V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

high flow cat.. yes or no?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-12-2003, 08:23 AM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
 
ChevyGuy5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700 R4
high flow cat.. yes or no?

I've been hearing different opinions about getting a high flow cat for a v6. What are the advantages/disadvantages of it?
Old 08-12-2003, 02:26 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
TomP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
There's really no disadvantages...

stock cat (original from when car was new)
-pellet beds break up over time and clog exhaust

high flow cat
-costs less then a new stock cat
-higher flow then original cat
-bolt right in
*might not lower emissions as much as a new GM cat

new GM cat
-very expensive
-higher flow then original cat
-bolt right in
-lower emissions then high-flow cat (tested by Hot Rod on dyno)

new parts store "generic" cat
-more expensive then high-flow, less expensive then GM
-no idea about flow rate
-usually sold as "universals", to bolt in, need to buy $15 kit
-no idea about emissions

GM got "better" at designing cats as they went along... for example, the early cats from the '70's were complete pieces of crap that choked the exhaust flow. That's why people removed them- they instantly felt a power increase.

Later, GM realized that a cat that doesn't choke the engine will produce less emissions- the more efficient an engine is, the less emissions it makes.

So the newer the GM cat the better it flows.

Hot Rod did a test once on a big block using no cat, a high flow cat, and a brand new GM cat. They tested horsepower and emissions. With a new GM cat, the motor only lost 1 or 2 horsepower over an aftermarket cat, BUT, emissions dropped almost 3 times as much! So if you're in a smog-strict state (like California or NJ) you might want to think about dropping the $300+ bux for a new GM cat if you have trouble passing emissions.
Old 08-12-2003, 08:19 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
Damien00677's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2006 'Nox 91 Camaro RS 91 1500 Silv
Engine: GM 3.8L, 305 SBC, 350 SBC
Transmission: Auto, auto, auto
keep in mind that GM cat isn't $300 for no reason. There's a lot of engineering in that which is why it flows so well and puts out so few emissions....it could be the platinum internals too

Tom, I assume you have that catco converter that you're always peddling from summit?
You live in NJ too right?
Ever had a problem at the sniffer station
Old 08-13-2003, 02:04 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

 
TomP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
I don't have catco; it's made by "Products for Power", which was supposedly a Dynomax company. I got it in '96, and it's not in Summit's catalogs anymore; don't know what happened to it... got it for $60. Granted that was 7 years ago... Karl (KED85, where's he been lately?) knows of a source for the PFP cat. I think it's Don's automotive?

I haven't had any problems passing the sniffer with it. In fact, with the old pre-"dyno/ASM 5015" test, the regular tailipipe sniffer during idle, I passed for 2 years with a gutted cat. I didn't know it was gutted until I removed it to put the high-flow cat on.

But I'm sure this ASM 50/15 dyno test would notice- and I've passed that twice, no problems.
Old 08-13-2003, 02:13 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

 
camaro_junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
I just finished putting in Dynomax superconverter #15735 (although the rest of the exhaust is not back together yet, I haven't driven my car for almost two weeks) which I don't think is "high-flow", but it is supposedly better flowing than a generic cat. It looks pretty much the same as the one I took off, but hopefully it's better.
Old 08-13-2003, 06:30 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
FAST RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Moorpark
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 CAMARO 1968 FIREBIRD
Engine: CAMARO 3.1L FIREBIRD 455
Transmission: CAMARO 700R4 FIREBIRD TH-400
I got a dynomax cat and have never had a problem and i have cali emissions to pass. I pass flawlessy each time my car has 222,XXX miles on the engine.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UltRoadWarrior9
Tech / General Engine
336
04-28-2020 10:39 PM
randy210
Cooling
3
10-15-2015 03:43 PM
327IROC85
Electronics
8
09-23-2015 12:11 AM
corey8084
Cooling
48
09-17-2015 02:56 PM
89fast5oh
Exhaust
2
09-08-2015 09:55 AM



Quick Reply: high flow cat.. yes or no?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 AM.