LT-1 Intake success rate? All owners please chime in...
#1
LT-1 Intake success rate? All owners please chime in...
Due to hood clearance issues, a HSR will not fit. I have been thinking about an LT-1 Intake because I have one readily available minus Mr. Millican's work which would have to be done..
How many people here have done it and are satisfied? Ecstatic?
And how many of you guys have had problems?
I wanna hear all the good, AND all the bad so I can make an informed decision! Thanks!
How many people here have done it and are satisfied? Ecstatic?
And how many of you guys have had problems?
I wanna hear all the good, AND all the bad so I can make an informed decision! Thanks!
#2
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,383
Likes: 368
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + ???
I've been watching this subject for months.
I've seen people just rave about how great it works, and I've seen people who continually have problems.
I'm close to doing it, but not quite convinced.
The remote stat thing is kinda un-American too.
I've seen people just rave about how great it works, and I've seen people who continually have problems.
I'm close to doing it, but not quite convinced.
The remote stat thing is kinda un-American too.
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
Originally posted by Abubaca
The LT1 intake requires a remote thermostat, doesn't it?
...I was kidding about the "un-American" thing, I just think it's kinda weird!
The LT1 intake requires a remote thermostat, doesn't it?
...I was kidding about the "un-American" thing, I just think it's kinda weird!
No, an engine doesn't require a thermostat to run. You could run a restrictor plate instead (big washer with a hole in it). You will still need hoses from the heads to radiator though.
#6
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,383
Likes: 368
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + ???
I wasn't commenting on any type or workmanship by anyone. I was just light-heartedly kidding about the different set-up. Kinda like how some traditional carb guys don't like fuel injecton.
There's was no offence intended to anyone, I apologize if that's how it came across.
...I've been considering the LT1 intake for a while myself.
There's was no offence intended to anyone, I apologize if that's how it came across.
...I've been considering the LT1 intake for a while myself.
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
Originally posted by Abubaca
I wasn't commenting on any type or workmanship by anyone. I was just light-heartedly kidding about the different set-up. Kinda like how some traditional carb guys don't like fuel injecton....
I wasn't commenting on any type or workmanship by anyone. I was just light-heartedly kidding about the different set-up. Kinda like how some traditional carb guys don't like fuel injecton....
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Elizabethtown, KY
Car: 89 Formula 350
Engine: L98 w/ Stealthram
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27
Now that mine is done, I love my new intake. John is a great guy to work with. He answers any questions promptly, and ships items very quickly. I can feel a difference in my performance via the "butt-dyno". Plus, it's a lot cheaper than an aftermarket setup too.
#10
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Elizabethtown, KY
Car: 89 Formula 350
Engine: L98 w/ Stealthram
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27
That's why I buy my tools like that NEW from a dealer. Mine came with a calibration certificate. But I bet that I spent a lot more too.
#11
I've heard about a few intakes leaking coolant into the oil.. that's really my biggest concern, can anyone shed some light on that?
My intake will have been ported before I send it to John so i'd be doubly screwed if that happens
My intake will have been ported before I send it to John so i'd be doubly screwed if that happens
#13
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,383
Likes: 368
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + ???
What's the deal with the actual intake being a little small for some heads, and requiring additional material to be welded on?
What are some popular heads that don't require this procedure?
What are some popular heads that don't require this procedure?
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
Originally posted by Abubaca
What's the deal with the actual intake being a little small for some heads, and requiring additional material to be welded on?
What are some popular heads that don't require this procedure?
What's the deal with the actual intake being a little small for some heads, and requiring additional material to be welded on?
What are some popular heads that don't require this procedure?
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
Originally posted by CarAteMyMoney
I've heard about a few intakes leaking coolant into the oil.. that's really my biggest concern, can anyone shed some light on that?
My intake will have been ported before I send it to John so i'd be doubly screwed if that happens
I've heard about a few intakes leaking coolant into the oil.. that's really my biggest concern, can anyone shed some light on that?
My intake will have been ported before I send it to John so i'd be doubly screwed if that happens
#16
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
From: West Des Moines, IA
Car: 2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3 GT
Engine: 2.3 DISI Turbo
Transmission: 6 speed MT
Originally posted by John Millican
I have only heard of ONE customer having coolant leak into the oil in the 3 years I've been converting the LT1 intake. I can't explain what happened or why it happened. He never did return the intake though even though I offered to take it back (less 20% refurb fee since he dremeled the intake).
I have only heard of ONE customer having coolant leak into the oil in the 3 years I've been converting the LT1 intake. I can't explain what happened or why it happened. He never did return the intake though even though I offered to take it back (less 20% refurb fee since he dremeled the intake).
The bolt holes have to be large enough and angled correctly so that the intake will seat up without cocking itself to one side or the other. This problem would just be extra tough without the added aluminum over the coolant ports as a buffer.
#17
Originally posted by John Millican
I have only heard of ONE customer having coolant leak into the oil in the 3 years I've been converting the LT1 intake. I can't explain what happened or why it happened. He never did return the intake though even though I offered to take it back (less 20% refurb fee since he dremeled the intake).
I have only heard of ONE customer having coolant leak into the oil in the 3 years I've been converting the LT1 intake. I can't explain what happened or why it happened. He never did return the intake though even though I offered to take it back (less 20% refurb fee since he dremeled the intake).
#18
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
From: Nazareth, PA
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
I have mine installed and am almost ready to fire it up. I'll then be able to report on the success of it. It sure does look good on the engine though and John is great to work with. He answers any and all questions in super quick fashion.
#19
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Car: 77 El Camino
Engine: 355 Converting to TPI
Transmission: Converting to 4L60/4L60E
Originally posted by CarAteMyMoney
Will it work for ported 882 heads?
Will it work for ported 882 heads?
The 882 castings are very thin having 2 EGR passageways per cylinder and are easily PRONE to CRACKING. I'm hard headed at times and had to learn this lesson the hard way myself. In the long run, it's cheeper to bolt on aftermarket then having to tear down the block and rebuild it again. Mine's in my shop at school waiting for me to put it back together this fall. I could have bolted a set of AFR heads on in the first place and came out money ahead in the long run.
Don't get me wrong, I'm just trying to keep you from making the same mistake as I did. It's your money, but when its all said and done I've lost about a grand in time, money & labor.
Good Luck Bill
#21
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX.
Car: 1994 Z28
Engine: 5.7 LT1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by screwowmer
I'm going to be using the stock LT1 water pump, upgrading it to an electric pump maaking a blocking plate for the rear of the pump.
I'm going to be using the stock LT1 water pump, upgrading it to an electric pump maaking a blocking plate for the rear of the pump.
Thanks,
#22
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Forgive me if this has been addressed before, but how much does this service cost, and can I use the stock throttle body (bored out though) from a non-LT1 motor? Also, this WILL work on a MAF setup since the LT1 is a MAF engine, correct? If I were to acquire an LT1 intake and have this done, would I need to modify any other parts besides cam/exhaust?
EDIT: Just found the price list on the site So, if I get the intake, I can send it to him for $200 to get it done, and then I would also need the fuel rails and t-stat housing? Or can I use stock LT1 fuel rails? Basically, I'm looking for the total cost of the minimal components (i.e. no painting, etc.).
EDIT: Just found the price list on the site So, if I get the intake, I can send it to him for $200 to get it done, and then I would also need the fuel rails and t-stat housing? Or can I use stock LT1 fuel rails? Basically, I'm looking for the total cost of the minimal components (i.e. no painting, etc.).
Last edited by DuronClocker; 06-22-2004 at 03:01 PM.
#23
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
I may be willing to test this out on my stock 305 TPI. I'm planning on dropping a 350 in next year, so it will eventually get used to its full potential.
#24
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Elizabethtown, KY
Car: 89 Formula 350
Engine: L98 w/ Stealthram
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27
You re-use the TPI throttle body. The LT1 tb has a different TPS connector. Also, it will work on MAF cars. Mine is. I believe that total cost after I sold my TPI unit and Hypertech PROM, was $228 for the whole thing.
#25
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Well, I decided to have the intake I bought shipped directly to John to have the work done instead of me having to have it shipped here and then me ship it to John. It should have left for his house today I'm also picking up some fuel rails from someone on CamaroZ28.com. If all goes as planned, this should be swapped in within 2 weeks, and I'll try to get some dyno results before/after. The only other mod would be my 3" cat-back taht I'll be getting on this week if all goes to plan. I'll also be going from a stock-replacement (STP) paper filter to a K&N filter with some sort of new cold air induction. Besides that though, it's going to be stock and the intake will be the only thing that changes. As I said I'll try to get some dyno testings as well as some track times, but since I'd be going different days, the track results may not be so consistent. Anyways, two weeks and we should have some hard data on what this intake will do for a stock 305. I can't wait til I'll be able to rev to 6k RPM
#26
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Ravenna, Ohio
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
Re: LT-1 Intake success rate? All owners please chime in...
Originally posted by CarAteMyMoney
Due to hood clearance issues, a HSR will not fit. I have been thinking about an LT-1 Intake because I have one readily available minus Mr. Millican's work which would have to be done..
How many people here have done it and are satisfied? Ecstatic?
And how many of you guys have had problems?
I wanna hear all the good, AND all the bad so I can make an informed decision! Thanks!
Due to hood clearance issues, a HSR will not fit. I have been thinking about an LT-1 Intake because I have one readily available minus Mr. Millican's work which would have to be done..
How many people here have done it and are satisfied? Ecstatic?
And how many of you guys have had problems?
I wanna hear all the good, AND all the bad so I can make an informed decision! Thanks!
you could have just cut the hood bracing in the middle like all of us other firebird/TA owners... my hood is still nice and stable and the hsr fits right under it.
#27
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Ravenna, Ohio
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
Originally posted by DuronClocker
Anyways, two weeks and we should have some hard data on what this intake will do for a stock 305. I can't wait til I'll be able to rev to 6k RPM
Anyways, two weeks and we should have some hard data on what this intake will do for a stock 305. I can't wait til I'll be able to rev to 6k RPM
#28
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Gives me all the more reason to drop in that 10:1 350ci sitting in my uncle's garage sooner Nevertheless, I thought these engines could handle up to 6300rpm stock. Then again maybe that was for the L98, but do the L98 and LB9 use different valvetrains?
#29
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Ravenna, Ohio
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
Originally posted by DuronClocker
Gives me all the more reason to drop in that 10:1 350ci sitting in my uncle's garage sooner Nevertheless, I thought these engines could handle up to 6300rpm stock. Then again maybe that was for the L98, but do the L98 and LB9 use different valvetrains?
Gives me all the more reason to drop in that 10:1 350ci sitting in my uncle's garage sooner Nevertheless, I thought these engines could handle up to 6300rpm stock. Then again maybe that was for the L98, but do the L98 and LB9 use different valvetrains?
#30
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Hmmm...maybe I'll be content with 5500RPM I really didn't know that at all. The 350ci still needs some work, but its got the bottom end complete forged bottom end. All she needs is a cam and heads (will probably use the ones I have on my 305..just self-port them and 1.6rr and get a 3-angle valve job). Thanks for the heads up info though..I'd like to not install that 350ci until this winter.
#31
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Ravenna, Ohio
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
you should do some research about putting 305 heads on a 350 motor. I saw something about how it raises compression but there is something that makes it not worth doing. I'd research on that before you do it this winter. There are rev kits to help you rev above 6000 rpm. check out the airflow research website, they sell a rev kit for around 185 bucks. An all forged bottom end is definitely a plus. Good luck with everything.
#32
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: Delta, PA
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: L05 350 TBI
Transmission: 700r4-slippin' on it's last leg
305 heads would raise the compression, but the valves are smaller than a 350 head, so they don't flow quite as well.
350 TPI heads are a good candidate for porting though, and too expensive, as everyone seems to be going Vortec.
*EDIT*
If you want to raise compression, you can go with a few options:
1: Have the block decked
2: Have the heads decked
3: Use thinner head gaskets
This is also providing that you don't want to change the pistons
350 TPI heads are a good candidate for porting though, and too expensive, as everyone seems to be going Vortec.
*EDIT*
If you want to raise compression, you can go with a few options:
1: Have the block decked
2: Have the heads decked
3: Use thinner head gaskets
This is also providing that you don't want to change the pistons
Last edited by jconrad; 06-29-2004 at 08:29 PM.
#33
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 491
Likes: 1
From: Wichita, KS
Car: 88 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.1L Gen III
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70
Back to the topic of the thread, I haven't had any problem with mine besides blowing the silicon out of the back of my intake while my PCV hose was kinked a little bit. Since then, I started running the PCV on the vavle cover like stock w/o any problems. Now if I can just figure out if I'm getting false knock and if its not false knock, why I'm getting knock on a 9.4 to 1 motor with so little timing.
#34
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: FARMINGTON AR
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 350 TPI RAMJET COMING
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by Roostmeyer
Back to the topic of the thread, I haven't had any problem with mine besides blowing the silicon out of the back of my intake while my PCV hose was kinked a little bit. Since then, I started running the PCV on the vavle cover like stock w/o any problems. Now if I can just figure out if I'm getting false knock and if its not false knock, why I'm getting knock on a 9.4 to 1 motor with so little timing.
Back to the topic of the thread, I haven't had any problem with mine besides blowing the silicon out of the back of my intake while my PCV hose was kinked a little bit. Since then, I started running the PCV on the vavle cover like stock w/o any problems. Now if I can just figure out if I'm getting false knock and if its not false knock, why I'm getting knock on a 9.4 to 1 motor with so little timing.
#35
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: Delta, PA
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: L05 350 TBI
Transmission: 700r4-slippin' on it's last leg
Hmmm, I had a batch of bad gas once, that caused alot of havoc with my old engine. I just added a bottle of 104+ and it was okay.
#36
Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: Hartland MI
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
The one I had on my Formula was a owner made job and was done fairly well but I think he got the dist base height and placement slightly off. I ate through a bronze dist gear and then a melonized one. I put a stock tpi intake on and show no signs of dist gear wear. I am going to rework the dist base and try it again.
I would highly recomend buying from John or having him do yours, he has been helping me with some questions and he didn't even do my intake, a true gentleman.
I would highly recomend buying from John or having him do yours, he has been helping me with some questions and he didn't even do my intake, a true gentleman.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ghettobird52
Tech / General Engine
16
07-05-2024 11:18 PM
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
04-25-2016 09:21 PM