Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

R32 Golf Kill

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-2004, 04:27 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
91RSHawaii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Honolulu Hawaii
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1999 30th Anniversary Pontiac T/A
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
R32 Golf Kill

I caught a redlight w/ a blue, brand new golf R32, hadn't seen one before, and looked over n gave him a thumbs up.. typical euro-trashricer flicks me off, starts revving. (his car was full w/ four people) Light turns green, i dump the clutch, and jump out ahead of him, by 50 mph ive got some noticable distance on him, but not much, he was pretty close, when I shut down... then he does the typical fly by w/ hazards.

Im not too sure how fast they are supposed to run, but it was one of the most fun races ive had in a while. (heh, ive raced like 3 times in my life)

On second thought, maybe he was a really ****ty driver... idk.

Last edited by 91RSHawaii; 10-31-2004 at 04:31 PM.
Old 10-31-2004, 04:44 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
jocww's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: cali
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84z, 65 elcamino
Engine: l69 and a hyped up sbc in the camino
Transmission: t5 m21
Axle/Gears: 373s 411s
well lets see he had 4 people u had 1 and u barely won i ont know if he had only him in the car you might be bowing down rite about now
Old 10-31-2004, 04:46 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
anondude13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
_

Last edited by anondude13; 02-17-2009 at 12:02 AM.
Old 10-31-2004, 04:54 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,775
Received 376 Likes on 304 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
congrats and that kid is a tool. Give him some credit and he flicks you off. Then has nerve to put on hazzards after he lost? what a moron for acting like that.

What do those R32's got in them?
Old 10-31-2004, 04:55 PM
  #5  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: R32 Golf Kill

Originally posted by 91RSHawaii
typical euro-trashricer flicks me off, starts revving.


At least you beat him though. Lucky his car was full.
Old 10-31-2004, 07:37 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,775
Received 376 Likes on 304 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....rticle_id=8006

0-60 in 6.4 Similar to 1.8T golf

240 horses at 6250 rpm 236lbft from 2800-3200 rpm.
3400lbs, 300 heavier than VR6

capable of .90 g on skidpad so Iroc's beware, this thing will run with you if not beat you stock. LOL

moves good. but L98 should walk it
Old 10-31-2004, 09:49 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
ThraxXx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L Fuel Injection
Transmission: Automatic 4speed /w OVerdrive
The R32 is a Fat heavy AWD VR6. Aparently VW made a big hype about them however people with a Chipped 1.8T have been known to school these overpriced GTI wannabes.
Old 11-01-2004, 02:00 AM
  #8  
Member
 
The Doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....rticle_id=8006

0-60 in 6.4 Similar to 1.8T golf

240 horses at 6250 rpm 236lbft from 2800-3200 rpm.
3400lbs, 300 heavier than VR6

capable of .90 g on skidpad so Iroc's beware, this thing will run with you if not beat you stock. LOL

moves good. but L98 should walk it
They are very nice to drive, great fun but rather over priced if you ask me. They tend to understeer pretty bad too.

One over thing they have that no stock thirdgen does...... fantastic brakes!
Old 11-01-2004, 02:19 AM
  #9  
TGO Supporter

 
MdFormula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Maryland; USA
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
yeah nothing to ride home about, my friend beat one pretty gppd and he runs mid 14s to low at the track. from a light and a roll.
i also agree they seem quite expensive also.
Old 11-01-2004, 04:05 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
91RSHawaii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Honolulu Hawaii
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1999 30th Anniversary Pontiac T/A
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
hehe, well i had a pretty ****ty launch, (broken torque arm bushing) and ive driven stick for less than two months.. so granted my car couldve hammered him harder, but it was interesting to race such a hyped up car, and realize that its ***** arent as huge as the pricetag.

anyone else have any experience racing these?
Old 11-01-2004, 07:20 AM
  #11  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
my 2000 jetta with the same VR6 was faster.


mostly because, the golf looks small, but with the AWD, leather, ect... that comes with the R32, it weighs 3200+ lbs... in otherwords, our 3rdgens are about the same weight.

it has somthing like 240-250 horses and 245-255 TQ... they're slightly under rated from VW.

if you're intrested in motors, look into the VR6 and the W8 that VW has, they're very intresting designs.
Old 11-01-2004, 07:28 AM
  #12  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,775
Received 376 Likes on 304 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Its 7 grand more than base VR6!
Old 11-01-2004, 07:52 AM
  #13  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
Its 7 grand more than base VR6!
whats a "base Vr6"?

the VR6 is a engine.
you can get it in several cars.
do you mean the GTI?
Old 11-01-2004, 09:01 AM
  #14  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,775
Received 376 Likes on 304 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Car N Driver quote:

"Like the R32's curb weight, this number, too, is a little heavy—$29,675, or $7030 more than the base price for a GTI VR6, and comparable to the WRX STi and the Evo"

I meant base price for GTI VR6
Old 11-01-2004, 11:31 AM
  #15  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
With AWD this kid should have smoked you out of the hole, but we've already determined that he can't drive.
Old 11-01-2004, 11:37 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
Thats heavier then my iroc---------- im not worried nice power four a 4 banger stock
Old 11-01-2004, 12:07 PM
  #17  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Mcdamit
Thats heavier then my iroc---------- im not worried nice power four a 4 banger stock
It's not a four banger. lol
Old 11-01-2004, 12:22 PM
  #18  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by Mcdamit
Thats heavier then my iroc---------- im not worried nice power four a 4 banger stock

VR6 = V6.

and since its a MODERN motor, compared to, i donno, what they designed in the early 80s, it ends up making just as much power, STOCK, as..... say a TPI V8.
Old 11-01-2004, 12:48 PM
  #19  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Just because it's modern, doesn't mean it's hightech. coughLS1cough. The NSX has basically had the same motor for the last 15 years.
Old 11-01-2004, 12:55 PM
  #20  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by stu
Just because it's modern, doesn't mean it's hightech. coughLS1cough. The NSX has basically had the same motor for the last 15 years.
duh.
now go research the motor. look at the variable intake tract length plastic intake. the valve train, hell the whole motor has so many nice design details id take me all day do describe them all.

it is a modern, hightech production motor.
Old 11-01-2004, 12:55 PM
  #21  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,775
Received 376 Likes on 304 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
uhh, the LS1 is real high tech

Edit, dang, you beat me to it! LOL
Old 11-01-2004, 12:56 PM
  #22  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
uhh, the LS1 is real high tech

Edit, dang, you beat me to it! LOL
I'm sure it is...for a pushrod.
Old 11-01-2004, 12:58 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
anondude13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
_

Last edited by anondude13; 02-17-2009 at 12:01 AM.
Old 11-01-2004, 01:07 PM
  #24  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'm just giving you guys a hard time you big baby. No wonder they keep such a tight leash on you guys over here, no one knows how to behave like an adult. Didn't you see the wink and the tongue?
Old 11-01-2004, 01:14 PM
  #25  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,775
Received 376 Likes on 304 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Didn't you see the wink and the tongue?
:lala:
Old 11-01-2004, 01:56 PM
  #26  
Supreme Member
 
25thmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I wouldnt call an LS1 high tech, but then again DOHC motors have now been around for a LONG time. I would soon enough say a motor is more technologically advanced by the computer than the actual workings of the motor, merely because everything out today has more or less been out for many years now. Nothing wrong with a non high tech motor, some of the fastest have carbs!!!
Old 11-01-2004, 02:33 PM
  #27  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I know, I was just giving you guys a hard time. I hope no one else comes in here trying to defend the LS1 (not saying that you are 25th).
Old 11-01-2004, 03:36 PM
  #28  
Supreme Member
 
25thmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by stu
I know, I was just giving you guys a hard time. I hope no one else comes in here trying to defend the LS1 (not saying that you are 25th).
Im not defending it by any means, the last LS1 I was supposed to race at the track (like me drive the car, not my car race) bent pushrods, and had a bad EGR leak. I have not met someone who hasent had an issue with one (personal friends, Im sure I have met people who havent had issues), just saying in my eyes most engines have been around and repeated so many times, they just arent modern or that high tech anymore!
Old 11-01-2004, 04:29 PM
  #29  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by 25thmustang
just saying in my eyes most engines have been around and repeated so many times, they just arent modern or that high tech anymore!
True, in fact the only ones I can think of are the new RX-8 rotary motor, the new Mustang motor that is supposed to be coming out where Ford purchased some of Honda's VTEC technology, the new I-VTEC stuff from Honda, and the newest BMW motors with infinitely variable valve timing, very cool if you ask me.
Old 11-01-2004, 09:29 PM
  #30  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,491
Received 192 Likes on 163 Posts
Originally posted by 25thmustang
...just saying in my eyes most engines have been around and repeated so many times, they just arent modern or that high tech anymore!
I hear what you're saying 25, but then you have to ask yourself.... does it really even matter?

I mean, the 2004 Z06 has proven to run high 11's naturally aspirated from the factory.... yet I never seen the 'High Tech' LT5 run those numbers, stock.
Old 11-01-2004, 09:32 PM
  #31  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,775
Received 376 Likes on 304 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
I am sure it has tho
Old 11-01-2004, 09:41 PM
  #32  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,491
Received 192 Likes on 163 Posts
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ I am sure it has tho
Very possible. But to tell you the truth, every Corvette challenge that I frequented, the stock ZR1's usually ran mid-high 12's (which is a very impressive number, for an early to mid 90's.... straight from the factory, Corvette).

But still though, the Z06 dominates the ZR1.... even with it's pre-historic pushrods.
Old 11-01-2004, 11:12 PM
  #33  
Supreme Member
 
25thmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by Street Lethal
I hear what you're saying 25, but then you have to ask yourself.... does it really even matter?

I mean, the 2004 Z06 has proven to run high 11's naturally aspirated from the factory.... yet I never seen the 'High Tech' LT5 run those numbers, stock.
It doesnt matter, that means the proven combos are working...
Old 11-01-2004, 11:19 PM
  #34  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,775
Received 376 Likes on 304 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Some people i know driven both the LS6 Z06 and the LT5 ZR1's and say they are about the same. They like the Lt5 cuz it revs higher but Z06 is lighter buy like 300 pounds. LOL Your right, most Zr1's are mid high 12's with the later 93-95 versions being the quicker. The Z06 is faster and i dont think a Zr1 could break 11's stock after reading up on some ZR1 forums.
Old 11-02-2004, 01:19 AM
  #35  
Supreme Member

 
jocww's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: cali
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84z, 65 elcamino
Engine: l69 and a hyped up sbc in the camino
Transmission: t5 m21
Axle/Gears: 373s 411s
for all out performance you cant beat a carb the fastest cars will always be running carbs. thats why theyre making ls1 manifolds that bolt on to carbs instead of fi altho id rather have fi just for the gas mileage and part throttle. but ft will always be won by the carb
Old 11-04-2004, 03:48 PM
  #36  
Supporter/Moderator
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,355
Likes: 0
Received 427 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by jocww
for all out performance you cant beat a carb the fastest cars will always be running carbs. thats why theyre making ls1 manifolds that bolt on to carbs instead of fi altho id rather have fi just for the gas mileage and part throttle. but ft will always be won by the carb
This is debatable but I know what you mean. They really make the carb intake for the LS1 so that old school tuners and racers can use these motors and not have to worry about tuning them. It appeals to a wider band of automotive racers. The "real" EFI guys are outnumbered by carb guys. The LS1 and LT1 can make just as much power with their EFI set-ups as with a carb. The only thing that sets them apart is price. You cannot beat the price of a carb set-up. It is how you go fast for cheap.

As a side note. In the world of IC engines only engines with overhead valves are considered "high performance". That does not mean that engines do not have tons of technology poured into them. It is just a word that designates certain spark ignition engines. A 100hp DOHC motor is considered high performance but a 700HP LS1 is not. Whpo would have figured. The LS1 was ahead of its time really. Only now are other car comapanies able to duplicate certian desing and performance features of the LS1. They started development in 1991 I beleive. To put this in perspective, ford now uses the LS1 intake (A slightly different version) and the HEMI is almost a carbon copy of the LS1. It only took them 7+ years to get there and in the end they all had to copy it.
Old 11-04-2004, 08:45 PM
  #37  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Good kill.

On a side note the R32's are overpriced pieces of ****.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
88CamZ
Engine Swap
9
10-08-2015 10:29 AM
corey8084
Cooling
48
09-17-2015 02:56 PM
InfinityShade
Body
3
09-05-2015 06:38 PM
FireDemonSiC
TPI
2
09-03-2015 12:31 PM
InfinityShade
Transmissions and Drivetrain
15
08-22-2015 08:00 PM



Quick Reply: R32 Golf Kill



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 PM.