high flow cat.. yes or no?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700 R4
high flow cat.. yes or no?
I've been hearing different opinions about getting a high flow cat for a v6. What are the advantages/disadvantages of it?
#2
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
There's really no disadvantages...
stock cat (original from when car was new)
-pellet beds break up over time and clog exhaust
high flow cat
-costs less then a new stock cat
-higher flow then original cat
-bolt right in
*might not lower emissions as much as a new GM cat
new GM cat
-very expensive
-higher flow then original cat
-bolt right in
-lower emissions then high-flow cat (tested by Hot Rod on dyno)
new parts store "generic" cat
-more expensive then high-flow, less expensive then GM
-no idea about flow rate
-usually sold as "universals", to bolt in, need to buy $15 kit
-no idea about emissions
GM got "better" at designing cats as they went along... for example, the early cats from the '70's were complete pieces of crap that choked the exhaust flow. That's why people removed them- they instantly felt a power increase.
Later, GM realized that a cat that doesn't choke the engine will produce less emissions- the more efficient an engine is, the less emissions it makes.
So the newer the GM cat the better it flows.
Hot Rod did a test once on a big block using no cat, a high flow cat, and a brand new GM cat. They tested horsepower and emissions. With a new GM cat, the motor only lost 1 or 2 horsepower over an aftermarket cat, BUT, emissions dropped almost 3 times as much! So if you're in a smog-strict state (like California or NJ) you might want to think about dropping the $300+ bux for a new GM cat if you have trouble passing emissions.
stock cat (original from when car was new)
-pellet beds break up over time and clog exhaust
high flow cat
-costs less then a new stock cat
-higher flow then original cat
-bolt right in
*might not lower emissions as much as a new GM cat
new GM cat
-very expensive
-higher flow then original cat
-bolt right in
-lower emissions then high-flow cat (tested by Hot Rod on dyno)
new parts store "generic" cat
-more expensive then high-flow, less expensive then GM
-no idea about flow rate
-usually sold as "universals", to bolt in, need to buy $15 kit
-no idea about emissions
GM got "better" at designing cats as they went along... for example, the early cats from the '70's were complete pieces of crap that choked the exhaust flow. That's why people removed them- they instantly felt a power increase.
Later, GM realized that a cat that doesn't choke the engine will produce less emissions- the more efficient an engine is, the less emissions it makes.
So the newer the GM cat the better it flows.
Hot Rod did a test once on a big block using no cat, a high flow cat, and a brand new GM cat. They tested horsepower and emissions. With a new GM cat, the motor only lost 1 or 2 horsepower over an aftermarket cat, BUT, emissions dropped almost 3 times as much! So if you're in a smog-strict state (like California or NJ) you might want to think about dropping the $300+ bux for a new GM cat if you have trouble passing emissions.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2006 'Nox 91 Camaro RS 91 1500 Silv
Engine: GM 3.8L, 305 SBC, 350 SBC
Transmission: Auto, auto, auto
keep in mind that GM cat isn't $300 for no reason. There's a lot of engineering in that which is why it flows so well and puts out so few emissions....it could be the platinum internals too
Tom, I assume you have that catco converter that you're always peddling from summit?
You live in NJ too right?
Ever had a problem at the sniffer station
Tom, I assume you have that catco converter that you're always peddling from summit?
You live in NJ too right?
Ever had a problem at the sniffer station
#4
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
I don't have catco; it's made by "Products for Power", which was supposedly a Dynomax company. I got it in '96, and it's not in Summit's catalogs anymore; don't know what happened to it... got it for $60. Granted that was 7 years ago... Karl (KED85, where's he been lately?) knows of a source for the PFP cat. I think it's Don's automotive?
I haven't had any problems passing the sniffer with it. In fact, with the old pre-"dyno/ASM 5015" test, the regular tailipipe sniffer during idle, I passed for 2 years with a gutted cat. I didn't know it was gutted until I removed it to put the high-flow cat on.
But I'm sure this ASM 50/15 dyno test would notice- and I've passed that twice, no problems.
I haven't had any problems passing the sniffer with it. In fact, with the old pre-"dyno/ASM 5015" test, the regular tailipipe sniffer during idle, I passed for 2 years with a gutted cat. I didn't know it was gutted until I removed it to put the high-flow cat on.
But I'm sure this ASM 50/15 dyno test would notice- and I've passed that twice, no problems.
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
I just finished putting in Dynomax superconverter #15735 (although the rest of the exhaust is not back together yet, I haven't driven my car for almost two weeks) which I don't think is "high-flow", but it is supposedly better flowing than a generic cat. It looks pretty much the same as the one I took off, but hopefully it's better.
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Moorpark
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 CAMARO 1968 FIREBIRD
Engine: CAMARO 3.1L FIREBIRD 455
Transmission: CAMARO 700R4 FIREBIRD TH-400
I got a dynomax cat and have never had a problem and i have cali emissions to pass. I pass flawlessy each time my car has 222,XXX miles on the engine.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UltRoadWarrior9
Tech / General Engine
336
04-28-2020 10:39 PM