TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Stock 305 TPI Dyno numbers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2005, 08:42 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
GMan 3MT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 556
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T5 WC
Axle/Gears: 3.42 T2R
Stock 305 TPI Dyno numbers?

Who has what? I'm trying to gather a list of HP/TQ numbers for stock or at least mostly stock 305 TPI motors. Here's a few that I know of.

'92 RS 180K all stock 213hp/278tq 9.52@74.9 in the 1/8
'92 RS 140K all stock 207hp/???tq 13.9@100 in the 1/4
'92 RS 176K all stock 217hp/298tq ???@??? (motor rebuilt in 97 tho so the 176K is not right)

*edited to add more numbers

Last edited by GMan 3MT; 07-23-2005 at 09:55 PM.
Old 07-23-2005, 08:45 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 6,859
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
I think someone is pulling you chain on the second set of numbers.
Old 07-23-2005, 08:47 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
KiLLJ0Y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pleasant Grove, Utah
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1993 GMC Typhoon
Engine: 4.3 Turbo
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Attached Images  
Old 07-23-2005, 09:49 PM
  #4  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
GMan 3MT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 556
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T5 WC
Axle/Gears: 3.42 T2R
I just got that info from this website so the acuracy is unknown to me. But I do know most of the guys that have owned that car. I'm assuming you think the 1/4 mile numbers are wrong? I'm not a drag racer and don't know what is accurate for a 305 TPI.

Killjoy... sorry for wasting your time.
Old 07-23-2005, 10:09 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 6,859
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Right the 1/4 mile numbers for the stated horsepower.

Last edited by 1989GTATransAm; 07-23-2005 at 10:27 PM.
Old 07-24-2005, 12:30 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
91GTABird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Memphis, Tn
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92' RS
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Camaro RS with 305 TPI?
Old 07-24-2005, 01:03 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
KiLLJ0Y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pleasant Grove, Utah
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1993 GMC Typhoon
Engine: 4.3 Turbo
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by GMan 3MT


Killjoy... sorry for wasting your time.

and dont let it happen again..
Attached Images  
Old 07-24-2005, 01:03 PM
  #8  
GOY
Senior Member
 
GOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cleveland Ohio
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Formula, a big red brick.
Engine: A Ford 351 Windsor... ?
Transmission: Dodge 727
Originally posted by 91GTABird
Camaro RS with 305 TPI?
B4C = cop package = tuned port cars.

In 92, it was an option to anyone, but made the RS more expensive than a Z28.
Old 07-24-2005, 05:44 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

 
BigWhiteGTP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,043
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1994 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.23
187whp & 267wtq from my stock '91 auto T/A.
Old 07-24-2005, 06:36 PM
  #10  
Member

 
EjBaL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Olean,NY
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just dynoed a stock 85 tpi camaro and it did 167hp and 211tq at the wheels, which is a little less then I expected but everyone there thought that was pretty good for a 305. I dont know how you get numbers that high from a stock 305, unless its really really low miles or something. Wait a sec, it doesnt seem possible for you to get that amount of torque at the wheels of a 305....
Old 07-24-2005, 07:21 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
firebirdjones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
305 dyno numbers

A friend of mine has an 87 Trans Am with 305 tuned port and automatic. It is very nice with low miles, he has only done a few simple things to the car. It has an SLP chip, a 3 inch cat back exhaust kit, can't remember the brand, K&N Filter, and thats it, still has stock exhaust manifolds etc... and he put down 199 horsepower to the wheels with a nice looking A/F ratio, I can't remember the torque numbers unfortunately but decent numbers for a 305 that is close to stock. Larry.
Old 07-25-2005, 01:10 AM
  #12  
Supreme Member

 
BigWhiteGTP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,043
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1994 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Originally posted by EjBaL
just dynoed a stock 85 tpi camaro and it did 167hp and 211tq at the wheels, which is a little less then I expected but everyone there thought that was pretty good for a 305. I dont know how you get numbers that high from a stock 305, unless its really really low miles or something. Wait a sec, it doesnt seem possible for you to get that amount of torque at the wheels of a 305....
And 211wtq is lower than a TBI car. GM has been underrating Fbodies for quite some time I think.
Old 07-25-2005, 02:21 PM
  #13  
Member

 
EjBaL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Olean,NY
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
then why didnt i get better numbers out of a stock strong running 305?
Old 07-25-2005, 05:07 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
firebirdjones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
dyno

Well, every dyno is different, the one we were using was outside and the ambient temp was near 90 etc... that hurts performance also. Using one in an A/C environment may help the numbers a little. In my opinion I would not worry too much about who makes what on the dyno, bottom line is which one is quicker at the track and can all that power be used successfully. Just the way I feel about it, I can give some perfect examples of what I am talking about. Larry.
Old 07-26-2005, 05:07 AM
  #15  
Supreme Member

 
BigWhiteGTP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,043
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1994 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Mine was done outside on a Dyno-jet around March-early April. And most cars were getting low numbers that day if my memory serves me right. My car feels stronger than it did since I went to 87 octane. But yeah, maybe you read the dyno sheet wrong or maybe your dyno was a mustang dyno....which is a conservative dyno actually.
Old 07-27-2005, 10:33 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
BT283's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hickory, NC
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS, 1993 Camaro Z-28
Engine: what engine, LT1
Transmission: did it come with one, 4l60
Axle/Gears: They spin (most of the time)
i have been lookin for a 91-92 z with a 350tpi and i cant find one in good condition close by. But i found a 305tpi in awesome condition for a desent price, and i was wondering what is a typical 8th mile number this car can lay down.
Old 07-27-2005, 11:14 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
3leggedog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: It's a west coast thing, you may not understand?
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 IROC, tpi, t top,
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 5 speed
Just did a 88. 105k headers,high flow cat, slp runners, fuel at 50 psi,6al msd,msd wires,msd coil,plat4 plugs,ported plenm. Stock bottom & top,block never opend. 178rwhp/195tq @5130 rpm On a 5 speed. Not done with this one yet!
Old 07-27-2005, 11:56 PM
  #18  
Member

 
EjBaL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Olean,NY
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not thats wierd because you were slightly ahead of me with hp, but I beat you with torque, and this a 100% stock 305 with k&n's and a flowmaster.
Old 07-28-2005, 01:39 AM
  #19  
Supreme Member

 
BigWhiteGTP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,043
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1994 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Originally posted by 3leggedog
Just did a 88. 105k headers,high flow cat, slp runners, fuel at 50 psi,6al msd,msd wires,msd coil,plat4 plugs,ported plenm. Stock bottom & top,block never opend. 178rwhp/195tq @5130 rpm On a 5 speed. Not done with this one yet!
No offense but those numbers are horrible. For one, crank torque on our Lb9 cars is 300lbs, minus 15-20% (depending on trans) you should put down 240-255tq to the wheels. And second, even w/o mods, because of your 5spd, you should have just as much and probably more power than my car. Which you don't.

Unless you read the dyno wrong, or you live on Mt. Everest with Alabama summer humidity, your car is sick and tired.
Old 07-28-2005, 07:57 AM
  #20  
Junior Member
 
3leggedog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: It's a west coast thing, you may not understand?
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 IROC, tpi, t top,
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 5 speed
yes bad numbers. Since found two small vacume leaks, The tq is compleatly differant with the new runners. I will get it fixed soon. It still is a strong driver. Was't the lb9 220hp at the motor? so minus 15 % or so for rwhp. It's not that far off for stock?
Old 07-28-2005, 11:50 AM
  #21  
Supreme Member

 
bnoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: West Des Moines, IA
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3 GT
Engine: 2.3 DISI Turbo
Transmission: 6 speed MT
Originally posted by 3leggedog
yes bad numbers. Since found two small vacume leaks, The tq is compleatly differant with the new runners. I will get it fixed soon. It still is a strong driver. Was't the lb9 220hp at the motor? so minus 15 % or so for rwhp. It's not that far off for stock?
Your HP reads fine for stock if it was a 225 horse car vs. a 195 horse car, but the torque is waaaaaay low at only 195. Is that peak torque rating, or did you just happen to read the torque number at the peak HP RPM? That could explain something...
Old 07-28-2005, 11:51 AM
  #22  
Supreme Member

 
BigWhiteGTP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,043
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1994 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.23
No your numbers aren't far from stock, but you had those mods ( headers, cat, runners, etc...) on those dyno runs correct? I "think" you should be around 200whp at least with those mods.

Now did you tune for the fuel pressure to be at 50psi? Seems to me the stock 46psi is good enough, 50 may be overkill. I could be wrong though, just a thought. Runners could be overkill as well. Do you know what your timing is set at?

I believe the 5spd TPI cars were 215hp at the motor and 225 later on with the dual cats and Speed Density systems. So factor in the 15% DT loss that's roughly 30hp less.
Old 07-28-2005, 10:06 PM
  #23  
Junior Member
 
3leggedog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: It's a west coast thing, you may not understand?
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 IROC, tpi, t top,
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 5 speed
the tq # is at 3900rpm. I am happy with the intrest! But it's not my listing, or thread. I also forgot that i did the MAF , screen and heat sinks. I am getting new design 2 svo 19# injectors. This well give me another shot at vac leaks! Also the bolt on mods - I was hopeing to get back to new stock #. They say 10hp for this 15 for that/ Idon't belive. It's a totale package thing. Not a best day test. But Iam still buying!!! Oh yea turns out slp runnres have no performance add on a 305. check the super rod article on top of the tpi listings???? Not to worry I'll make this car better!!$$

Last edited by 3leggedog; 07-28-2005 at 10:18 PM.
Old 07-29-2005, 12:12 AM
  #24  
Senior Member

 
CHEVY_EATER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Plattsburgh,NY
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 93 Mustang GT
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
I know the later 305's have to be close to a stock 302 dyno. They make around 185-190 rwhp and 260-270 rwtq. My friends 88 GT was at 227rwhp and 284rwtq with full exhaust, cold air and pulleys. I know that I have seen stock dyno #'s for L98's that were around 200-205 rwhp..not sure on the torque...
Old 07-29-2005, 01:21 AM
  #25  
Member

 
91RS5speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Duluth, Ga
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Auburn Pro / 3.42
I got some graphs of mine as I changed things. Goes from a 305 tbi to tpi with headers. Still has the tbi cam and heads so numbers will be alittle different.

http://bitchincamaro.no-ip.com/dyno.html
Old 07-29-2005, 11:37 AM
  #26  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Zepher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Norfolk, VA. USA
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
My friends stock 91 Z28 put down 165rwhp, don't recall the tq #.
Old 07-29-2005, 07:46 PM
  #27  
Supreme Member
 
87TPI350KID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI - SLP Runners, AFPR, MSD Goodies
Transmission: 700R4 - Shift Kit, Corvette Servo
Axle/Gears: BW 9 bolt, 3.27s
.

If your stock 305 is putting down 180 hp and 255 rwhp, get rid of it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1984HO
LTX and LSX
20
03-19-2021 11:59 AM
jaridjohn
History / Originality
5
04-25-2019 03:21 PM
st.evel07
Engine Swap
5
08-13-2015 06:15 PM
Sanjay
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
08-12-2015 03:41 PM
marcusaw
DFI and ECM
4
08-10-2015 08:13 AM



Quick Reply: Stock 305 TPI Dyno numbers?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 PM.