TPI VS LS1
#1
TPI VS LS1
HI EVERYONE I HAVE A TPI 89 IROC Z 350 I LIKE TO REBUILT IT USEING A BETTER CAM ALUMINUM HEADS WHAT KIND OF PISTONS I USE I LIKE TO HAVE 9.5.1 COMPRESSION 93 OCT IS GOOD TO USE OR 10.1 COMPRESSION WILL 93 OCT GAS WORK IF IT DOSE ITS GOOOOOD I WILL BE TUNEING THE ECU COMPUTER AT JETCHIP.COM DO I USE STOCK ROCKERS WHAT ELS DO I HAVE TO GET RIGHT TO RUN LIKE A LS1 I LIKE TO GET 350 HORSE POWER OR BETTER WITH THESE MODFICAION WOULD IT BEAT A 2002 LS1 CAMARO STOCK BY A FENDER OR A CAR LINK OR BETTER I WILL ALLSO BE PUTING SLP RUNNERS IN BETTER MANNIFOLD IN TB 52. MM OR DO I NEED 400 HORSE POWER BEAT THEM HELP GUYS LET ME NO THANKS
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
If you want to run with an LS, you'd probably be best off going carbureted. LS1's are very potent and with just a few mods can get fast, they flow a TON of air which is why they run so strong.
#4
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
uhh.
take off the bold.
take off the caps.
use some punctuation, and split it into something that somewhat resembles english.
if you want someone to reply, try throwing a question in there.
take off the bold.
take off the caps.
use some punctuation, and split it into something that somewhat resembles english.
if you want someone to reply, try throwing a question in there.
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally Posted by big_nick_kgm
YO ONLY THING IM TRYING TO DO IS GET A BETTER RUN TO BEAT LS1.S IF YOU CAN HELP FINE
1. make your post readable, so that its not only helpful to you, but to others.
2. tell you to put a question in there, so that theres something to answer.
can i help? hell ya.
am i going to attempt to read something in bold, all caps, with no punctuation? no. and dont expect others to either. just be thankful that someone took the time to tell you WHY no one wants to answer your thread, instead of just thinking "what a moron" and clicking on like everyone else did... look at the views, then look at the posts... you'll see what i mean.
#6
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '88 G T/A
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt
Translation:
Originally Posted by big_nick_kgm
HI EVERYONE, I HAVE A TPI 89 IROC Z 350. I WOULD LIKE TO REBUILD IT USEING A BETTER CAM AND ALUMINUM HEADS. WHAT KIND OF PISTONS SHOULD I USE? I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE 9.5:1 COMPRESSION AND RUN 93 OCTANE, OR WILL 10:1 COMPRESSION RUN FINE ON 93 OCTANE GAS? IF IT DOES THAT WOULD BE GREAT. I WILL BE GETTING A CUSTOM CHIP FROM JETCHIP.COM. CAN I USE STOCK ROCKERS? WHAT ELSE DO I HAVE TO DO TO RUN LIKE A LS1? I WOULD LIKE TO GET 350 HORSE POWER OR BETTER. THINK I COULD BEAT A 2002 LS1 CAMARO? I WILL ALSO BE PUTTING ON SLP RUNNERS AND MAYBE A 52MM THROTTLE BODY, OR IS THAT OVERKILL?
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Mims, Florida
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '87 IROCZ
Engine: 395 ZZ4
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70s
Now that someone interpeted the original post (thanks Matt), What you are getting into is comparing a car with maybe 220 to 225 Hp to a car with 290 (Z28) or 305 (SS). You must add about 50% to your engine Hp, a very tall order, and then you might get a fender on the LS1. You will have to do most of my mods; alum heads, full exhaust, gears, cam, full intake, and get a good tune.
I have a great idea, just by an LS1 for yourself and save yourself alot of grief.
I have a great idea, just by an LS1 for yourself and save yourself alot of grief.
#9
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: check under the car
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: White 25th Anniversary RS
Engine: lt1
Transmission: t56
Axle/Gears: 4:10
The ls1 will still beat you. with a t56 they only lose somthing like 15% loss through the drivetrain. your automatic l98 loses allot more that that. you need like a 350 or 383 with an lt1 intake, cam, aftermarket heads ect the ls1 is a beast of an engine and will laugh at a mild l98.
#10
TPI VS LS1
Originally Posted by doc
Now that someone interpeted the original post (thanks Matt), What you are getting into is comparing a car with maybe 220 to 225 Hp to a car with 290 (Z28) or 305 (SS). You must add about 50% to your engine Hp, a very tall order, and then you might get a fender on the LS1. You will have to do most of my mods; alum heads, full exhaust, gears, cam, full intake, and get a good tune.
I have a great idea, just by an LS1 for yourself and save yourself alot of grief.
I have a great idea, just by an LS1 for yourself and save yourself alot of grief.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: CHICAGO
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 FORMULA 350
Engine: 5.7 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 BOLT/ 3.27 GEARS
Now that someone interpeted the original post (thanks Matt), What you are getting into is comparing a car with maybe 220 to 225 Hp to a car with 290 (Z28) or 305 (SS). You must add about 50% to your engine Hp, a very tall order, and then you might get a fender on the LS1. You will have to do most of my mods; alum heads, full exhaust, gears, cam, full intake, and get a good tune.
I have a great idea, just by an LS1 for yourself and save yourself alot of grief.
__________________
Ummm no.... actually there is no horsepower difference at all between an SS and a Z28 with an LS1! And Your horsepower estimates are quite off too. Most stock LS1's make somewhere between 285-315 to the wheels alone! Some slightly higher or lower. This equates to roughly 330-375 at the engine.
I have a great idea, just by an LS1 for yourself and save yourself alot of grief.
__________________
Ummm no.... actually there is no horsepower difference at all between an SS and a Z28 with an LS1! And Your horsepower estimates are quite off too. Most stock LS1's make somewhere between 285-315 to the wheels alone! Some slightly higher or lower. This equates to roughly 330-375 at the engine.
#12
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Armpit state
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08
Originally Posted by doc
I have a great idea, just by an LS1 for yourself and save yourself alot of grief.
Last edited by shaggy56; 08-04-2006 at 08:10 PM.
#13
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally Posted by doc
Now that someone interpeted the original post (thanks Matt), What you are getting into is comparing a car with maybe 220 to 225 Hp to a car with 290 (Z28) or 305 (SS). You must add about 50% to your engine Hp, a very tall order, and then you might get a fender on the LS1. You will have to do most of my mods; alum heads, full exhaust, gears, cam, full intake, and get a good tune.
I have a great idea, just by an LS1 for yourself and save yourself alot of grief.
I have a great idea, just by an LS1 for yourself and save yourself alot of grief.
you're confusing "factory ratings" with actual HP.... the LS1 actually puts down over 300 at the rear wheels.... regardless of the "official ratings"..
#14
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '88 G T/A
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt
Originally Posted by MrDude_1
you're confusing "factory ratings" with actual HP.... the LS1 actually puts down over 300 at the rear wheels.... regardless of the "official ratings"..
#15
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally Posted by MattODoom
The LS1 is a hoss, but it's not god.
lol, most put down between 305 and 316... occasionally the factory freak thats alot lower or higher, but thats the general range.
hell mine, thru a stock 99z catback, put down 316 uncorrected on a humid, hot day... corrected its 326 or so...
#16
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '88 G T/A
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt
Originally Posted by MrDude_1
LOL. so what are you trying to tell me? that all of the stock LS1s ive seen on dynos are wrong?
lol, most put down between 305 and 316... occasionally the factory freak thats alot lower or higher, but thats the general range.
hell mine, thru a stock 99z catback, put down 316 uncorrected on a humid, hot day... corrected its 326 or so...
lol, most put down between 305 and 316... occasionally the factory freak thats alot lower or higher, but thats the general range.
hell mine, thru a stock 99z catback, put down 316 uncorrected on a humid, hot day... corrected its 326 or so...
And when people post up how they can build their gen I and people just say "aww **** it get an LS1.." really not helping much.
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally Posted by MattODoom
It was not in regard to your HP figure, i meant in general, people just think the LS1 is the greatest thing ever. I drive an 88GTA and a 98 SS, I can tell you that yeah its great out of the box, buts its not unbeatable.
And when people post up how they can build their gen I and people just say "aww **** it get an LS1.." really not helping much.
And when people post up how they can build their gen I and people just say "aww **** it get an LS1.." really not helping much.
well,
i suppose i could reccomend a diffrent bottom end... because you need atleast a 4" bore in a SBC..
then i could reccomend some good aftermarket heads... none of that 23* crap either. we're looking for something competitive here.
then of course, you need a new intake to match the heads... either converted to EFI, or go carb.
and a upgraded ignition system.
and then you need to upgrade the clutch, and the t5 needs to be replaced...
or you can drop in a stock LS1 drivetrain, toss a cam in it, and make the same power..... either way, its the same power.
#18
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Armpit state
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08
Originally Posted by MattODoom
And when people post up how they can build their gen I and people just say "aww **** it get an LS1.." really not helping much.
#19
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '88 G T/A
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt
Originally Posted by MrDude_1
or you can drop in a stock LS1 drivetrain, toss a cam in it, and make the same power..... either way, its the same power.
Personally I am building a stealthrammed 406 for the GTA. It has worked over vortec heads (huh... arent those 23*?!?!) and will be backed by a T56. Id like to see the cammed LS1 make that same power.
aww **** it I dont even want to argue with you guys. We have both a Gen I car and a Gen III car and they both run great.
take a look at your goals, your mechanical and electrical ability and decide which is the best route for you.
Not everyone can take on the LS1 swap Mr_Dude.
Last edited by MattODoom; 08-04-2006 at 09:14 PM.
#20
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally Posted by MattODoom
Yeah cause the LS1 just falls right in the car. Its not a bit of wiring modification to make things work and theres not $700 headers you have to buy if you dont want to run manifolds. Oh yeah and the motor is cheap to begin with too right? How about swapping to a LS1 gas tank as well? The **** adds up.
Personally I am building a stealthrammed 406 for the GTA. It has worked over vortec heads (huh... arent those 23*?!?!) and will be backed by a T56. Id like to see the cammed LS1 make that same power.
aww **** it I dont even want to argue with you guys. We have both a Gen I car and a Gen III car and they both run great.
take a look at your goals, your mechanical and electrical ability and decide which is the best route for you.
Not everyone can take on the LS1 swap Mr_Dude.
Personally I am building a stealthrammed 406 for the GTA. It has worked over vortec heads (huh... arent those 23*?!?!) and will be backed by a T56. Id like to see the cammed LS1 make that same power.
aww **** it I dont even want to argue with you guys. We have both a Gen I car and a Gen III car and they both run great.
take a look at your goals, your mechanical and electrical ability and decide which is the best route for you.
Not everyone can take on the LS1 swap Mr_Dude.
i made more power with manifolds then 95% of the people here make with their SBCs.... if that comes off as cocky, so be it, but its correct.
the motor, trans, PCM, clutch, ect... pullout costs less the just the cost of the SBC engine built to match it... so its like a free trans, clutch, and EFI system.
the wiring is simple.
im using my stock 91 camaro tank. id reccomend keeping the 3rdgen tank... and keeping the 3rdgen radiator too... and keeping the stock fans.. hell, keep as much stock as you can... cheaper and reliable that way.
im sorry to disappoint you, but i HIGHLY doubt a stealthram 406 with just vortec heads will make the same power as a cammed LS1... and if its too close for comfort, the LS1 owner could just bolt on some ported heads... for $600 new.... try finding heads that flow like them that cheap for the SBC... (hint, you can port vortecs all you want and not be close in price or flow.)
btw, that T56 swap costs between a quarter to half the cost of a LS1 swap....
#21
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '88 G T/A
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt
Originally Posted by MrDude_1
im sorry to disappoint you, but i HIGHLY doubt a stealthram 406 with just vortec heads will make the same power as a cammed LS1...
Originally Posted by MrDude_1
and if its too close for comfort, the LS1 owner could just bolt on some ported heads... for $600 new.... try finding heads that flow like them that cheap for the SBC... (hint, you can port vortecs all you want and not be close in price or flow.)
Originally Posted by MrDude_1
btw, that T56 swap costs between a quarter to half the cost of a LS1 swap....
PS: Im not trying to start anything with you, just defending the good old Gen I's.
#22
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally Posted by MattODoom
lol. Come on man... GM sells crate motors with mild cams and TPI vette heads that make the same horse as LS1's. And those are 350's.
Originally Posted by MattODoom
That's great, but they have easily 4x as much money in just buying their car then I have in mine. So whats the leave me with, $12,000 to put in a motor just to get to where they started?
in no way shape or form would i endorse buying a LS1 fbody for 12,000.... esp when you can get a reasonable mileage one for 7k or less.
Originally Posted by MattODoom
And it will be well worth it! T56 >>>>> 700R4
Originally Posted by MattODoom
PS: Im not trying to start anything with you, just defending the good old Gen I's.
but, when i mention that on here, it usually falls on def ears... i know, you guys would rather replace every part on your motor to start making decent power.... and then defend how great it is. and thats fine.. i mean, people have been doing that to thirdgens since 1981. (82 model year went on sale in 81)
#23
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '88 G T/A
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt
Originally Posted by MrDude_1
im not trying to start **** either... but its just amazing how people defend one motor, without knowing anything about the other..... the other motor is absolutely amazing.. in both performance and price. people just assume the SBC is cheaper, without ever looking at the cost of the LS1 parts. the only way the SBC is cheaper, is if you settle for less performance then the LS1 is stock.
but, when i mention that on here, it usually falls on def ears... i know, you guys would rather replace every part on your motor to start making decent power.... and then defend how great it is. and thats fine.. i mean, people have been doing that to thirdgens since 1981. (82 model year went on sale in 81)
but, when i mention that on here, it usually falls on def ears... i know, you guys would rather replace every part on your motor to start making decent power.... and then defend how great it is. and thats fine.. i mean, people have been doing that to thirdgens since 1981. (82 model year went on sale in 81)
The differense is really that you have so much more to start with and get so much more from mods that dollar for dollar the mods are better.
Personally I think the gen I is great. I grew up working on them, theyre simple and a great way for gear heads to get going. Theyre easy to tinker on and work on and just overall great.
Perhaps you would like to consider the SBC Gen I the intro motor for getting into cars and horsepower, and the Gen III the graduated level powerplant :P
Last edited by MattODoom; 08-04-2006 at 10:24 PM.
#24
TPI VS LS1
OK HOW ABOUT IF I JUST DO A STOCK REBUILT AS IN A 350 ON MY CAMARO BY JUST ADDING 72CC ALUM HEADS FLATHEAD PISTONS IN A MILD CAM LIKE A 450 LIFT 224 DUR AT 050. 112 DEG WITH SLP RUNNERS INTANK MANNIAFOLD BASE PLATE WITH STOCK FUEL INJECTORS IN MSD 6AL BOX COIL IN WIRES 8.5 3 PEC ALUM SET PULLIES AIR FOIL FOR TB IN CUT OUT THE BOXES WITH KNn IN A GOOD TUNE FOR THE ECU IN BYE THE WAY WHAT KIND OF HORSE POWER DOSE ALUM HEADS IN CAM BRING ALONE on a 350 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ANY INFO
Last edited by big_nick_kgm; 08-04-2006 at 10:28 PM.
#26
Originally Posted by MattODoom
Well actually LS1 parts are quite expensive. Intakes are what $700? Headers are $700.
The differense is really that you have so much more to start with and get so much more from mods that dollar for dollar the mods are better.
Personally I think the gen I is great. I grew up working on them, theyre simple and a great way for gear heads to get going. Theyre easy to tinker on and work on and just overall great.
Perhaps you would like to consider the SBC Gen I the intro motor for getting into cars and horsepower, and the Gen III the graduated level powerplant :P
The differense is really that you have so much more to start with and get so much more from mods that dollar for dollar the mods are better.
Personally I think the gen I is great. I grew up working on them, theyre simple and a great way for gear heads to get going. Theyre easy to tinker on and work on and just overall great.
Perhaps you would like to consider the SBC Gen I the intro motor for getting into cars and horsepower, and the Gen III the graduated level powerplant :P
----------
Originally Posted by MattODoom
72CC heads will drop your compression a bit.
Last edited by big_nick_kgm; 08-04-2006 at 10:32 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#27
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '88 G T/A
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt
Originally Posted by big_nick_kgm
hey can you help me
----------
what cc then
----------
what cc then
Stock L98 heads are 64CC and 9.3:1 compression with stock pistons.
#28
Originally Posted by MattODoom
Stock L98 heads are 64CC and 9.3:1 compression with stock pistons.
#29
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '88 G T/A
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt
Originally Posted by big_nick_kgm
i heard that there 76 cc
#30
Originally Posted by MattODoom
Pretty sure theyre 64CC, someone step in and correct me if Im wrong?
----------
Originally Posted by MattODoom
Stock L98 heads are 64CC and 9.3:1 compression with stock pistons.
Last edited by big_nick_kgm; 08-04-2006 at 10:48 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#31
TPI VS LS1
OK HOW ABOUT IF I JUST DO A STOCK REBUILT AS IN A 350 ON MY CAMARO BY JUST ADDING 72CC ALUM HEADS FLATHEAD PISTONS IN A MILD CAM LIKE A 450 LIFT 224 DUR AT 050. 112 DEG WITH SLP RUNNERS INTANK MANNIAFOLD BASE PLATE WITH STOCK FUEL INJECTORS IN MSD 6AL BOX COIL IN WIRES 8.5 3 PEC ALUM SET PULLIES AIR FOIL FOR TB IN A GOOD TUNE FOR THE ECU IN BYE THE WAY WHAT KIND OF HORSE POWER DOSE ALUM HEADS IN CAM BRING ALONE ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ANY INFO
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: CHICAGO
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 FORMULA 350
Engine: 5.7 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 BOLT/ 3.27 GEARS
Anybody know the valve sizes on the iron L98 head? Im not sure if their 2.02and 1.60 or 1.94 and 1.50
#37
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Amarillo, Tx
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: 5.7tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt posi w/ 2.77s
Originally Posted by big_nick_kgm
OK HOW ABOUT IF I JUST DO A STOCK REBUILT AS IN A 350 ON MY CAMARO BY JUST ADDING 72CC ALUM HEADS FLATHEAD PISTONS IN A MILD CAM LIKE A 450 LIFT 224 DUR AT 050. 112 DEG WITH SLP RUNNERS INTANK MANNIAFOLD BASE PLATE WITH STOCK FUEL INJECTORS IN MSD 6AL BOX COIL IN WIRES 8.5 3 PEC ALUM SET PULLIES AIR FOIL FOR TB IN A GOOD TUNE FOR THE ECU IN BYE THE WAY WHAT KIND OF HORSE POWER DOSE ALUM HEADS IN CAM BRING ALONE ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ANY
INFO
INFO
no caps!!!!!!! spelling helps too.
INTAKE - not intank
MANIFOLD - not manniafold
DOES - not dose
AND - not in
. - those complete what we call sentences
? - those complete what we call a sentence that asks a question
#39
Originally Posted by bfox88
yes stock l98 heads are 64cc.
Last edited by big_nick_kgm; 08-07-2006 at 12:22 AM.
#40
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: south Louisiana
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Z28
Engine: 85 L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock 10 bolt-3.73 eaten posi
Originally Posted by 5.7tpiroc
no caps!!!!!!! spelling helps too.
INTAKE - not intank
MANIFOLD - not manniafold
DOES - not dose
AND - not in
. - those complete what we call sentences
? - those complete what we call a sentence that asks a question
INTAKE - not intank
MANIFOLD - not manniafold
DOES - not dose
AND - not in
. - those complete what we call sentences
? - those complete what we call a sentence that asks a question
omg, that is ****ing funny.
#42
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Originally Posted by DENN_SHAH
im starting to wonder,... is the RCkid back?
#43
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: houston
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 83 POS monte carlo 2015 chevy P/U
Engine: 92 5.7 tpi 5.3
Transmission: 700r4 6L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.42 too high
big_nick_kgm, please turn your caps off. are you from the USA?
a L98 comes stock with flat tops with valve reliefs, the compression is around 9.3 or so.
any major mods you make pretty much need some chip work.
urbanhunter44, i know, his posts started out pretty much ok at first,.. but went down hill the longer he was here,.. i think he maybe spent too many nights with mary jane & her friends, if you know what i mean
a L98 comes stock with flat tops with valve reliefs, the compression is around 9.3 or so.
any major mods you make pretty much need some chip work.
urbanhunter44, i know, his posts started out pretty much ok at first,.. but went down hill the longer he was here,.. i think he maybe spent too many nights with mary jane & her friends, if you know what i mean
#44
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SOCAL
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Just some food for thought, im making almost 500 at the crank with my ls1(430 to the tire) and still running my crappy y-pipe set up, and havn't even touched the throttle body or intake.
But i'm not saying they are the end all of all motors. The nice thing about though is you can make big power and still be 100% drivable, my drives almost like stock.
But on another note, they are kinda pricey (not as bad as you guys make it sound) and building a old fanished SBC will generate a lot of power if you do it right.
Like i always say its your car, your money, do with you want, as long as your happy with it thats all that matters.
Justin
But i'm not saying they are the end all of all motors. The nice thing about though is you can make big power and still be 100% drivable, my drives almost like stock.
But on another note, they are kinda pricey (not as bad as you guys make it sound) and building a old fanished SBC will generate a lot of power if you do it right.
Like i always say its your car, your money, do with you want, as long as your happy with it thats all that matters.
Justin
#45
[quote=DENN_SHAH]big_nick_kgm, please turn your caps off. are you from the USA?
a L98 comes stock with flat tops with valve reliefs, the compression is around 9.3 or so.
any major mods you make pretty much need some chip work.
urbanhunter44, i know, his posts started out pretty much ok at first,.. but went down hill the longer he was here,.. i think he maybe spent too many nights with mary jane & her friends, if you know what i mean [/quote ok which is the best heads i could use with my stock flattop pistons i like to get at 9.8 to1 let me no thanks
a L98 comes stock with flat tops with valve reliefs, the compression is around 9.3 or so.
any major mods you make pretty much need some chip work.
urbanhunter44, i know, his posts started out pretty much ok at first,.. but went down hill the longer he was here,.. i think he maybe spent too many nights with mary jane & her friends, if you know what i mean [/quote ok which is the best heads i could use with my stock flattop pistons i like to get at 9.8 to1 let me no thanks
#46
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Amarillo TX
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally Posted by 5.7tpiroc
no caps!!!!!!! spelling helps too.
INTAKE - not intank
MANIFOLD - not manniafold
DOES - not dose
AND - not in
. - those complete what we call sentences
? - those complete what we call a sentence that asks a question
INTAKE - not intank
MANIFOLD - not manniafold
DOES - not dose
AND - not in
. - those complete what we call sentences
? - those complete what we call a sentence that asks a question
thanks James, that helped alot
btw, PM me with your phone number, i got somethin your gonna want to see
#47
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Firebird Formula
Engine: 383 Stealth Ram
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 9 bolt Posi
As far as what heads, cam, etc are "best" - I would recommend doing a search.
Over the last several years, I have had many questions about improving my car's performance. Searching this vast website has helped me learn alot about my stock parts as well as aftermarket performance parts.
As far as building a motor just to beat a 2002 Camaro LS1 - why? There are other motors out there that are faster. Will you keep rebuilding your motor to beat them all? It has been my experience, over the years, that you need to build your car faster/better for yourself... for the joy of being a car nut. Not to race people on the streets. That is a great way to end up in the hospital or worse! So get what you want out of your motor, but don't get carried away in "my car is faster than yours" insanity.
Sorry for the zen speech. It's only my 2 cents.
Hope this helps.
Best of luck!
Over the last several years, I have had many questions about improving my car's performance. Searching this vast website has helped me learn alot about my stock parts as well as aftermarket performance parts.
As far as building a motor just to beat a 2002 Camaro LS1 - why? There are other motors out there that are faster. Will you keep rebuilding your motor to beat them all? It has been my experience, over the years, that you need to build your car faster/better for yourself... for the joy of being a car nut. Not to race people on the streets. That is a great way to end up in the hospital or worse! So get what you want out of your motor, but don't get carried away in "my car is faster than yours" insanity.
Sorry for the zen speech. It's only my 2 cents.
Hope this helps.
Best of luck!
#48
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: E.B.F. TN
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
Originally Posted by DENN_SHAH
im starting to wonder,... is the RCkid back?
#49
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: in front of mustangs
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 z-28 conv.
Engine: 350 vortec tpi crate
Transmission: 700r4
I have outrun ls1 cars repeatedly including a coupld of ss camaros. the only one i lost to was a highly modified TA. it had cam, heads, headers, exhaust, NO2 and who knows what else. that car was freakin fast but what fun it was running it. after i pulled his stock 04 cobra he went home and went on the hunt for me with the TA. that should tell you something about that car.
now, having said that and still doing modifactions to my car. if i had to do it over again............i'd buy an ls1 off ebay (or elsewhere) rather than spending quite a lot of money and time on what i have. the ls1 is a proven engine.
why spend the time and money playing mad scientist when you can buy frankenstein from the get go? just my
now, having said that and still doing modifactions to my car. if i had to do it over again............i'd buy an ls1 off ebay (or elsewhere) rather than spending quite a lot of money and time on what i have. the ls1 is a proven engine.
why spend the time and money playing mad scientist when you can buy frankenstein from the get go? just my
#50
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,773
Likes: 0
Received 93 Likes
on
78 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Originally Posted by MrDude_1
im not trying to start **** either... but its just amazing how people defend one motor, without knowing anything about the other..... the other motor is absolutely amazing.. in both performance and price. people just assume the SBC is cheaper, without ever looking at the cost of the LS1 parts. the only way the SBC is cheaper, is if you settle for less performance then the LS1 is stock.
but, when i mention that on here, it usually falls on def ears... i know, you guys would rather replace every part on your motor to start making decent power.... and then defend how great it is. and thats fine.. i mean, people have been doing that to thirdgens since 1981. (82 model year went on sale in 81)
but, when i mention that on here, it usually falls on def ears... i know, you guys would rather replace every part on your motor to start making decent power.... and then defend how great it is. and thats fine.. i mean, people have been doing that to thirdgens since 1981. (82 model year went on sale in 81)
If LS1's and LS1 parts were as cheap as SBC parts, i'd prolly jump at it. But even silly things like ECM's and sensors are still crazy big money.. dollar for hp it just doesn't make sense. Not to say your LS1 swap isn't cool stuff. We're glad your happy with it. Well at least I am, I can't vouch for some of the other idiots on here
-- Joe