89 Iroc Vs 94 3000gt
#51
Supreme Member
![](https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/images/ranks/tgo10.gif)
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: 89 Iroc Vs 94 3000gt
Hmmmm 3.5yr old thread...I'm going to go out on a limb and say this race probably happened or at the very least it's at the end of the planning stage. ![lmao](https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/images/smilies/lmao.gif)
![lmao](https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/images/smilies/lmao.gif)
![lmao](https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/images/smilies/lmao.gif)
Damn NJ people can't read.![Wink](https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
![lmao](https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/images/smilies/lmao.gif)
![lmao](https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/images/smilies/lmao.gif)
![lmao](https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/images/smilies/lmao.gif)
Damn NJ people can't read.
![Wink](https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
![Big Grin](https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#52
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: central NJ
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 iroc
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: 89 Iroc Vs 94 3000gt
hahaha i dont care. my friends gt is the only car in my town thats fun to race an hes not a a**hole about it. i just wanted to tell someone that the 3000 gt arent as fast as everyone thinks they are based on what ive experienced. even the vr-4. at least inna a quarter mile they arent. thats just my 2 cents tho. lol
#53
TGO Supporter
![](https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/images/ranks/tgo10.gif)
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 83 bird
Engine: 305/383
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: 89 Iroc Vs 94 3000gt
lol... uh... the 94-96 3000GT VR4 twin turbo puts down 321hp/315lb-ft factory. The car weighs around 3700lbs...
Maybe the non turbo (221hp/204lb-ft) would lose to a 5.7 Iroc with some mods... but no way you'd ever beat a VR4, sorry.
Just a few performance specs on a stock VR4:
0 - 60 mph : 5.4 seconds
0 - 100 mph : 13.6 seconds
Lateral acceleration on 200' skidpad = .90g
1/4 mile - 13.7 mph
Capable of 160 mph in 6th gear
Engine redline - 7,000 rpm
Drag coefficient - .33 Cd
Stolen from here: http://www.cjbyron.com/3000gtspecifications.htm
Maybe the non turbo (221hp/204lb-ft) would lose to a 5.7 Iroc with some mods... but no way you'd ever beat a VR4, sorry.
Just a few performance specs on a stock VR4:
0 - 60 mph : 5.4 seconds
0 - 100 mph : 13.6 seconds
Lateral acceleration on 200' skidpad = .90g
1/4 mile - 13.7 mph
Capable of 160 mph in 6th gear
Engine redline - 7,000 rpm
Drag coefficient - .33 Cd
Stolen from here: http://www.cjbyron.com/3000gtspecifications.htm
Last edited by aaron7; 11-18-2009 at 07:42 AM.
#54
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: central NJ
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 iroc
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: 89 Iroc Vs 94 3000gt
i knew someone would say that.....now, i don't know if he just a bad driver or what but i promise you ill beat him 0-80 if not 90. promise. but your totally right with the stats and i thought id lose too but that just wasn't the case. ill video tape it next time we race cause i know nobody believes me. haha
#55
TGO Supporter
![](https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/images/ranks/tgo10.gif)
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 83 bird
Engine: 305/383
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: 89 Iroc Vs 94 3000gt
Go for it! I'm not knocking 3rd gens, I've owned 3, just saying that not ALL imports are all noise with nothing to back it up!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mustangman65_79
Body
3
08-11-2015 03:17 PM