire.
By loering the angle any futher than this will also promote massive oversteer in the rearend making the car dangerous in corners.
#42
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Originally posted by vsixtoy
I have to chime in here.
You want yor LCA angles as close to parallel to the chassis as pssible without any wheel hop. Setting the rears any lower is only raising the instant center of the car and hurting weight transfeer front to rear. Straightline traction is only as good as weight transfer onto that tire.
By loering the angle any futher than this will also promote massive oversteer in the rearend making the car dangerous in corners.
I have to chime in here.
You want yor LCA angles as close to parallel to the chassis as pssible without any wheel hop. Setting the rears any lower is only raising the instant center of the car and hurting weight transfeer front to rear. Straightline traction is only as good as weight transfer onto that tire.
By loering the angle any futher than this will also promote massive oversteer in the rearend making the car dangerous in corners.
http://www.spohn.net/product.cfm?productid=1290
and this -
as to why I think that....
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...ation+brackets
#43
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
DOward, The best way I can explain in words is the LCA angle only raises and lowers the instant center. It does not move it for and aft. The length of the TQarm is what detemines the instant centerline for and aft.
Now the higher the IC is, the more the nose weight wants to rotate under it as launch weight transfer forces weight towards the rear. You want the weight to transfer pivoting up over the IC height and then down on the rear tires. The higher this is (combined with limited traction of street tires) the harder it is for inistial grip of the rear tires to lift the frontend up above the higher IC and rotate the weight backwards. The lower the IC height is, the easier it will "teter-totter" over the IC and weight the rears.
Slicks and a light weight nose can get away with a steeper LCA angle than with street tires- so many other factors come into play also it is hard to teach this in one post.
You just basically want the IC low and/or back for launching in general on a street drag car.
Now the higher the IC is, the more the nose weight wants to rotate under it as launch weight transfer forces weight towards the rear. You want the weight to transfer pivoting up over the IC height and then down on the rear tires. The higher this is (combined with limited traction of street tires) the harder it is for inistial grip of the rear tires to lift the frontend up above the higher IC and rotate the weight backwards. The lower the IC height is, the easier it will "teter-totter" over the IC and weight the rears.
Slicks and a light weight nose can get away with a steeper LCA angle than with street tires- so many other factors come into play also it is hard to teach this in one post.
You just basically want the IC low and/or back for launching in general on a street drag car.
#45
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro, '85 Z28, '92 Firebird
Engine: LB8 2.8, LG4 5.0, LO3 5.0
Transmission: TH-700R4, T-5, TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42s, 3.23s, 2.73s
Does the T5 conversion really only cost 600-800$? I mean, is that including all the other parts you are gonna need to go from the auto to stick? I personally have a leaking seal on my tranny, and was just planning on getting it fixed, then putting the transgo shift kit in, and maybe some stall converter that could launch it better. Would the stick just be a better solution? It just seems like there is a lot of work involved like the floor cutting, installing the clutch, ect... Just wanted to know if it really was that cheap and easy.
#46
Depends on your skill level and experience. I had
no problems switching from auto to T-56, and that's
slightly harder to do than the T-5. T-5 is almost a direct
bolt in, minus cutting the floor for the shifter. Everything
else lines up with no special crossmember needed.
That's correct as far as a USED COMPLETE T-5 conversion.
Between $600-$800. T-5s are more available than the
T-56 (only from 93-97 in the F bodies for the gen II SBC).
T-5s were like from 85-97 ( Yes, some fourth gen's came
with a 5 speed!) Don't quote me exactly on the years,
but you get my point. Also for being a weaker trans.
and uses a more common style clutch system as compared
to the T-56, the T-5 is very cheap nowadays. T-56s
are nearly double the price for a complete used conversion.
Even the clutch kit is double the price compared to the T-5.
no problems switching from auto to T-56, and that's
slightly harder to do than the T-5. T-5 is almost a direct
bolt in, minus cutting the floor for the shifter. Everything
else lines up with no special crossmember needed.
That's correct as far as a USED COMPLETE T-5 conversion.
Between $600-$800. T-5s are more available than the
T-56 (only from 93-97 in the F bodies for the gen II SBC).
T-5s were like from 85-97 ( Yes, some fourth gen's came
with a 5 speed!) Don't quote me exactly on the years,
but you get my point. Also for being a weaker trans.
and uses a more common style clutch system as compared
to the T-56, the T-5 is very cheap nowadays. T-56s
are nearly double the price for a complete used conversion.
Even the clutch kit is double the price compared to the T-5.
#47
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: surrey b.c. canada
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
oh don't get us wrong. we never said cheap and easy. the parts aren't gonna cost you more then 800 bucks. but actually getting everything in thats a different story. it really all depends how good you are at fabbing things up
#48
Originally posted by kretos
oh don't get us wrong. we never said cheap and easy. the parts aren't gonna cost you more then 800 bucks. but actually getting everything in thats a different story. it really all depends how good you are at fabbing things up
oh don't get us wrong. we never said cheap and easy. the parts aren't gonna cost you more then 800 bucks. but actually getting everything in thats a different story. it really all depends how good you are at fabbing things up
due to the fact that I have been doing this stuff since
1992!
So it really depends on your skill level and experience!
Keep that in mind!
#49
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro, '85 Z28, '92 Firebird
Engine: LB8 2.8, LG4 5.0, LO3 5.0
Transmission: TH-700R4, T-5, TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42s, 3.23s, 2.73s
Well, then there is a problem. I don't have any real experience with fabrication, and I don't have any real place to work on it (like a garage). Do you think there are many places that would do the swap? But then there is the cost problem. Just can't win. But does the shift kit and higher stall sound like a good idea?
#50
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro, '85 Z28, '92 Firebird
Engine: LB8 2.8, LG4 5.0, LO3 5.0
Transmission: TH-700R4, T-5, TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42s, 3.23s, 2.73s
and does the gears in the rear make a big difference? I am not exactly sure what I have, but I think they are 2 somethings, but all I know is I can't spin my tires in a straight line, which may be something a lot of you try to prevent, but I wouldn't mind being able to smoke them when I want to. Would higher gears be the answer, and like what size is good?