2.8 and 3.1 parts interchangable?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pinehurst, NC, USA
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro
Engine: 350 miniram
Transmission: T-56
2.8 and 3.1 parts interchangable?
I was wondering if the y pipe from a 3.1 would directly bolt up to 2.8 without any modifications.
Do they use the same thermostats?
Can an auto trans from a 91 3.1 bolt up directly to the 2.8 without modification?
I have a 91 RS and a 87 camaro both V6s just one is the 2.8 and the other is the 3.1, and I am curious as to what parts are the same just in case I have to swap stuff.
Thanks
Do they use the same thermostats?
Can an auto trans from a 91 3.1 bolt up directly to the 2.8 without modification?
I have a 91 RS and a 87 camaro both V6s just one is the 2.8 and the other is the 3.1, and I am curious as to what parts are the same just in case I have to swap stuff.
Thanks
#3
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pinehurst, NC, USA
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro
Engine: 350 miniram
Transmission: T-56
Oh thats great to hear.
So I guess the only differences are the displacement and that the 2.8 is a MAF setup where the 3.1 is speed density?
So I guess the only differences are the displacement and that the 2.8 is a MAF setup where the 3.1 is speed density?
#4
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: surrey b.c. canada
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
yeah and a couple of sensors are in different spots. but nothing worth mentioning
#5
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Originally posted by kretos
everything is completly and utterly the same
everything is completly and utterly the same
Intake is different
Some of the pullys may be different (depending on year)
EGR is different
Vac routing is different
Elec system is different
fuel injectors different
Flywheel/flexplate different
Trans is partly different (can be made to swap)
valve springs are different (I think)
Alot will swap, but some wont. Exhaust should be ok to swap.
Alot of the sensors are in the same spot. Only major one on that is the Fan switch which on 2.8 is in the head, where the 3.1 uses the ECT and the ECM turns the fan on.
#6
I've got a 3.1 mpfi and a 2.8 mpfi intake side by side, and there are no differences that can be seen, you can bolt one to the other, and vice versa. What gives? Most all fo the accessory brackets look the same, I cant tell much of a difference. What makes the difference in the trans? They are both 60*?
#7
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Staunton,illinois
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
only reason i can see the transmission wouldnt work would be speedo issues but thats easily fixed by swapping tailshafts from one to the other......
Trending Topics
#9
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pinehurst, NC, USA
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro
Engine: 350 miniram
Transmission: T-56
I am very interested to know the difference in the transmissions and what would need to be done to put the 91 trans onto the 2.8 motor.
As far as the speedo goes on the V8 cars the only difference is one uses the cable drive speedo and the other uses the electric, but to change them over is very simple. You defenitly don't have to swap tail shafts.
Thanks for the input
As far as the speedo goes on the V8 cars the only difference is one uses the cable drive speedo and the other uses the electric, but to change them over is very simple. You defenitly don't have to swap tail shafts.
Thanks for the input
#10
As far as the speedo goes on the V8 cars the only difference is one uses the cable drive speedo and the other uses the electric, but to change them over is very simple. You defenitly don't have to swap tail shafts.
#11
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
There aren't any.
The 'huge' difference in the intake, is the CSI (cold start injector) in the base of the 2.8 intake, and the '2.8' proudly displayed on the top. Look at the 3.1 base intake - you'll see a plug where the CSI once was. That's the difference - costmetic. Volume, runner length, bolt patterns, etc (aka, all the IMPORTANT stuff) is the same.
3.1 has bigger injectors (15pph vs 2.8's 13pph)
That's about it, as far as the motors go.
The 'huge' difference in the intake, is the CSI (cold start injector) in the base of the 2.8 intake, and the '2.8' proudly displayed on the top. Look at the 3.1 base intake - you'll see a plug where the CSI once was. That's the difference - costmetic. Volume, runner length, bolt patterns, etc (aka, all the IMPORTANT stuff) is the same.
3.1 has bigger injectors (15pph vs 2.8's 13pph)
That's about it, as far as the motors go.
#12
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
2.8 intake doesnt have a vac port for the map sensor . Also where the TB bolts on is slightly different.
middle intake is same
lower is the CSI.
Trans is different due to speedo cables. Also, the older versions are said to be weaker. As I said, they CAN be made to interchange.
Also fuel rail is different.
middle intake is same
lower is the CSI.
Trans is different due to speedo cables. Also, the older versions are said to be weaker. As I said, they CAN be made to interchange.
Also fuel rail is different.
#15
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Staunton,illinois
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by Dale
for me its a huge difference.
for me its a huge difference.
or the intakes and injectors ??
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
Trans EXACTLY the same. As for the rest of the motor, the 3.1 is a MAP air metering system, 2.8 is a MAF air metering system. Also, the 3.1 EGR is electronically controlled, the 2.8 has the 'flying saucer' EGR valve setup. All of the HARD parts are the same however. Same manifolds, heads and TB. And the cute little 2.8 MPFI badge on the intake
#20
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
I'm sure a hole could be tapped to get the MAP vac signal from a 2.8 intake. Injectors are, of course, larger on the 3.1, but you'll still pass emissions with 3.1 injectors in a 2.8 motor (I did that earlier this year, passed on NJ's dyno emissions test.)
#21
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: surrey b.c. canada
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
ok maybe not completly and utterly the same, but the differences aren't really that big
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
20
11-14-2015 12:02 AM
1988, 1990, 2000, 28, 31, axle, body, bolt, carbuerated, chevy, differences, g80, head, interchangable, interchangeable, silverado, throttle, transmission