More Power with larger gap????
#1
More Power with larger gap????
Hey guys,
I've supposedly heard that by gapping your spark plugs slightly wider, you can increase the horsepower of your motor, or the efficiency, IE: fuel economy, performance, smooth idle, etc.
I have the Accel high output ignition coil. Before everyone gets crazy, I've had it on for 40k miles, and it still works great, but I keep a spare too!
So, with that in mind, what is the benefit to having a shorter gap, or a taller spark plug gap?
Anyone have any experience or would like to add something to this?
Thanks,
I've supposedly heard that by gapping your spark plugs slightly wider, you can increase the horsepower of your motor, or the efficiency, IE: fuel economy, performance, smooth idle, etc.
I have the Accel high output ignition coil. Before everyone gets crazy, I've had it on for 40k miles, and it still works great, but I keep a spare too!
So, with that in mind, what is the benefit to having a shorter gap, or a taller spark plug gap?
Anyone have any experience or would like to add something to this?
Thanks,
#2
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
a longer gap will allow more spark flame to ignite the mixture. However, coma, you don'y want to go too far, as you might actually break/weaken the center electrode from the plug.
#3
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Don't know about the center electrode... generally, a longer gap increases the amount of spark available to the mixture = cleaner burn = better emissions.
On the other side, a smaller gap = stronger spark (for forced induction and such) but less spark shown to the mixture.
Too small a gap might burn an electrode...
On the other side, a smaller gap = stronger spark (for forced induction and such) but less spark shown to the mixture.
Too small a gap might burn an electrode...
#4
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
yeah, the longer gaps were used to help better burn the leaner mixtures on the old smogger cars, such as my 76 Bonnie & 77 T/A. gap was .060 if I remember right.
#5
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Originally posted by Project: 85 2.8 bird
yeah, the longer gaps were used to help better burn the leaner mixtures on the old smogger cars, such as my 76 Bonnie & 77 T/A. gap was .060 if I remember right.
yeah, the longer gaps were used to help better burn the leaner mixtures on the old smogger cars, such as my 76 Bonnie & 77 T/A. gap was .060 if I remember right.
'77 Firebird Esprit (354 Poncho) @ .060" gap.
#6
Banned
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Run a higher volt coil, AND run wires with very low resistence that will relieve the charge from the coil to the plugs without straining the coil (without causing heat buildup and weakening the volt output of the coil) and yes you will have a better, more complete burn resulting in more power.
A hotter coil and very good wires will allow you to open the plug gap for a larger ignition trigger without weakening the spark.
A hotter coil and very good wires will allow you to open the plug gap for a larger ignition trigger without weakening the spark.
#7
Everyone's always told me to cut the gap .001" for every 10whp you make over stock. Stock gap on LS1s was .060, I've dropped down to .050, most the guys I know running nitrous go down to about .040 or .035.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
I don't know what stock is, but I set all mine down to .035", just to be sure that the spark will be strong enough to ignite the compressed mixture...
#9
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
I had tried going to 0.050", didn't notice much improvement. Tried 0.055", car was sluggish off the line, and reeked of gasoline when it idled. This was all with the MSD 6AL box and Blaster SS coil, and changes were done back-to-back. (Good thing for gloves!)
I went back to 0.045, and never played with it again... this was, what, 3 years ago I guess?
I went back to 0.045, and never played with it again... this was, what, 3 years ago I guess?
#12
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
Damn, that was a HUGE increase, I wonder that the electrode didn't break
.005 should have been max, as you fond the car wold still run, and longer was just too long.
.005 should have been max, as you fond the car wold still run, and longer was just too long.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
diana227vegas
Camaros for Sale
10
07-08-2016 01:27 AM
sailtexas186548
Problems / Help / Suggestions / Comments
2
08-24-2015 11:11 PM