Beware of the new SS!
#151
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, MA.
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: Carb'd L31 Vortec 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4th gen torsen / 3.23
Originally Posted by Psycho_91Camaro
Ok Impalas are good cars, if you have a family. Happy now!
#152
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 Camaro
Engine: Blown 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Originally Posted by FrankA330
1985 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28 7.0 15.2
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 6.6 14.9
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z L98 6.8 15.3
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 7.0 15.5
1990 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 5.8 14.4
1990 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 6.5 15.0
Thats a 305
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 6.6 14.9
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z L98 6.8 15.3
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 7.0 15.5
1990 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 5.8 14.4
1990 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 6.5 15.0
Thats a 305
#153
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Red 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0L 305 TBI
GM cars suck lately, except the Z06 of course. The foreign car companies redesign almost every year, GM does every few and that sets them back. Isn't is surprising how as soon as the American car companies take heat about gas mileage the mpg goes up, if they could do the change so quickly they should have done it earlier like the foreign cars did, who didn't know gas would eventually go up? They needed to take one for the team so their customer base wasn't being screwed at the pump. All that hydrogen research stuff the foreign companies are pushing annoys the heck out of me, you don't get something for nothing, just because the car runs on something that from the car standpoint doesn’t release emissions, you still need to produce the usable hydrogen (compression, filtering, actual refining), and that requires the same amount of energy and releases the comparable emissions. The power sucks too. I'm glad the american companies are bringing out respectably powered cars, but style wise, they blow, who the heck thought the HHR (I'm not saying the HHR has good power) was a good idea?
#154
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The HHR does suck. What a terrible idea. They can add that to the list of the Aztek and the Thunderbird.
Anyway, please expand on why you don't like hydrogen. I don't understand what you're trying to say.
Anyway, please expand on why you don't like hydrogen. I don't understand what you're trying to say.
#155
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Goldsboro, NC
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI L98
Originally Posted by stu
The HHR does suck. What a terrible idea. They can add that to the list of the Aztek and the Thunderbird.
Anyway, please expand on why you don't like hydrogen. I don't understand what you're trying to say.
Anyway, please expand on why you don't like hydrogen. I don't understand what you're trying to say.
I just wonder what it was like at GM when they we're looking at the concept drawings and which people thought that car would be a hit.
#156
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One thing that GM is doing right (although I'm not interested at all) is the Hummer line. All those suckers wanted the H2 (12 mpg? give me a break!) and I actually like the H3. I commend them on making a smaller SUV that people still cream their panties over. Now if they would just do that with their cars they'd be alright.
#157
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 4 Mopars total
Engine: Pentastar power
Transmission: T/F and New Process
Axle/Gears: Three 8 3/4's & one 9 1/4
Originally Posted by FrankA330
this Chevy is STOCK and its fast.
#160
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ready room
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: NCC-1701-D (docked in AZ)
Engine: impulse drive
Transmission: fusion reactors
Axle/Gears: Rescued from the Borg by my crew
Originally Posted by stu
One thing that GM is doing right (although I'm not interested at all) is the Hummer line. All those suckers wanted the H2 (12 mpg? give me a break!) and I actually like the H3. I commend them on making a smaller SUV that people still cream their panties over. Now if they would just do that with their cars they'd be alright.
#161
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having experience working at a lot that sold new and used Hummers, I can for sure tell you that the H1 sucks a ****. Well, just the motor I guess. It IS, hands down, THE stupidest personal vehicle you can buy hands down.
#162
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, MA.
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: Carb'd L31 Vortec 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4th gen torsen / 3.23
Originally Posted by sasser43
The aztek reminds me of a crx mixed with a minivan.
I just wonder what it was like at GM when they we're looking at the concept drawings and which people thought that car would be a hit.
I just wonder what it was like at GM when they we're looking at the concept drawings and which people thought that car would be a hit.
And next year doesn't look so hot either. The "redesigned" Aveo? Looks like a chevy-fied Ford Echo. Don't they have the cobalt? Do the really need another car just like it?
#163
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ford Echo?
Toyota Echo
Ford Focus
Speaking of Toyota, it's not just a coincidence that they are in position to be the largest auto manufacture in the entire world. Something to think about.
Toyota Echo
Ford Focus
Speaking of Toyota, it's not just a coincidence that they are in position to be the largest auto manufacture in the entire world. Something to think about.
#164
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock
Originally Posted by Psycho_91Camaro
I do not like the way those cars handle, the steering is so damn sensative especially on the v8 models.... and it looks like a honda accord and or toyota camry from a distance... I dont like any new Chevrolet cars, they look way to close to Japanese crap. In my opinion only New Chevy Trucks, and the corvette are still good looking vehicles.
I almost completely agree. Except for the Monte Carlo SS.
Now that's a decent looking car, healthy V8, pretty nice interior. Only real drawback: FWD. If they put the axle under the gas tank I wouldn't mind having one as a daily driver.
#165
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, MA.
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: Carb'd L31 Vortec 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4th gen torsen / 3.23
Originally Posted by stu
Ford Echo?
Toyota Echo
Ford Focus
Speaking of Toyota, it's not just a coincidence that they are in position to be the largest auto manufacture in the entire world. Something to think about.
Toyota Echo
Ford Focus
Speaking of Toyota, it's not just a coincidence that they are in position to be the largest auto manufacture in the entire world. Something to think about.
#166
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Red 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0L 305 TBI
Originally Posted by stu
The HHR does suck. What a terrible idea. They can add that to the list of the Aztek and the Thunderbird.
Anyway, please expand on why you don't like hydrogen. I don't understand what you're trying to say.
Anyway, please expand on why you don't like hydrogen. I don't understand what you're trying to say.
#167
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Water and wind power have no emissions and are replenishable.
Which car company just came out with a hybrid that has over 300 hp and does 0-60 in under 6 seconds? I can't remember what it was, but I've seen the commercial. I think it's either Infinity or Lexus.
Which car company just came out with a hybrid that has over 300 hp and does 0-60 in under 6 seconds? I can't remember what it was, but I've seen the commercial. I think it's either Infinity or Lexus.
#168
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Red 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0L 305 TBI
Originally Posted by stu
Water and wind power have no emissions and are replenishable.
Which car company just came out with a hybrid that has over 300 hp and does 0-60 in under 6 seconds? I can't remember what it was, but I've seen the commercial. I think it's either Infinity or Lexus.
Which car company just came out with a hybrid that has over 300 hp and does 0-60 in under 6 seconds? I can't remember what it was, but I've seen the commercial. I think it's either Infinity or Lexus.
2) Hybrids are a different story, they take the good aspects of both gas based cars and electric, I have no problem with hybrid based cars, they are many times less powerful but they are not weak, especially new ones being released. Again though, look at the companies you listed, not too many people want to fork out the cash to buy a lexus or infinity just to be able to do what a normal gas based car can do, you have to make it desireable for a consumer to buy and make the switch. Many people will say that they want to do their part for the environment, but when push comes to shove if it takes away from their lifestyle they won't go for it.
#169
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I understand all the production costs that you are talking about, I majored in Economics, I spent 4 years talking about all that stuff.
I also know what you mean about the Infiniti/Lexus deal, but for 300 hp you are looking at $30-40k anyway, unless you want just a cheapo car like an SRT-4.
I also know what you mean about the Infiniti/Lexus deal, but for 300 hp you are looking at $30-40k anyway, unless you want just a cheapo car like an SRT-4.
#170
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Red 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0L 305 TBI
Are people willing to spend $30k-40k for a car with power that is comparable to a lower priced gas car? I think the only way that truly higher powered hybrids can be worth it to the public is if they figure out ways to cut costs, just like anything else when something first comes out its expensive, prices just need to drop and people will get on board.
#171
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Leandro(Oakland)
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '92 Toyota Pickup
Engine: 22R-E
Transmission: 5sp Manual
Axle/Gears: 4:??
Originally Posted by stu
Water and wind power have no emissions and are replenishable.
Which car company just came out with a hybrid that has over 300 hp and does 0-60 in under 6 seconds? I can't remember what it was, but I've seen the commercial. I think it's either Infinity or Lexus.
Which car company just came out with a hybrid that has over 300 hp and does 0-60 in under 6 seconds? I can't remember what it was, but I've seen the commercial. I think it's either Infinity or Lexus.
#172
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Phily PA
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 06 Impala SS
Engine: 5.3 327 CU
Originally Posted by 84L69TA
You are seriously the stupidest person Ive ever seen post on this site. Your car isnt fast! If you think low-mid 14's is fast, then Im sorry but you are a bigger idiot than I thought. And dont get too cocky...when my L69 was stock, you wouldnt have been as far ahead of me as you think. Come on Mr. Jet Fuel, why dont you take that boat out to the track? Dont have the ***** for it? Dont want to come back here with a stack of 15-sec timeslips and tell everyone you really are a moron? Everyone that has replied to this post thinks the same way....youre a joke. Lkie I said, do yourself a favor and get the hell out of here.
P.S. No disrespect to knowledgeable "good" mechanics but this guy just can't read whats in front of him and is a bit quick with the name calling, no big deal, just need to let him know where he REALLY stands!
5.6 sec 0 - 60 STOCK, pretty quick! Thats all I'm saying.
Last edited by FrankA330; 06-10-2006 at 02:47 AM.
#173
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Phily PA
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 06 Impala SS
Engine: 5.3 327 CU
Originally Posted by hihighost
Exactly! I seriously doubt you bought the impala for it's drag racing capabilities. You must have had other priorities when making the purchase...the fact that it can move relatively quick is just an added bonus...But certainly not the main focus of the vehicle.
#174
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Phily PA
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 06 Impala SS
Engine: 5.3 327 CU
Originally Posted by Treys_IROC
Your incesant bitching has angered me, run your car at the track, i think you will be very dissappointed.
1985 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28 7.0 15.2
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 6.6 14.9
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z L98 6.8 15.3
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 7.0 15.5
1990 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 5.8 14.4
1990 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 6.5 15.0
Dissapointed in what? The numbers on those stock ROCS are HIGHER than mine. Do the math. First of all where we race is not quite a quarter mile. Also your car is probably somewhat worked. My car hasn't been touched yet. Im also not gonna race until I do SOME work at least. Would you race your stock ROC? My car does 0 - 60 in about 5.7 secs. After I do some mods, I OBVIOUSLY will lower that number depending on whats done. No?!? - YES!
Last edited by FrankA330; 06-10-2006 at 02:38 AM.
#175
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by FrankA330
I OBVIOUSLY will lower that number depending on whats done. No?!? - YES!
"Are you guys brothers?"
"No.......YES! MAN!"
Why wouldn't you race a car just because it's stock? Sounds like you are doubting how fast it is. Plus, haven't you ever heard of bracket racing?
#177
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Red 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0L 305 TBI
I can't wait to see how much cash he pours into his impala just to try and prove a point that doesnt exist. Dollar for dollar in mods a third gen will beat him. Isn't the point of this site for third gen owners to converse, not unsatisfied impala buyers?
#178
1985 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28 7.0 15.2
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 6.6 14.9
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z L98 6.8 15.3
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 7.0 15.5
1990 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 5.8 14.4
1990 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 6.5 15.0
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 6.6 14.9
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z L98 6.8 15.3
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 7.0 15.5
1990 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 5.8 14.4
1990 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 6.5 15.0
and yes there are 5spd 305 cars that will do mid lower 14's well driven, just like the L98's
Last edited by Orr89RocZ; 06-10-2006 at 12:33 PM.
#180
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Originally Posted by FrankA330
5.6 sec 0 - 60 STOCK, pretty quick! Thats all I'm saying.
someone close this thread
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FiReBReTHa
Auto Detailing and Appearance
10
10-06-2001 02:55 AM