why is there a tpi plenum difference [look at pic]
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto,Ontario
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 346 LS6
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Hybrid 8.8 3.73
why is there a tpi plenum difference [look at pic]
Hello
I was just looking at some pics when i noticed the the grooves on one plenum extended much farther than the grooves on another.if you look closely on one the grooves end at the begining of the first two runners. and on the other the grooves go even farther than that.
I am not sure as to why this is. maybe it is a vette/camaro, bird difference or maybe they changed the look slightly one year. All that i know for sure is that both my 89 iroc and 90 gta have plenums with grooves like the blue one.
It isnt anything important but i was hoping just out of interest if someone could shed some light on the subject.
Speed
I was just looking at some pics when i noticed the the grooves on one plenum extended much farther than the grooves on another.if you look closely on one the grooves end at the begining of the first two runners. and on the other the grooves go even farther than that.
I am not sure as to why this is. maybe it is a vette/camaro, bird difference or maybe they changed the look slightly one year. All that i know for sure is that both my 89 iroc and 90 gta have plenums with grooves like the blue one.
It isnt anything important but i was hoping just out of interest if someone could shed some light on the subject.
Speed
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock
I don't see any differences in those pictures. But in the later third gen years GM was phasing out the L98 parts and switching everything over to the LT1. So when the factories ran out of L98 parts, some third gens wound up with LT1 runners.
*Edit*
I just noticed you were talking about the plenum.
Maybe it's the same story?
*Edit*
I just noticed you were talking about the plenum.
Maybe it's the same story?
Last edited by ScottyRS; 07-01-2006 at 07:32 PM.
#4
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 383 SuperRam
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3:23 Posi
The MAF systems have a different plenum than speed density systems. The difference in grooves made it possibly to quickly tell what year car it came from. The longer grooves were used from 85 - 88, and the shorter were used on 89 - 92. The other thing that made them different is the earlier plenums had a passage for the cold start injector, they also had a cut out in the front for the IAC. The later plenums did not have this, in 90 - 92 the plenums got a MAP boss for the map sensor.
#5
Supreme Member
Originally Posted by ScottyRS
I don't see any differences in those pictures. But in the later third gen years GM was phasing out the L98 parts and switching everything over to the LT1. So when the factories ran out of L98 parts, some third gens wound up with LT1 runners.
*Edit*
I just noticed you were talking about the plenum.
Maybe it's the same story?
*Edit*
I just noticed you were talking about the plenum.
Maybe it's the same story?
Yes, to tell the difference between the MAF and SD cars. Maf had longer ribs and were slower, and the SD cars were shorter ribbed but much MUCH faster.
#6
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '88 G T/A
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt
Originally Posted by ScottyRS
I don't see any differences in those pictures. But in the later third gen years GM was phasing out the L98 parts and switching everything over to the LT1. So when the factories ran out of L98 parts, some third gens wound up with LT1 runners.
*Edit*
I just noticed you were talking about the plenum.
Maybe it's the same story?
*Edit*
I just noticed you were talking about the plenum.
Maybe it's the same story?
#7
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 383 SuperRam
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3:23 Posi
Originally Posted by ScottyRS
I don't see any differences in those pictures. But in the later third gen years GM was phasing out the L98 parts and switching everything over to the LT1. So when the factories ran out of L98 parts, some third gens wound up with LT1 runners.
*Edit*
I just noticed you were talking about the plenum.
Maybe it's the same story?
*Edit*
I just noticed you were talking about the plenum.
Maybe it's the same story?
Trending Topics
#11
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '88 G T/A
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt
Originally Posted by GuitarJunki17
Since when do LT1's have removable runners?
Anything's removable with the right tools
#13
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '88 G T/A
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt
Originally Posted by 87zjeff
since when do LT1's have runners??? with the exception of the fuel rails, the intake on an LT1 is all 1 peice isn't it?
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: louisville, ky
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Axle/Gears: '01 3.42 10 bolt
well, that's what i was thinking but someone posted before seemed to imply that they seperated from the intake like the tpi runners do. didn't sound right.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto,Ontario
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 346 LS6
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Hybrid 8.8 3.73
I dont think the difference is a maf/map thing. MY 89 iroc tpi [maf] and my 90 gta tpi [map] both look the blue tpi pic. The plenums are slightly different because the is a hook up for the speed density on the rear passenger side of the plenum but the grooves are the same.
I side the 89 to 92 tpi plenum statement. I know for sure those look like the second pic .. but as for 85 to 88 i havent seen a tpi in one of those for a while so i couldnt be sure.
Speed
I side the 89 to 92 tpi plenum statement. I know for sure those look like the second pic .. but as for 85 to 88 i havent seen a tpi in one of those for a while so i couldnt be sure.
Speed
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Northern California, Redding
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Red 1987 IROC Convertible
Engine: 305 LB9 TPI
Transmission: T5 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.45
My 87 looks like the one on the left. Longer grooves.
#22
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,716
Likes: 0
Received 252 Likes
on
188 Posts
Car: 1987 Formula (original owner)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt/3.45
Originally Posted by speedmachine
so then really all we now need to know is what 88 has.
Speed
Speed
But assuming that number relates to the model year, then the 88 looks like the one on the right, whereas my '87's, like everyone else's '87, is like the one on the left(the better-looking of the two, IMO). But I've never had my '87's plenum off, so I can't confirm that its number is 87. Maybe someone else can though.
So if that's correct, then that also would make the SD/MAF plenum comparison inaccurate.
#23
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ocean, NJ
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: Check The Sig
There are several differences over the years of the plenums between the length of the grooves on top, which was more or less for astetics, to the different set ups such as ones equiped with the cold start injector or not, as well as MAF and MAP. I belive there are 3 or 4 variations, and the Corvette had another design if I recall.
#24
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Back in the states...
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Silver 1980 Corvette (L82 w/TPI)
Engine: L82
Transmission: TH350
Originally Posted by bigals87z28
There are several differences over the years of the plenums between the length of the grooves on top, which was more or less for astetics, to the different set ups such as ones equiped with the cold start injector or not, as well as MAF and MAP. I belive there are 3 or 4 variations, and the Corvette had another design if I recall.
The plenums break down into three groups--'85-88 (left), '89 only (middle), and '90-up (right).
The fuel inlets and returns differ between the different years. The '89-91 Corvette fuel rail (left) has a female 16mm passenger-side inlet and a female 16mm return. The '85-88 Corvette (middle) has a female 16mm passenger-side inlet and a female 14mm return. The '85-92 F-body (right) has a female 16mm driver-side inlet and a female 14mm return
Three intake manifold styles were used on the TPI equipped engines. The '87-91 Corvette intake on the left used a heat-riser tube off of the passenger-side header and has a water crossover at the back to relieve hot spots on the back of the aluminum heads. The middle intake was used on '85-86 IROCs, T/As, and Corvettes with cast-iron heads with outside valve-cover bolt holes (early-style). (The two center bolts on these two intakes are at the same position as the end bolts and will fit the early head-bolt pattern.) The intake on the right was used on '87-92 IROCs and T/As with cast-iron heads with center-bolt valve covers. The '87-95 intakes with the later cast-iron head-bolt pattern can be machined to fit the early bolt pattern. If you want to run Vortec and Fast Burn-style heads, GM and S&P have new TPI intakes to adapt a TPI to both.
All the passenger-side TPI tubes (top) for all '85-92 models are the same. There are two different driver-side tubes. The '85-88 units (left) had the ninth injector port (arrow), while the '89-92 F-body and '89-91 Corvette tubes (right) didn't.
Identifying GM's Tuned-Port Injection Units
#25
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 383 SuperRam
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3:23 Posi
The maf to sd is mostly true, except for 89. Check out Chevy TPI swapper's guide on page 20. It gives you the run down. There were actually three upper plenums made from 85 - 92. 85 - 88, 89 and 90 - 92. 89 - 92 had shorter fins than the earlier plenums.
#26
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sayre, PA
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by speedmachine
Hello
I was just looking at some pics when i noticed the the grooves on one plenum extended much farther than the grooves on another.if you look closely on one the grooves end at the begining of the first two runners. and on the other the grooves go even farther than that.
I am not sure as to why this is. maybe it is a vette/camaro, bird difference or maybe they changed the look slightly one year. All that i know for sure is that both my 89 iroc and 90 gta have plenums with grooves like the blue one.
It isnt anything important but i was hoping just out of interest if someone could shed some light on the subject.
Speed
I was just looking at some pics when i noticed the the grooves on one plenum extended much farther than the grooves on another.if you look closely on one the grooves end at the begining of the first two runners. and on the other the grooves go even farther than that.
I am not sure as to why this is. maybe it is a vette/camaro, bird difference or maybe they changed the look slightly one year. All that i know for sure is that both my 89 iroc and 90 gta have plenums with grooves like the blue one.
It isnt anything important but i was hoping just out of interest if someone could shed some light on the subject.
Speed
http://www.hotrodlane.cc/PDFFILES/TPIStory.pdf
ScotSea
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sanjay
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
08-12-2015 03:41 PM