V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

tire preference - 2.8?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2004, 08:53 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
eddie jr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
tire preference - 2.8?

Just curious what tires all you 2.8 er's have. If ya went wider than the 215's....say to 235, did you notice a change in mileage or would you say no effect??
Old 06-05-2004, 11:13 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
TechSmurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
My 88 is wearing 235/60R15s... rolling resistance is noticably higher than the V6 wearing 205/65s.... gas milage difference is highly likely, but degree unknown.
Old 06-05-2004, 11:26 PM
  #3  
Banned
 
vsixtoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Originally posted by TechSmurf
.... gas milage difference is highly likely, but degree unknown.
Based on the "35mpg realistic" thread, I'd say yes. I run 245/50 16 very sticky tires and get about 14mpg at best.
Attached Thumbnails tire preference - 2.8?-bumpsteer.jpg  
Old 06-06-2004, 04:06 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

 
Xophertony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Or-eh-gun
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 2012 Nissan Leaf
Engine: 80-kW AC synchronous electric motor
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: n/a
omg look at those tie rods!
Old 06-06-2004, 08:23 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
vsixtoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Originally posted by Xophertony
omg look at those tie rods!
Look familiar? I'm Agood2.8 http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/518752/2
Old 06-06-2004, 11:42 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
85f-bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
did ya have to change ur name for the mods? couldn't remember.....as i recal, you have a very very very well handling lil sixer, along w/ an intake manifold that'll make people go gaga....how's that coming?
Old 06-07-2004, 12:34 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
vsixtoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Originally posted by 85f-bird
did ya have to change ur name for the mods? couldn't remember.....as i recal, you have a very very very well handling lil sixer, along w/ an intake manifold that'll make people go gaga....how's that coming?
Like I care what the Mods think...They ban me for doing their job and exposing the people that post misleading knowledge that can cause innocent people hard earn cash. I come in here because it is a very good tech board source, better than any others I have seen- and theres lots of activity on the suspension board. I arrogantly know anything currently availiable suspension wise on these cars and have fabbed many things others still don't have (heck I should go into business making and selling parts here- but then its no longer a hobby, and thus no longer fun) This site helps me brainstorm for new suspension ideas when its late and I'm unwinding the day on the computer. I always try to bring new ideas to this site.

Latest plenum info:
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=239836
Old 06-07-2004, 11:23 AM
  #8  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (12)
 
Dale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Daily- 235/60/15, 2 being cobra something (look almost like bfg tires), and two futra grand sport or something (elcheapos)

Autox- 245/50/16 Firestone sz50ep's, almost down to tread bars.


The firestones grip like nothing else I have ever drove on, but any slight angle/dip/flaw in the road, and it highly exagerates it.

The others, smoother ride, decent on wet roads, dont toss the car or wheel. Grip moderatly.
Old 06-07-2004, 02:47 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

 
camaro_junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
I have 215/65/15 all around... Michelin Rainforce. Michelin is my favourite brand in terms of bang for buck. The tires grip pretty good, but cut through puddles awesome. I don't like how the Camaro planes so easily, so I got these tires to solve the problem.
Old 06-07-2004, 05:22 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

 
85f-bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
heck, when i was running my ole' 215/65s that car didn't hydroplane for a crap....i swear i can only remember one time of hydroplanin, and that was because i really applied the brakes hard, and was attmepting to turn the wheel at the same time. I have on the other hand, felt that back end get loose, and that's never any fun, try in the snow at 50 mph on a two lane highway. My normally 3 hour drive took me near 6, and the only cars i saw on the side of the road (in the ditch) were camaro's , firebirds, and mustangs...........
Old 06-07-2004, 05:29 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

 
camaro_junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
Well, the tires that were on the car when I bought it had very little tread, but I still didn't like how easily it hydroplaned, so I decided to play it safe. Even with the tires I have, I wouldn't say it never planes. I definitely like the tires though. But I live a rainy city, so you have to be able to drive in the rain.
Old 06-07-2004, 08:56 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
vsixtoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
The tires I posted in the picture are the best all around tire you can buy. I kid you not when I say this car performs 9/10's its potential on wet surfaces and about 7/10's on heavy downpour. I can drive this car faster around corners in a heavy downpour than I could see ahead of me and still have very good traction (I don't drive blind though).

Dale, The twichyness of the tires is bumpsteer, not the tires. The wider tires will magnify this affect though, and may not be noticable at all with softer sidewalls and narrower tread.
(ps I'm getting to your E-mail right now- been busy today)
Old 06-07-2004, 09:10 PM
  #13  
Junior Member
 
Rebel 92 F-bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Glade Spring, VA
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 F-bird, 1965 Goat (GTO for those who don't know what a Goat is.)
Engine: 3.1 V6, 400 w/3 2 bbl's
Transmission: 700-R4, TH350
[QUOTE]=Daily- 235/60/15, 2 being cobra something (look almost like bfg tires)

Must have been Cooper Cobras. Very good everyday street tires. They get excellent wear. I have a full set of 4 215/65R15's. I know they are good because we sell them at work.
Old 06-07-2004, 10:26 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member
 
br()bert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: Pos 2.8 pulled and replaced with a 350 tpi motor converted to carb.
Transmission: 700r4, vette servo,shift kit, hayden 15"x8" trans cooler.
I had elcheapo cobra tires on the car when i got it. They sucked for traction wet and didnt fair too well dry either. Then i bought some Yokahama db uhp 225's (still too skinny) They work VERY good when wet and dry. Worked great when i had the 2.8.
Old 06-07-2004, 11:48 PM
  #15  
Supreme Member

 
85f-bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
hey brobert
know it's off topic but how did the v8 turn out. i remember you stating how much work you had to do, but was just curious if you're happy w/ the results. And when do we get to see some timeslips for the lil thang.
Old 06-08-2004, 09:53 AM
  #16  
Supreme Member
 
br()bert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: Pos 2.8 pulled and replaced with a 350 tpi motor converted to carb.
Transmission: 700r4, vette servo,shift kit, hayden 15"x8" trans cooler.
Im Very happy with it. Im done the swap now. This past weekend i drove from my house in Philly to hamilton NJ. On the way back i used just under a 1/4 tank. (before we went i had to tune the carb a little, it was gulping gas down)

The trans has had some work done to it,.The guy told me when i got it it had a shift kit and a corvette servo in it. I didnt believe him, well 1-2 shift is VERY hard. Spins the tires everytime. It slide sideways when it rains just from the shift (the reason why i said the tires aint cutting it anymore)when its dry out i get a long bark and some tire smoke. It gets pretty annoying!!!!!!2-3 isnt too bad though.

oh, and i got my stitches out too!

Everything went pretty good, z28guy83 was there the whole time with the swap. But when i think back to doing those damn motor mounts i still cring.

If i had to do it all over again i wouldnt! I would not mess with those damn mounts ever again, instead i would just drop a 3.4 in! Sure i wouldnt have as much power as i do now but the swap would have been much easier.

Ill get some times as soon as i get money to go racing. Unemployment sucks and is running out fast!!!

Sorry to get off topic....

Im thinking about some 245-255 tires to put on now. I dont wanna go with some massive tires. I like the stock look of the firebird. (main reason why i dont wanna change the hood.)
Old 06-08-2004, 11:14 AM
  #17  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (12)
 
Dale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
ok, just looked, tires are not cobra, they are "VIPER TR". Some elcheapos.

Vsix, I thought I wouldnt have to worry about bumpsteer tell I lowered it? I guess my springs are just that worn out. Guess that would explain the 3rd set of shocks blowing out on the rear.
Old 06-08-2004, 11:19 AM
  #18  
Supreme Member

 
85f-bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
got the same viper TR's on the back of the bird right now, definately elcheapo's, they work ok i guess, and their tread wear thus far has been really really good.....meaning i won't need a freakin new set of them for another 100 years. .... damnit.
Old 06-08-2004, 03:51 PM
  #19  
Member
 
mory's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: South Central Los Scandolus, CA
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 camaro
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4
dude im runnin 245/50/R18 front and back should i change this? the car seems fine tread is perfect. is this wrong yall? i like the look and the tires.
Old 06-08-2004, 04:16 PM
  #20  
Supreme Member

 
85f-bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
don't know why mory, if you're running the tires, have plenty of tread left, and enjoy them (aka: no complaints) then i don't see why it is that you'd really find a need to change them off. Unless you just wanna jump on a smaller tire rim size bandwaggon....what type of wheels do you have w/ the 18's?
Old 06-08-2004, 07:22 PM
  #21  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (12)
 
Dale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
mory, people change wheel/tire size alot. If you like what you have, dont worry. Only thing I "might" see wrong, is that the combo is larger in diameter, thus throwing your speedo/milage off. Trade off is that generally, larger diameter tires ride smoother.

85bird, I havent looked at the tread wear on them, they have only been on a few months. Nothing to brag about, but they get the job done. If they wear really good, I'll get another set.
Old 06-08-2004, 07:31 PM
  #22  
Supreme Member
 
pvt num 11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wahiawa, Hawai'i
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 TTA
Engine: LC2
Transmission: Worn-out 200R4
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt, 3.27's
Glad to hear we have somwone who knows their stuff back on the boards. (I sure don't...) I have... um... lumps of black stuff on these crummy 'rally' rims on my F'bird... The GTA blew a front tire (Aquatread, what was I thinking?!) at the autocross event I ran at. New tires a generic stock replacements. I'm going to run the F'bird at another autocross event in September, in complete street trim. Well, my wife is. I'll find out who makes those black lumps and get back.
Old 06-08-2004, 10:28 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
vsixtoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Originally posted by Dale
ok, just looked, tires are not cobra, they are "VIPER TR". Some elcheapos.

Vsix, I thought I wouldnt have to worry about bumpsteer tell I lowered it? I guess my springs are just that worn out. Guess that would explain the 3rd set of shocks blowing out on the rear.
Forgot you aren't lowered (purposely ). I doubt if sagging springs would give you enough geometry change to encounter bumpsteer. It could just be alignment (toe). You'd generally see that on the tire wear though. This is one of those things that I'd have to see the car (bounce it, wiggle things etc..) to see why its walking on you going down the road. My car never has done that no matter what tires I run- and I have had the SZ50's on it before the Goodyears.

Shocks blowwing in the rear could be from sagging springs and stock height shocks bottoming out and causing damage internally. Again would have to see things to properly diagnose whats the cause. Do check the bumpstops on the rear-see if the axlepads (where the rubber bumpstops will meet the axle if grounded out) are shiney from regular contact.
Old 06-08-2004, 10:39 PM
  #24  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
eddie jr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So what have you guys experienced as far as mileage changes when going to wider tires. I am thinking of going from 215's to 235's but staying at the same overall height (60 aspect instead on 65). What have you guys noticed, any difference when going a little wider but not taller?
Old 06-09-2004, 07:10 AM
  #25  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (12)
 
Dale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Thanks vsix. Alignment is slightly off, but not alot. Waiting tell I do a few things before I get another

215/65 to 235/60, you might noticed a little mpg difference, not alot. All you will be getting is more friction. My racing tires are ever so slightly smalle diameter, I dont notice alot.
Old 06-09-2004, 10:28 AM
  #26  
Supreme Member

 
85f-bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
don't think i noticed a difference w/ my 215 to 235 swap. At the same time, my 235's aren't "sticky" and i really wish they were. I'm now thinking of ditching them next time around, for something in a 225, but that has a little more aggressive tread pattern.
Old 06-09-2004, 03:35 PM
  #27  
Member
 
mory's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: South Central Los Scandolus, CA
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 camaro
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4
i have chrome iroc rims on it. the rims are 16x8 the 88-89 rims.
Old 06-09-2004, 05:00 PM
  #28  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
eddie jr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by 85f-bird
don't think i noticed a difference w/ my 215 to 235 swap. At the same time, my 235's aren't "sticky" and i really wish they were. I'm now thinking of ditching them next time around, for something in a 225, but that has a little more aggressive tread pattern.
So when you guys are referring to "sticky" tires, your BFG radial TA's and Goodyear eagle type stuff, although advertised as performance tires, would be considered normal and not "sticky"??? Am I on the right track?
Old 06-09-2004, 08:11 PM
  #29  
Banned
 
vsixtoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Originally posted by eddie jr
So when you guys are referring to "sticky" tires, your BFG radial TA's and Goodyear eagle type stuff, although advertised as performance tires, would be considered normal and not "sticky"??? Am I on the right track?
There is a big difference between Goodyear F1's And Goodyear F1 GS-D3's. They are not the same tire.

The GS-D3's (pictured above in this post) and the FIrestone FIreHawk SZ50Ep's are both "max performance" street tires. The closest thing you are going to get next to an "R" compound race tire- but without the radical wear (Only semi-radical ) I go through tires about once a year.

BFG radial T/A's are about as slippery of a so called performance tire there is- Dunlops are worst. GOodyear F1's are average. F1 GS-D3's and SZ50EP's are well in a league of their own- there's no comparison, not even close.
Old 06-10-2004, 03:49 AM
  #30  
Supreme Member

 
85f-bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
ah mory, u meant R16, was wondering what rim you were running those 18 in tires on.

And to Eddie.....and in response to agood. YEH, WHAT HE SAID!
Old 06-10-2004, 08:46 AM
  #31  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (12)
 
Dale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
yea, my firehawks have noticed some wear in them, and I bet I havent drove 500 miles on them. Of course, them werent "easy" miles either

And when they smoke, do they ever smoke!!! Make sure you have a resperator mask on, cause it will gag the hell outta you!!
Old 06-10-2004, 08:01 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Dennis91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Solomons Island Maryland
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 4 bbl 305
Transmission: 700R4
im running 215/65R15 on the front and 275/60R15 on the rear on my 87 bird
Old 06-10-2004, 11:05 PM
  #33  
Supreme Member
 
Doward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
245/50/16 Eagle HP Ultra's up front
255/50/16 Goodyear ZR50's in the back.

Going to go 245/50/16 Kuhmo Ectsa 711's all the way around, till I get the spare $$ for some SZ50's
Old 06-11-2004, 04:06 PM
  #34  
Member
 
mory's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: South Central Los Scandolus, CA
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 camaro
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by 85f-bird
[Bb
And to Eddie.....and in response to agood. YEH, WHAT HE SAID! [/B]
Old 06-14-2004, 03:59 PM
  #35  
Supreme Member

 
devianb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
I went from 215/65 to 245/50. I didn't notice any change in milage. I get lots more traction with the 245s, and they look better.
Old 06-14-2004, 04:47 PM
  #36  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
eddie jr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by devianb
I went from 215/65 to 245/50. I didn't notice any change in milage. I get lots more traction with the 245s, and they look better.
What brand are they? are they super sticky performance or...?
Old 06-18-2004, 01:09 PM
  #37  
Supreme Member

 
devianb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Originally posted by eddie jr
What brand are they? are they super sticky performance or...?
They are NITTO 450s. Not a great deal of traction when its wet out.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GeneralIesrussi
Carburetors
6
06-20-2024 07:21 PM
dennisbernal91z
Wheels and Tires
7
09-12-2015 12:28 AM
snakeshooter
V6
3
09-07-2015 11:13 AM
rjcme
Tech / General Engine
0
09-05-2015 01:23 PM



Quick Reply: tire preference - 2.8?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 PM.