i killed another 4th gen
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: garland,tx
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 gta
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: turbo 350
i kilt another 4th gen
ran a lt1 six speed from a roll today, about 25-30mph in 2nd gear. i let him hit first and then i pulled about a car and a half. as i shifted into third i pulled another car on him and he let out. he was lookin real snotty and seemed pissed that i beat him. ah, oh well its the life of a third gen owner. ive never been beat by a lt1, i dont plan to either!
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Clearfield,Utah
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC, 1989 IROC
Engine: built 305, stock 305 tpi
Transmission: Corvette 700r4, t-5
Axle/Gears: 4.10 posi, 3.08 posi
your slightly moddified 350 might have put him down but a stock 350 tpi against a SS lt1, i'm gonna have to call unless he sucked at drivning really bad.
#7
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
He said light to light, the tpi will womp on any fourth gen to begin with, but problem is the fourthgen pulls far away after the top of 2nd gear.
Trending Topics
#8
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
yea A L98 vs a LT1 at stop light to stop light, the 350 TPI should win.. After 50 or so the Lt1 will take it slowly.. LT1 and the L98 arent much diff.. Lt1 has much better top and the L98 loves low end.. Man i wish GM threw atleast a 5 speed in the L98
#9
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Atlanta, GA, US of A
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 94 Z28
Engine: LT1 w/ headers, catback, CAI, tune
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
auto vs auto the later L98s aren't much slower than the LT1s. Especially if we're talking 0-60 or 70 mph-ish runs on the street, where it's all in the launch and a truly faster car could easily lose with less than perfect driving...
The LT1 cars main benefit was the availability of the 6spd manual...
The LT1 cars main benefit was the availability of the 6spd manual...
#10
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: antioch, california
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 camaro z28
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 auto
I know what you mean I've raced quite a few LT1's and I get them off the line unless i get alot of wheel spin, but mid way through their 3rd gear the pull next to me then slowly pull on me.
I haven't raced one since I had my headers and shocks installed.
nice kill, :hail: 3rd gens.
I haven't raced one since I had my headers and shocks installed.
nice kill, :hail: 3rd gens.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: garland,tx
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 gta
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: turbo 350
oh btw, i ran that lt1 on the motor. i would never dream of running a dead stock lt1 with my spray. not worth the $2.75 a pound for the n2o. and my motor is a l98. the race lasted to about 85mph. even with my car in hurt condition he had no chance on the street.
#12
Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Smithville TN
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 GTA trans am
Engine: L98 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4 built
Axle/Gears: 3.45 4th gen 10 bolt
lt1s weeeeeeeeeee
i raced a lt1 in my dads mini van 3.0 baby. i could had taken it had i not spun for about 5 mins. you guys know how much low-end those mini vans make.punk got lucky i will get him next time.
#13
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by pasky
Yup, just about any newer engine will pass the fourthgens, were much lighter than our little brothers. Much sexier too .
Yup, just about any newer engine will pass the fourthgens, were much lighter than our little brothers. Much sexier too .
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Plattsburgh,NY
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 93 Mustang GT
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
Originally posted by nick418
yea A L98 vs a LT1 at stop light to stop light, the 350 TPI should win.. After 50 or so the Lt1 will take it slowly.. LT1 and the L98 arent much diff.. Lt1 has much better top and the L98 loves low end.. Man i wish GM threw atleast a 5 speed in the L98
yea A L98 vs a LT1 at stop light to stop light, the 350 TPI should win.. After 50 or so the Lt1 will take it slowly.. LT1 and the L98 arent much diff.. Lt1 has much better top and the L98 loves low end.. Man i wish GM threw atleast a 5 speed in the L98
#15
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Originally posted by ES87iroc
Define "much lighter".
Define "much lighter".
#16
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,345
Likes: 0
Received 425 Likes
on
326 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by pasky
Lets see, my car with a LT1 weighs 3200 without me in it without any weight reduction. How much does a fourthgen weigh? I only weigh 167.
Lets see, my car with a LT1 weighs 3200 without me in it without any weight reduction. How much does a fourthgen weigh? I only weigh 167.
You can't beat the shell of the 3rd gen.
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
You can't beat the shell of the 3rd gen.
You can't beat the shell of the 3rd gen.
#18
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,345
Likes: 0
Received 425 Likes
on
326 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by 25thmustang
Shell of a fox body, mines 3150-3200 with me in it!
Shell of a fox body, mines 3150-3200 with me in it!
#19
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
Ha I knew someone was going to say that. We don't like our girls to be too skinny
Ha I knew someone was going to say that. We don't like our girls to be too skinny
#20
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
They weigh 3400 to 3800. The average weight for a fully optioned LT1 or LS1 car is 3500 to 3600. The verts are the high end and the 1LE and base Z's are the low end. My 95 was weighed in at like 3550 at one point (previous owner).
You can't beat the shell of the 3rd gen.
They weigh 3400 to 3800. The average weight for a fully optioned LT1 or LS1 car is 3500 to 3600. The verts are the high end and the 1LE and base Z's are the low end. My 95 was weighed in at like 3550 at one point (previous owner).
You can't beat the shell of the 3rd gen.
#21
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,345
Likes: 0
Received 425 Likes
on
326 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by pasky
Well this guy apparently thought I was being a smart *** or something. I suppose mine weighs so little because I have power nothing and it was originally a v6 with literally no options.
Well this guy apparently thought I was being a smart *** or something. I suppose mine weighs so little because I have power nothing and it was originally a v6 with literally no options.
#22
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
My iroc-z = 3500 lbs.
my 98 ws6 = 3500 lbs.
Your car is unusually light if you are weighing in around 3050 lbs.
You have to comepare apples to apples, i.e. a stripped/loaded 4th gen to a stripped/loaded 3rd gen.
my 98 ws6 = 3500 lbs.
Your car is unusually light if you are weighing in around 3050 lbs.
You have to comepare apples to apples, i.e. a stripped/loaded 4th gen to a stripped/loaded 3rd gen.
#23
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
My car isn't stripped.....I was assuming both the fourthgen and thirdgen have the same engine, which is why I broguth up thirdgen with newer engine, that was the key. Not a stock iroc. Once again, no weight reduction done on my car. I gaurantee you a ls1 fourthgen vs a ls1 thirdgen your gonna see a 250-300 lb difference. Perhaps you should pay closer attention.
#24
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by pasky
My car isn't stripped.....I was assuming both the fourthgen and thirdgen have the same engine, which is why I broguth up thirdgen with newer engine, that was the key. Not a stock iroc. Once again, no weight reduction done on my car. I gaurantee you a ls1 fourthgen vs a ls1 thirdgen your gonna see a 250-300 lb difference. Perhaps you should pay closer attention.
My car isn't stripped.....I was assuming both the fourthgen and thirdgen have the same engine, which is why I broguth up thirdgen with newer engine, that was the key. Not a stock iroc. Once again, no weight reduction done on my car. I gaurantee you a ls1 fourthgen vs a ls1 thirdgen your gonna see a 250-300 lb difference. Perhaps you should pay closer attention.
Originally posted by pasky
I suppose mine weighs so little because I have power nothing and it was originally a v6 with literally no options.
I suppose mine weighs so little because I have power nothing and it was originally a v6 with literally no options.
So which is it?
#25
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
I was speaking of my weight and why it weighs considerably lower than the normal v8 thirdgen. Once again, in general with the same engine and tranny the thirdgen will weigh 200-300 lb's less than the fourthgen. Is this just too hard for you to understand?
#26
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
I was speaking of my weight and why it weighs considerably lower than the normal v8 thirdgen. Once again, in general with the same engine and tranny the thirdgen will weigh 200-300 lb's less than the fourthgen. Is this just too hard for you to understand?
#28
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by pasky
I was speaking of my weight and why it weighs considerably lower than the normal v8 thirdgen. Once again, in general with the same engine and tranny the thirdgen will weigh 200-300 lb's less than the fourthgen. Is this just too hard for you to understand?
I was speaking of my weight and why it weighs considerably lower than the normal v8 thirdgen. Once again, in general with the same engine and tranny the thirdgen will weigh 200-300 lb's less than the fourthgen. Is this just too hard for you to understand?
In the same thread, one minute you say your car has NO options, and a post later you say it is not stripped. (Well optioned)
What was difficult about that? Which is it? Compare an apple to an apple. (well equiped to well equiped -OR- stripped to stripped) From what it sounds like, you can't decided wether your car is an apple or an orange.
#29
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western NY
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 2007 Saturn Sky Redline
Engine: 2.0 turbo
Transmission: m5
Axle/Gears: 3.91 LSD
A fully loaded thirdgen weighs about as much as a no option fourth gen by all anecdotal postings I've seen 3500-3600 to 3500-3600.
Stripped means no interior, just a tach and/or speedo where the new lightweight dash sits all crash bars removed (since roll cages don't really need them) along with various other race car mods. No options is simply no options.
Stripped means no interior, just a tach and/or speedo where the new lightweight dash sits all crash bars removed (since roll cages don't really need them) along with various other race car mods. No options is simply no options.
#30
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Originally posted by Inwo
A fully loaded thirdgen weighs about as much as a no option fourth gen by all anecdotal postings I've seen 3500-3600 to 3500-3600.
Stripped means no interior, just a tach and/or speedo where the new lightweight dash sits all crash bars removed (since roll cages don't really need them) along with various other race car mods. No options is simply no options.
A fully loaded thirdgen weighs about as much as a no option fourth gen by all anecdotal postings I've seen 3500-3600 to 3500-3600.
Stripped means no interior, just a tach and/or speedo where the new lightweight dash sits all crash bars removed (since roll cages don't really need them) along with various other race car mods. No options is simply no options.
So I suppose someone else has eye sight problems identifying an apple from an orange.
#31
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: garland,tx
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 gta
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: turbo 350
Originally posted by r3pp3r
Dam where do you get your? I was paying 4.50 a pound to fill the bottle in my caprice
Dam where do you get your? I was paying 4.50 a pound to fill the bottle in my caprice
btw, my 1988 sport coupe l03 camaro weighed 3370 with me and with no wieght reduction besides no smog and no cat. it was a fully optioned(power window, door lock, hatch,a/c, but non t-top)car. i weighed 170lbs at the time. my 1988 gta weighed 3515 without me and no weight reduction. last time i weghed the gta, it was 3380lbs without driver, with the slicks mounted, a full nitrous bottle,and a 1/4 tank of gas. ive pulled nearly 200lbs out of it since, and hope to go down the road to the nearest truck stop soon and weigh it agian.
#32
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by pasky
Glad someone knows the definition of stripped....Meaning no carpet, no seats except the driver, etc...
So I suppose someone else has eye sight problems identifying an apple from an orange.
Glad someone knows the definition of stripped....Meaning no carpet, no seats except the driver, etc...
So I suppose someone else has eye sight problems identifying an apple from an orange.
#33
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 pontiac firebird
Engine: 305 V8 flo-pro exhaust
Transmission: automatic 700r4 4speed
Axle/Gears: stock 2.73's :(
i do notice that alot of 4th gen owners are real snobby n arrogant n they dont really give a *** bout our 3rd gens no respect n no im not speakin for every1 this is how i feel
#34
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by fly89gta
I think what he meant by stripped was no options from the factory.
I think what he meant by stripped was no options from the factory.
Last edited by ES87iroc; 03-02-2005 at 02:56 PM.
#35
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by MoroteZ28
i do notice that alot of 4th gen owners are real snobby n arrogant n they dont really give a *** bout our 3rd gens no respect n no im not speakin for every1 this is how i feel
i do notice that alot of 4th gen owners are real snobby n arrogant n they dont really give a *** bout our 3rd gens no respect n no im not speakin for every1 this is how i feel
Now to compare, the Mustangs reason for not sticking their noses up, the newer ones arent much faster. A well driven notch, back in 88 could run low 14s high 13s, and a new GT is right in the same area, maybe slightly faster. Cant stick your nose up at a car that isnt much slower, and done 15+ years ago!
I dont agree with it, but I can see why. Just make your car faster than most LS1s in your area, and you have nothing to worry about!
#36
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Originally posted by ES87iroc
Yep, I think he is confusing stripped with gutted, and he has to look/act big and try to have the last word. I was just letting it go as it was not worth trying to expain it to him. That, and he seems to have a reverse superiority complex with 3rd/4th gens, which might be why he is being so hard headed.
Yep, I think he is confusing stripped with gutted, and he has to look/act big and try to have the last word. I was just letting it go as it was not worth trying to expain it to him. That, and he seems to have a reverse superiority complex with 3rd/4th gens, which might be why he is being so hard headed.
#37
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by pasky
quit trying to deny facts because you own a fourthgen.
quit trying to deny facts because you own a fourthgen.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Plattsburgh,NY
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 93 Mustang GT
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
When my friend and I weighed are cars his 2000 SS was 3565 with him (130lbs?) and mine was 3500 exactly. His has all options but leather and is a 6spd. I weighed about 145-150 at the time. So..my Mustang is a little on the heavy side for a foxbody. That was when it was AOD still though, so I lost some weight with the 5spd swap but gained it back with the SC probably.
#40
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Upland Pa
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Camaro Vert
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 S60
My IROC... 3200 pounds (no driver) before the 6 speed swap. with a 60/40 weight ratio.
Err so Erik what aboot that? :finger:
Kat
Err so Erik what aboot that? :finger:
Kat
#41
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by Kat
My IROC... 3200 pounds (no driver) before the 6 speed swap. with a 60/40 weight ratio.
Err so Erik what aboot that? :finger:
Kat
My IROC... 3200 pounds (no driver) before the 6 speed swap. with a 60/40 weight ratio.
Err so Erik what aboot that? :finger:
Kat
I guess I just own an overweight pig, that's all.
#42
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Upland Pa
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Camaro Vert
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 S60
Same here. The only options mine has are power locks and AC.
Then again all the smog stuff is gone and thats about it. I think the 3" y-pipe's weight makes up for that loss tho. lol
I should weigh it at work again just to see what the differance is with the 6 speed and Spohn Torque Arm.
Kat
Then again all the smog stuff is gone and thats about it. I think the 3" y-pipe's weight makes up for that loss tho. lol
I should weigh it at work again just to see what the differance is with the 6 speed and Spohn Torque Arm.
Kat
#43
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Mine has every option for 87 and then some, I keep adding crap (weight) to it. Soon it might be eligible for the LBC. LoL Ah well, it was never meant to be fast, I gave up on that along time ago with this car.
#44
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Upland Pa
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Camaro Vert
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 S60
Thats why you have a LS1 car. Just remember the godly power of the LS1 is no match for the lowly out dated pos L98.
Kat
Kat
#45
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by Kat
Thats why you have a LS1 car. Just remember the godly power of the LS1 is no match for the lowly out dated pos L98.
Kat
Thats why you have a LS1 car. Just remember the godly power of the LS1 is no match for the lowly out dated pos L98.
Kat
#47
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by DON 88T/A
ES87iroc...where are you in MD?
Have you raced in Glen-burnie before..might have met you..
ES87iroc...where are you in MD?
Have you raced in Glen-burnie before..might have met you..
#48
My loaded 01 SS with T-Tops, leather, power everything, + SLP dual center exit exhaust and 1/2 tank of gas weighed 3420 lbs when I weighed it at the track. I have never weighed my IROC but I remember always seeing quotes of 3400-ish pounds. They are essentially the same weight.
#49
You have/had a blue Iroc that was not shifting right at the time?
I have a black 88 Trans-am...we met up at glen-burnie a couple times(about 4 years ago)...did you ever get it to shift right?
I was off the internet for awhile but have been back on for a year now...you were also on tealnet? Sorry if i have the wrong person..
I have a black 88 Trans-am...we met up at glen-burnie a couple times(about 4 years ago)...did you ever get it to shift right?
I was off the internet for awhile but have been back on for a year now...you were also on tealnet? Sorry if i have the wrong person..
#50
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by DON 88T/A
You have/had a blue Iroc that was not shifting right at the time?
I have a black 88 Trans-am...we met up at glen-burnie a couple times(about 4 years ago)...did you ever get it to shift right?
I was off the internet for awhile but have been back on for a year now...you were also on tealnet? Sorry if i have the wrong person..
You have/had a blue Iroc that was not shifting right at the time?
I have a black 88 Trans-am...we met up at glen-burnie a couple times(about 4 years ago)...did you ever get it to shift right?
I was off the internet for awhile but have been back on for a year now...you were also on tealnet? Sorry if i have the wrong person..
I fixed it by throwing away the A4 and switching to a t5. Do you still have the t/a? Check out the mid-atlantic forums here, there is a calendar of events for this season with everything we have going on in it.
(Link is also in the sig)