TTA vs G92 z28
#1
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbus, OH, USA
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '91 Z28, '13 Civic EX-L
Engine: 355 LT1, 1.8 I4
Transmission: T56, 5spd auto
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.42(as long as no breaky)
TTA vs G92 z28
I have a 91 G92 z28 305, 3.42 gears, posi, 5 spd, no power opts the whole 9 yards.. and i know that the tta would most likley beat me stock vs stock. but how bad do you think?
just curious and thought it might be an interesting subject.
thanks
just curious and thought it might be an interesting subject.
thanks
#2
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: cali
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84z, 65 elcamino
Engine: l69 and a hyped up sbc in the camino
Transmission: t5 m21
Axle/Gears: 373s 411s
couple cars prob assuming both are in the same condition and drivers are the same
#3
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Your car should run mid 14's stock, whereas the TTA should run mid 13's stock, and possibly a bit quicker with a good driver/launch. It easy to get into the 12s with one of those with a simple exhaust upgrade and a manual boost controller, which can be home-made for $10. So it may look/sound stock, but be a 12sec (or quicker!!) daily driver.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Stock vs. stock, the TTA by a full second or 10 cars.
To get into the 12's, $30. Thrasher chip $30/shipped and paper clip Pump gas on radials. Paper clip to lock the converter at the line so when it goes into second, its locked. No turning up boost, no exhaust mods, just those mods and you'll be there.
I ran 13.0x with a chip. Didn't do the paper clip as nobody around had one but its worth .2/2mph.
To get into the 12's, $30. Thrasher chip $30/shipped and paper clip Pump gas on radials. Paper clip to lock the converter at the line so when it goes into second, its locked. No turning up boost, no exhaust mods, just those mods and you'll be there.
I ran 13.0x with a chip. Didn't do the paper clip as nobody around had one but its worth .2/2mph.
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Milan, MI
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: A4
Originally posted by TTA 1387
Stock vs. stock, the TTA by a full second or 10 cars.
To get into the 12's, $30. Thrasher chip $30/shipped and paper clip Pump gas on radials. Paper clip to lock the converter at the line so when it goes into second, its locked. No turning up boost, no exhaust mods, just those mods and you'll be there.
I ran 13.0x with a chip. Didn't do the paper clip as nobody around had one but its worth .2/2mph.
Stock vs. stock, the TTA by a full second or 10 cars.
To get into the 12's, $30. Thrasher chip $30/shipped and paper clip Pump gas on radials. Paper clip to lock the converter at the line so when it goes into second, its locked. No turning up boost, no exhaust mods, just those mods and you'll be there.
I ran 13.0x with a chip. Didn't do the paper clip as nobody around had one but its worth .2/2mph.
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Less slippage I suppose, though I figured that's the point of a torque converter...to allow the engine to stay at a higher RPM while multiplying the torque until the output shaft matches input shaft speed.
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Originally posted by TTA 1387
Stock vs. stock, the TTA by a full second or 10 cars.
To get into the 12's, $30. Thrasher chip $30/shipped and paper clip Pump gas on radials. Paper clip to lock the converter at the line so when it goes into second, its locked. No turning up boost, no exhaust mods, just those mods and you'll be there.
I ran 13.0x with a chip. Didn't do the paper clip as nobody around had one but its worth .2/2mph.
Stock vs. stock, the TTA by a full second or 10 cars.
To get into the 12's, $30. Thrasher chip $30/shipped and paper clip Pump gas on radials. Paper clip to lock the converter at the line so when it goes into second, its locked. No turning up boost, no exhaust mods, just those mods and you'll be there.
I ran 13.0x with a chip. Didn't do the paper clip as nobody around had one but its worth .2/2mph.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
I did a 8"K&N, ATR MAF pipe, cat pipe, tubular pan hard rod and lower control arms, 92 Thrasher chip and ran 12.6@110 on the Firestone Firehawks. With no other changes other than Nitto Drag Radials, 12.1@111. Drag Radials change the car emensely because you can build and hold boost to launch. My short times went from around 1.90 to mid 1.6.
So all together, those mods cost around $6-700, including tires.
As far as the paper clip, you put it in the ALDL connector. You manually lock the converter so there is no slip. Basically like a manual. On the dyno, I saw 10rwhp and 18rwtq with locking up the converter with the above mods.
The day after I ran that 12.1, I dynoed the car and it was 318/455 at the wheels
So all together, those mods cost around $6-700, including tires.
As far as the paper clip, you put it in the ALDL connector. You manually lock the converter so there is no slip. Basically like a manual. On the dyno, I saw 10rwhp and 18rwtq with locking up the converter with the above mods.
The day after I ran that 12.1, I dynoed the car and it was 318/455 at the wheels
#9
Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hillsborough, NJ, USA
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1996 Jeep Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Transmission: 5 speed
I didnt think torque converter clutches were strong enough to stay locked under those conditions. I would think locking it under full throttle would fry the thing.
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Originally posted by Ian_F
I didnt think torque converter clutches were strong enough to stay locked under those conditions. I would think locking it under full throttle would fry the thing.
I didnt think torque converter clutches were strong enough to stay locked under those conditions. I would think locking it under full throttle would fry the thing.
And that's amazing that the lil V6 put out 455TQ to the wheels.. I gotta get me one of 'dem 'dere lil mighty motors
#11
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
shhhhh quiet guys I have been trying to get my hands on one. I have looked at a few locally but, they are all trashed and want top dollar.
but, to the question the TTA by at least a few cars. there are even original tests that show them only running high 13's like 13.9 I think but, I would bet they had very very bad drivers to get such poor times. at the track I have seen first had 13.6 @ over 104.00 stock
you would be a mid 14.XX and still be in the high 90's mph the TTA would be pulling away pretty well
but, to the question the TTA by at least a few cars. there are even original tests that show them only running high 13's like 13.9 I think but, I would bet they had very very bad drivers to get such poor times. at the track I have seen first had 13.6 @ over 104.00 stock
you would be a mid 14.XX and still be in the high 90's mph the TTA would be pulling away pretty well
#12
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbus, OH, USA
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '91 Z28, '13 Civic EX-L
Engine: 355 LT1, 1.8 I4
Transmission: T56, 5spd auto
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.42(as long as no breaky)
yeah, i figured it woul dbe by at least a car length in the end. im just happy my lil 305 (often flammed) will run that stock. soon ill start moddin er up..but untill then.
and i cant believe that 6 put 455 to the wheels thats amazing!!
and i cant believe that 6 put 455 to the wheels thats amazing!!
#13
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Lincoln Nebraska
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro "RS"
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23 LSD
I'm going with the TTA on this one...
As for the Paper clip... no ones actually explained whats the deal with it.
Where does it go? Is it a one time deal or can it be reused?
As for the Paper clip... no ones actually explained whats the deal with it.
Where does it go? Is it a one time deal or can it be reused?
#14
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Temecula, Ca
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 TA
Engine: 3.8 V6
Transmission: 2004R
Originally posted by ThUnDeR2005
I'm going with the TTA on this one...
As for the Paper clip... no ones actually explained whats the deal with it.
Where does it go? Is it a one time deal or can it be reused?
I'm going with the TTA on this one...
As for the Paper clip... no ones actually explained whats the deal with it.
Where does it go? Is it a one time deal or can it be reused?
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Originally posted by 88 350 tpi formula
shhhhh quiet guys I have been trying to get my hands on one. I have looked at a few locally but, they are all trashed and want top dollar.
but, to the question the TTA by at least a few cars. there are even original tests that show them only running high 13's like 13.9 I think but, I would bet they had very very bad drivers to get such poor times. at the track I have seen first had 13.6 @ over 104.00 stock
you would be a mid 14.XX and still be in the high 90's mph the TTA would be pulling away pretty well
shhhhh quiet guys I have been trying to get my hands on one. I have looked at a few locally but, they are all trashed and want top dollar.
but, to the question the TTA by at least a few cars. there are even original tests that show them only running high 13's like 13.9 I think but, I would bet they had very very bad drivers to get such poor times. at the track I have seen first had 13.6 @ over 104.00 stock
you would be a mid 14.XX and still be in the high 90's mph the TTA would be pulling away pretty well
That's why those times in Motortrend, C&D, Road&Track, etc always suck.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Originally posted by Ian_F
I didnt think torque converter clutches were strong enough to stay locked under those conditions. I would think locking it under full throttle would fry the thing.
I didnt think torque converter clutches were strong enough to stay locked under those conditions. I would think locking it under full throttle would fry the thing.
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
shhhhh quiet guys I have been trying to get my hands on one. I have looked at a few locally but, they are all trashed and want top dollar.
i know these are rare cars and all, but it seems their owners think no matter how bad the condition of the car is, theyre worth at least 10k
if i could find one thats in decent shape, for the right price, id sell my turbo Buick AND my GTA for that car in a heartbeat. TTA rules!
#18
Supreme Member
iTrader: (-1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: Bright Red 91 GTA
Engine: CARBED LT4
Transmission: MK6
Re: TTA vs G92 z28
Originally posted by BCdawg57
I have a 91 G92 z28 305, 3.42 gears, posi, 5 spd, no power opts the whole 9 yards.. and i know that the tta would most likley beat me stock vs stock. but how bad do you think?
just curious and thought it might be an interesting subject.
thanks
I have a 91 G92 z28 305, 3.42 gears, posi, 5 spd, no power opts the whole 9 yards.. and i know that the tta would most likley beat me stock vs stock. but how bad do you think?
just curious and thought it might be an interesting subject.
thanks
the TTA was the fastest Regular production 3rd gen made...the firehawks would walk them easily though
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Re: TTA vs G92 z28
Originally posted by f-crazy
the TTA was the fastest Regular production 3rd gen made...the firehawks would walk them easily though
the TTA was the fastest Regular production 3rd gen made...the firehawks would walk them easily though
#20
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wahiawa, Hawai'i
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 TTA
Engine: LC2
Transmission: Worn-out 200R4
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt, 3.27's
I guess I lucked out, I got mine for 7K, and yeah, it has some problems. At least the interior andexterior are pretty nice, it's just needs a big tuneup.
#21
Supreme Member
iTrader: (-1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: Bright Red 91 GTA
Engine: CARBED LT4
Transmission: MK6
Re: Re: Re: TTA vs G92 z28
Originally posted by TTA 1387
That's another myth. Only the 383 or whatever it was would beat the TTA. The 350 wouldn't. It ran 13.5 as well as the TTA.
That's another myth. Only the 383 or whatever it was would beat the TTA. The 350 wouldn't. It ran 13.5 as well as the TTA.
go over to www.transamGTA.com/firehawk for all the info you need
#22
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Schererville , IN
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
Box stock 1989 Turbo Trans AM with 96k on the clock will run 13.3-13.4 in the qrtr in the 103-104ish range.
Why do I know this? I own one and ran it shortly after I bought it.
The TTA was the fastest production thirdgen made. It will walk any and all TPI variants, LT1's also, I ran door to door with the LS1 crowd stock to stock.
Another thing, people who dont own them or dont have experience with them, shouldnt talk about things they dont know, and magainze tests dont count unless your a retard working at motor trend :-)
later
Jeremy
Why do I know this? I own one and ran it shortly after I bought it.
The TTA was the fastest production thirdgen made. It will walk any and all TPI variants, LT1's also, I ran door to door with the LS1 crowd stock to stock.
Another thing, people who dont own them or dont have experience with them, shouldnt talk about things they dont know, and magainze tests dont count unless your a retard working at motor trend :-)
later
Jeremy
#23
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
Originally posted by 3.8TransAM
Box stock 1989 Turbo Trans AM with 96k on the clock will run 13.3-13.4 in the qrtr in the 103-104ish range.
Why do I know this? I own one and ran it shortly after I bought it.
The TTA was the fastest production thirdgen made. It will walk any and all TPI variants, LT1's also, I ran door to door with the LS1 crowd stock to stock.
Another thing, people who dont own them or dont have experience with them, shouldnt talk about things they dont know, and magainze tests dont count unless your a retard working at motor trend :-)
later
Jeremy
Box stock 1989 Turbo Trans AM with 96k on the clock will run 13.3-13.4 in the qrtr in the 103-104ish range.
Why do I know this? I own one and ran it shortly after I bought it.
The TTA was the fastest production thirdgen made. It will walk any and all TPI variants, LT1's also, I ran door to door with the LS1 crowd stock to stock.
Another thing, people who dont own them or dont have experience with them, shouldnt talk about things they dont know, and magainze tests dont count unless your a retard working at motor trend :-)
later
Jeremy
they were true I would have said hey they only run a high 13
but, if you see what I wrote It is almost perfect with your times w/ a couple tenths even the MPH is dead nuts on
Last edited by 88 350 tpi formula; 03-04-2005 at 10:15 PM.
#24
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: In the corner of my mind!
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 TTA #1240
Engine: 3.8 SFI turbo
Transmission: 2004r
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Anyone looking for a TTA, my only advice is whether you trust the guy selling it or not. Go through the car completely right down to the compression and leakdown numbers.
My car wasn't bad, but after tearing it down you get to see just how many people should never own a tool set. Even the plastic ones from Tonka could be dangerous in the hands of an idiot.....
My car wasn't bad, but after tearing it down you get to see just how many people should never own a tool set. Even the plastic ones from Tonka could be dangerous in the hands of an idiot.....
#25
Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Kirkwood, MO, USA
Posts: 371
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 454
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: 3.73
tta vs firehawk
Get a transbrake for that TTA so you can get the boost up for the launch and a set of dragslicks. Then you will annihilate a Firehawk. The Firehawk is easier to regulate the power, so with stock tires it could be a close race, but I'd bet on the TTA.
#26
Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Kirkwood, MO, USA
Posts: 371
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 454
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: 3.73
TTA
Just noticed there is a TTA for sale in the classifieds of this website. $15k, looks like a good one.
#27
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by 3.8TransAM
Another thing, people who dont own them or dont have experience with them, shouldnt talk about things they dont know, and magainze tests dont count unless your a retard working at motor trend :-)
later
Jeremy
Another thing, people who dont own them or dont have experience with them, shouldnt talk about things they dont know, and magainze tests dont count unless your a retard working at motor trend :-)
later
Jeremy
#28
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Temecula, Ca
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 TA
Engine: 3.8 V6
Transmission: 2004R
Re: Re: Re: Re: TTA vs G92 z28
Originally posted by f-crazy
no your wrong...Firehawk #1 the press car was a 366in rodeck motored car..it ran consistant 13.2's....the fastest it ran was a 12.9 the firehawk didnt have a 350...they were 366inchers and 383's
go over to www.transamGTA.com/firehawk for all the info you need
no your wrong...Firehawk #1 the press car was a 366in rodeck motored car..it ran consistant 13.2's....the fastest it ran was a 12.9 the firehawk didnt have a 350...they were 366inchers and 383's
go over to www.transamGTA.com/firehawk for all the info you need
3rd gen Firehawks are not even considered a production car. They didn't even come with a factory GM warranty.
They were more along the lines of a Motion or a Dana Camaro of the late 60's
#29
Supreme Member
iTrader: (-1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: Bright Red 91 GTA
Engine: CARBED LT4
Transmission: MK6
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: TTA vs G92 z28
Originally posted by 1BADDAM
3rd gen Firehawks are not even considered a production car. They didn't even come with a factory GM warranty.
They were more along the lines of a Motion or a Dana Camaro of the late 60's
3rd gen Firehawks are not even considered a production car. They didn't even come with a factory GM warranty.
They were more along the lines of a Motion or a Dana Camaro of the late 60's
Originally posted by f-crazy
the TTA was the fastest Regular production 3rd gen made...the firehawks would walk them easily though
the TTA was the fastest Regular production 3rd gen made...the firehawks would walk them easily though
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Re: Re: Re: TTA vs G92 z28
Originally posted by f-crazy
no your wrong...Firehawk #1 the press car was a 366in rodeck motored car..it ran consistant 13.2's....the fastest it ran was a 12.9 the firehawk didnt have a 350...they were 366inchers and 383's
go over to www.transamGTA.com/firehawk for all the info you need
no your wrong...Firehawk #1 the press car was a 366in rodeck motored car..it ran consistant 13.2's....the fastest it ran was a 12.9 the firehawk didnt have a 350...they were 366inchers and 383's
go over to www.transamGTA.com/firehawk for all the info you need
Hardly walking it... Owners knew how to drive it, magazine's didn't.
#31
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 tta trans am
Engine: 3.8 L turbo
back in 89 I owned a 87 grand national. we would race at union grove. The TTA would run high twelves all day stock with tires. Made my GN look stupid. Couple of mod likea chip, adjustable wastegate and free floww exhaust they were high elevens. Your z28 has a ways to go before you line up with a TTA. especially at a track where some of those guys get real intense.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post