M39 Vs. M50

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

05-27-2011, 03:54 AM

1992COUPE

Junior Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: May 2011

Location: Kansas City Mo.

Posts: 16

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Car: 92 RS 25TH ANNIVERSARY All original

Engine: 305

Transmission: T5 WORLDCLASS

Axle/Gears: 3.08 OPEN

M39 Vs. M50

Does anyone know if a M50 trans out of a s10 fit into a 92 camaro with the M39 in it now.

Reply Like

06-03-2011, 05:44 AM

1992COUPE

Junior Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: May 2011

Location: Kansas City Mo.

Posts: 16

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Car: 92 RS 25TH ANNIVERSARY All original

Engine: 305

Transmission: T5 WORLDCLASS

Axle/Gears: 3.08 OPEN

Re: M39 Vs. M50

Update on this, The M50 has a ten spline input shaft so you would have to use the clutch for the s10. You would also have to use the yoke shaft from the drive line on the s10. swap the speedo adapter both are electric. little fun with the mounting on the tail shaft. I will let you know what I get done.

Reply Like

06-03-2011, 07:23 AM

sofakingdom

Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Sep 2005

Posts: 26,458

Likes: 1

Received 1,839 Likes on 1,399 Posts

Car: Yes

Engine: Usually

Transmission: Sometimes

Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Re: M39 Vs. M50

No the S truck trans will not fit our cars.

The trans mount pad is not rotated, the shifter mount pad isn't rotated, and the shifter mount is about 6" too far forward.

YOu could maybe change out the extension housing and the cover with the shifter rail to fix that.

Not sure about the overall length or the drive shaft; I don't mess with 6-cyl stuff, period. Don't know the details down to that level therefore.