4wd firebird concept
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: toledo OH
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
4wd firebird concept
i have this crazy idea. i have a 350 sbc with a th350 attached to it and a 9" ford rear with 4.11 gears. i found out that there are transfer cases that bolt right up to the t350 (the np205). this case was used '71-'80 and i htink all i would need is a front axle assembly and some new driveshafts and some gaskets/bushings, etc,some minor changes to the passenger compartment(for the shifters), and a ****load of time and money.
all i really want to know is if anybody has any practical experience with any kind of transfer case installation or might possibly have any ideas on clearance for the fornt axle assy.
i figured the pros to this would be improved handleing, and better launches. i wouldnt have to have any rollout from the trap when dragging. and i wouldnt get sideways taking turns when im busy being an ******* on the roads.
the cons would obviously be cost and labor.
some info on the np205
-can get a junkyard 205 for less then $150 and a full rebuild kit for around $200 more. or buy new for $750
-the high gear is 1:1
-the low gear is 1.98:1
-considered to be "bulletproof"
-used by GM in 71-80 blazers, c-10's, and c-20's
i looked around in some off road mags and new front axle assy's go for around 1k for new stuff. here is a page with all of this stuff on it. http://www.boyceequipment.com/pricelist.html
these guys prices are kind of inflated comparedto what i've been quoted at.
ill add more later
p.s.
the car i have listed in my bio isnt a 3rd gen but i plan on doing this to a 3rd gen. so dont get on me about this being a 3rd gen site, becuase i know.
all i really want to know is if anybody has any practical experience with any kind of transfer case installation or might possibly have any ideas on clearance for the fornt axle assy.
i figured the pros to this would be improved handleing, and better launches. i wouldnt have to have any rollout from the trap when dragging. and i wouldnt get sideways taking turns when im busy being an ******* on the roads.
the cons would obviously be cost and labor.
some info on the np205
-can get a junkyard 205 for less then $150 and a full rebuild kit for around $200 more. or buy new for $750
-the high gear is 1:1
-the low gear is 1.98:1
-considered to be "bulletproof"
-used by GM in 71-80 blazers, c-10's, and c-20's
i looked around in some off road mags and new front axle assy's go for around 1k for new stuff. here is a page with all of this stuff on it. http://www.boyceequipment.com/pricelist.html
these guys prices are kind of inflated comparedto what i've been quoted at.
ill add more later
p.s.
the car i have listed in my bio isnt a 3rd gen but i plan on doing this to a 3rd gen. so dont get on me about this being a 3rd gen site, becuase i know.
#2
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: MN
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 2009 Pontiac G8 GXP
Engine: LS3
Transmission: 6L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Any transfer case of that size won't work on a thirdgen...there simply isn't enough space, not to mention having to completely re-do your front suspension...
I think the best way to do it...is to graft a thirdgen body onto an S-10 chassis...That would make the most sense in the long run...
That way, you can have your V-8 and 4WD in the same setup...
A bit more research would tell you this...
S E A R C H :lala:
I think the best way to do it...is to graft a thirdgen body onto an S-10 chassis...That would make the most sense in the long run...
That way, you can have your V-8 and 4WD in the same setup...
A bit more research would tell you this...
S E A R C H :lala:
#3
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 17,167
Likes: 0
Received 136 Likes
on
114 Posts
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
A 205 transfer case is the best one ever built but it's also big and heavy. You'd have to cut the floor to make it fit. The bottom of the transfer case would drag on the ground in a third gen.
If you have enough money, you could do anything.
If you have enough money, you could do anything.
#4
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: under the hood
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 92 Z28 heritage
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Wait a minute. I think you guys need a little education. 4WD is not AWD. They are two different things. You cant put a transfer case and solid front axel assembly in a passenger car and just drive around in 4WD all the time. You cant even do it some of the time. You cant even drive around a 4WD truck in 4WD when the ground is dry. 4WD DOES NOT permit the wheels to spin at different speed, ie: going around a corner. Go put your daddy's bronco in 4 LO, turn the steering wheel a turn or two, and try to drive in circles. It doesn't work. You are thinking of AWD, like what suburu has, or a 3000 GT VR4. Thats completely different. It is all time, all wheel drive, but there are allowences for all 4 wheels to spin at different speed when needed. This system would help you out with launches, and cornering, 4WD will not. Besides, retrofitting an AWD system into a Camaro or FIrebird, although cool sounding, would be virtually impossible. It would require a whole new subframe, redesigning the geometry of the WHOLE car, and a whole lot of other impossible feats that the mere idea shouldn't even be considered. You would be better off dropping a 350 TPI into a Mitsubishi 3000 GT VR-4 and calling it a Camaro. At least that has a chance of getting off the ground.
#5
Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92Z, 96RamAir, 91 4X4 Burb
Engine: 383 Super Ram, LT1, 350 roller
Transmission: 700R4, Probulit 700R4 &4L60E, 4L80E
To Clarify 4WD comments
To clarify fisherbody's comments a little:
4WD systems DO allow for slippage during turns under normal conditions (short of a spool or a locked up posi), just like any other axle. You can take your Dad's Bronco, put it in 4L, drive it straight and the drivetrain will still "bind up". Now remove the rear driveshaft or the front shaft and you will be able to drive it in circles. THe T-case is not an axle differential or posi lockup. THe problem is that the 4WD transfer cases in 4WD positions are designed to turn the front axle drive wheels at approximately ~5% faster than the rear axle wheels. THis is to augment steering control in mud/sand/wet/slippery conditions. This is what causes the "binding up" on hard drive pavement. This in effect has the front wheels pulling the vehicle through the mud, instead of plowing or pushing the front wheels through the mud. THis would mean the only way to run on the street with a NP205 would be to determine the different diameter front tires required to end up with the same rotational speed as the rears.
The way the older full time 4WD's (NP203's) worked was that in 2H & 4H positions, the front and rear's turned at the same speed. When off road, the t-case was shifted into 4HLock or 4LLock which increased the front wheel speed for steering control.
My 76 Blazer was originally Full time (NP203), but got tired of stretching the chain behind the 400sbc in the truck. Adapted to the NP205 (along with a 700R4) which is an all gear driven unit. It is bullet proof as has been mentioned, but is heavy and the offset to the output shaft on the front side is ~8-10 inches lower than the rear output shaft, which would cause ground clearance issues.
Hope this clears things up a bit
4WD systems DO allow for slippage during turns under normal conditions (short of a spool or a locked up posi), just like any other axle. You can take your Dad's Bronco, put it in 4L, drive it straight and the drivetrain will still "bind up". Now remove the rear driveshaft or the front shaft and you will be able to drive it in circles. THe T-case is not an axle differential or posi lockup. THe problem is that the 4WD transfer cases in 4WD positions are designed to turn the front axle drive wheels at approximately ~5% faster than the rear axle wheels. THis is to augment steering control in mud/sand/wet/slippery conditions. This is what causes the "binding up" on hard drive pavement. This in effect has the front wheels pulling the vehicle through the mud, instead of plowing or pushing the front wheels through the mud. THis would mean the only way to run on the street with a NP205 would be to determine the different diameter front tires required to end up with the same rotational speed as the rears.
The way the older full time 4WD's (NP203's) worked was that in 2H & 4H positions, the front and rear's turned at the same speed. When off road, the t-case was shifted into 4HLock or 4LLock which increased the front wheel speed for steering control.
My 76 Blazer was originally Full time (NP203), but got tired of stretching the chain behind the 400sbc in the truck. Adapted to the NP205 (along with a 700R4) which is an all gear driven unit. It is bullet proof as has been mentioned, but is heavy and the offset to the output shaft on the front side is ~8-10 inches lower than the rear output shaft, which would cause ground clearance issues.
Hope this clears things up a bit
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: MN
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 2009 Pontiac G8 GXP
Engine: LS3
Transmission: 6L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Hey fisherbody86, lets not be making any large ASSumptions before "educating" here. I just sold a 95 Talon, TSI Turbo AWD, and currently own a 94 Suburban 4WD...I am quite aware of the differences between the two, especially in winter.
Although I like your idea of trying to squeeze a 350 into a 3000GT, it is too cost prohibitive...while doing a 350 in an S-10 isn't a large investment of time or money and you would have the 4wd (or AWD if you can find a Typhoon/Cyclone setup)
Good luck in figuring it out...
Although I like your idea of trying to squeeze a 350 into a 3000GT, it is too cost prohibitive...while doing a 350 in an S-10 isn't a large investment of time or money and you would have the 4wd (or AWD if you can find a Typhoon/Cyclone setup)
Good luck in figuring it out...
Trending Topics
#10
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Blacklick, Ohio, USA
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '91 RS
Engine: 5.7 tbi
Transmission: 700r4
Look into a Bravada setup. It wasn't 4WD, it was AWD. I'm pretty sure that same running gear was used in development of the GMC Cyclone/Typhoon turbos.
I figure, it wouldn't help ride height, but it would give you the performance you need.
Here's a better question for you. How come that 4.3 turbo never made it into an fbody?
I figure, it wouldn't help ride height, but it would give you the performance you need.
Here's a better question for you. How come that 4.3 turbo never made it into an fbody?
Last edited by gcore45; 03-16-2003 at 07:01 AM.
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: toledo OH
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
is the diference between 4wd and awd entirely in the tranfer case?.. how exactly does subaru do it?... if this information is available and is done on tiny little suabrus then wouldnt it probobyl be possible to fit the hardware under a 3rd gen?
#14
Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92Z, 96RamAir, 91 4X4 Burb
Engine: 383 Super Ram, LT1, 350 roller
Transmission: 700R4, Probulit 700R4 &4L60E, 4L80E
AWD trtansfer case designs
I know some of the AWD vehicles use a viscous coupling instead of a chain or gear drive, this allows a bit of slippage between front and rear as well as power transfer when one wheel/axle is slipping.
Ask around, maybe an Audi Quatro or equivalent owner could chime in.
Ask around, maybe an Audi Quatro or equivalent owner could chime in.
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: THE QUADS
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: FBODYS
Engine: ALWAYS 8'S
Transmission: ALWAYS MENTAL
Axle/Gears: RUSTY AND BRAND NEW
Im in Love
I need to build me one of those orange monster cars. No one would steal parking spots from you any more and if they did....oh no. No more door dings either. Who owns that thing I have to know
#16
Supreme Member
203 cases were full time 4wd and were from 73 to 79 and they didnt use manual or auto hubs on the front axle, they used slugs, 73 to early 77 were bolted on type and 77 late through 79 were chrome sheetmetal capped and stick out a little further than the bolted on early ones, these were on the dana 44 front 203 trucks
before 73 they were part time 205 case trucks and after 79 alot of them were 208 aluminum case ones
205 were gear to gear all the rest were chain driven
203 have a unit in the tail of them that differentiates front to rear power kinda like an axle spider gear setup does
when you get a part time conversion kit for 203 then you eliminate the unit in the tail of the 203 and add manual hubs to the front axle so that you can unlock it and also run in 2hi range just like a 208 or 205 truck can so you dont wear out the front line and axle prematurely
before 73 they were part time 205 case trucks and after 79 alot of them were 208 aluminum case ones
205 were gear to gear all the rest were chain driven
203 have a unit in the tail of them that differentiates front to rear power kinda like an axle spider gear setup does
when you get a part time conversion kit for 203 then you eliminate the unit in the tail of the 203 and add manual hubs to the front axle so that you can unlock it and also run in 2hi range just like a 208 or 205 truck can so you dont wear out the front line and axle prematurely
#18
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Englewood, OH
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Get the parts from a sy or ty if you can, and it will fit under the hood nicely. If not, the front differential from am Astro/Safari awd will work along w/ the transfer case from a Bravada. That's what I'm looking to do, its a 70 rear, 30 front split awd system.
#20
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Huber Heights, OH
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 00 TA, 91 Formula, 89 RS
Engine: LS1 / 305 / 2.8, respectively
Transmission: T-56 / auto / auto
Wow awdcamaro, I see you're from Englewood... Huber Heights dweller, here. I've been finding more and more locals on here lately...
#21
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: Eaton Supercharged 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
That thing might corner horribly but with it you may not even need to take the corner....just go straight
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1Aauto
Sponsored Vendors
0
09-02-2015 01:35 PM