stock lo3 vs stock accord
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: spartanburg, sc
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 rs RIP, 96 grand marquis, 92rs
Engine: LO3, 4.6l, L03
Transmission: 700r4, AODE,700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.08, 2.73
stock lo3 vs stock accord (another question please look)
who do you think would win. this kid in my class is running his mouth saying if we ever pulled up to a stoplight all i would see are his tail lights. he has a big stero to add weight and nice big shiny rims. who do you think would win. oh and the car is a 1997 v6 accord and mine is a 1989 305 tbi.
Last edited by redcamaro1989; 05-01-2005 at 10:18 PM.
#3
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,345
Likes: 0
Received 425 Likes
on
326 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
He basically set himself up for a loss by asking you to run from a dig. From a roll he would most likely edge you out but from a dig he is meat.
#4
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Pedro, Ca
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: White KSwisses
Engine: 5.3L Gen III
Man, i dont know dude...
I think you PROBABLY would get him because he has an auto and he has to rev the **** out of an accord before it makes power.
But 305TBI's arent race cars and have been known to be embarrassed by Honduhs before. Believe me, i know, i have a basically stock 305 TBI.
I think you PROBABLY would get him because he has an auto and he has to rev the **** out of an accord before it makes power.
But 305TBI's arent race cars and have been known to be embarrassed by Honduhs before. Believe me, i know, i have a basically stock 305 TBI.
#5
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: spartanburg, sc
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 rs RIP, 96 grand marquis, 92rs
Engine: LO3, 4.6l, L03
Transmission: 700r4, AODE,700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.08, 2.73
so yes or no ill win...plus lol he braggs to much and yu ask him somehting about his car he is like idk....he knows nothing about cars...he will broble just wait till go and slam the gas down...no power brakeing or anything and start in drive
#6
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,345
Likes: 0
Received 425 Likes
on
326 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by redcamaro1989
so yes or no ill win...
so yes or no ill win...
#7
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: you aint stealing my car..
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Auto w/ shift kit
i think 97 were the older v6s so i say you will win but might be close if its the newer style v6 they run like mid 14's
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The kid is for sure a tool. This is probably his first car, because everyone's first car is always the fastest. There is a chance he'll beat you, but his big ugly wheels, and his crappy subs (that probably rattle) aren't helping him at all. I also want to guess that he's probably an idiot who thinks that manually shifting his car will make him faster, so if you just wait long enough, he'll break it. Auto Honda trannys don't tolerate jackass drivers like that.
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wahiawa, Hawai'i
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 TTA
Engine: LC2
Transmission: Worn-out 200R4
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt, 3.27's
My first car was a Hyndai Excel, 1992 hatchback. Never again. Even then I knew it was dog-slow, but it was light and seemed to handle okay... It seems that every car I get, they just get faster.
89 Grand Prix 3.1 LHO
96 Grand Prix 3100
88 GTA L98
89 TTA LC2
Gosh, what's next...?
89 Grand Prix 3.1 LHO
96 Grand Prix 3100
88 GTA L98
89 TTA LC2
Gosh, what's next...?
#11
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: spartanburg, sc
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 rs RIP, 96 grand marquis, 92rs
Engine: LO3, 4.6l, L03
Transmission: 700r4, AODE,700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.08, 2.73
so basicly from a stop i should win....lol and here there are way too many ricers..that is all there is and mabey like 5 real cars around here...the rest are civics they thing are fast as hell
#12
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bristol Va
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS...GONE 87 SC (84 Z/28 clone)
Engine: 305 TBI LO3....GONE....305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4 with shift kit
because everyone's first car is always the fastest
But yea go smoke the accord....and if you dont....dont tell anyone!!
#13
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: you aint stealing my car..
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Auto w/ shift kit
Originally posted by redcamaro1989
so basicly from a stop i should win....lol and here there are way too many ricers..that is all there is and mabey like 5 real cars around here...the rest are civics they thing are fast as hell
so basicly from a stop i should win....lol and here there are way too many ricers..that is all there is and mabey like 5 real cars around here...the rest are civics they thing are fast as hell
#14
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: spartanburg, sc
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 rs RIP, 96 grand marquis, 92rs
Engine: LO3, 4.6l, L03
Transmission: 700r4, AODE,700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.08, 2.73
now he is saying he has a manual.i havent seen the car but he talks alot of crap i dont think he knows what he is talking about but now he wants to put 200 dollars on the race but im gonna look under the hood before i do it. what do yall think
#16
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: spartanburg, sc
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 rs RIP, 96 grand marquis, 92rs
Engine: LO3, 4.6l, L03
Transmission: 700r4, AODE,700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.08, 2.73
lol no he is stalling. he is all like but wait till i get this and that
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wahiawa, Hawai'i
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 TTA
Engine: LC2
Transmission: Worn-out 200R4
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt, 3.27's
...because he probably knows he will lose. You could always respond with "well, okay, I'll wait, but that will give me time to stick [insert mod here] on the car, and you'll still lose..." Oh, and take it to the track, I'd hate to read how you both got busted for racing on public roads, or worse.
#19
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: spartanburg, sc
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 rs RIP, 96 grand marquis, 92rs
Engine: LO3, 4.6l, L03
Transmission: 700r4, AODE,700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.08, 2.73
here is anothen question. do you think i could beat a 93 accord with a 5 speed. completly bone stock. and if i win how much money someone would have to put in to it for them to be able to beat me.
#20
Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '90 Mercury Grand Marquis GS
Engine: 5.0L Ford V8
Transmission: AOD
Axle/Gears: 8.8" Ford, 3.08:1
He's stalling, tell him to put up or shut up! Heads up, no money, no BS or he's a @#$%.
#21
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Originally posted by redcamaro1989
here is anothen question. do you think i could beat a 93 accord with a 5 speed. completly bone stock. and if i win how much money someone would have to put in to it for them to be able to beat me.
here is anothen question. do you think i could beat a 93 accord with a 5 speed. completly bone stock. and if i win how much money someone would have to put in to it for them to be able to beat me.
In all honesty, and as much of a jackass I think the other kid is, I think the kid in the '97 will beat you. The kid in the '93 should get his *** handed to himself though.
#22
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by DuronClocker
Stop being a wimp and just race. Quit asking us if you'll win or not. How do we know what kind of shape your car is in? A 305 TBI can be anywhere from 15s to 18s depending on your tune and driver skill. You mentioned earlier in your thread how the one guy would probably start off in "D" on his auto because he doesn't know how to drive. Starting in "1" doesn't give you anymore power than starting in "D".
In all honesty, and as much of a jackass I think the other kid is, I think the kid in the '97 will beat you. The kid in the '93 should get his *** handed to himself though.
Stop being a wimp and just race. Quit asking us if you'll win or not. How do we know what kind of shape your car is in? A 305 TBI can be anywhere from 15s to 18s depending on your tune and driver skill. You mentioned earlier in your thread how the one guy would probably start off in "D" on his auto because he doesn't know how to drive. Starting in "1" doesn't give you anymore power than starting in "D".
In all honesty, and as much of a jackass I think the other kid is, I think the kid in the '97 will beat you. The kid in the '93 should get his *** handed to himself though.
#23
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: TACOMA WA
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 rs 355 TBI **swapped**
Engine: 80 Ford Fiesta GHIA dual carb
Transmission: 72 Cutlass S 350/350 3.42
Axle/Gears: s10 tq converter/stock rear gear
Originally posted by redcamaro1989
now he is saying he has a manual.i havent seen the car but he talks alot of crap i dont think he knows what he is talking about but now he wants to put 200 dollars on the race but im gonna look under the hood before i do it. what do yall think
now he is saying he has a manual.i havent seen the car but he talks alot of crap i dont think he knows what he is talking about but now he wants to put 200 dollars on the race but im gonna look under the hood before i do it. what do yall think
The older boxy looking accords are pretty quick FEELING, but I dont know how well they run, but I was suprised at how well teh stock accord pulled from 4000 rpms. probably run low 16's but with good trap speeds. these cars are considerably lighter than later accords, I have a friend with an h22 prelude motor in his, and he runs mid 14's at almost 100mph He smokes v6 auto accords all the time. Those ppl think their cars are fast as hell.
Whats ur camaro run?
#24
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: spartanburg, sc
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 rs RIP, 96 grand marquis, 92rs
Engine: LO3, 4.6l, L03
Transmission: 700r4, AODE,700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.08, 2.73
idk i havent taken it to the track yet but it feels strong and kills my step moms v6 1995 camaro pretty badly. but what can you expect. v6 vs v8
#25
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: pefferlaw ontario
Posts: 1,951
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1987 iroc-z custom
Engine: 355 tuned port
Transmission: 5spd baby, only way to go
Axle/Gears: 3.45
ACCORD 1 CAMARO 0
sorry dude...
tbis arent that fast, and no matter if its auto or stick, he will still beat you..
just the facts of life..
iroc2nv
sorry dude...
tbis arent that fast, and no matter if its auto or stick, he will still beat you..
just the facts of life..
iroc2nv
#26
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,119
Received 428 Likes
on
368 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
My van was faster than a stock L03 but a buddy at school could always walk away from me from the start in his 2001 Accord V6 Auto. Lets no even talk about my moms 1995 Legend that will smoke him.
The Acura Legend runs 14.4s @ 95 in Drive all night long. Its only a little 3.2 non-Vtec.
The Acura Legend runs 14.4s @ 95 in Drive all night long. Its only a little 3.2 non-Vtec.
#27
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,345
Likes: 0
Received 425 Likes
on
326 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by iroc2nv
tbis arent that fast,
tbis arent that fast,
You guys just need to go to a track and settle it. Theory alone is not enough to decide a winner between 15 year old cars.
#29
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,119
Received 428 Likes
on
368 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Do the math it is a 230 Net HP car that weighs 3,560 lbs with a 200 lbs driver and has a six speed along with some fairly sticky rubber.
Here is the calculator showing its not to unrealistic.
http://www.speedworldmotorplex.com/calc.htm
Takes 238 HP at the wheels based on Speed.
or 236 HP at the wheels based on time.
Here is the calculator showing its not to unrealistic.
http://www.speedworldmotorplex.com/calc.htm
Takes 238 HP at the wheels based on Speed.
or 236 HP at the wheels based on time.
Last edited by Fast355; 05-17-2005 at 12:58 PM.
#30
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Fast355
Do the math it is a 230 Net HP car that weighs 3,560 lbs with a 200 lbs driver and has a six speed along with some fairly sticky rubber.
Here is the calculator showing its not to unrealistic.
http://www.speedworldmotorplex.com/calc.htm
Takes 238 HP at the wheels based on Speed.
or 236 HP at the wheels based on time.
Do the math it is a 230 Net HP car that weighs 3,560 lbs with a 200 lbs driver and has a six speed along with some fairly sticky rubber.
Here is the calculator showing its not to unrealistic.
http://www.speedworldmotorplex.com/calc.htm
Takes 238 HP at the wheels based on Speed.
or 236 HP at the wheels based on time.
#31
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,345
Likes: 0
Received 425 Likes
on
326 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Fast355
Do the math it is a 230 Net HP car that weighs 3,560 lbs with a 200 lbs driver and has a six speed along with some fairly sticky rubber.
Here is the calculator showing its not to unrealistic.
http://www.speedworldmotorplex.com/calc.htm
Takes 238 HP at the wheels based on Speed.
or 236 HP at the wheels based on time.
Do the math it is a 230 Net HP car that weighs 3,560 lbs with a 200 lbs driver and has a six speed along with some fairly sticky rubber.
Here is the calculator showing its not to unrealistic.
http://www.speedworldmotorplex.com/calc.htm
Takes 238 HP at the wheels based on Speed.
or 236 HP at the wheels based on time.
#33
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
I can't see any older accord or legend putting down 230+ at the front wheels.
I can't see any older accord or legend putting down 230+ at the front wheels.
EDIT: I looked up the Legend and it does have a 6 speed manual. I never knew they started putting in 6 speeds that early. I want one now.
Last edited by stu; 05-18-2005 at 05:10 AM.
#34
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,119
Received 428 Likes
on
368 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Stock with everything installed and running the engine makes 230 HP at the crank. Turn the A/C off and you gain back about 5 hp at the crank. By the way I never said the Acura was stock either. It is stock appearing. It has a chip(reprogrammed ECM) and a lower restriction exhaust (when we bought it, it had a plugged cat and wouldn't go over 30 mph, stupid person thought the engine was blown long story short the cat is hollow and several resonators have been removed). It isn't your typical ***** exhaust note, it is a throaty V6 until it hits about 6,000 at 6,500 it sounds cool. Not to mention it has loosened up a little with age. It is probably 230 HP at the wheels with no problem considering it is a six speed.
Last edited by Fast355; 05-18-2005 at 08:49 AM.
#35
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by redcamaro1989
but what can you expect. v6 vs v8
but what can you expect. v6 vs v8
Tim
#36
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Originally posted by Fast355
Stock with everything installed and running the engine makes 230 HP at the crank. Turn the A/C off and you gain back about 5 hp at the crank. By the way I never said the Acura was stock either. It is stock appearing. It has a chip(reprogrammed ECM) and a lower restriction exhaust (when we bought it, it had a plugged cat and wouldn't go over 30 mph, stupid person thought the engine was blown long story short the cat is hollow and several resonators have been removed). It isn't your typical ***** exhaust note, it is a throaty V6 until it hits about 6,000 at 6,500 it sounds cool. Not to mention it has loosened up a little with age. It is probably 230 HP at the wheels with no problem considering it is a six speed.
Stock with everything installed and running the engine makes 230 HP at the crank. Turn the A/C off and you gain back about 5 hp at the crank. By the way I never said the Acura was stock either. It is stock appearing. It has a chip(reprogrammed ECM) and a lower restriction exhaust (when we bought it, it had a plugged cat and wouldn't go over 30 mph, stupid person thought the engine was blown long story short the cat is hollow and several resonators have been removed). It isn't your typical ***** exhaust note, it is a throaty V6 until it hits about 6,000 at 6,500 it sounds cool. Not to mention it has loosened up a little with age. It is probably 230 HP at the wheels with no problem considering it is a six speed.
I was always under the impression that the factory rating was with the AC turned off. They usually like to make those numbers sound as high as possible. Not like 5hp would make a huge difference anyways.
230HP at the wheels is like 280HP at the crank. I also want to hear what kind of 60' times you're pulling to get 14.4s in that car.
To the thread starter, I'd like to say, that the V6 camaros in '95 were quite slow. Most of the '95 model year still had the 3.4L V6 in it which produced an almighty 160hp in a 3400lb car.
#37
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,345
Likes: 0
Received 425 Likes
on
326 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Engines do loosen over time and break in over time as well. An engine is a system with moving parts. Every time it turns over it's parts fractionaly wear more and "loosen". Some parts actually do reduce friction over time because tollerances creep and forces on certian parts are therefore reduced. Oiling can change as well. Is not uncommon to see new engines make more power after 15k miles than when they were new.
#38
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Well, I understand that it happens to a point. I know that's what the break-in period is for, but when your car has 120k miles you can't say that it has more power because everything is looser. Granted, I understand how oiling can change and things can reduce friction I suppose...there is still more play/give in the bearings and/or other parts.
#39
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,345
Likes: 0
Received 425 Likes
on
326 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by DuronClocker
but when your car has 120k miles you can't say that it has more power because everything is looser.
but when your car has 120k miles you can't say that it has more power because everything is looser.
#40
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Hmm that makes sense about the iron. Also, I do agree that a well-taken-care-of engine could possibly have the same amount of power as stock, or more I suppose. Typically though a higher-mileage vehicle isn't in as good as shape. Though, there are people like us
#41
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: TACOMA WA
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 rs 355 TBI **swapped**
Engine: 80 Ford Fiesta GHIA dual carb
Transmission: 72 Cutlass S 350/350 3.42
Axle/Gears: s10 tq converter/stock rear gear
Originally posted by stu
Proof please.
Proof please.
#44
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The more I think about it, the more I realize what crap that statement is about any ole V6 running a 14. Look at all the crapbox cars like Malibus, Tauruses, Oldsmobiles and what not that even with a manual transmission wouldn't be anywhere near a mid 14. What it boils down to is that it still takes power to run mid 14's, power that most V6 cars don't have.
#45
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: TACOMA WA
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 rs 355 TBI **swapped**
Engine: 80 Ford Fiesta GHIA dual carb
Transmission: 72 Cutlass S 350/350 3.42
Axle/Gears: s10 tq converter/stock rear gear
yeah i probably kinda overextended that comment, there are a lot of v6 slugs... I just kinda ignore they exist. my bad.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Genopsyde
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
10-07-2015 08:35 PM