1966 Mustang vs me
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NH
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1966 Mustang vs me
I got a friend whos fixing up a 66 mustang and I assume one of these days we will line up.
Hes car: 1966 Mustang 289 3 speed (not the best of shape..its been sitting for about 5 6 years but does run)
My car: 1988 L03 122,*** auto (little mods i have in sig) and I'll be putting headers on this winter
Where do I have my best chance if any at all?
I've asked this before, but if I could line up with him with a 1976 L48 4 (32,***)speed I would win no?
------------------
1988 Sport Coupe 305 TBI
K&N
Flowmaster 80
Daily driver:
1988 K1500 5.7 4x4 shortbed flowmaster cat-back gutted cat.
AIM: RyanNH84
[This message has been edited by NHcamaro (edited October 29, 2001).]
Hes car: 1966 Mustang 289 3 speed (not the best of shape..its been sitting for about 5 6 years but does run)
My car: 1988 L03 122,*** auto (little mods i have in sig) and I'll be putting headers on this winter
Where do I have my best chance if any at all?
I've asked this before, but if I could line up with him with a 1976 L48 4 (32,***)speed I would win no?
------------------
1988 Sport Coupe 305 TBI
K&N
Flowmaster 80
Daily driver:
1988 K1500 5.7 4x4 shortbed flowmaster cat-back gutted cat.
AIM: RyanNH84
[This message has been edited by NHcamaro (edited October 29, 2001).]
#2
I used to have a 66 mustang with a stock 69 302, a 1988 T5, 2.73 gears, and a 2bbl. Taht car was not a speed demon to say the least, but I raced a Civic once and beat it. I would say you should win.
#5
Supreme Member
![](https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/images/ranks/tgo10.gif)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
If it's bone stock it's not very fast. They respond really well to mods, but still...a stock 289 isn't making much power.
------------------
1989 Mustang LX 5.0 Coupe
13.34@106.7 - needs more gear and converter
1992 Mustang LX 5.0 Convertible
14.23 @ 95.something - 100% bone stock motor - it's been a while since I've ran this one
1993 LX 2.3L Hatchback - "The Ride to VCU"
Moderator Stangtec.com, SN95.com
Amelia and Nic's Twin Terrors
[This message has been edited by Nic (edited October 29, 2001).]
------------------
1989 Mustang LX 5.0 Coupe
13.34@106.7 - needs more gear and converter
1992 Mustang LX 5.0 Convertible
14.23 @ 95.something - 100% bone stock motor - it's been a while since I've ran this one
1993 LX 2.3L Hatchback - "The Ride to VCU"
Moderator Stangtec.com, SN95.com
Amelia and Nic's Twin Terrors
[This message has been edited by Nic (edited October 29, 2001).]
#7
Supreme Member
![](https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/images/ranks/tgo10.gif)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
btw...if he needs any help with that thing tell him to shoot me an email. I used to have a '66 hardtop with a bunch of goodies before I got into late model performance.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NH
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, I will Nic. He just picked up new fenders for it...and he is having some1 do some frame work on it. He just picked up a 305 which for some reason hes putting more work into that POS then he is his mustang
.
------------------
1988 Sport Coupe 305 TBI
K&N
Flowmaster 80
Daily driver:
1988 K1500 5.7 4x4 shortbed flowmaster cat-back gutted cat.
AIM: RyanNH84
![](https://www.thirdgen.org/messgboard/confused.gif)
------------------
1988 Sport Coupe 305 TBI
K&N
Flowmaster 80
Daily driver:
1988 K1500 5.7 4x4 shortbed flowmaster cat-back gutted cat.
AIM: RyanNH84
#9
Man I miss my 66 coupe. If I were him I would spend my time and money on the Mustang, and forget the 305. No offense to 305 owners, but in the end I feel he has more potential with the Mustang (not necesarily with the 289) than the 305. I want my 66 BACK!!!
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NH
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oh, I agree. Its out of a truck too. If it was a LB9 or something I would say ya..but if i had a 66 in my backyard I would be working on that every day
------------------
1988 Sport Coupe 305 TBI
K&N
Flowmaster 80
Daily driver:
1988 K1500 5.7 4x4 shortbed flowmaster cat-back gutted cat.
AIM: RyanNH84
------------------
1988 Sport Coupe 305 TBI
K&N
Flowmaster 80
Daily driver:
1988 K1500 5.7 4x4 shortbed flowmaster cat-back gutted cat.
AIM: RyanNH84
#11
Supreme Member
![](https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/images/ranks/tgo10.gif)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Stock that car comes with a 289 2bbl. and 2:7x gears. Which I doubt will be slow. I would say around 16's, because that car if it has no Powersteering and all the other deletes only weighs 2400lbs. My friend has the same year with a rebuilt 289 4bbl., and exhaust. He ran a 14.6 with stock gears, probably in the high 13's now with 3:55s.
------------------
"Rice burners are like tampons...Every pu$$y has to have one"
'86 IROC
T-TOPS, TINTED WINDOWS, BRAKE LIGHT BLACKOUTS
GM GOODWRENCH 350
EDELBROCK TES HEADERS
3" Hooker CatBack w/Aero Chamber muffler
EDELBROCK 600CFM CARB.
KN AIRFILTER
ACCEL HEI DISTRIBUTOR
160* Stat, just switched to 180* b/c of winter coming and going to college in the mts.
3:73 Posi
Rebuilt 700R4
B&M Megashifter, 5" Autometer Tach w/shift lite
------------------
"Rice burners are like tampons...Every pu$$y has to have one"
'86 IROC
T-TOPS, TINTED WINDOWS, BRAKE LIGHT BLACKOUTS
GM GOODWRENCH 350
EDELBROCK TES HEADERS
3" Hooker CatBack w/Aero Chamber muffler
EDELBROCK 600CFM CARB.
KN AIRFILTER
ACCEL HEI DISTRIBUTOR
160* Stat, just switched to 180* b/c of winter coming and going to college in the mts.
3:73 Posi
Rebuilt 700R4
B&M Megashifter, 5" Autometer Tach w/shift lite
#12
Supreme Member
![](https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/images/ranks/tgo10.gif)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">I want my 66 BACK!!!</font>
#13
Supreme Member
![](https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/images/ranks/tgo10.gif)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Stock that car comes with a 289 2bbl. and 2:7x gears. Which I doubt will be slow. I would say around 16's, because that car if it has no Powersteering and all the other deletes only weighs 2400lbs. My friend has the same year with a rebuilt 289 4bbl., and exhaust. He ran a 14.6 with stock gears, probably in the high 13's now with 3:55s.</font>
I never had a chance to run mine since most of the time I owned it consisted of doing major upgrades on the front suspension and brakes, but I was told it was a 12 second car with the mods done to it. Like I said...they respond VERY well to mods like most of Ford's windsor engines do.
#16
Supreme Member
![](https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/images/ranks/tgo10.gif)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Oops, I'm not sure whether it would matter or not, my friend's is a 65 not 66. Oh well, just thought I would correct the mistake.
------------------
"Rice burners are like tampons...Every pu$$y has to have one"
'86 IROC
T-TOPS, TINTED WINDOWS, BRAKE LIGHT BLACKOUTS
GM GOODWRENCH 350
EDELBROCK TES HEADERS
3" Hooker CatBack w/Aero Chamber muffler
EDELBROCK 600CFM CARB.
KN AIRFILTER
ACCEL HEI DISTRIBUTOR
160* Stat, just switched to 180* b/c of winter coming and going to college in the mts.
3:73 Posi
Rebuilt 700R4
B&M Megashifter, 5" Autometer Tach w/shift lite
------------------
"Rice burners are like tampons...Every pu$$y has to have one"
'86 IROC
T-TOPS, TINTED WINDOWS, BRAKE LIGHT BLACKOUTS
GM GOODWRENCH 350
EDELBROCK TES HEADERS
3" Hooker CatBack w/Aero Chamber muffler
EDELBROCK 600CFM CARB.
KN AIRFILTER
ACCEL HEI DISTRIBUTOR
160* Stat, just switched to 180* b/c of winter coming and going to college in the mts.
3:73 Posi
Rebuilt 700R4
B&M Megashifter, 5" Autometer Tach w/shift lite
#17
Supreme Member
![](https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/images/ranks/tgo10.gif)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
My inclination is to say they were rated at 215 hp for the 2 barrel and 225 hp for the 4 barrel, but I could be off.
------------------
1989 Mustang LX 5.0 Coupe
13.34@106.7 - needs more gear and converter
1992 Mustang LX 5.0 Convertible
14.23 @ 95.something - 100% bone stock motor - it's been a while since I've ran this one
1993 LX 2.3L Hatchback - "The Ride to VCU"
Moderator Stangtec.com, SN95.com
Amelia and Nic's Twin Terrors
------------------
1989 Mustang LX 5.0 Coupe
13.34@106.7 - needs more gear and converter
1992 Mustang LX 5.0 Convertible
14.23 @ 95.something - 100% bone stock motor - it's been a while since I've ran this one
1993 LX 2.3L Hatchback - "The Ride to VCU"
Moderator Stangtec.com, SN95.com
Amelia and Nic's Twin Terrors
#18
I found some statistics for 1966 Mustangs...
6-cylinder: 120 horsepower.
2bbl 289- 200 horsepower.
4bbl 289- 225 horsepower.
4bbl hi-po 289- 271 horsepower. (K-code)
I was telling him if his friend has a K code motor, to watch out. Those are the fast Mustangs of the era, but they have their drawbacks...One thing that could make him lose is the fact that the K code has solid lifters, which means it's valves are going to need to be adjusted almost all the time. I really doubt it's a K-code though, because I thought it wasn't offered with a 3-speed, only the M-10 toploader 4-speed.
-Todd-
[This message has been edited by ws6formula89 (edited October 30, 2001).]
6-cylinder: 120 horsepower.
2bbl 289- 200 horsepower.
4bbl 289- 225 horsepower.
4bbl hi-po 289- 271 horsepower. (K-code)
I was telling him if his friend has a K code motor, to watch out. Those are the fast Mustangs of the era, but they have their drawbacks...One thing that could make him lose is the fact that the K code has solid lifters, which means it's valves are going to need to be adjusted almost all the time. I really doubt it's a K-code though, because I thought it wasn't offered with a 3-speed, only the M-10 toploader 4-speed.
-Todd-
[This message has been edited by ws6formula89 (edited October 30, 2001).]
#21
Most K-codes are spotted and restored, so he probably doesn't have one, but with some money, time, and effort that car could be pretty quick. Ahhhhh, I miss the smell of non-catalitic converters on a carbbed 2bbl, that would always let me know I had a unique car. I want that '66 back!!!
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr Coupe
Engine: 403 Olds v8, bored .030 over
Transmission: 350 T.H. 3A, shift kit
A 1964 289 mustang....
0-60 in 7.6 seconds
1/4 mile in 15.2 with a lot of wheel spin.
That is from "The World's Greatest Classic Cars".
------------------
1981 Oldsmobile Supreme Brougham... 403 V8, bored .030 over, Blue Racer Wolverine camshaft with hydraulic lifters, 700 Edelbrock carb, stock intake, K&N air filter, Bosch plugs and wires, dual exhaust...400 turbo...
1985 Ford LTD Crown Victoria 4dr...302 TBI V8, Bosch +4 plugs and wires, K&N air filter...AOD transmission...3.08 non posi
0-60 in 7.6 seconds
1/4 mile in 15.2 with a lot of wheel spin.
That is from "The World's Greatest Classic Cars".
------------------
1981 Oldsmobile Supreme Brougham... 403 V8, bored .030 over, Blue Racer Wolverine camshaft with hydraulic lifters, 700 Edelbrock carb, stock intake, K&N air filter, Bosch plugs and wires, dual exhaust...400 turbo...
1985 Ford LTD Crown Victoria 4dr...302 TBI V8, Bosch +4 plugs and wires, K&N air filter...AOD transmission...3.08 non posi
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Thirdgen89GTA
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
8
09-12-2015 08:39 PM