Anyone w/ ALDL software working on their SD V-6
#1
Anyone w/ ALDL software working on their SD V-6
I have a 1990 Firebird, a 468 SX-50 laptop and a ALDL cable I bought and I am trying to get them all to talk right. I am using both Craigs Moats software and ALDLMon. Craigs software kinda freezes when I try and get it to connect, though it is getting data through the serial port. ALDLMon is what made sure that cable was connected, because when the car is off the software tells me cable or interface missing. When I turn the key on it tells it ECM not Responding....
What the heck is going on!! How can I make them talk. The car is a 1990 V-6 w/ AT MPFI Speed Density setup....
Thanks,
Douglas
What the heck is going on!! How can I make them talk. The car is a 1990 V-6 w/ AT MPFI Speed Density setup....
Thanks,
Douglas
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 00 T/A Firehawk
Engine: 346ci LS1
Transmission: MN6
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD
Is there anyone that can help with this concern? I have been looking into using WinALDL to tap into my car, but it looks as though that's not an option according to the cars that it works with. It does not like the 3.1L...
http://w1.601.telia.com/~u60113744/s...l/aldldata.htm
Is there anyone else with a laptop ALDL interface hooked up to their V6??
http://w1.601.telia.com/~u60113744/s...l/aldldata.htm
Is there anyone else with a laptop ALDL interface hooked up to their V6??
#3
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 225 Likes
on
211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
WinALDL will not work on the '90 through '92 3.1l ECMs. This ECM is a '730 that runs the interface at 8192 baud. WinALDL only operates on the 160 baud interfaces.
As for Craig's program working on the SD TPI f-body and not on the 3.1l f-body, even though the ECM is the same the software is not. The data stream headers are different between the V8 & V6 ECM software.
If you can set the header values in a setup file or such then it is possible to get Craig's and/or ALDLMon to operate with the 3.1l.
RBob.
As for Craig's program working on the SD TPI f-body and not on the 3.1l f-body, even though the ECM is the same the software is not. The data stream headers are different between the V8 & V6 ECM software.
If you can set the header values in a setup file or such then it is possible to get Craig's and/or ALDLMon to operate with the 3.1l.
RBob.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 00 T/A Firehawk
Engine: 346ci LS1
Transmission: MN6
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD
So basically what you are saying is that there are no software programs out there that will allow me to tap into my ALDL
I guess my next option would be a scanner tool, more money, but looks to be the only feasible choice if I want to be able to read things from my car.
Are there any scan tools that anyone suggests?
I guess my next option would be a scanner tool, more money, but looks to be the only feasible choice if I want to be able to read things from my car.
Are there any scan tools that anyone suggests?
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
What do you mean edit the header files, im willing to give it a shot, but which .dat file is the configuration file and what exactly am I looking for?
#6
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 225 Likes
on
211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by pasky
What do you mean edit the header files, im willing to give it a shot, but which .dat file is the configuration file and what exactly am I looking for?
What do you mean edit the header files, im willing to give it a shot, but which .dat file is the configuration file and what exactly am I looking for?
May want to get Moates software and check to see if it can be changed. I know that the source for an older version is on his site.
RBob.
#7
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Is it in C or assembly, im guessing the core is assembly. Anyways, do you know what the values would need to be changed to and what variables? If not I won't even bother.
Trending Topics
#8
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 225 Likes
on
211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by pasky
Is it in C or assembly, im guessing the core is assembly. Anyways, do you know what the values would need to be changed to and what variables? If not I won't even bother.
Is it in C or assembly, im guessing the core is assembly. Anyways, do you know what the values would need to be changed to and what variables? If not I won't even bother.
RBob.
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Just took a look at the 850 Source and man its been quite a few years since I even touched basic (never did much in the first place). Did a quick search and although his source is nice and clean, couldn't find anything you were speaking of. Also what worries me is it says its designed for the 160 baud rate on the serial connection which is what the TPI's use I think, don't the 3.1's use 8192 or something? Thanks for the help.
#12
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
just got my cable Rbob and im looking through this source code and have no idea where to start. Do you at least know which Sub it is under? I really want to get this sucker going on my car so I can fix the idle and see what other crap is happening under the hood. Thanks.
#13
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 225 Likes
on
211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by pasky
just got my cable Rbob and im looking through this source code and have no idea where to start. Do you at least know which Sub it is under? I really want to get this sucker going on my car so I can fix the idle and see what other crap is happening under the hood. Thanks.
just got my cable Rbob and im looking through this source code and have no idea where to start. Do you at least know which Sub it is under? I really want to get this sucker going on my car so I can fix the idle and see what other crap is happening under the hood. Thanks.
Here is the one location, the other is on page 7:
FromPort:
mode = 1: basebyte = &H55
IF ecmtype = 1 THEN reqbyte = &H80: msgsize = 1 ELSE reqbyte = &HF4: msgsize = 2
For some reason I think that the basebyte needs to be changed to &H85 (I may be wrong).
RBob.
#14
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by RBob
Not one to dig in and take a look, are we? The source is in Quick Basic, the header values are hard coded (but easy to change), and I gave them to you in the post above.
RBob.
Not one to dig in and take a look, are we? The source is in Quick Basic, the header values are hard coded (but easy to change), and I gave them to you in the post above.
RBob.
I bought two 386sx16 laptops a lonnng time ago ($50 each, I guess in '95?) to run WinALDL, then found out that Win95 was needed, and they've sat ever since. I do have an Inspiron 8200 at home, but feel a little worried about hooking that up to the car. So I won't be using the Inspiron at -all-... not an option. I was going to get a $100 laptop off of eBay, but if I can recompile the program in DOS, all the more better...
#15
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 225 Likes
on
211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by TomP
Quick Basic? Wait; I thought the computer need at least Windows 95 to run?
I bought two 386sx16 laptops a lonnng time ago ($50 each, I guess in '95?) to run WinALDL, then found out that Win95 was needed, and they've sat ever since. I do have an Inspiron 8200 at home, but feel a little worried about hooking that up to the car. So I won't be using the Inspiron at -all-... not an option. I was going to get a $100 laptop off of eBay, but if I can recompile the program in DOS, all the more better...
Quick Basic? Wait; I thought the computer need at least Windows 95 to run?
I bought two 386sx16 laptops a lonnng time ago ($50 each, I guess in '95?) to run WinALDL, then found out that Win95 was needed, and they've sat ever since. I do have an Inspiron 8200 at home, but feel a little worried about hooking that up to the car. So I won't be using the Inspiron at -all-... not an option. I was going to get a $100 laptop off of eBay, but if I can recompile the program in DOS, all the more better...
RBob.
#16
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Kick *** thanks Rbob, I had already found this earlier with Craig's help but its great that you replied, I love this board . He also said i'll need to change that value in a few other places to ensure that the data translation is correct. Thanks for the tip on the 85, i'll give it a shot tonight trying two versions, thanks again Rbob, i'll let you know how it goes.
#18
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Got it to work!!! However, a lot of the values are not reading correctly, I always have IAC steps 0-1, took it around the block and my MPH never ran over 6 and sometimes go -1, TPS never moves, a lot doesn't work, Battery voltage and RPM's might be correct (*** I hope RPM's are correct because it says im idling at 800 if thats the case its only my tach that is off) what other values could there be?
#19
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Also, after about 5min running it will lock up my laptop. I really hope that RPM reading is correct, I gave it gas and it would rise, it seems my tach is off a few hundered rpm if that is the case, anyways, give me a holler Rbob.
#20
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 225 Likes
on
211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by pasky
Also, after about 5min running it will lock up my laptop. I really hope that RPM reading is correct, I gave it gas and it would rise, it seems my tach is off a few hundered rpm if that is the case, anyways, give me a holler Rbob.
Also, after about 5min running it will lock up my laptop. I really hope that RPM reading is correct, I gave it gas and it would rise, it seems my tach is off a few hundered rpm if that is the case, anyways, give me a holler Rbob.
RBob.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Santiago, CHILE
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
Engine: 305 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: The famous 700R4
Axle/Gears: No idea
Anyone?
Yes, I.
A148 datastream is for 3.1 90 92 with digital EGR valve.
I'm working in my software named "Autolink" compatible with the A57 datastream:
1987 - 1990 8192 baud 2.8 & 3.1 engines with 730 ECM (most common in FWD vehicles).
I don't have my laptop here, but tonight I can put the folder with the complete stuff somewhere.
Please, explain me how & where I can put this folder for free download and use for thirdgen guys only.
I've ready: Tº, RPM, KPH, O2, EGR v, EGR%, TPS v, TPS%, bat v., MAP kpa, MAF, IAC pos, knock ret, knock counts, etc,
Regards,
Denis V.
Yes, I.
A148 datastream is for 3.1 90 92 with digital EGR valve.
I'm working in my software named "Autolink" compatible with the A57 datastream:
1987 - 1990 8192 baud 2.8 & 3.1 engines with 730 ECM (most common in FWD vehicles).
I don't have my laptop here, but tonight I can put the folder with the complete stuff somewhere.
Please, explain me how & where I can put this folder for free download and use for thirdgen guys only.
I've ready: Tº, RPM, KPH, O2, EGR v, EGR%, TPS v, TPS%, bat v., MAP kpa, MAF, IAC pos, knock ret, knock counts, etc,
Regards,
Denis V.
#22
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
OK RBob, got a question for you, it seems my ECM loves to throw out the final byte BB, however Craig's software is looking for 64, know what this could be?
#23
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 225 Likes
on
211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by pasky
OK RBob, got a question for you, it seems my ECM loves to throw out the final byte BB, however Craig's software is looking for 64, know what this could be?
OK RBob, got a question for you, it seems my ECM loves to throw out the final byte BB, however Craig's software is looking for 64, know what this could be?
As for a packet with the checksum byte of BB I'd say you are seeing the normal chatter packets (F0 55 BB).
To request a data packet send: F0 56 01 B9
The B9 is that packets checksum, so if Craig's software does the checksum for you don't send that.
From the A148 doc these are the request & data stream that you'll be doing:
Code:
; MODE 1 (TRANSMIT FIXED DATA STREAM) ; ALDL REQUEST: ; - MESSAGE ID = $F0 ; - MESSAGE LENGTH = $56 ; - MODE = $01 ; - SUM CHECK ; ; THE ECM WILL RESPOND WITH THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE: ; - MESSAGE ID = $F0 ; - MESSAGE LENGTH = $95 ; - MODE = $01 ; - DATA BYTE 1 ; . ; . ; - DATA BYTE 63 ; - SUM CHECK
RBob.
#24
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Was looking at craig's software and yes he does calculate the checksums so need to change the final byte, however, he doesn't call them message length and ID.
'regbyte' is message ID,
'msgsize' would be mode?
What is 'basebyte'?
Thanks.
'regbyte' is message ID,
'msgsize' would be mode?
What is 'basebyte'?
Thanks.
#25
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
I have a 1990 3.1... and I just bought a cable...
will I have to modify this cable to get it to work with my ECM?
this cable
the ECM interface goes into pins E, and M only.
will this cable work, or will I need to re-wire it with the resistor?
also, did you guys EVER get the 3.1 liter motor ECM to work with any of these programs?
I couldn't get anything accept "Bad/Unknown Headers" when I useds WinALDL, or Moates or whatever...
will I have to modify this cable to get it to work with my ECM?
this cable
the ECM interface goes into pins E, and M only.
will this cable work, or will I need to re-wire it with the resistor?
also, did you guys EVER get the 3.1 liter motor ECM to work with any of these programs?
I couldn't get anything accept "Bad/Unknown Headers" when I useds WinALDL, or Moates or whatever...
#27
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
so the aldlcable.com cable should work just fine with my car? as long as I find the right software for my ECU?
#29
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
The TunerPro RT looks promising... because it had an ALDL definition for the 90-92 3.1.... I just need to try it tomorrow to see...
don't we have the same ECU's as cavaliers, grand ams, buicks and all sorts of cars with R/FWD 3.1's?
don't we have the same ECU's as cavaliers, grand ams, buicks and all sorts of cars with R/FWD 3.1's?
#31
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
for the TPI cars, I've read you have to use the resistor between A -> B on the ALDL... but my ECM was spitting out all sorts of info... just the program had no idea what to do with it all...
and I don't have a wire going to B at all...
yeah I'll let you know if I get something working... I'd probably donate $30 to the author if I got it working...
and I don't have a wire going to B at all...
yeah I'll let you know if I get something working... I'd probably donate $30 to the author if I got it working...
#33
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
if I see IIRC one more time without knowing what the hell it means... I think I may snap!
*snap*
*snap*
#34
If I recall correctly
"Run a wire/hairpin from Pin 6 to Pin 12 with the ignition off (although on later cars it should be from Pin 5 to Pin 6) "
So that holds true for both V-8 and V-6, at least for my 88, 89, 90, and 91. The 88 is the one that uses 6 and 12, and my 90 and 91 use 5 and 6. 88 V-8, 89 V-6, 90 V-6, 91 V-8
"Run a wire/hairpin from Pin 6 to Pin 12 with the ignition off (although on later cars it should be from Pin 5 to Pin 6) "
So that holds true for both V-8 and V-6, at least for my 88, 89, 90, and 91. The 88 is the one that uses 6 and 12, and my 90 and 91 use 5 and 6. 88 V-8, 89 V-6, 90 V-6, 91 V-8
Last edited by AmorgetRS; 04-12-2005 at 12:58 AM.
#37
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
The pins in question are A and B... and a 10k resistor is not required to put the '730 into aldl mode. That can be handled entirely by the software. TunerPro will talk, it's just a question of the definition of each byte of the packet being accurate. That's easily fixed if someone's bothering to use the software.
ScrapMaker, can you please exercise *a little* more restraint in ressurecting so many deceased threads on the same topic? I'm gonna go bury half of 'em now
ScrapMaker, can you please exercise *a little* more restraint in ressurecting so many deceased threads on the same topic? I'm gonna go bury half of 'em now
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Santiago, CHILE
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
Engine: 305 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: The famous 700R4
Axle/Gears: No idea
Yes,
Camaros 90-92 V6s:
-pin A & B with a paper clip = code 12, then error codes, if they are here.
- 10 k resistor: forget it.
- ECM: 1227730 ("730", for the friends).
- Calibration file: $88
For SCANN:
- Hardware: ALDL cable + an old laptop
- Software: Search for V6 730 ECM 8192 baud.
Camaros 90-92 V6s:
-pin A & B with a paper clip = code 12, then error codes, if they are here.
- 10 k resistor: forget it.
- ECM: 1227730 ("730", for the friends).
- Calibration file: $88
For SCANN:
- Hardware: ALDL cable + an old laptop
- Software: Search for V6 730 ECM 8192 baud.
#39
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
sorry about that...
but I got the cable to work PERFECTLY with my 1990 3.1 !!!
it's friggin amazing!
now I just have to figure out why my car pings...
is anyone fluent in scantool?
can someone look at my datalog and tell me why when I actually take off, I start pinging like crazy.... I was sitting there for a few minutes, and you can watch my temps rise... but a car shouldn't ping no matter what, right? i was like a constant drum roll of pinging... but it only registered like 3 pings during that time period...
the o2 sensor drops down way low.. I wonder what is wrong...
--
to get all this to work do the following...
1. Download... install... go into tools>preferences>associate windows with *.adl/*.ads files
-- http://www.m2stream.com/scrapmaker/A...ProRT_v310.exe
2. Download this ECM file.. and just double click it
-- http://www.m2stream.com/scrapmaker/A...0_V6_90-92.ads
3. This is my datalog, if you can help me out, I'd appreciate it!
-- http://www.m2stream.com/scrapmaker/A...;s_1990_V6.adl
4. Hit play, and watch the various sensors or go to 'monitor' mode
5. Donate to the author!!
but I got the cable to work PERFECTLY with my 1990 3.1 !!!
it's friggin amazing!
now I just have to figure out why my car pings...
is anyone fluent in scantool?
can someone look at my datalog and tell me why when I actually take off, I start pinging like crazy.... I was sitting there for a few minutes, and you can watch my temps rise... but a car shouldn't ping no matter what, right? i was like a constant drum roll of pinging... but it only registered like 3 pings during that time period...
the o2 sensor drops down way low.. I wonder what is wrong...
--
to get all this to work do the following...
1. Download... install... go into tools>preferences>associate windows with *.adl/*.ads files
-- http://www.m2stream.com/scrapmaker/A...ProRT_v310.exe
2. Download this ECM file.. and just double click it
-- http://www.m2stream.com/scrapmaker/A...0_V6_90-92.ads
3. This is my datalog, if you can help me out, I'd appreciate it!
-- http://www.m2stream.com/scrapmaker/A...;s_1990_V6.adl
4. Hit play, and watch the various sensors or go to 'monitor' mode
5. Donate to the author!!
Last edited by ScrapMaker; 04-12-2005 at 10:59 AM.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Memphis, Tn
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92' RS
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 4.10
ECM852 and AldlMonitor will work on an 8192 baud rate. Ive been using it on my 91' gta for a while.
ECM852 you have to go to the setting and set it up.
Scrapmaker: im reading you datalog right now.
ECM852 you have to go to the setting and set it up.
Scrapmaker: im reading you datalog right now.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Memphis, Tn
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92' RS
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 4.10
First thing dont worry about the o2 voltage unless you get a widband.
Second of all a 15 year old car will tend to detonate at"wide open throttle, 218* and at 3500 rpm and more than likely you are running 89 octane.
Dont worry to much about the "pinging" (detonation) as long as its not just off the charts. A car is going to detonate. Thats the reason they have a 3200hz knock sensor. When the knock sensor detects the detonation thats when the knock retartd comes into play. Thats why your are getting .33-3.0 degrees retard.
Although your blm's are showing some lean conditions at a few points.
As far as the dos-based programs you cant run them from any windows OS. Your have to boot to dos and exe from there.
Second of all a 15 year old car will tend to detonate at"wide open throttle, 218* and at 3500 rpm and more than likely you are running 89 octane.
Dont worry to much about the "pinging" (detonation) as long as its not just off the charts. A car is going to detonate. Thats the reason they have a 3200hz knock sensor. When the knock sensor detects the detonation thats when the knock retartd comes into play. Thats why your are getting .33-3.0 degrees retard.
Although your blm's are showing some lean conditions at a few points.
As far as the dos-based programs you cant run them from any windows OS. Your have to boot to dos and exe from there.
#42
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
well the weird part is.... my engine is only 3 years old... pretty much all new sensors except the knock sensor...
my car tends to ping when it's under load more than at WOT... for example, if I have the TCC engaged, and I try to go up a hill and it stays engaged the whole time, sometimes I can hear over 30 'knocks' in a 10 second period....
I normally stop it before anything that severe happens... and I deliver on the weekends, and my car idles around a lot, and if I don't leave my fan running the whole time my car is on... I get some pretty bad pinging...
a ping or two at WOT doesn't bother me, it's the pinging at like 2,000 rpm under load that bothers me...
I guess I should go out and try and record a good datalog that shows this information...
also, can I use ECM852 or AldlMonitor on my 1990? if so, would I use that same .ads file that I have for TunerPro RT? or does each program have it's own standard for ECM readings?
I like tunerpro, but I wish I could see a more graphical display when I'm playing back... like the ability to have several sensors on a time-based graph playback...
also I noticed that my o2 sensor kept turning red in TunerPro, does that mean it's going out of normal range? it seems to go to one extreme or the other sometimes...
also, on another run I did later, my TPS sensor didn't seem to match my pedal movements...
my car tends to ping when it's under load more than at WOT... for example, if I have the TCC engaged, and I try to go up a hill and it stays engaged the whole time, sometimes I can hear over 30 'knocks' in a 10 second period....
I normally stop it before anything that severe happens... and I deliver on the weekends, and my car idles around a lot, and if I don't leave my fan running the whole time my car is on... I get some pretty bad pinging...
a ping or two at WOT doesn't bother me, it's the pinging at like 2,000 rpm under load that bothers me...
I guess I should go out and try and record a good datalog that shows this information...
also, can I use ECM852 or AldlMonitor on my 1990? if so, would I use that same .ads file that I have for TunerPro RT? or does each program have it's own standard for ECM readings?
I like tunerpro, but I wish I could see a more graphical display when I'm playing back... like the ability to have several sensors on a time-based graph playback...
also I noticed that my o2 sensor kept turning red in TunerPro, does that mean it's going out of normal range? it seems to go to one extreme or the other sometimes...
also, on another run I did later, my TPS sensor didn't seem to match my pedal movements...
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Memphis, Tn
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92' RS
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Tunerpro is about the most graphical software that i know of. ECM852 and ALDLmon is dos-based and not really graphical at all, but yes it should work with your car.
The 2 programs afore mentioned dont use a .ads. Ecm852 you have to set it up for your car. If you try and use it let me know and i will explain on how to use it. You have to boot to DOS though.
Before i recommend anything get me a good datalogg with the detonation that you are getting.
The 2 programs afore mentioned dont use a .ads. Ecm852 you have to set it up for your car. If you try and use it let me know and i will explain on how to use it. You have to boot to DOS though.
Before i recommend anything get me a good datalogg with the detonation that you are getting.
#44
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
yeah I think I'll try that...
I just wish that the tunerpro would let me display several sensors graphically at once... because just seeing all those numbers is kinda confusing...
I just wish that the tunerpro would let me display several sensors graphically at once... because just seeing all those numbers is kinda confusing...
#45
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: In your ear. No, the other one.
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Thought I'd chime in and let you know that you should download the latest version of TunerPro if you haven't already. Most of your requests have been realized.
Also, try to avoid posting local version of TunerPro on your personal site. The (only) reason behind this request is to avoid people downloading outdated versions of the software. I update it often!
Mark
Also, try to avoid posting local version of TunerPro on your personal site. The (only) reason behind this request is to avoid people downloading outdated versions of the software. I update it often!
Mark
#47
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alpharetta, GA, USA
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Software/Cable for 91 V6
Just to make sure I'm reading all this correctly...
to read the ECM data off my '91 V6 Camaro, I just need this software:
-- http://www.m2stream.com/scrapmaker/...rProRT_v310.exe
-- http://www.m2stream.com/scrapmaker/...30_V6_90-92.ads
And this Cable:
http://www.aldlcable.com/
And it should work with my car?
to read the ECM data off my '91 V6 Camaro, I just need this software:
-- http://www.m2stream.com/scrapmaker/...rProRT_v310.exe
-- http://www.m2stream.com/scrapmaker/...30_V6_90-92.ads
And this Cable:
http://www.aldlcable.com/
And it should work with my car?
#49
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: In your ear. No, the other one.
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
http://tunerpro.markmansur.com/ for the latest version of the software.
#50
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Central Mass.
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Berlinetta
Engine: Megasquirted TPI
Transmission: Transgo 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by AmorgetRS
If I recall correctly
"Run a wire/hairpin from Pin 6 to Pin 12 with the ignition off (although on later cars it should be from Pin 5 to Pin 6) "
So that holds true for both V-8 and V-6, at least for my 88, 89, 90, and 91. The 88 is the one that uses 6 and 12, and my 90 and 91 use 5 and 6. 88 V-8, 89 V-6, 90 V-6, 91 V-8
If I recall correctly
"Run a wire/hairpin from Pin 6 to Pin 12 with the ignition off (although on later cars it should be from Pin 5 to Pin 6) "
So that holds true for both V-8 and V-6, at least for my 88, 89, 90, and 91. The 88 is the one that uses 6 and 12, and my 90 and 91 use 5 and 6. 88 V-8, 89 V-6, 90 V-6, 91 V-8