TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

why is there a tpi plenum difference [look at pic]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2006, 06:56 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
speedmachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto,Ontario
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 346 LS6
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Hybrid 8.8 3.73
why is there a tpi plenum difference [look at pic]

Hello
I was just looking at some pics when i noticed the the grooves on one plenum extended much farther than the grooves on another.if you look closely on one the grooves end at the begining of the first two runners. and on the other the grooves go even farther than that.

I am not sure as to why this is. maybe it is a vette/camaro, bird difference or maybe they changed the look slightly one year. All that i know for sure is that both my 89 iroc and 90 gta have plenums with grooves like the blue one.

It isnt anything important but i was hoping just out of interest if someone could shed some light on the subject.

Speed
Attached Thumbnails why is there a tpi plenum difference [look at pic]-120943d1151352822-strut-tower-brace   why is there a tpi plenum difference [look at pic]-460224_32_full.jpg  
Old 07-01-2006, 07:07 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ScottyRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock
I don't see any differences in those pictures. But in the later third gen years GM was phasing out the L98 parts and switching everything over to the LT1. So when the factories ran out of L98 parts, some third gens wound up with LT1 runners.


*Edit*

I just noticed you were talking about the plenum.

Maybe it's the same story?

Last edited by ScottyRS; 07-01-2006 at 07:32 PM.
Old 07-01-2006, 07:32 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
firebirdjosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 86 T/A
Engine: HSR 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77 posi
There's definitely a difference, probably something small between certain years.
Old 07-01-2006, 07:41 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Fast92RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 383 SuperRam
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3:23 Posi
The MAF systems have a different plenum than speed density systems. The difference in grooves made it possibly to quickly tell what year car it came from. The longer grooves were used from 85 - 88, and the shorter were used on 89 - 92. The other thing that made them different is the earlier plenums had a passage for the cold start injector, they also had a cut out in the front for the IAC. The later plenums did not have this, in 90 - 92 the plenums got a MAP boss for the map sensor.
Old 07-01-2006, 07:51 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

 
BigWhiteGTP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,043
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1994 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Originally Posted by ScottyRS
I don't see any differences in those pictures. But in the later third gen years GM was phasing out the L98 parts and switching everything over to the LT1. So when the factories ran out of L98 parts, some third gens wound up with LT1 runners.


*Edit*

I just noticed you were talking about the plenum.

Maybe it's the same story?
Yeah, they also started using LS1 parts on the last couple years of the LT1 motors because they were running out of LT1 parts.

Yes, to tell the difference between the MAF and SD cars. Maf had longer ribs and were slower, and the SD cars were shorter ribbed but much MUCH faster.
Old 07-01-2006, 08:31 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
MattODoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '88 G T/A
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt
Originally Posted by ScottyRS
I don't see any differences in those pictures. But in the later third gen years GM was phasing out the L98 parts and switching everything over to the LT1. So when the factories ran out of L98 parts, some third gens wound up with LT1 runners.


*Edit*

I just noticed you were talking about the plenum.

Maybe it's the same story?
I have GOT to get me some of those LT1 runners!!!
Old 07-01-2006, 08:42 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Fast92RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 383 SuperRam
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3:23 Posi
Originally Posted by ScottyRS
I don't see any differences in those pictures. But in the later third gen years GM was phasing out the L98 parts and switching everything over to the LT1. So when the factories ran out of L98 parts, some third gens wound up with LT1 runners.


*Edit*

I just noticed you were talking about the plenum.

Maybe it's the same story?
I didnt know thirgens came with LT1's
Old 07-01-2006, 09:45 PM
  #8  
Member
 
87IROCZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: BW 7.75" 3.27
Originally Posted by ScottyRS
...when the factories ran out of L98 parts, some third gens wound up with LT1 runners.
WHAT?
Old 07-01-2006, 09:52 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 6,859
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Those LT1 runners for the L98 are pretty rare. I have been looking for some for quite awhile now but they are hard to locate as so few were made.
Old 07-01-2006, 10:24 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
GuitarJunki17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 IROCZ Camaro
Engine: 350 4bbl, 200cc Heads, 270hr Cam
Transmission: 700R4 w/ Trans-Go shift kit.
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt Posi
Since when do LT1's have removable runners?
Old 07-01-2006, 10:27 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
MattODoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '88 G T/A
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt
Originally Posted by GuitarJunki17
Since when do LT1's have removable runners?

Anything's removable with the right tools
Old 07-01-2006, 10:56 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
87zjeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: louisville, ky
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Axle/Gears: '01 3.42 10 bolt
since when do LT1's have runners??? with the exception of the fuel rails, the intake on an LT1 is all 1 peice isn't it?
Old 07-01-2006, 11:04 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
MattODoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '88 G T/A
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt
Originally Posted by 87zjeff
since when do LT1's have runners??? with the exception of the fuel rails, the intake on an LT1 is all 1 peice isn't it?
The runners are the actual rectangular ports and yes they are cast into the manifold.
Old 07-01-2006, 11:06 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
87zjeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: louisville, ky
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Axle/Gears: '01 3.42 10 bolt
well, that's what i was thinking but someone posted before seemed to imply that they seperated from the intake like the tpi runners do. didn't sound right.
Old 07-02-2006, 10:23 AM
  #15  
Member
 
87IROCZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: BW 7.75" 3.27
Dude, read the rest of the posts. They've been ripping this guy up ever since he said that.
Old 07-02-2006, 10:54 AM
  #16  
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
bfox88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cinnaminson, NJ
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 90 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
wait so is the MAF plenum the one on the left and SD the pic on the right?
Old 07-02-2006, 11:05 AM
  #17  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 6,859
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Not quite. My 1989 MAF car is like the one on the right. So it well could be that the one on the right is for 1989 to 1992 cars.
Old 07-02-2006, 04:35 PM
  #18  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
speedmachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto,Ontario
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 346 LS6
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Hybrid 8.8 3.73
I dont think the difference is a maf/map thing. MY 89 iroc tpi [maf] and my 90 gta tpi [map] both look the blue tpi pic. The plenums are slightly different because the is a hook up for the speed density on the rear passenger side of the plenum but the grooves are the same.

I side the 89 to 92 tpi plenum statement. I know for sure those look like the second pic .. but as for 85 to 88 i havent seen a tpi in one of those for a while so i couldnt be sure.

Speed
Old 07-02-2006, 04:55 PM
  #19  
Senior Member

 
mnorton's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Northern California, Redding
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Red 1987 IROC Convertible
Engine: 305 LB9 TPI
Transmission: T5 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.45
My 87 looks like the one on the left. Longer grooves.
Old 07-02-2006, 06:22 PM
  #20  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
speedmachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto,Ontario
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 346 LS6
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Hybrid 8.8 3.73
so then really all we now need to know is what 88 has.

Speed
Old 07-02-2006, 11:15 PM
  #21  
Member
 
87IROCZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: BW 7.75" 3.27
Although this has already been established, my 87 is also like the one on the left.
Old 07-03-2006, 12:57 AM
  #22  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
LAFireboyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,716
Likes: 0
Received 252 Likes on 188 Posts
Car: 1987 Formula (original owner)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt/3.45
Originally Posted by speedmachine
so then really all we now need to know is what 88 has.

Speed
Cast into the underside of the plenum, there's an encircled number, which might mean something. From an '85 in a junkyard, that encircled number was 85. And one I have in my garage for porting has an 88 on it(though I don't remember what year car it was from).

But assuming that number relates to the model year, then the 88 looks like the one on the right, whereas my '87's, like everyone else's '87, is like the one on the left(the better-looking of the two, IMO). But I've never had my '87's plenum off, so I can't confirm that its number is 87. Maybe someone else can though.

So if that's correct, then that also would make the SD/MAF plenum comparison inaccurate.
Old 07-03-2006, 02:44 AM
  #23  
Supreme Member

 
bigals87z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ocean, NJ
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: Check The Sig
There are several differences over the years of the plenums between the length of the grooves on top, which was more or less for astetics, to the different set ups such as ones equiped with the cold start injector or not, as well as MAF and MAP. I belive there are 3 or 4 variations, and the Corvette had another design if I recall.
Old 07-03-2006, 03:21 AM
  #24  
Member
 
JB97C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Back in the states...
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Silver 1980 Corvette (L82 w/TPI)
Engine: L82
Transmission: TH350
Originally Posted by bigals87z28
There are several differences over the years of the plenums between the length of the grooves on top, which was more or less for astetics, to the different set ups such as ones equiped with the cold start injector or not, as well as MAF and MAP. I belive there are 3 or 4 variations, and the Corvette had another design if I recall.
There were three different plenums used through the TPI era-



The plenums break down into three groups--'85-88 (left), '89 only (middle), and '90-up (right).


The fuel inlets and returns differ between the different years. The '89-91 Corvette fuel rail (left) has a female 16mm passenger-side inlet and a female 16mm return. The '85-88 Corvette (middle) has a female 16mm passenger-side inlet and a female 14mm return. The '85-92 F-body (right) has a female 16mm driver-side inlet and a female 14mm return
Don't forget the three lower intake manifolds-



Three intake manifold styles were used on the TPI equipped engines. The '87-91 Corvette intake on the left used a heat-riser tube off of the passenger-side header and has a water crossover at the back to relieve hot spots on the back of the aluminum heads. The middle intake was used on '85-86 IROCs, T/As, and Corvettes with cast-iron heads with outside valve-cover bolt holes (early-style). (The two center bolts on these two intakes are at the same position as the end bolts and will fit the early head-bolt pattern.) The intake on the right was used on '87-92 IROCs and T/As with cast-iron heads with center-bolt valve covers. The '87-95 intakes with the later cast-iron head-bolt pattern can be machined to fit the early bolt pattern. If you want to run Vortec and Fast Burn-style heads, GM and S&P have new TPI intakes to adapt a TPI to both.
So, maybe it would be easy to confuse who had Vette parts versus F-body TPI parts. They weren't always the same!



All the passenger-side TPI tubes (top) for all '85-92 models are the same. There are two different driver-side tubes. The '85-88 units (left) had the ninth injector port (arrow), while the '89-92 F-body and '89-91 Corvette tubes (right) didn't.
From-
Identifying GM's Tuned-Port Injection Units
Old 07-03-2006, 07:42 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Fast92RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 383 SuperRam
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3:23 Posi
The maf to sd is mostly true, except for 89. Check out Chevy TPI swapper's guide on page 20. It gives you the run down. There were actually three upper plenums made from 85 - 92. 85 - 88, 89 and 90 - 92. 89 - 92 had shorter fins than the earlier plenums.
Old 07-04-2006, 04:50 PM
  #26  
Junior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
ScotSea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sayre, PA
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by speedmachine
Hello
I was just looking at some pics when i noticed the the grooves on one plenum extended much farther than the grooves on another.if you look closely on one the grooves end at the begining of the first two runners. and on the other the grooves go even farther than that.

I am not sure as to why this is. maybe it is a vette/camaro, bird difference or maybe they changed the look slightly one year. All that i know for sure is that both my 89 iroc and 90 gta have plenums with grooves like the blue one.

It isnt anything important but i was hoping just out of interest if someone could shed some light on the subject.

Speed
Here is a link that most of the ID storys seem to originate from:

http://www.hotrodlane.cc/PDFFILES/TPIStory.pdf

ScotSea
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MantyZ28
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
12-21-2015 11:02 AM
masonta
TPI
13
08-31-2015 10:14 PM
TheExaminer
Cooling
26
08-26-2015 04:59 PM
ASE doc
Alternative Port EFI Intakes
5
08-25-2015 09:14 AM
Sanjay
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
08-12-2015 03:41 PM



Quick Reply: why is there a tpi plenum difference [look at pic]



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 PM.