V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Turbo Update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2003, 03:35 PM
  #101  
Member
 
vortex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Mustang GT Vert
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T5
We don't have to rebuild the motor.. its just the turbo seal is leaking and fouling the plugs... my guess is they were dry rotted from when they were sitting on a shelf... and it's 10 years old. Im thinking we should just upgrade the turbo at the same time.
vortex is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 03:41 PM
  #102  
Supreme Member

 
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
were you talking about the bearings in the turbo then? i thought that you meant the main bearings in the motor.
AM91Camaro_RS is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 03:53 PM
  #103  
Member
 
vortex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Mustang GT Vert
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T5
well yeah,i was, but i was just saying when we pull the oil pan (now with custom speed hole) I would like to see if anything was damaged.. the jack didnt go in enough, but its good to find out whut got fuggered up. I want to consult with Doward on the decision makings, but i believe we pretty much decided to rebuild the turbo and see how it goes..
vortex is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 05:01 PM
  #104  
Banned
 
Lee7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E
Originally posted by vortex
well yeah,i was, but i was just saying when we pull the oil pan (now with custom speed hole) I would like to see if anything was damaged.. the jack didnt go in enough, but its good to find out whut got fuggered up. I want to consult with Doward on the decision makings, but i believe we pretty much decided to rebuild the turbo and see how it goes..
i would replace the oil pump with a high volume one while i had the oil pan off.

Better safe than sorry, high oil pressure is always a good thing.
Lee7 is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 05:08 PM
  #105  
Member
 
vortex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Mustang GT Vert
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T5
there in lies the problem.. unless its different with your cars, for high volume pumps you need to have 7 qts. of oil.. because it sucks it out too fast for the crank to get an oil bath..
then your bottom end goes.
vortex is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 05:12 PM
  #106  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
Doward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Lee7, a few pointers -

http://tiago.phxchevy.com/

Tiago's running 7psi, not 20 man... and he's also got new heads and all. He's done a LOT of work to his car!

Also, oil pressure means nothing. Oil flow is important! I'll happily trade 10psi pressure for 10gph flow.



Anyway, IROC... man... you can't believe anyone would ever sell a turbo kit with PVC, do you? The final setup will be fully stainless steel, mandrel bent piping. Intake and exhaust...

The key is - THE TURBO WORKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ordering the seals Monday.... hopefully. Either way, guys, this has been a hell of a ride!
Doward is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 05:37 PM
  #107  
Banned
 
Lee7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E
Originally posted by Doward
Lee7, a few pointers -

http://tiago.phxchevy.com/

Tiago's running 7psi, not 20 man... and he's also got new heads and all. He's done a LOT of work to his car!

Also, oil pressure means nothing. Oil flow is important! I'll happily trade 10psi pressure for 10gph flow.



Anyway, IROC... man... you can't believe anyone would ever sell a turbo kit with PVC, do you? The final setup will be fully stainless steel, mandrel bent piping. Intake and exhaust...

The key is - THE TURBO WORKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ordering the seals Monday.... hopefully. Either way, guys, this has been a hell of a ride!
i have talked to both Tiago and his freind boostnzsandm, Boost told me tiago ran up to 20psi of boost on the dyno pull where get made 400ft/lbs of TQ. He doesnt run it normally like that, but did it once for that run. There is no way you are going to make 400ft/lbs of torque on just 7psi of boost.

yeah, he has ported heads and stuff, be he also still has the stock bottom end. Yours heads are not very likely to break under that much power, the first thing to go would be the cast pistons.

And oil PRESSURE is what keeps the main bearings and rod bearings spinning on a film of oil, not volume.

You dont need a 7qt oil pan to use a high volume oil pump, Fiero's have the same size oil pan as us and they use the pump just fine.

EDIT:

New Dyno numbers are in, 336rwhp and 397 rwtq, still from the internally stock 3.4L. Impressive, even I am surprised how well it likes boost. Seems like Ive maxed out my current turbo, t72 comign up. Videos can be seen in the videos section.
And there is no way 7psi of boost is going to max out a T04 :sillylol:

Last edited by Lee7; 08-07-2003 at 05:52 PM.
Lee7 is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 05:44 PM
  #108  
Banned
 
Lee7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E
Originally posted by vortex
there in lies the problem.. unless its different with your cars, for high volume pumps you need to have 7 qts. of oil.. because it sucks it out too fast for the crank to get an oil bath..
then your bottom end goes.
ehh, the crank never dips into the oil, and if it did... that would be a bad thing. The only place where the crank needs to be oil'ed is on the bearings, and all that is supplied by oil plumbing in the block and crankshaft. (if you ever look at a crankshaft, you will see holes in it, that is where the oil comes out of)

Oil on the crank weights and stuff is a bad thing, that little bit of wieght can throw things off ballance.

Why do you think alot of race engines have "crank scrapers" installed?
Lee7 is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 05:52 PM
  #109  
Member
 
vortex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Mustang GT Vert
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T5
wow... ok where did i say the crank swims in oil? I was merely stating that high volume oil pumps on most engines will pull all of the oil out of the pan... and that is a bad thing..
vortex is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 05:53 PM
  #110  
Banned
 
Lee7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E
Originally posted by vortex
wow... ok where did i say the crank swims in oil? I was merely stating that high volume oil pumps on most engines will pull all of the oil out of the pan... and that is a bad thing..
well, you did say the crank takes an "oil bath"
Lee7 is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 05:55 PM
  #111  
Member
 
vortex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Mustang GT Vert
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T5
yes... the crankshaft does have oil on it during operation, its not submerged in oil. and those "crank scrapers" as you put it, are called windage trays.. they block most of the oil from getting on the crank but allow some at certain points.
vortex is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 06:00 PM
  #112  
Banned
 
Lee7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E
Originally posted by vortex
yes... the crankshaft does have oil on it during operation, its not submerged in oil. and those "crank scrapers" as you put it, are called windage trays.. they block most of the oil from getting on the crank but allow some at certain points.
crank scrapers and windage trays are 2 different things.

Windage trays prevent the wind from the crankshaft from making a "wall" of air and not letting the oil past it to go back down into the sump thing.

Oil scrapers are exactly what it says, they scrape the oil off of the crankshaft so that the extra weight of the oil doesnt throw the crank offballance.

Sometimes you can get a windage tray with a crank scraper on it, but normally they do not come with one.
Lee7 is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 06:15 PM
  #113  
Supreme Member
 
funstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: great lakes
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my question is did i nail the tune or not ??? im curios as hell about that. any comments ?
funstick is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 07:01 PM
  #114  
Senior Member
 
The_Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Nest
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
Just to correct an oiling issue, the holes in the crank are for rod bearing oiling, that is transfered from the main bearings, the oil supply to the main bearings comes from the left, lifter oil galley, that also feed the cam bearings, the left oil galley gets it's oil from a passage drilled vertically that goes to the filter mount, which gets it's oil from the passage leading to the rear main journal.

I know backwards way to describe the oil flow, but in this we see that the rods are the last part to get oil, which means that those holes in the crank are the second last thing to see oil under pressure.
The_Raven is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 07:18 PM
  #115  
Supreme Member

 
camaro_junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
Well, having personally compared super to turbo, I have always been a fan of supers. And I thought if I ever took on a project like this it would be a super. But the work of Doward and Vortex is pulling me over to the other side.

Congratulations on breaking through the barrier guys. Don't listen to all that other crap that people are telling you. You did it. It works. It's not very pretty... yet. It works though. And now that you know it works you can justify spending the money making it reliable and pretty. Why would someone think you would put a crapload of money into something that might not work? But now you've proven it does.
camaro_junkie is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 07:33 PM
  #116  
Banned
 
Lee7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E
Originally posted by The_Raven
Just to correct an oiling issue, the holes in the crank are for rod bearing oiling, that is transfered from the main bearings, the oil supply to the main bearings comes from the left, lifter oil galley, that also feed the cam bearings, the left oil galley gets it's oil from a passage drilled vertically that goes to the filter mount, which gets it's oil from the passage leading to the rear main journal.

I know backwards way to describe the oil flow, but in this we see that the rods are the last part to get oil, which means that those holes in the crank are the second last thing to see oil under pressure.
you are correct, in our engines, the 2 most important things to get oil, get it last, which is why the Pre-85 blocks had alot of oiling problems, until they revised it a little.

Even after revisions, the main bearings are the 2nd to last to get oil, and rod bearings are last. Which is why its pretty damn important to keep up oil pressure and volume.

GM Sells a High Volume oil pump for our engines, and just by changing the springs you can turn it into a high volume AND high pressure pump. (80 PSI to be exact)

IMO, anyone wanting to do any type of performance build up on these blocks, and skips the upgraded oil pump is asking for major trouble.
Lee7 is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 07:34 PM
  #117  
Banned
 
Lee7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E
Originally posted by camaro_junkie
Well, having personally compared super to turbo, I have always been a fan of supers. And I thought if I ever took on a project like this it would be a super. But the work of Doward and Vortex is pulling me over to the other side.

Congratulations on breaking through the barrier guys. Don't listen to all that other crap that people are telling you. You did it. It works. It's not very pretty... yet. It works though. And now that you know it works you can justify spending the money making it reliable and pretty. Why would someone think you would put a crapload of money into something that might not work? But now you've proven it does.
Turbo > *

The sound of a turbo is just amazing, it makes me almost want to cream my pants.

Superchargers have this loud *** shrieking sound, which makes all non-educated people think your car is broke and is a POS.
Lee7 is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 07:36 PM
  #118  
Senior Member
 
The_Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Nest
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
Originally posted by camaro_junkie
Don't listen to all that other crap that people are telling you. You did it. It works. It's not very pretty... yet. It works though. And now that you know it works you can justify spending the money making it reliable and pretty. Why would someone think you would put a crapload of money into something that might not work? But now you've proven it does.
I had the same train of thought with my build, well I was sure it was going to "work", but I wanted to see how well, and to what extremes it would take to make it work well. No point in putting too much money into it before you know if the combo will work.
The_Raven is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 07:59 PM
  #119  
Supreme Member
 
funstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: great lakes
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
most engines hace similar type oiling. with a hv pump the best thing you can do is to have the valve trian oiling restricted.otherwise that hv pump will flood the vavle covers and pump the pan dry.
funstick is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 08:19 PM
  #120  
Supreme Member

 
camaro_junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
Originally posted by Lee7
Turbo > *

The sound of a turbo is just amazing, it makes me almost want to cream my pants.

Superchargers have this loud *** shrieking sound, which makes all non-educated people think your car is broke and is a POS.
I won't argue that turbos are awesome, but I just like the feel of the super better, that's all. It's different for other people I'm sure.
camaro_junkie is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 08:30 PM
  #121  
Banned
 
Lee7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E
Originally posted by funstick
most engines hace similar type oiling. with a hv pump the best thing you can do is to have the valve trian oiling restricted.otherwise that hv pump will flood the vavle covers and pump the pan dry.
i doubt it, because not 100% of the oil goes to the rocker arms, i doubt even 10% goes to the rockers since they dont need that much oil anyways. The heads have a pretty decent channeling design to channel oil back into the lifter valleys, so its basically impossible for oil to be "stuck" in the valve covers because gravity sends it right back down to the oil gallery.

if you have ever seen the oil gallery's you can easily tell that its almost impossible to get even a half quart of oil in there without it spilling over the edge and back down into the oil pan.

the oil gallery is pretty small, i dont see how it would be possible to have even a half quart of oil in there.

If the oil gallery only uses up about a half quart, and the oil filter uses about that much, that gives us only a 1 quart of oil thats NOT in the oil pan, so you have 4 quarts of oil left sitting in the pan waiting to get sucked up! Thus it is very very unlikely that the pump would pump all the oil up to the top of the engine.

And even if the pump somehow miraculously managed to pump all the oil into the valve covers, gravity would just send it right back down to the oil pan.

And you also have to think about it this way, why in the hell would GM sell you, and recomend a high volume oil pump if they thought it would starve the oil pump itself of oil?
Lee7 is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 09:24 PM
  #122  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting thread , although I dont quite understand why you half *** something together. I respect the effort, just not sure how your expecting that junk to provide good results. No flame intended.
614Streets is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 09:28 PM
  #123  
Member
 
vortex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Mustang GT Vert
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T5
You're right, we are not expecting junk to do anything good.

We have Proven that it works.. and its taken a little 2.8 down at least a second.. Not as fast as my stang, but hey, at least we dared to try it, and we actually did it.. i wanna know who else can say that. any other currently boosted 2.8 thirdgen'ers on here?
vortex is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 09:31 PM
  #124  
Supreme Member

 
camaro_junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
Well, I wouldn't say half a$$ed. It's more like having the courage to spend some money to see if it works. It's all about R&D. And as for results, I can't speak for the heroes, but I would guess they were hoping for good results, but only expecting results. So if you don't have anything nice to say, go buy an import.
camaro_junkie is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 10:08 PM
  #125  
Banned
 
Lee7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E
Originally posted by 614Streets
Interesting thread , although I dont quite understand why you half *** something together. I respect the effort, just not sure how your expecting that junk to provide good results. No flame intended.
thats just a very very early prototype thing, they didnt expect it to work good at all, they just expected it to work. And it did, so they accomplished what they were trying to do. Now they are going to build a more robust and non-ghetto rigged system to see how it can really perform.

of course, i would not expect you to know this since you probably did not read all of this thread, or the other 2 threads about this setup.

Its not your fault tho, whatever dumb *** admin at these forums decided to set the default post per thread count to like 75 needs to be shot, its retarded.

Anyways, i like i was saying earlier, they knew it was going to be crappy, they knew it wasnt going to work at optimum efficiency, they knew all this. They did a great job of doing what they set out to do. Turbocharge a 2.8L 3rd gen.

Their next build will hopefully be better.
Lee7 is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 10:12 PM
  #126  
Banned
 
Lee7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E
Originally posted by vortex
You're right, we are not expecting junk to do anything good.

We have Proven that it works.. and its taken a little 2.8 down at least a second.. Not as fast as my stang, but hey, at least we dared to try it, and we actually did it.. i wanna know who else can say that. any other currently boosted 2.8 thirdgen'ers on here?
this is 614Streets setup:









his setup is awsome, but i dont think its going into a 3rd gen.

Still awsome by any means.

Last edited by Lee7; 08-07-2003 at 10:14 PM.
Lee7 is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 10:36 PM
  #127  
Supreme Member
 
Nixon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
Holyyyy crap.... I wanna hump it...
Nixon1 is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 10:43 PM
  #128  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I RESPECT the labor , I RESPECT the effort , I RESPECT the determination. If you guys take it to the next level and actually spend some money to do it right , you will prove yourself to me you really like these engines and you have bigger and better dreams.

All in all Id like to see you succeed and go fast. And by fast I mean 13's or better. Trust me I have faced the walls with the 60.


I know if you could you would fab up a better set up. Time will tell if you have the desire to do so. As you maybe can tell by my attitude Ive been with 60 v6's since 1997 and been reaserching them since 1994.
614Streets is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 11:19 PM
  #129  
Banned
 
Lee7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E
Originally posted by 614Streets
I know if you could you would fab up a better set up. Time will tell if you have the desire to do so. As you maybe can tell by my attitude Ive been with 60 v6's since 1997 and been reaserching them since 1994.
would you happen to know where to get a 3.31" Forged crank?

Ive been searching everywhere for like 2 months now, and still nothing

I know those midget class racer guys have to know where to get some forged cranks.
Lee7 is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 11:32 PM
  #130  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Lee7
would you happen to know where to get a 3.31" Forged crank?

Ive been searching everywhere for like 2 months now, and still nothing

I know those midget class racer guys have to know where to get some forged cranks.
Sure do , Moldex in detroit michigan. I think I still have the phone number and address somewhere. In the mean time search moldex crankshaft.
614Streets is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 11:39 PM
  #131  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Moldex Tool Co crankshafts
25249 W. Warren Avenue
Dearborn Heights MI 48127
313-561-7676
614Streets is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 11:54 PM
  #132  
Senior Member
 
The_Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Nest
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
Originally posted by vortex
You're right, we are not expecting junk to do anything good.

We have Proven that it works.. and its taken a little 2.8 down at least a second.. Not as fast as my stang, but hey, at least we dared to try it, and we actually did it.. i wanna know who else can say that. any other currently boosted 2.8 thirdgen'ers on here?
Mines not a third gen, or a 2.8, but it is a 60*V6, that is boosted, my first custom turbo build, and I think it turned out well, Does that count?

As for the hostility, flaming, critisism, etc, what ever you want to call it, I'm not sure it was all inteneded to be down right negitive, but it could be read in that manner. Honestly I too when, I saw the pics with the PCV, kinda shook my head, but I can see how it would be a quick easy way to do such a set-up and see if any drastic changes need to be made, and I'm sure that it will be changed in the future, and an improvement will be seen from such, being not limited to 90s and 45s, but any angle you could want.

I know how expensive this can be, to do a custom turbo set-up, I spent somewhere around $2000 CDN on my engine build AND turbocharging, I used some used stock parts, like rods, the crank, block, heads, valves, etc, because I figured that since this was just my daily driver, and a research project to see what lets go first, I didn't want to spend a lot of cash on it, from the beginning, I was trying to do it for around the $1000 mark, but when I found out the block I bought was already .030" over, well I kinda needed new pistons, that sent the budget up about $400 CDN right there, and a few other unforseen things came up. I have between $1000 to $1200 into my engine alone, about $500 into my turbo set-up and the rest is all the small parts and hoses etc to make it all work, like they say, what ever you think it will cost you, double it, it worked in my situation.
The_Raven is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 09:21 AM
  #133  
Junior Member
 
TravisZ28MAXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NE florida
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Z28 and 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: both L98s one with SD and one with MAF
Transmission: both 700R4s
hey 614, where di you get your intake for that supercharger, is it a factory two barrel converted?if so did you do the machining yourself or did you have some one else do it? thats a cool setup might have to imitate you if I can get your specs on that motor
TravisZ28MAXX is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 01:05 PM
  #134  
Supreme Member

 
TechSmurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Well, I got most of the passenger's side of the engine compartment cleared out yesterday... two bolts holding in the manifold.. interesting notes, a bolt was missing, the entire egr assembly was loose, found a vac leak in egr, and noticed a distinct lack of gaskets.... I'm amazed my car had any power to speak of =P

still need to unbolt the Y-pipe today, cut it from the main exhaust, and bring it with me to Tucson to weld a plate onto it, effectively making it a U pipe. Mandrel piece in the future. Looking at the fun I'll encounter with the alternator relocation, I'm considering instead routing my exhaust under the stock alternator location and adding heat shields for the water and electrical above.. just too much of a hassle at the moment.. oh well. Have a fun weekend, folks.. catch you guys next week
TechSmurf is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 03:31 PM
  #135  
Banned
 
Lee7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E
Originally posted by 614Streets
Moldex Tool Co crankshafts
25249 W. Warren Avenue
Dearborn Heights MI 48127
313-561-7676
i called.

the guy who specialise's(sp?) in Crankshafts wasnt in, but the guy on the phone said it would run roughly $2150 (US)

damn... i cant get that now, i guess i will have to use the 981 forging crankshaft until i can afford it later on down the line.
Lee7 is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 05:48 PM
  #136  
Member
 
F585's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Paradise, CA
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Dow, you know how to bang a dent out of a fender right?
F585 is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 10:42 PM
  #137  
Supreme Member
 
funstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: great lakes
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
at molodex youll need to talk with (little joe ) tell him d&s motorsports reffered you.
funstick is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 10:48 PM
  #138  
Banned
 
Lee7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E
Originally posted by funstick
at molodex youll need to talk with (little joe ) tell him d&s motorsports reffered you.
ok cool, i will call on monday.

Will this make the price any lower, i think the price the guy quoted me for was for a totally custom V6 crank, and not one that they have the forging blueprints on hand.
Lee7 is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 10:52 PM
  #139  
Member
 
F585's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Paradise, CA
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard about those cranks http://www.eastendsc.com/
F585 is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 11:21 PM
  #140  
Supreme Member
 
funstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: great lakes
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Lee7
ok cool, i will call on monday.

Will this make the price any lower, i think the price the guy quoted me for was for a totally custom V6 crank, and not one that they have the forging blueprints on hand.
most of the cranks molodex does for custm stuff are billet. there like 5 minutes from where i work. anyway they qouted you for a billet. little joe is big time hooked up with parts. there are some forgings out there and if anybody knows where they are itll be little joe.so tell him what you need im sure he will find it somewhere.
funstick is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 11:39 PM
  #141  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Lee7
ok cool, i will call on monday.

Will this make the price any lower, i think the price the guy quoted me for was for a totally custom V6 crank, and not one that they have the forging blueprints on hand.
Uh they do have the blueprint for the 3.1 crank , dont let them tell you otherwise.
614Streets is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 10:53 AM
  #142  
Banned
 
Lee7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E
alright, so "Little Joe" is the guy i guess i should be talking to?

I hope he is in on Monday when i call up. Yeah, $2150 does sound alot like the price for a custom billet crank, not a forged crank they have the blueprints to.
Lee7 is offline  
Old 08-10-2003, 02:21 AM
  #143  
Senior Member

 
biff85ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Glasgow Kentucky
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 04 Vette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Doward I have a drivers side fender if you want it yo pay the shipping and its yours just shoot me an email if you want it.
biff85ta is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 03:40 AM
  #144  
Supreme Member

 
TechSmurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Woohah! Have turbo flange and downpipe flange ready to be welded to pipe.. manifold flange is cut to size, but unfortunately, thanks to forces beyond my control plotting against me (a bolt on the Y-pipe absolutely refusing to come loose) I was forced to leave the stock manifold at home, and couldn't machine the new bolt holes/ports, nor could I face it. Looks like next weekend for welding that up and getting this show on the road. Hopefully I can have everything else finished by then, or possibly even find someone locally who has a mill and transfer punches I can borrow.. muahaha. So close. Oh so close.

Next step. Pipe fabrication. Wish me luck.

Current deadline: aug 22
TechSmurf is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 02:45 PM
  #145  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
Doward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
TechSmurf, good luck! Love to have a battle of the turbo'd V6s

We're all doing our own thing. Next year or so, we'll see who's still running, and who's not. Simple as that

Heading to the boneyard tomorrow to get an oil pan. My first priority is to get the turbo nailed back down. I'm going to do some more R&D on the oil return - I think I might have a resistriction in it that's causing oil pressure to build in the turbo, and force oil by the seals.

The seals looked really good, as did the bearing, when I pulled the turbo apart. Tomorrow will tell more.

As you guys can see, my internet is very sketchy right now. Vortex will be posting a lot of the updates.

The car may not look very good, but I'll be damned if I stop this project this far into it!
Doward is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 02:47 PM
  #146  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
Doward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Oh yeah - funstick - the calibration is very close. Seems to be running a bit rich, and 6psi was no problem with 12º initial timing, on 93 (and some 3 month old 87).

I'm going to shoot for 8psi oin the next run. If that works, I think you and I should meet up online, and go over the timing tables, to see if we can increase the timing at all, under boost.

For now, better safe than sorry!

Next - new oil pan, retapped, and new plugs.
Doward is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 06:32 PM
  #147  
Senior Member
 
The_Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Nest
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
I'll ask again....

What are the specs on your oil return? Is it at least 5/8" in diameter, and have a pretty good down ward slope to the oil pan? The oil once it enters the bearing housing gets pretty frothed up, nesesiatating the large oil return, if it's not large and able to slide down the return into a spot that is ABOVE the oil level, then it will back up, blowing out seals, or at the very least oil will go by the seals and into the compressor and turbine sections.
The_Raven is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 06:34 PM
  #148  
Member
 
vortex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Mustang GT Vert
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T5
yeah. with this new pan, we are gonna upgrade to 3/4" just to be safe.. and yeah, it was routed well too. We're nitpicking ourselves.
vortex is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 09:26 PM
  #149  
Supreme Member
 
funstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: great lakes
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by The_Raven
I'll ask again....

What are the specs on your oil return? Is it at least 5/8" in diameter, and have a pretty good down ward slope to the oil pan? The oil once it enters the bearing housing gets pretty frothed up, nesesiatating the large oil return, if it's not large and able to slide down the return into a spot that is ABOVE the oil level, then it will back up, blowing out seals, or at the very least oil will go by the seals and into the compressor and turbine sections.
i just went into this with my honda fortunately t3 seals are robust. i fabbed a new manifold to fix a few sizing issues and spool up problems. yes oil drian is critical. the bigger the better. remeber oil level with the engine running is different then when its sitting.
still above the sitting oil level is the best.
funstick is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 11:59 PM
  #150  
Senior Member
 
The_Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Nest
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
Originally posted by funstick
yes oil drian is critical. the bigger the better. remeber oil level with the engine running is different then when its sitting.
still above the sitting oil level is the best.
I agree with Funstick.
I used the same idea, I welded my bung for the oil drain back as high as I could in the oil pan, I wish I could have ran it back into the other side of teh engine, to go with crank rotation, but unfortunatly, I couldn't, and next time I will do a couple of things differently when it comes to the drain back.
The_Raven is offline  


Quick Reply: Turbo Update



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:48 AM.