TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

gear drives

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-2006 | 10:29 PM
  #1  
CC89Formula's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo TX
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
gear drives

anyone use them? ive heard you cant use the noisy version but i was wondering about a quiet one. i wonder if the knock sensor would pull timing because of it, what do you guys think?
Old 03-21-2006 | 08:24 AM
  #2  
CrazyHawaiian's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 3
From: Changing Tires
Car: too many ...
There's a few posts about it but the search is down. Basically there is the possibility that the gear drive could throw off the knock sensor but nobody has been able to step up with knock counts before/after to prove it. There are a few guys around here running the quiet pete jackson setup with TPI and no issues. But the noisy version, eh nobody has verified it works no issues from what I've seen. But hey keep in mind if it did cause issues you could change the knock sensor to one that senses a different range of harmonics or you could modify the PROM to act differently when it gets knock counts.
Old 03-21-2006 | 10:18 AM
  #3  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Tim Burgess runs the noisy PJ.
Old 03-21-2006 | 04:38 PM
  #4  
CC89Formula's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo TX
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
hehe...so i crawled under my car today (people look at you funny when you do that at a parking lot outside the dorms ) and my knock sensor isnt even hooked up...looks like the wire got old and fell out.

anyway: more than likely a quiet one will work?
Old 03-21-2006 | 05:14 PM
  #5  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,456
Likes: 244
More likely that your ECM is never completing KS testing and you're running with less than full timing.

As for the gears, they're heavier than a chain, create noise, and may require extra lubrication:


Old 03-21-2006 | 05:45 PM
  #6  
Shagwell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 2
From: Southwest Florida
Car: projects.......
gear drives cause harmonics, quiet or noisy version. No amount of harmonics is good, whether or not the knock sensor picks it up. Why would you want one? Unless you're running HUGE(over 300lbs seat) valve springs there is no need. - Plus, it takes more power to turn 2 gears(crank turns idler which turns cam) than a good roller chain. So again, why?
- we've got a blower car thats running a billet double roller. The springs are 330 seat, around 1300 open, plus the cam driven fuel pump....so,obviously, nothing wrong with a good chain.
- I have nothing against a gear drive if its needed(proper application), but otherwise I see no point. A street car just isn't the application....
Old 03-21-2006 | 08:03 PM
  #7  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
only other reason I can see using a gear rather then a chain is timing accruacy over time. the gears shouldn't stretch out like a chain would and stand even less of a chance of braking then a chain I would think. but then again that is why we maintain the cars also. so stuff like this doesn't happen.
plus chains can last quite some time plus they don't break that easily
Old 03-22-2006 | 07:50 PM
  #8  
CC89Formula's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo TX
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
the reason for why is because i came across one cheaper than i can get a timing chain, so i was just curious.
Old 03-22-2006 | 08:18 PM
  #9  
CreepingDeath94's Avatar
Senior Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 683
Likes: 2
From: Florida
Car: '87 Trans-Am
Engine: LB9 (305 TPI)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 or 3.73..figuring it out still
Originally Posted by rx7speed
only other reason I can see using a gear rather then a chain is timing accruacy over time. the gears shouldn't stretch out like a chain would and stand even less of a chance of braking then a chain I would think. but then again that is why we maintain the cars also. so stuff like this doesn't happen.
plus chains can last quite some time plus they don't break that easily
Thats the reason I threw it on my engine when I rebuilt it. Just one less thing Id have to worry about down the road...plus I was keeping it pretty stock and didnt care about the weight. Plus they sound cool :-p
Old 03-22-2006 | 11:48 PM
  #10  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,456
Likes: 244
I know there are more than a few 300,000 mile timing chains lurking around here. Chain sets got a bad rap when the factory was using nylon toothed cam sprockets to make them even more quiet - As if chain noise was ever a problem.

A timing chain (typical set) has to stretch to the point of actually skipping a tooth before it has enough slack to lose even 5.5° of timing. Considering variations in grinding, pinning cam snouts and drilling sprockets, broaching keyways, installation, and the fact that most people don't even care enough to degree their cams when they install them makes use of a gear set about as sensible as driving through McDonald's for two quarter pounders with cheese, a super-size french fry, two apple pies, and a DIET Coke. Unless you're **** enough about valve timing to the point of using an eccentric bushing, checking everything for accuracy, and knowing what you actually want you valve timing to be, using a gear drive for "accuracy" makes about as much sense as the "low-calorie" trip through McDonald's. You're trusting too many vendors and suppliers to get it right for the "super accurate" timing to even matter.

And if you're that concerned, you'd be running a HTD belt drive instead of a gear set. Don't fool yourself with gears thinking they are "accurate". If you want the noise, just admit that you want the noise. By the time you get the engine tuned just right, you'll be tired of the noise anyway. But don't take my word for it.

Last edited by Vader; 03-22-2006 at 11:58 PM.
Old 03-23-2006 | 09:54 AM
  #11  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
what a CAS for timing accuracy?
Old 03-23-2006 | 10:04 AM
  #12  
pwdbychevy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 26
From: Wesley Chapel, Florida
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: Dart SHP 406ci T88 turbo
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: QP 35 spline Ford 9" 3.50 gears
I've been using the Pete Jackson "quiet" gear drive for 13 years now. It's still pretty noisy. My scantool shows a few knocks but nothing that affects performance.
Old 03-23-2006 | 04:43 PM
  #13  
CC89Formula's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo TX
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
i guess ill just pass it up then, a guy i know was going to sell me one that was only slightly used for $20 so i was just curious.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
specialized
TPI
27
06-18-2022 10:26 AM
jklein337
Tech / General Engine
2
09-19-2018 07:23 PM
jharrison5
Engine Swap
5
08-19-2015 06:53 PM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
08-17-2015 12:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 AM.