Stock 305 TPI Dyno numbers?
#1
Stock 305 TPI Dyno numbers?
Who has what? I'm trying to gather a list of HP/TQ numbers for stock or at least mostly stock 305 TPI motors. Here's a few that I know of.
'92 RS 180K all stock 213hp/278tq 9.52@74.9 in the 1/8
'92 RS 140K all stock 207hp/???tq 13.9@100 in the 1/4
'92 RS 176K all stock 217hp/298tq ???@??? (motor rebuilt in 97 tho so the 176K is not right)
*edited to add more numbers
'92 RS 180K all stock 213hp/278tq 9.52@74.9 in the 1/8
'92 RS 140K all stock 207hp/???tq 13.9@100 in the 1/4
'92 RS 176K all stock 217hp/298tq ???@??? (motor rebuilt in 97 tho so the 176K is not right)
*edited to add more numbers
Last edited by GMan 3MT; 07-23-2005 at 09:55 PM.
#4
I just got that info from this website so the acuracy is unknown to me. But I do know most of the guys that have owned that car. I'm assuming you think the 1/4 mile numbers are wrong? I'm not a drag racer and don't know what is accurate for a 305 TPI.
Killjoy... sorry for wasting your time.
Killjoy... sorry for wasting your time.
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pleasant Grove, Utah
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1993 GMC Typhoon
Engine: 4.3 Turbo
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by GMan 3MT
Killjoy... sorry for wasting your time.
Killjoy... sorry for wasting your time.
and dont let it happen again..
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cleveland Ohio
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Formula, a big red brick.
Engine: A Ford 351 Windsor... ?
Transmission: Dodge 727
Originally posted by 91GTABird
Camaro RS with 305 TPI?
Camaro RS with 305 TPI?
In 92, it was an option to anyone, but made the RS more expensive than a Z28.
#10
just dynoed a stock 85 tpi camaro and it did 167hp and 211tq at the wheels, which is a little less then I expected but everyone there thought that was pretty good for a 305. I dont know how you get numbers that high from a stock 305, unless its really really low miles or something. Wait a sec, it doesnt seem possible for you to get that amount of torque at the wheels of a 305....
#11
305 dyno numbers
A friend of mine has an 87 Trans Am with 305 tuned port and automatic. It is very nice with low miles, he has only done a few simple things to the car. It has an SLP chip, a 3 inch cat back exhaust kit, can't remember the brand, K&N Filter, and thats it, still has stock exhaust manifolds etc... and he put down 199 horsepower to the wheels with a nice looking A/F ratio, I can't remember the torque numbers unfortunately but decent numbers for a 305 that is close to stock. Larry.
#12
Supreme Member
Originally posted by EjBaL
just dynoed a stock 85 tpi camaro and it did 167hp and 211tq at the wheels, which is a little less then I expected but everyone there thought that was pretty good for a 305. I dont know how you get numbers that high from a stock 305, unless its really really low miles or something. Wait a sec, it doesnt seem possible for you to get that amount of torque at the wheels of a 305....
just dynoed a stock 85 tpi camaro and it did 167hp and 211tq at the wheels, which is a little less then I expected but everyone there thought that was pretty good for a 305. I dont know how you get numbers that high from a stock 305, unless its really really low miles or something. Wait a sec, it doesnt seem possible for you to get that amount of torque at the wheels of a 305....
#14
dyno
Well, every dyno is different, the one we were using was outside and the ambient temp was near 90 etc... that hurts performance also. Using one in an A/C environment may help the numbers a little. In my opinion I would not worry too much about who makes what on the dyno, bottom line is which one is quicker at the track and can all that power be used successfully. Just the way I feel about it, I can give some perfect examples of what I am talking about. Larry.
#15
Supreme Member
Mine was done outside on a Dyno-jet around March-early April. And most cars were getting low numbers that day if my memory serves me right. My car feels stronger than it did since I went to 87 octane. But yeah, maybe you read the dyno sheet wrong or maybe your dyno was a mustang dyno....which is a conservative dyno actually.
#16
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hickory, NC
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS, 1993 Camaro Z-28
Engine: what engine, LT1
Transmission: did it come with one, 4l60
Axle/Gears: They spin (most of the time)
i have been lookin for a 91-92 z with a 350tpi and i cant find one in good condition close by. But i found a 305tpi in awesome condition for a desent price, and i was wondering what is a typical 8th mile number this car can lay down.
#17
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: It's a west coast thing, you may not understand?
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 IROC, tpi, t top,
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 5 speed
Just did a 88. 105k headers,high flow cat, slp runners, fuel at 50 psi,6al msd,msd wires,msd coil,plat4 plugs,ported plenm. Stock bottom & top,block never opend. 178rwhp/195tq @5130 rpm On a 5 speed. Not done with this one yet!
#19
Supreme Member
Originally posted by 3leggedog
Just did a 88. 105k headers,high flow cat, slp runners, fuel at 50 psi,6al msd,msd wires,msd coil,plat4 plugs,ported plenm. Stock bottom & top,block never opend. 178rwhp/195tq @5130 rpm On a 5 speed. Not done with this one yet!
Just did a 88. 105k headers,high flow cat, slp runners, fuel at 50 psi,6al msd,msd wires,msd coil,plat4 plugs,ported plenm. Stock bottom & top,block never opend. 178rwhp/195tq @5130 rpm On a 5 speed. Not done with this one yet!
Unless you read the dyno wrong, or you live on Mt. Everest with Alabama summer humidity, your car is sick and tired.
#20
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: It's a west coast thing, you may not understand?
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 IROC, tpi, t top,
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 5 speed
yes bad numbers. Since found two small vacume leaks, The tq is compleatly differant with the new runners. I will get it fixed soon. It still is a strong driver. Was't the lb9 220hp at the motor? so minus 15 % or so for rwhp. It's not that far off for stock?
#21
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: West Des Moines, IA
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3 GT
Engine: 2.3 DISI Turbo
Transmission: 6 speed MT
Originally posted by 3leggedog
yes bad numbers. Since found two small vacume leaks, The tq is compleatly differant with the new runners. I will get it fixed soon. It still is a strong driver. Was't the lb9 220hp at the motor? so minus 15 % or so for rwhp. It's not that far off for stock?
yes bad numbers. Since found two small vacume leaks, The tq is compleatly differant with the new runners. I will get it fixed soon. It still is a strong driver. Was't the lb9 220hp at the motor? so minus 15 % or so for rwhp. It's not that far off for stock?
#22
Supreme Member
No your numbers aren't far from stock, but you had those mods ( headers, cat, runners, etc...) on those dyno runs correct? I "think" you should be around 200whp at least with those mods.
Now did you tune for the fuel pressure to be at 50psi? Seems to me the stock 46psi is good enough, 50 may be overkill. I could be wrong though, just a thought. Runners could be overkill as well. Do you know what your timing is set at?
I believe the 5spd TPI cars were 215hp at the motor and 225 later on with the dual cats and Speed Density systems. So factor in the 15% DT loss that's roughly 30hp less.
Now did you tune for the fuel pressure to be at 50psi? Seems to me the stock 46psi is good enough, 50 may be overkill. I could be wrong though, just a thought. Runners could be overkill as well. Do you know what your timing is set at?
I believe the 5spd TPI cars were 215hp at the motor and 225 later on with the dual cats and Speed Density systems. So factor in the 15% DT loss that's roughly 30hp less.
#23
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: It's a west coast thing, you may not understand?
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 IROC, tpi, t top,
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 5 speed
the tq # is at 3900rpm. I am happy with the intrest! But it's not my listing, or thread. I also forgot that i did the MAF , screen and heat sinks. I am getting new design 2 svo 19# injectors. This well give me another shot at vac leaks! Also the bolt on mods - I was hopeing to get back to new stock #. They say 10hp for this 15 for that/ Idon't belive. It's a totale package thing. Not a best day test. But Iam still buying!!! Oh yea turns out slp runnres have no performance add on a 305. check the super rod article on top of the tpi listings???? Not to worry I'll make this car better!!$$
Last edited by 3leggedog; 07-28-2005 at 10:18 PM.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Plattsburgh,NY
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 93 Mustang GT
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
I know the later 305's have to be close to a stock 302 dyno. They make around 185-190 rwhp and 260-270 rwtq. My friends 88 GT was at 227rwhp and 284rwtq with full exhaust, cold air and pulleys. I know that I have seen stock dyno #'s for L98's that were around 200-205 rwhp..not sure on the torque...
#25
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Duluth, Ga
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Auburn Pro / 3.42
I got some graphs of mine as I changed things. Goes from a 305 tbi to tpi with headers. Still has the tbi cam and heads so numbers will be alittle different.
http://bitchincamaro.no-ip.com/dyno.html
http://bitchincamaro.no-ip.com/dyno.html
#27
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI - SLP Runners, AFPR, MSD Goodies
Transmission: 700R4 - Shift Kit, Corvette Servo
Axle/Gears: BW 9 bolt, 3.27s
.
If your stock 305 is putting down 180 hp and 255 rwhp, get rid of it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sanjay
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
08-12-2015 03:41 PM