V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Were all the 3.1 people?....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-2004, 10:50 AM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
entrig00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: t-5
Were all the 3.1 people?....

I was reading through some threads and I noticed that there is a hell of allot of people in the V6 thread that have 2.8. Were all the 3.1 people? Is it just me or is there crap load of 2.8?

Theres times I feel alone with my 3.1.
Old 05-22-2004, 10:58 AM
  #2  
Member
 
92RSSlowmaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Proud 3.1 owner right here.
Old 05-22-2004, 11:04 AM
  #3  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
entrig00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: t-5
Cool beans...

I thought I was the only one thats proud of the 3.1. Anyone else out there.....come on people....
Old 05-22-2004, 11:13 AM
  #4  
Banned
 
vsixtoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
All I want to know is "what ever happened to the 2.9 & the 3.0, did they get jipped?" (spoken with a readneck draw)
Old 05-22-2004, 11:17 AM
  #5  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
entrig00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: t-5
huh?

vsixtoy,


Are you for reals? I didn't know that there was 2.9 & the 3.0??? Damn man, I had never heard of those. Thats crazy?
Old 05-22-2004, 11:55 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
89V6FBIRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UCIrvine or SFV, CA
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1999 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: LS1 - 346 ci
Transmission: 4L60E


Gotta love ******* jokes... my ex g/f always had one on her mind.
Old 05-22-2004, 12:00 PM
  #7  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
entrig00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: t-5
damn...

I feel pretty stupid now!
Old 05-22-2004, 12:01 PM
  #8  
Member
 
GreyFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: V6
Transmission: ATOD
I love my 3.1 buddy, wouldn't trade it for any other v6 (well soon as i take care of the problems i bought with it)
Old 05-22-2004, 12:03 PM
  #9  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
entrig00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: t-5
alright....

I'm seeing more 3.1...



Yeah about time....were you all hiding out at? I'm seeing allot 2.8's all over the damn....no offence to them and all. I just been seeing a crap load of 2.8 guys. I just think it would be nice to see as many 3.1 people as there is of 2.8 guys
Old 05-22-2004, 03:04 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member
 
FbodTrek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
The reason

They only came with the 3.1 for 2 years, so you don't see as many. They had them in passenger FWD cars for many years though, good motor.
Old 05-22-2004, 03:08 PM
  #11  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
entrig00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: t-5
No wonder...

And I take it the 3.1 only came in 91-92 camaros right? So I take it this explains why I'l running into more of the 2.8 then the 3.1....no wonder! So is there a big difference between the two engines?
Old 05-22-2004, 03:21 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member

 
TechSmurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
3 years.. 90-92... 2.8=135hp/160tq, 3.1=140hp/180tq
Old 05-22-2004, 03:25 PM
  #13  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
entrig00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: t-5
This might be pushing it...

TechSmurf would you happen know know how many were created? I'm pretty sure its a low number....explains why there isn't to many of us 3.1 banners then the 2.8


thanks....
Old 05-22-2004, 03:44 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

 
TechSmurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
If half of the 90-92 RS and base Firebirds shipped with the 3.1 and half with the LO3, approximately 125k... but this is unlikely to be accurate... best I could say is between 80k and 170k.
Old 05-22-2004, 05:19 PM
  #15  
Member

 
91 Ragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canal Winchester, Ohio
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Trans Am Convertible
Engine: 305
Transmission: 5-Speed
Another 3.1 here. 198,800 on the orginal motor and transmission. Slow as hell, but most reliable car I've owned.
Old 05-22-2004, 08:41 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
BitchinRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Modesto, CA USA
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
3.1 290,XXX miles and still running strong. It will be replaced with a SBC 400 though.
Old 05-22-2004, 09:11 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
91rsv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 IROC Z
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
My old 91 rs has 296,xxx on th clock and dosent even smoke were as my iroc puffs 1/2 car length at start up. I know valve seals are bad but that just gives me an excuse to replace with a 350.
Old 05-22-2004, 09:49 PM
  #18  
Member
 
92RSSlowmaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dayum, and I thought I had a high mileage vehicle!

Mine puffs a little bit when I start it.. I let a friend drive it one time. He was doing good, but out of nowhere he decides to redline it coming off a light. Probably busted a valve seal.

Only reason I trusted him is because I sold him my old truck, and he drives it responsibly.
Old 05-22-2004, 11:33 PM
  #19  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Firebird90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Livermore, Ca. US
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: Firebird SSA
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: 700R4
3.1 here :lala:
Old 05-23-2004, 03:43 AM
  #20  
Supreme Member

 
FAST RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Moorpark
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 CAMARO 1968 FIREBIRD
Engine: CAMARO 3.1L FIREBIRD 455
Transmission: CAMARO 700R4 FIREBIRD TH-400
BitchinRS is it all orig 290,000? My 3.1 is at 230,000
Old 05-23-2004, 07:57 AM
  #21  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
entrig00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: t-5
Thats what I'm talking about...

Whats up people. Nice to see that more and more of you guys are poping in, I thank you people for that. If you guys only knew how good it feels to see more 3.1's out there/here. A quick question for the ones with HIGH miles.....does your cars still run the same/strong?

For anyone with a 3.1 feel free in replying, I'm curious to see how many of use 3.1 people show up in this thread, later on this might be helpful towards any questions with people that have 3.1....



ME--------> 128,000 miles (wow, it seems like I have the least miles in here...)

Anyone else?????
Old 05-23-2004, 12:05 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
BitchinRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Modesto, CA USA
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Fast RS,

It's all original. Only smoke I get is a slight wiff at startup. The heads have never been removed from the car. I was told I should get a valve job, but I am afraid that I will brake head bolts due to them being on there so long. I even still get good gas mileage. About 24 MPG highway and 21 MPG city. Lack of low end power is driving me to replace it with a V8. The V6 has been reliable and fun to drive, but I really want that low end pull.
Old 05-23-2004, 01:00 PM
  #23  
Junior Member

 
planman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Kissimmee FL
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: 700R4
3.1 here. 95,500 miles. I am the second owner. It's a keeper.
Old 05-23-2004, 01:14 PM
  #24  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
entrig00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: t-5
damn...

Damit planman....

You beat my numbers......


Thanks for the reply....
Old 05-23-2004, 01:30 PM
  #25  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (12)
 
Dale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Use to be a 3.1 tell I got a kick **** deal on a 3.4. Had aprox 195k on orginal engine.

I still have a few 3.1 parts on my engine, does that count
Old 05-23-2004, 02:25 PM
  #26  
Supreme Member

 
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
i've got a 3.1. about 5k on the motor since it got a healthy rebuild.
Old 05-23-2004, 03:10 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
FirebirdNYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ozone Park, NYC
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 firebird
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 700R4
happy 3.1 owner here:rockon: , i think the 90 firebird is and will be the best looking bird around! , . all older birds have that ugly looking cover on the bumpers . i love my car even though i get ****ty mileage, taking care of that slowly though , 120.000 miles since last week

Last edited by FirebirdNYC; 05-23-2004 at 03:13 PM.
Old 05-23-2004, 03:21 PM
  #28  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
entrig00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: t-5
What????

So far 14 replied stating that they got a 3.1....well actually 13 1/2...lol



Shocking....very shocking


Old 05-23-2004, 03:40 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Nocturnall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 191ci 6cyl
Transmission: 700r4
I got a 3.1 and I love it. If I do an engine swap it'll be a 3.4. Trying to build it up though. Love the car. 91 Firebird.
Old 05-23-2004, 03:47 PM
  #30  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
entrig00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: t-5
can we hit 20???

Will we hit number 20???


Thanks Nocturnall, your number 15
Old 05-23-2004, 04:18 PM
  #31  
Supreme Member
 
Kj Rockz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Mililani, HI USofA Search Posts: 2848.............. Whore Posts: 47.................. Magical Whore Posts: 1
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro 77K
Engine: 3.1 Vslick
I have a 3.1 in 91 rs!

Number 16
Old 05-23-2004, 04:45 PM
  #32  
Supreme Member

 
FAST RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Moorpark
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 CAMARO 1968 FIREBIRD
Engine: CAMARO 3.1L FIREBIRD 455
Transmission: CAMARO 700R4 FIREBIRD TH-400
I get about 30 MPG city/HWY My car does not pull like it use to i got the car with 130,000 on it. How ever it does have a deacent high end and it does have power when it feels like it wants to. I know my cam is probly worn to hell but im not gonna touch anything just because it may cause new problems.
Old 05-23-2004, 05:09 PM
  #33  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
jay92,85,79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: glenwood IL
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85z28,
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
3.1 here to first time ever haveing a camaro with a v6 not to bad it has 115000. I see people talking about put a 3.4 in would a 4.3 work in a camaro i had one of them in a 86 monty i had and it was a pretty fast car.Or I allways wonder y GM never used that motor in the comaros.
Old 05-24-2004, 09:43 PM
  #34  
Senior Member

 
eric17422001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 3
Engine: inboard
Transmission: underfloor
One more three point one checking in from the hot humid coastal south! 200,123 and not burning a drop of oil!
Old 05-24-2004, 11:34 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
FirebirdNYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ozone Park, NYC
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 firebird
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 700R4
awesome, i plan on keeping my firebird for a very long time, i want to see how long this baby will last before major break down, not that im trying to beat my car up but it would sure be fun to see hella mileage on a car that runs great.. my uncle owns a 79 regal, *** knows how many miles that baby got, she runs like a beauty for old *** car. thats his beater, and when i say beater i mean beater, the thing got rust all over the place , half the time he leaves it unlocked, nobody really wants to steal a car that has 5 different color of rusts , i love driving that monster , 4.9 liter , gota love the loose steering wheel , its like driving a ship, and of course the squeeking dashboard

Last edited by FirebirdNYC; 05-24-2004 at 11:36 PM.
Old 05-25-2004, 10:48 AM
  #36  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
entrig00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: t-5
almost hitting 20

Thanks Kj Rockz.......number 16...nice number


jay92,85,79 - Thanks jay for popping in.


eric17422001 - thanks eric for showing up....






18 people..........
Old 05-25-2004, 11:21 AM
  #37  
Supreme Member
 
elevario's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tucson, Az, USA
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: 3.1L V6
Transmission: T5
3.1L here! I love it but hate it at the same time! i want more power!! 128,000 miles and still running as strong as when I got it at 98,000. I'm proud of her and she has served me well!
Old 05-25-2004, 12:06 PM
  #38  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
entrig00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: t-5
Thanks elevario

Hey elevario thanks for popping in man. 128,000....I'm at the same number. I say the same thing also.....I love it but then I hate it....but I still love my baby. I've been wanting some more power also. I think I should lookin into getting the timing chain changed...I was told that makes a pretty big change....


I see that your from Tucson, kickass. We need to hang out and gather some people ( I know theres some people in this thread that are from Tucson) sometime in the weekend...Let me know whatca think....


Again thanks for popping in.


Your number 19........nice!!!
Old 05-25-2004, 05:54 PM
  #39  
Member
 
kevo2k6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L v6
Transmission: 700r4 auto
3.2 90 rs right here!!! auto though :'(
Old 05-25-2004, 08:01 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
FirebirdNYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ozone Park, NYC
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 firebird
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 700R4
3.2 90 rs
EHum
Old 05-25-2004, 09:08 PM
  #41  
Member
 
kevo2k6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L v6
Transmission: 700r4 auto
ooops

mah bad cant type. u prolly all thought i was stupid as hell. its the 3.1!!! they dont even make a 3.2 do they?
Old 05-25-2004, 10:06 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
FirebirdNYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ozone Park, NYC
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 firebird
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 700R4
i dont think they made them for firebirds or camaros, im pretty sure somebody out there has a 3.2 under there hood, as a matter of fact i think my boys van has a 3.2 , fun as hell trying to get his car to burnout
Old 05-26-2004, 10:15 AM
  #43  
Member
 
92RS3.1L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Shelby Twp. MI
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: Rebuilt and modified 350
Transmission: rebuilt T-5
Re: Were all the 3.1 people?....

Originally posted by entrig00
I was reading through some threads and I noticed that there is a hell of allot of people in the V6 thread that have 2.8. Were all the 3.1 people? Is it just me or is there crap load of 2.8?

Theres times I feel alone with my 3.1.

82-89 V6 engines were 2.8L. 90-92 were the 3.1L engines. We are the elite few!
Old 05-26-2004, 01:20 PM
  #44  
Supreme Member
 
Kj Rockz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Mililani, HI USofA Search Posts: 2848.............. Whore Posts: 47.................. Magical Whore Posts: 1
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro 77K
Engine: 3.1 Vslick
Re: ooops

Originally posted by kevo2k6
mah bad cant type. u prolly all thought i was stupid as hell. its the 3.1!!! they dont even make a 3.2 do they?
I'm pretty sure that you can bore out the engine to 3.2.
Old 05-26-2004, 05:01 PM
  #45  
Junior Member

 
78camaroz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 40
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 2001 Trans Am WS6
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Out of 4 F-bodies I own...1 of them is a 92 RS w/ 3.1
New motor on the stand ready to drop in within the week...
Old 05-26-2004, 06:55 PM
  #46  
Supreme Member
 
Kj Rockz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Mililani, HI USofA Search Posts: 2848.............. Whore Posts: 47.................. Magical Whore Posts: 1
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro 77K
Engine: 3.1 Vslick
Here is my hella dirty 3.1
Attached Thumbnails Were all the 3.1 people?....-31insidebayoptima.jpg  
Old 05-26-2004, 09:40 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
FirebirdNYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ozone Park, NYC
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 firebird
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 700R4


we should all throw pics of the beast we have under the hood :rockon:
Old 05-26-2004, 09:53 PM
  #48  
Supreme Member
 
Kj Rockz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Mililani, HI USofA Search Posts: 2848.............. Whore Posts: 47.................. Magical Whore Posts: 1
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro 77K
Engine: 3.1 Vslick
Originally posted by FirebirdNYC


we should all throw pics of the beast we have under the hood :rockon:
thats good idea, glad I started it, lets unite.
Old 05-26-2004, 10:31 PM
  #49  
Supreme Member

 
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
here's a pic of mine. i think i've got a better one somewhere but i'll have to find it later.

Old 05-26-2004, 10:38 PM
  #50  
Supreme Member
 
Kj Rockz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Mililani, HI USofA Search Posts: 2848.............. Whore Posts: 47.................. Magical Whore Posts: 1
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro 77K
Engine: 3.1 Vslick
Originally posted by AM91Camaro_RS
here's a pic of mine. i think i've got a better one somewhere but i'll have to find it later.
Ooh blue, I likes that


Quick Reply: Were all the 3.1 people?....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 PM.