Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

'87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-2008, 09:05 PM
  #51  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

How can someone afford a 'vette when they're not even smart enough to use the correct form of there and their?...Christ....I don't know how much your Iroc weighs but my GTA weighed 3650 without me in it.

Anyway, back on track...to the OP: That Evo will smoke you 6 ways from Sunday...good luck.
Old 10-16-2008, 09:33 PM
  #52  
Member
 
Vash Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento,Ca,
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc Z,2004 Z06 Corvette
Engine: 5.7 L98 tpi/LS6 346 ci
Transmission: 700r4/MN12
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23/DTE 3.42
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

shut the hel1 up its the internet people make typing errors and i do have a open mind i give respect to fast cars but i don't give a damn about import cars and will never own one

my Iroc Z weights 3250 without me in it

Last edited by Vash Vega; 10-16-2008 at 09:37 PM.
Old 10-16-2008, 09:42 PM
  #53  
Member
 
Vash Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento,Ca,
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc Z,2004 Z06 Corvette
Engine: 5.7 L98 tpi/LS6 346 ci
Transmission: 700r4/MN12
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23/DTE 3.42
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by Manic Z
I'm not wasting my time. I'm trying to educate you on your ignorance, in a vain attempt to make you a better person with a more open mind.
educate yourself then maybe you'll have a better 1/4 mi time with 370hp you should be in the 12's
Old 10-16-2008, 09:46 PM
  #54  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by Kidd Vette
shut the hel1 up its the internet people make typing errors and i do have a open mind i give respect to fast cars but i don't give a damn about import cars and will never own one

my Iroc Z weights 3250 without me in it
God you're contradicting yourself. You give respect to fast cars because you're open minded but you don't give a damn about imports. Ok...it's official, you must be a trust fund baby or something because you're not intelligent enough to make the $$ needed to own a Z06.

That's pretty damn light for an Iroc, I've seen stripper SC and RS Camaros weigh more than that....interesting....
Old 10-16-2008, 10:31 PM
  #55  
Member
 
Vash Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento,Ca,
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc Z,2004 Z06 Corvette
Engine: 5.7 L98 tpi/LS6 346 ci
Transmission: 700r4/MN12
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23/DTE 3.42
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

get of my d1ck i still have my corvette wheres yours and for you info you don't know nothing about me,i don't like imports period i meant to say i give respect to fast domestic cars like i said its the internet don't get all up set and commit suicide because i make a few typing errors
Old 10-16-2008, 10:41 PM
  #56  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (9)
 
krisb410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 2,346
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 RS Camaro, 75 L82 Corvette
Engine: LO3, 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4, TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23 posi/LS1 discs, stock
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Calm down guys. Your acting like my 10 year old sister does.
Old 10-16-2008, 10:57 PM
  #57  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Shadygrady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Flowood,MS
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 IROC Z
Engine: 5.7 L98 TPI
Transmission: 700r4,2500 stall
Axle/Gears: G80,10 bolt 3.42's
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

I think we`ve gotton way of topic.We answered the OP question and we`re not saying anything worth taking up space in the archives of a tech site.Lets just ignore the guy with the foul mouth who is voting for CHANGE and got his vette with a trust fund or whatever and get or this puppy down.
Old 10-16-2008, 10:59 PM
  #58  
Member
 
Vash Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento,Ca,
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc Z,2004 Z06 Corvette
Engine: 5.7 L98 tpi/LS6 346 ci
Transmission: 700r4/MN12
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23/DTE 3.42
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

yes please do
Old 10-17-2008, 08:26 AM
  #59  
Senior Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Manic Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hamilton Ontario Canada
Posts: 878
Received 35 Likes on 22 Posts
Car: 1985 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350
Transmission: GForce T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73 posi
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Sorry guys.
But it's hard when you read so many dumb posts from dumb people.

Yee ha!
Old 10-17-2008, 08:30 AM
  #60  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Old 10-17-2008, 08:47 AM
  #61  
Senior Member

iTrader: (4)
 
atc3434's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Weedsport, NY
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: Bolt-on/cam 305
Transmission: 700R4 w/ 2500stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt Posi
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??



I'm with these guys on this one - some pretty ridiculous statements were tossed out that just simply weren't true. I can respect everybody has a different opinion, and you can justify your opinion all you want - but when you try to take your opinion and make it fact, your gonna get fireworks.

Originally Posted by Kidd Vette
get of my d1ck i still have my corvette wheres yours and for you info you don't know nothing about me,i don't like imports period i meant to say i give respect to fast domestic cars like i said its the internet don't get all up set and commit suicide because i make a few typing errors
Your absolutely right Kidd, we don't know you, the only thing we have to go by is how you've responded and acted through this discussion. Our perception of you is in your hands, you can do with it what you like, I welcome a response that will show us your reasonable side.

Last edited by atc3434; 10-17-2008 at 08:52 AM.
Old 10-17-2008, 11:16 AM
  #62  
Member
 
Vash Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento,Ca,
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc Z,2004 Z06 Corvette
Engine: 5.7 L98 tpi/LS6 346 ci
Transmission: 700r4/MN12
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23/DTE 3.42
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

i can't help it the evo is so damn ugly,looks like a suped up scion tc with 4doors,these new cars specially jap cars are hideous
Old 10-17-2008, 11:20 AM
  #63  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

What does that have to do with performance?
Old 10-17-2008, 11:33 AM
  #64  
Member
 
Vash Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento,Ca,
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc Z,2004 Z06 Corvette
Engine: 5.7 L98 tpi/LS6 346 ci
Transmission: 700r4/MN12
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23/DTE 3.42
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

like i said in my other posts awd and a turbo is the reason why the car is fast it would be impressing if that ugly thing run 13's n/a there are too many cars with awd and a turbo setup running the same times and these jap cars don't impress me one bit
Old 10-17-2008, 11:45 AM
  #65  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (9)
 
krisb410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 2,346
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 RS Camaro, 75 L82 Corvette
Engine: LO3, 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4, TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23 posi/LS1 discs, stock
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

I've said it before, and I'm sure I'll say it again. "Opinions are like a-holes, everybody has one."

Now, we already got your opinion, we don't need it more than once!

Why do you like stiring everybody up? In almost every thread you post you smake yourself look like my 10 year sister. Arguing over the forums is useless/pointless. Man up a bit, post your opinions in a respectful manor. It's no wonder why 3rd gen owners are stereo-typed, with guy like this running around

Does it make you feel all big and bad? Well, congrats, you just made it to my ignore list, 1st actual member beside spamers. I recomend everyone else do the same. Just click on his profile, then on the upper right of his profile, you will see, add ____ to your Buddy / Ignore list. Click on ignore, hit the "Save list" button, and your done.

Last edited by krisb410; 10-17-2008 at 11:49 AM.
Old 10-17-2008, 11:55 AM
  #66  
Senior Member

iTrader: (4)
 
atc3434's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Weedsport, NY
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: Bolt-on/cam 305
Transmission: 700R4 w/ 2500stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt Posi
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by Kidd Vette
like i said in my other posts awd and a turbo is the reason why the car is fast it would be impressing if that ugly thing run 13's n/a there are too many cars with awd and a turbo setup running the same times and these jap cars don't impress me one bit
The 350Z run's 13's stone stock, and does so with only 3.5 liters. Not all wheel drive, not turbo'd. Better gas mileage than an stock thirdgen, and the handling is right there as well. Its essentially a Japanese Camaro.

I guess I still can't understand your thinking - you seem stuck on the fact that big cubes and pushrods and the only respectable way to go fast, and unopen to any other school of thought. Just so I understand in no uncertain terms, your not impressed with a normally aspirated motor that makes 100hp/liter, right?

Last edited by atc3434; 10-17-2008 at 11:58 AM.
Old 10-17-2008, 12:03 PM
  #67  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by Kidd Vette
like i said in my other posts awd and a turbo is the reason why the car is fast
...and our cars are fast because it has 346-350 cubic inches...what's your point?

I guess the TTA doesn't impress you since it has a turbo?
Old 10-17-2008, 12:38 PM
  #68  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Shadygrady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Flowood,MS
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 IROC Z
Engine: 5.7 L98 TPI
Transmission: 700r4,2500 stall
Axle/Gears: G80,10 bolt 3.42's
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

guess the TTA doesn't impress you since it has a turbo?
Or the GN T type.Now thats a really good point.I want a TTA so bad.But he`ll prolly say its a 90*,single cam,pushrod,OHV engine.

The 350Z run's 13's stone stock, and does so with only 3.5 liters. Not all wheel drive, not turbo'd. Better gas mileage than an stock thirdgen, and the handling is right there as well. Its essentially a Japanese Camaro.
We bought my wife an 06 Maxima a couple of years ago with the 3.5 6 speed autostick or whatever you call the trans.It is a fast car.I cant get her to go to the track with me but from driving it seems as fast as my car.It`s a little hard to judge cause it`s a dog on the low end but comes alive in the mid/upper rpms.It`s a well built car with a N/A V6 about 270 hp.
Old 10-17-2008, 01:33 PM
  #69  
Member
 
Vash Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento,Ca,
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc Z,2004 Z06 Corvette
Engine: 5.7 L98 tpi/LS6 346 ci
Transmission: 700r4/MN12
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23/DTE 3.42
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

those are 6 cylinder engines look everybody im sorry for starting this gay *** debate yall like imports so much and i don't so ill keep my comments to myself,yes i like big cube ohv engines there not max out like them ohc motors yall talk about.no matter what yall say there is no replacement for displacement
Old 10-17-2008, 01:59 PM
  #70  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by Kidd Vette
those are 6 cylinder engines look everybody im sorry for starting this gay *** debate yall like imports so much and i don't so ill keep my comments to myself,yes i like big cube ohv engines there not max out like them ohc motors yall talk about.no matter what yall say there is no replacement for displacement
I'm not an import lover by any means, all of my vehicles have been GM with the exception of one Chrysler and one Ford. I'd never buy an EVO however the technology that went into it is something to respect.

Also, what does the TTA being a V6 have to do with anything? You said that the EVO isn't impressive because it needs a turbo...I brought up the TTA and you have no response.

There IS a replacement for displacement and the TTA and cars like it proved it.
Old 10-17-2008, 02:07 PM
  #71  
Member
 
Vash Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento,Ca,
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc Z,2004 Z06 Corvette
Engine: 5.7 L98 tpi/LS6 346 ci
Transmission: 700r4/MN12
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23/DTE 3.42
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by fly89gta
There IS a replacement for displacement and the TTA and cars like it proved it.
put a turbo on a big cube motor and see what happens,i don't care about the tta
Old 10-17-2008, 02:13 PM
  #72  
Senior Member

iTrader: (4)
 
atc3434's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Weedsport, NY
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: Bolt-on/cam 305
Transmission: 700R4 w/ 2500stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt Posi
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

fly89GTA - give up its a lost cause. I'm with ya, I have almost exclusively GM cars my whole life, but I can certainly respect what the import (not rice) crowd is doing with their technology. I had an Ford (Gasp!) SVT Contour a few years back that had a simply amazing engine in it - 2.5liter DOHC V6 with multiple length runners and multiple cam profiles that came online over 3500rpm, that motor made fair torque down low and was still pulling when the rev limiter showed up at 6800rpm. That was a fun piece of tehcnology.

By the way, I'm still waiting on a response Kidd Vette...

Originally Posted by atc3434
Just so I understand in no uncertain terms, your not impressed with a normally aspirated motor that makes 100hp/liter, right?
Old 10-17-2008, 02:20 PM
  #73  
Member
 
Vash Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento,Ca,
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc Z,2004 Z06 Corvette
Engine: 5.7 L98 tpi/LS6 346 ci
Transmission: 700r4/MN12
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23/DTE 3.42
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

a v6 or v8 but im not impressed by no puny 4cylinder that makes 200hp on 2liters
Old 10-17-2008, 02:21 PM
  #74  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by Kidd Vette
put a turbo on a big cube motor and see what happens,i don't care about the tta
...ok and? Put a supercharger AND a turbo on it blah blah blah

Ok, go build a big cube motor with a turbo on it and go warranty it for 36K miles. Go obtain the same gas mileage. You can't. For a factory car it was perfect...it sure smoked the hell out of your Iroc and with minimal mods would make your Z06 look silly...all with 20yr old technology.
----------
Originally Posted by Kidd Vette
a v6 or v8 but im not impressed by no puny 4cylinder that makes 200hp on 2liters
Out of all the cars we've talked about what car is making 200hp on 4 cylinders?

Does your breath smell like crap since you're talking out of your *** again?

...another typical arrogant 'vette owner. No wonder why no one likes them.

Last edited by fly89gta; 10-17-2008 at 02:23 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 10-17-2008, 02:22 PM
  #75  
Member
 
Vash Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento,Ca,
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc Z,2004 Z06 Corvette
Engine: 5.7 L98 tpi/LS6 346 ci
Transmission: 700r4/MN12
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23/DTE 3.42
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by atc3434
fly89GTA - give up its a lost cause.
please do
Old 10-17-2008, 02:25 PM
  #76  
Member
 
Vash Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento,Ca,
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc Z,2004 Z06 Corvette
Engine: 5.7 L98 tpi/LS6 346 ci
Transmission: 700r4/MN12
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23/DTE 3.42
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by fly89gta
...another typical arrogant 'vette owner. No wonder why no one likes them.
i know huh there beating on them little imports bad and they need a turbo to keep up but can't
----------
your so ignorant why you had one then

Last edited by Vash Vega; 10-17-2008 at 02:26 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 10-17-2008, 02:27 PM
  #77  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by Kidd Vette
i know huh there beating on them little imports bad and they need a turbo to keep up but can't
----------
your so ignorant why you had one then
English man, English....
Old 10-17-2008, 02:32 PM
  #78  
Member
 
Vash Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento,Ca,
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc Z,2004 Z06 Corvette
Engine: 5.7 L98 tpi/LS6 346 ci
Transmission: 700r4/MN12
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23/DTE 3.42
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

give up leave me alone,you just making yourself look stupid
Old 10-17-2008, 02:33 PM
  #79  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

If you say so chief. Hooked on phonics, it does wonders.
Old 10-17-2008, 02:33 PM
  #80  
Member
 
Vash Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento,Ca,
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc Z,2004 Z06 Corvette
Engine: 5.7 L98 tpi/LS6 346 ci
Transmission: 700r4/MN12
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23/DTE 3.42
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by fly89gta
English man, English....
stop stalking me man im not changing my opinion and im not g@y
Old 10-17-2008, 02:40 PM
  #81  
Member
 
Vash Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento,Ca,
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc Z,2004 Z06 Corvette
Engine: 5.7 L98 tpi/LS6 346 ci
Transmission: 700r4/MN12
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23/DTE 3.42
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by fly89gta
If you say so chief. Hooked on phonics, it does wonders.
you should know huh
Old 10-17-2008, 02:43 PM
  #82  
Senior Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Manic Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hamilton Ontario Canada
Posts: 878
Received 35 Likes on 22 Posts
Car: 1985 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350
Transmission: GForce T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73 posi
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Hmmm...I'm starting to get the feeling that Kid Vette is an alternate or joke account to somebody here.

Nobody would be like this for real......
Old 10-17-2008, 02:52 PM
  #83  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by Manic Z
Nobody would be like this for real......
Look at the state he resides in...enough said.
Old 10-17-2008, 02:55 PM
  #84  
Member
 
Vash Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento,Ca,
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc Z,2004 Z06 Corvette
Engine: 5.7 L98 tpi/LS6 346 ci
Transmission: 700r4/MN12
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23/DTE 3.42
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by fly89gta
Look at the state he resides in...enough said.
and your point is,look at where you at lol
----------
enough im not responding anymore,im done playing with you ladies peace

Last edited by Vash Vega; 10-17-2008 at 02:56 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 10-17-2008, 02:56 PM
  #85  
Senior Member

iTrader: (4)
 
atc3434's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Weedsport, NY
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: Bolt-on/cam 305
Transmission: 700R4 w/ 2500stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt Posi
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by Kidd Vette
a v6 or v8 but im not impressed by no puny 4cylinder that makes 200hp on 2liters
Well, if your really a performance enthusiast, you should be.

See, this is the thing everybody is getting caught up by - your impressed with a 5.7 liter that makes 350, but not a 2 liter that makes 200hp. Don't you understand the 2 liter in this example is more powerful for its size. Effieciency is performance, and the effeciency of that 2 liter motor BLOWS AWAY the effeciency of the 350hp 5.7 liter you referenced before. You continue ignore that fact, and that is what everybody here is blown away by, that your thinking is so biased towards one method of making power that you're completely blind to some of the facts you've been presented with.
Old 10-17-2008, 03:01 PM
  #86  
Member
 
Vash Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento,Ca,
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc Z,2004 Z06 Corvette
Engine: 5.7 L98 tpi/LS6 346 ci
Transmission: 700r4/MN12
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23/DTE 3.42
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

ls series blocks can get close to 100hp per liter,will you stop talking to me about 2liter engines I DON'T CARE
Old 10-17-2008, 03:03 PM
  #87  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by atc3434
Well, if your really a performance enthusiast, you should be.
Most 'vette guys aren't "car" guys. A select few have respect for the entire spectrum of the performance world.

Most would rather just circle jerk around the new chrome alternator bracket and carbon fiber center console cover they just bought.
Old 10-17-2008, 03:06 PM
  #88  
Member
 
Vash Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento,Ca,
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc Z,2004 Z06 Corvette
Engine: 5.7 L98 tpi/LS6 346 ci
Transmission: 700r4/MN12
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23/DTE 3.42
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by fly89gta
Most 'vette guys aren't "car" guys. A select few have respect for the entire spectrum of the performance world.

Most would rather just circle jerk around the new chrome alternator bracket and carbon fiber center console cover they just bought.
i guess so huh
Old 10-17-2008, 03:06 PM
  #89  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

I didn't say all.
Old 10-17-2008, 03:09 PM
  #90  
Member
 
Vash Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento,Ca,
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc Z,2004 Z06 Corvette
Engine: 5.7 L98 tpi/LS6 346 ci
Transmission: 700r4/MN12
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23/DTE 3.42
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

me too
Old 10-17-2008, 03:47 PM
  #91  
Senior Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Manic Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hamilton Ontario Canada
Posts: 878
Received 35 Likes on 22 Posts
Car: 1985 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350
Transmission: GForce T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73 posi
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

I keep laughing at your 'no replacement for displacement' comments, when a 5.7 liter isn't even that big....
Old 10-17-2008, 05:07 PM
  #92  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Codename 47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28
Engine: 400
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt Posi 3.73
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by atc3434
Well, if your really a performance enthusiast, you should be.

See, this is the thing everybody is getting caught up by - your impressed with a 5.7 liter that makes 350, but not a 2 liter that makes 200hp. Don't you understand the 2 liter in this example is more powerful for its size. Effieciency is performance, and the effeciency of that 2 liter motor BLOWS AWAY the effeciency of the 350hp 5.7 liter you referenced before. You continue ignore that fact, and that is what everybody here is blown away by, that your thinking is so biased towards one method of making power that you're completely blind to some of the facts you've been presented with.
That's what doesn't impress me at all. I really don't care about "200 hp". Even if they made it out of a .5 L engine. Big deal. Good for them. I like big power, even if it's "inefficient". The majority of imports out there don't do **** like this, and this is what I like:


Lots of power and torque.

PS: Sorry if anyone likes golf and is offended.
Old 10-17-2008, 11:53 PM
  #93  
Member
 
buell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Jarrettsville,MD
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro iroc
Engine: 5.7L
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

okay yeah i know the basic idea about those trans, just enough to get me in trouble apparently lol. Alot of what i learn is from the british show called top gear... love that show but anyway def. want to thank you for clearing that up, there is no actual pedal clutch though right?

Alright so i'm, 18 and my fathers view on the foreign cars has rubbed off on me a bit, i truly cna respect that a little one liter engine can do what it cna these days and us getting much better mpg as well. I still like the old school cars and to be honest although i love my car i wanted a 1st gen camaro instead b/c of the fact that it has less tech. though i can be tech crazy at times.... anyway so yeah i'm not a ******* even if i sould like it sometimes and just wanted to clear that up. either way you can't beat old school looks when it comes to cars (except for a few instances, the veyron being one...)

So yeah i reread my last post and def. feel like an jackass now. didn't mean for some of that to come out the way it did... ahh well noones perfect right...

Last edited by buell; 10-18-2008 at 12:07 AM. Reason: read my last post
Old 10-18-2008, 02:12 AM
  #94  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Saculia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: currently a 91 G92.
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: Borg Warner WC 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

These dual clutch manual transmissions are something impressive. I didn't know that they offer them now in the new evos. The only car that I have driven with something like that was a mercedes benz sl 55 amg. That thing was insane. I didn't bother shifting with the little shifters on the steering wheel. I left it in automatic mode and stepped on it. The only thing that I have been on that accelerates like that is a large displacement sprot bike.
Old 10-18-2008, 12:23 PM
  #95  
Senior Member

iTrader: (4)
 
atc3434's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Weedsport, NY
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: Bolt-on/cam 305
Transmission: 700R4 w/ 2500stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt Posi
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by Codename 47
That's what doesn't impress me at all. I really don't care about "200 hp". Even if they made it out of a .5 L engine. Big deal. Good for them. I like big power, even if it's "inefficient". The majority of imports out there don't do **** like this, and this is what I like:
Wheelie pics


PS: Sorry if anyone likes golf and is offended.
I like big power too, and I'll say it again that the pushrod V8 is my power production platform of choice. I guess you could say I'm playing the devil's advocate a bit in this thread. I do respect motors like the 2.4 liter in the S2000 - but it wouldn't be my choice - my SBC just got done putting some of those I4's in their place on the way home from lunch!

I will say that kid-vette, there are not very many LSx motors that are making 100hp/liter NA - certainly not any from the factory. The only factory offerings from GM that are making over 100hp/liter are the LS9 - 6.2L w/ 640hp, and the Ecotec in the Cobalt, making 260hp on 2L. Oddly enough, they are both forced induction motors.
Old 10-19-2008, 01:20 AM
  #96  
Member
 
chevy boi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: califorina
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 i roc-z28
Engine: 350 tpi l98
Transmission: 700r4
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

just to throw fuel on the fire. honda isnt the best at hp/ liter

its mazda

who is using a german concept

13b-REW 1.3L twin rotary making 280 hp woot
20b 2.0 3 rotor making 300 hp

then the evil little sucker
R26B 2.6 liter 700hp 9k rpm devil ( yea for racing , but still impressive)
Old 10-19-2008, 02:39 PM
  #97  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Codename 47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28
Engine: 400
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt Posi 3.73
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by atc3434
I like big power too, and I'll say it again that the pushrod V8 is my power production platform of choice. I guess you could say I'm playing the devil's advocate a bit in this thread. I do respect motors like the 2.4 liter in the S2000 - but it wouldn't be my choice - my SBC just got done putting some of those I4's in their place on the way home from lunch!

I will say that kid-vette, there are not very many LSx motors that are making 100hp/liter NA - certainly not any from the factory. The only factory offerings from GM that are making over 100hp/liter are the LS9 - 6.2L w/ 640hp, and the Ecotec in the Cobalt, making 260hp on 2L. Oddly enough, they are both forced induction motors.
Because you couldn't make 100hp/liter and offer that to the public. You can't offer a 600 hp truck to the public. You used to need big inch engines back in the 60s and 70s to make 350hp or 400 hp, back when technology wasn't that great. Today, American car producers have a history of big inch engines, and that's what people want. If they produced a Camaro with a small 3.5 L V8, it just wouldn't be the same.

The LSx engines now are just is good as those little import motors. It's just that you can't release a truck with 600 hp. Not every corvette can have 700 hp. It's too much for the general public.

I really think the American manufacturers are right on par with the foreign guys.
Old 10-19-2008, 05:25 PM
  #98  
Junior Member
 
Fireteam Echo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

This has gotten way off topic, the original question has been answered. If only I could lock this thead.

Last edited by Fireteam Echo; 10-19-2008 at 05:27 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 10-19-2008, 05:41 PM
  #99  
Senior Member

iTrader: (4)
 
atc3434's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Weedsport, NY
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: Bolt-on/cam 305
Transmission: 700R4 w/ 2500stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt Posi
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by Codename 47
Because you couldn't make 100hp/liter and offer that to the public. You can't offer a 600 hp truck to the public. You used to need big inch engines back in the 60s and 70s to make 350hp or 400 hp, back when technology wasn't that great. Today, American car producers have a history of big inch engines, and that's what people want. If they produced a Camaro with a small 3.5 L V8, it just wouldn't be the same.

The LSx engines now are just is good as those little import motors. It's just that you can't release a truck with 600 hp. Not every corvette can have 700 hp. It's too much for the general public.

I really think the American manufacturers are right on par with the foreign guys.
Originally Posted by atc3434
I like big power too, and I'll say it again that the pushrod V8 is my power production platform of choice.
Requoted to empahsize I'm right on with your thinking. I agree the LSx platform is every bit as good as whats coming over-seas - big power, great efficiency, and incredbily strong, and extremely compact. Of course people want big cube motors in thier trucks, they can make boat-loads of torque at ridiculously low RPM's, just the kind of thing you need for towing and hauling.

I wouldn't go so far as to say you can't offer 100hp/liter engines, take a look at the Cobalt SS. Oddly enough you mention a Camaro with a small V8, the LT models have a small 3.6 liter V6 thats making just as much power as Ford's 5.4 liter V8 in their pony car. Seems GM is using this big power on small cubes technology in select platforms where it makes sense from an economy and production stand point, and keeping the big cubes in the platforms where they fit the best.

Last edited by atc3434; 10-19-2008 at 05:49 PM.
Old 10-19-2008, 05:56 PM
  #100  
Member

iTrader: (4)
 
fastfbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Smithville TN
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 GTA trans am
Engine: L98 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4 built
Axle/Gears: 3.45 4th gen 10 bolt
Re: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??

Originally Posted by Kidd Vette
put a turbo on a big cube motor and see what happens,i don't care about the tta



its people like you bashing on imports that makes all domestic fans look stupid . ease up and show will power over ur mouth . might not be ur cup of tea but doesnt mean its just awful . and the 231 ci 3.8 thats in the buick gnx and the tta is accepted everywhere as 1 of the best engines to put in a drag car .yes turbos on v8s are insane u think thats news to anybody here ?


Quick Reply: '87 iroc vs. '09 evo??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19 AM.