RCR

In reference to your post, I suggest Brad lighten up and read the rest of your post. Second, without having used the Stealth Ram, my guess would be that it has the potential of delivering slifghtly more torque due to its slightly longer runner length. Also because you plan on using this on a 400+ci engine in the future, the extra flow from the larger runner sizes should also be of benefit. The LT1 can support some big numbers, too. There are also less complications in using the Steath Ram, such as having the thermostat on the intake and being able to contact the manufacturer if there is a problem. (Not that they'll listen) I have not gotten the hard numbers from a dyno run yet, and I've yet to see anyone else post them for the LT1 or Stealth, so, I guess the ball's in your court.

1slow60

Thanks for the input. Since I found this site I spend about 3 hours a day on it digging through the archives. I think that you may be right about the stealth ram being the better way to go. I to have not seen any real numbers of of either intake set up so I think that when I get to the intake that I will go with the stealth ram. I have seen alot of people having a little difficulty with the fuel lines but I think that I can make that work when the time comes alot easier than the LT1 set up. For a while I wanted to go with the vortecs and intake from SD being that I really liked the vortecs on my 60 pickups 400 but I think that I will move up to the AFR 195s for that build. Maybe those heads will make it to the 350 while I am waiting. Once agin thanks for ya input.