Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

cocky '78 running on 7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2004, 01:39 AM
  #51  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
305q_ta86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Originally posted by anymethod
Hey 305q, we have the exact same car even down to the wheels. I never saw one like mine with those wheels. Anyway an old friend of mine who isn't a friend anymore had a 78 z28 4 speed. Nothing to brag about at all. He could drive ok and it had the 3.73s, but the only thing it did well was wheel stands. I say it will be close with 8 cylinders, but you should win if you launch well.

~Matt
Hmm, yeah we'll have to see. Hopefully by summer I will have an intake manifold and headers, possibly a cutout, so that should push me over the top... Cool that we have the same car. Dont see too many around anymore. What color is your interior? Red/grey?
Old 10-30-2004, 01:44 AM
  #52  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
305q_ta86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Originally posted by rx7speed

305q the rotary redlines at 7k
for many years
highest rating is 8000rpms
not twice what a piston motor does and also due to it's design it does have some flaws with running high rpms being the center of the crank isn't supported but free floating leading to flex.... plus do you think accesories would like to be reved up that high?
Oh, I know about the crank, I didnt know it was a problem though. I know a guy with an 88 that says he makes trips past 9k easily, but I dont know how legit that claim is. So yeah, not twice, but a hell of a lot higher for sure. And as for the accesories, good point. The water pump would probably go PPFT and the alt. might charge like 30 volts for a split second and then BAM. UNless you had underdrive pulleys
Old 10-30-2004, 11:20 AM
  #53  
Member

 
1981z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i was taalking about the 1980 and 81 trans am 301 turbo
Old 10-30-2004, 03:24 PM
  #54  
Supreme Member

 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Re: the 301

Originally posted by 1981z28
was a pontiac turbo motor.it ran low psi last time i checked just turn up the turnbo and watch out. i think they where 16 seccars stock.
the 301 my friend has is a 79 firebird

it is for the most part like a chevy 302 design. you know 4 inch bore 3 inch stroke
but unlike the chevy 302 that can rev up quite a bit this 302 won't even hit 4500rpms
there is a built in rev limiter on the car it seems due to bad flowing heads.
I put the car in first held it to the floor and hit 4200 and there it stayed
the car has something like -150hp and 3900lbs of weight runnign at least 3.08/3.23 gears I think the cars are junk for performance straight from the factory...
now he was going to put a 428 poncho in there lucky bastard bought it for 100 bucks. but the bastard sold that and is instead maybe putting a 350 in there rather then the 301 that is nwo sitting in pieces.

Last edited by rx7speed; 10-30-2004 at 03:29 PM.
Old 10-30-2004, 03:24 PM
  #55  
Supreme Member

 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by 305q_ta86
Oh, I know about the crank, I didnt know it was a problem though. I know a guy with an 88 that says he makes trips past 9k easily, but I dont know how legit that claim is. So yeah, not twice, but a hell of a lot higher for sure. And as for the accesories, good point. The water pump would probably go PPFT and the alt. might charge like 30 volts for a split second and then BAM. UNless you had underdrive pulleys
the stock tach only goes to 8k rpms
unless build up with high revs you tend to get flex in the crank which will allow the rotor to move up and make contact with the rotor housing allowing a nice piece of your apex seal to break off.
also comes problems with the gears inside the motor and those breaking and making contact in wrong ways when warmed up at high revs. water pumps would hate it. on a N/A even slightly modded no point in it for the most part being the stock ports don't flow enough air to really do much at 9k rpms heck at 7k rpms most stock cars start to drop off.

now I have heard of some cars doing 9k rpms but those are HIGHLY BUILT motors with lots of supporting mods for airflow to actually have a need there

but stock... eh whats the point


oh and another thing I have heard there is a rev limiter though I don't know myself being I haven't hit it yet doing at least 8k... :-( stupid me wasn't paying attention and instead starting at some hot chick forgot to shift into second..... and when I did broke the clutch.. doh... ironic thing I was on the way to get my clutch checked out
Old 10-30-2004, 03:54 PM
  #56  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
305q_ta86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Heh that sucks about the clutch. I remember when i was in like the second grade I rode my bike into a pole checking out this girl. And in grade 2, that's really saying something lol.


But yeah about that guy, all I'm saying is what he told me he did. I never said he was smart
Old 10-30-2004, 04:13 PM
  #57  
Member

 
1981z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the 301 my friend has is a 79 firebird


didnt the 77-79 301s have 2barrls and where they turbo or n\a
Old 10-30-2004, 05:01 PM
  #58  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
305q_ta86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Originally posted by 1981z28
didnt the 77-79 301s have 2barrls and where they turbo or n\a
You can find most of that info here: http://www.musclecarclub.com/musclec...istory-2.shtml
Old 10-31-2004, 02:19 AM
  #59  
Supreme Member

 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by 1981z28
didnt the 77-79 301s have 2barrls and where they turbo or n\a
my friends was a 4bbl and it was N/A
the turbo 301's I think came out in 80 and ended in 81
again tha tis if I remember right.... sad thing is they are still slow as ***** and on a good day might make a high 15 second run.... not bad for boosted v8 power huh
Old 10-31-2004, 02:33 AM
  #60  
Member
 
custom88camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oregon, Roseburg area
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 camaro
Engine: carby 350
Transmission: t-5 from v6 car
I beat one with a rusting to pieces 77 280z. The 301 turbo model. I think it was an ex-police interceptor of some sort. so I heard. Anyway, my old z with 260 head on it opened a can of you know what on it.
Old 10-31-2004, 10:39 AM
  #61  
Supreme Member
 
THEGENERAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Staunton,illinois
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by Air_Adam
You are thinking of the original Turbo TA, which was only 1981 I think. It had a turbo'd 301 in it. Rated something like 220hp I think, but it was still a 4000lb turd. An '89 TTA would eat it alive, and so would a '78-81 Z28.
they were from 80-81 only with the 301 and turbo...
Old 10-31-2004, 03:48 PM
  #62  
Supreme Member

 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
ok best way to imagine a N/A 301
take a honda insight.............





now think of a car slower then that...



you now have a pontiac 301



best way to think of a turbo 301.......




picture a honda civic DX......





there is the performance of a turbo 301






thank us pontiac for blessing us with real muscle cars there
Old 11-01-2004, 08:14 AM
  #63  
Member
 
anymethod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hillsborough, NJ & SJU in Philly
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: carb 305 LG4
Transmission: TH700-R4
305q:
My interior is gray. And by the way, I meant the only thing my friend's 78 Z28 was good for was BRAKE stands, not wheel stands hahaha. Yea right....

~Matt
Old 11-01-2004, 08:59 AM
  #64  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
305q_ta86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Ah yeah my interior is red with grey. Still darn close though.


And yeah, I figured about the brake stands lol. :lala:
Old 11-01-2004, 08:59 AM
  #65  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,762
Received 372 Likes on 301 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
thank us pontiac for blessing us with real muscle cars there




LMAO, thats funny rx7!

Old 11-01-2004, 12:16 PM
  #66  
Supreme Member

 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
oops
was trying to say thank you pontiac for blessing us with true muscle cars"
not thank us pontiac for ...
Old 11-01-2004, 12:57 PM
  #67  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,762
Received 372 Likes on 301 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
i understood what you were saying but it is funny
Old 11-01-2004, 04:00 PM
  #68  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
305q_ta86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Well nonetheless, if a LS2 isnt a good example of American muscle, I dont know what is..
Old 11-01-2004, 04:09 PM
  #69  
Senior Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
IceManRS305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: hamilton nj
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .030 carbed
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
well considering you have wheels and he has cinder blocks... i think you will win... hehe
Old 11-01-2004, 04:12 PM
  #70  
Member

 
1981z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hehehehe

if a LS2 isnt a good example of American muscle, I dont know what is..

ls3 396 or ls6 454
Old 11-01-2004, 04:32 PM
  #71  
Senior Member
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
yeah 383,390, 396,400, 427,429,454, 502,............572. thats definite muscle
Yes ford, chevy,pontiac and AMC
Old 11-01-2004, 04:34 PM
  #72  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
305q_ta86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Re: hehehehe

Originally posted by 1981z28
ls3 396 or ls6 454
*officially stands corrected*
Old 11-01-2004, 04:34 PM
  #73  
Member

 
1981z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hey

yeah 383,390, 396,400, 427,429,454, 502,............572. thats definite muscle

383 is a dodge big block (yes its also a ford and chevy stroker motor)
Old 11-01-2004, 04:41 PM
  #74  
Member

 
1981z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i also

think small blocks are pure muscle to .the high model L-48s ,Z28,L98,LT1a,LS1,LS6(corvette small block)
not to minchin 400 small bocks 327s i forgot 283s real 283s are mean for there size.

Last edited by 1981z28; 11-01-2004 at 04:54 PM.
Old 11-01-2004, 04:44 PM
  #75  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
305q_ta86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Yeah, small blocks are def. muscle. I even consider my 305 American muscle, even though it is one of the lowest output engines GM made. And heck, it's still enough to have fun with.


The plan is to get a 350 in the spring though. If I can afford it.... I need to find ways to cut costs.. Any suggestions?
Old 11-01-2004, 04:56 PM
  #76  
Member

 
1981z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well

go to the junk yard grab a old c10 350 for about 75 bucks .get a rebuild kit from auto zone 300 bucks for the factory rebuild kit bam 300hp and 380ft.lbs all for 375 bucks.
Old 11-01-2004, 04:57 PM
  #77  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,762
Received 372 Likes on 301 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
The greatest pontiac is the Super Duty 455 in 73.
Old 11-01-2004, 05:33 PM
  #78  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
305q_ta86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Re: well

Originally posted by 1981z28
go to the junk yard grab a old c10 350 for about 75 bucks .get a rebuild kit from auto zone 300 bucks for the factory rebuild kit bam 300hp and 380ft.lbs all for 375 bucks.
Jesus that's awesome! Then all I need is machining work done..


..And I assume this will be a simple bolt-in swap? Should be... And then I can even use perf. parts off my 305, and then sell the 305 longblock for a bit lol
Old 11-01-2004, 05:47 PM
  #79  
Supreme Member
 
THEGENERAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Staunton,illinois
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Re: Re: well

Originally posted by 305q_ta86
Jesus that's awesome! Then all I need is machining work done..


..And I assume this will be a simple bolt-in swap? Should be... And then I can even use perf. parts off my 305, and then sell the 305 longblock for a bit lol
should bolt right in as long as you dont need to get a flywheel and starter and your definatly gonna need better exhaust and headers ..LOL

but yes it will bolt in a small block is a small block just make sure you get heads that arent junk and have accessory holes..
Old 11-01-2004, 05:54 PM
  #80  
Member

 
1981z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
most

c10s have a set off 300hp heads that are not for perfomence so change those.
Old 11-01-2004, 06:07 PM
  #81  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
305q_ta86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Hm. I hear my LG4 heads are pretty good, maybe I'd just rebuild those with a little porting...
Old 11-01-2004, 06:35 PM
  #82  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ScottyRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock
Originally posted by rx7speed
um I would say there is
ask the guy who is running a 502 on cam that has 410" of lift and 210* of duration through some smogger heads from the early 70's with 8.5:1 compression with his timing retarded a little too much

he has displacement but he is missing tuning right
take that motor vs a stock L98 and who would win?
L98 being his parts are designed to work together and tuned with each other


now take a 350 vs some some boosted 2.0L motor
the 2.0 might have a chance depending on what mods it has


now now I know you are going to say "well what if you add boost to the 350 motor now it will win so see no replacemenet for displacment"

so let me ask you this
take a boosted 302 vs a 350 N/A

you argue no replacement for displacement and to prove that you say the same thing "displacement rules and to show that lets add boost to my bigger motor and we will see who wins"

but in reply the guy with the smaller motor says " to show that boost rules I will add displacement to my boosted motor now to show you that boost wins."

so who is right?
the bigger motor showing it's better by adding a boost
or a boosted motor showing it is better by adding displacement
What?
Old 11-01-2004, 06:42 PM
  #83  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
305q_ta86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Originally posted by ScottyRS
What?
Displacement+boost+tuning = power

EDIT: actually, it's more like displacement x boost x tuning = power
Old 11-01-2004, 07:28 PM
  #84  
Supreme Member

 
ljnowell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
go to the junk yard grab a old c10 350 for about 75 bucks .get a rebuild kit from auto zone 300 bucks for the factory rebuild kit bam 300hp and 380ft.lbs all for 375 bucks.
You could use any 350 block, it doesnt have to come from a truck. But, why would you buy that rebuild kit, when you could spend the same amount and get better? There are much better cams than that old school grind that would come with that kit. Beyond that its all the same.
Old 11-01-2004, 07:32 PM
  #85  
Supreme Member
 
THEGENERAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Staunton,illinois
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
hey ljnowell empty your pm box..LMAO
Old 11-01-2004, 07:47 PM
  #86  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
305q_ta86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
I probably will get a slightly hotter one. Only problem is, if I get the kit and then find out the block needs more work, and I need oversize bearings, I'm boned..
Old 11-01-2004, 07:49 PM
  #87  
Supreme Member
 
THEGENERAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Staunton,illinois
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by 305q_ta86
I probably will get a slightly hotter one. Only problem is, if I get the kit and then find out the block needs more work, and I need oversize bearings, I'm boned..
you always have your machine work done first ...then decide what you need as in bearings and rings ,pistons and so on
Old 11-01-2004, 08:00 PM
  #88  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
305q_ta86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Ah yeah that makes sense. Might be harder to find a kit with all the right specs, but I can mix and match too. Thx for the help btw.
Old 11-01-2004, 08:00 PM
  #89  
Supreme Member

 
ljnowell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
um I would say there is
ask the guy who is running a 502 on cam that has 410" of lift and 210* of duration through some smogger heads from the early 70's with 8.5:1 compression with his timing retarded a little too much
he has displacement but he is missing tuning right
take that motor vs a stock L98 and who would win?
L98 being his parts are designed to work together and tuned with each other
now take a 350 vs some some boosted 2.0L motor
the 2.0 might have a chance depending on what mods it has

now now I know you are going to say "well what if you add boost to the 350 motor now it will win so see no replacemenet for displacment"

so let me ask you this
take a boosted 302 vs a 350 N/A

you argue no replacement for displacement and to prove that you say the same thing "displacement rules and to show that lets add boost to my bigger motor and we will see who wins"

but in reply the guy with the smaller motor says " to show that boost rules I will add displacement to my boosted motor now to show you that boost wins."

so who is right?
the bigger motor showing it's better by adding a boost
or a boosted motor showing it is better by adding displacement
Compare apples to apples. If you take two engines and do the same mods to both, the bigger displacement will prevail. if you boost both, the bigger displacement will win.
Of course a poorly planned package Vs a perfectly matched one will have skewed results. That doesnt prove anything in the displacement argument.
Old 11-01-2004, 08:02 PM
  #90  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I agree for the most part, but I think I could come up with a few instances where this isn't true. The more I think about it though, I think that the bigger motor would have less compression in each one of my examples.
Old 11-01-2004, 08:03 PM
  #91  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
305q_ta86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Originally posted by ljnowell
Compare apples to apples. If you take two engines and do the same mods to both, the bigger displacement will prevail. if you boost both, the bigger displacement will win.
Of course a poorly planned package Vs a perfectly matched one will have skewed results. That doesnt prove anything in the displacement argument.
Like I said, I think displacement x tuning x boost = power about sums it up. You pretty much need tuning and boost/displacement to make power, and if you have both boost and displacement, in addition to the tuning I just mentioned, then you're set.
Old 11-01-2004, 11:53 PM
  #92  
Supreme Member

 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by ljnowell
Compare apples to apples. If you take two engines and do the same mods to both, the bigger displacement will prevail. if you boost both, the bigger displacement will win.
Of course a poorly planned package Vs a perfectly matched one will have skewed results. That doesnt prove anything in the displacement argument.
it's not all about displacement

some of you guys say nothing can replace displacement

tell me who is right here

guy a is a boost guy
guy b is a displacement guy


guy a drives a 302 with 10psi of boost
guy b drives a N/A 350

guy a says no replacement for boost to proove that boost wins I am going to show that by making my motor a 350... boost wins

guy b says no replacement for displacement to prove that I am going to add 10 psi to my car


who was right?


you guys always argue that there is no replacement for displacement. and your only standing arguement it seems is if yo utake a small motor that has boost and now add boost to the larger engine then who would win?
in that case the displacement motor.

the above shows that if both ppl add there own mod to prove that boost or displacement is the winner end up doing the same thing end up in the same place... niehter is really right yet they both are at the same time


you guys seem to want to compare a small boosted motor to a large motor that has boost added later to show that displacement rules...
this puts the larger motor of course at an advantage

you guys always want to compare even mods and only make displacement the factor there and that is it. even mods right except for displacement and that now means displacement is unreplaceable

now to finish this ranting



displacement IS NOT THE END ALL.. IT IS NOT UNREPLACABLE, IT IS NOT THE FIX FOR EVERYTHING

displacement is a TOOL. nothing more

guys tell me what ALL OF THESE HAVE IN COMMON

displacement
boost
nitrous...... for the r<x>icers out there..... this means you stu NAWS!!!
bigger cam
better flowing heads
better flowing intake
headers
mufflers
cai



they all have at least one thing in common
can someone answer that for me and you might see that displacement ISN'T the end all and is replaceable and you might see it is nothing more then a tool to achieve more power
Old 11-01-2004, 11:59 PM
  #93  
Supreme Member
 
THEGENERAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Staunton,illinois
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
okay here we go again ...LOL

if your going to start out with a 305 and put 3000 dollars worth of mods in it boost what ever

or you could start off with a 350 and put 3000 dollars worth of mods in it boost what ever

which is going to be faster????

the end..

displacement will win ...

and i know what you mean by the engine size and mods they arent ever exact from engine to engine

but its silly to keep bringing this up when a larger displacement engine with the as you say exact mods as the smaller one will in fact win you even stated that in your last post..

"this puts the larger motor of course at an advantage "


little dog big dog syndrome
Old 11-02-2004, 12:13 AM
  #94  
Supreme Member

 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by THEGENERAL
okay here we go again ...LOL

if your going to start out with a 305 and put 3000 dollars worth of mods in it boost what ever

or you could start off with a 350 and put 3000 dollars worth of mods in it boost what ever

which is going to be faster????

the end..

displacement will win ...

and i know what you mean by the engine size and mods they arent ever exact from engine to engine

but its silly to keep bringing this up when a larger displacement engine with the as you say exact mods as the smaller one will in fact win you even stated that in your last post..

"this puts the larger motor of course at an advantage "


little dog big dog syndrome

care to answer the question I stated at the last part of this

also I Was refering to a 302 not a 305

and to say of course this puts the lager motor at an advantage with everything else being even is like saying
of course the motor with more boost will have an advantage
or
of course the motor with more nitrous will win
or
of course the motor with more compression will win
or
of course the motor with the larger cam will win
or
of course the motor with better heads will win
if all else is equal do you see a trend here



once again though

guys tell me what ALL OF THESE HAVE IN COMMON

displacement
boost
nitrous...... for the ricers out there..... this means you stu NAWS!!!
bigger cam
better flowing heads
better flowing intake
headers
mufflers
cai


answer that question and read the part right above the question and you might catch something
Old 11-02-2004, 12:49 AM
  #95  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
They all determine what the motor can flow as far as the capacity of air it can burn. There are only like three ways to increase power, displacement, compression, and rpms. Boring and stroking increase power maybe 10-15%. Raising rpms makes more power, but the wear on the motor (and pressure on the rods) increases exponentially. So you are left with boost, which raises the effetive compression of the motor without the extra wear.

Or something like that...
Old 11-02-2004, 12:50 AM
  #96  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Oh yeah, I don't use nitrous.

When I get a Saab though, I will probably end up using water injection.
Old 11-02-2004, 06:19 AM
  #97  
Senior Member

 
84firebird383's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oshkosh wi
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 77 Firebird
Engine: 454
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 4.10
The saying "no replacement for displacement " is most correct on two motors of the same design.An example would be a sbc283 vs a sbc400.The 400 can pump more air so it has the potential to make more power with the same mods.Once you start camparing different designs the saying isnt necessarily true. I think it was carcraft that did a build up of a sbc400 and a bbc396 trying to make them as similar as they could then did a dyno comparison and put them in the same car for a dragstrip comparison. In both cases the 396 stomped the 400.As far as boost being a replacement for displacement .I think its 100% correct. Boost forces the motor to pump more air than it normally could making it seem bigger than it is. No matter how big the motor is you can always add boost to make it seem bigger than it is.
Old 11-02-2004, 09:54 AM
  #98  
Supreme Member

 
ljnowell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The argument isnt displacement replaces boost. I dotn see why you cant understand that. Yes, boost can overcome displacement to a degree, is that what you want to hear? The argument of displacement comes in when examining an engine build. Such as If Ido all this work to a 305 it will make XX amount of HP. IF Ido that same amount of work to a 350 it will make
XX + 20%. That is why the statement says no replacement for displacement. If you are comparing a boosted engine to an NA engine, that statement does not apply.
Old 11-02-2004, 11:19 AM
  #99  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,762
Received 372 Likes on 301 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
LMAO this is funny watching everyone bicker about motors.

I'll add my two cents. Dont forget about compression

A 8.5 to 1 350 with XXX mods might not make more hp than 12 to 1 305 with similar XXX mods.

There are so many variables to building engines that its almost impossible to compare motors. compare mods on similar displacement motors cuz thats the only fair way. Displacement usually helps cuz extra cubes makes extra HP and Torque.

Also you cant compare a 454 big block to a 454 small block cuz totally different designs. Airflow and fuel distributed in big block will always make more power and torque.

another example, 10 to 1 compression 355 super ram motor with LPE 219/219 cam and AFR 195 heads makes over 400hp. Can run low 12's.

Add 33 cubic inches to that and make a 383 with same stuff as above, the 383 will make more power and torque, and thus run faster. LOL
Old 11-02-2004, 12:19 PM
  #100  
Supreme Member

 
ljnowell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
another example, 10 to 1 compression 355 super ram motor with LPE 219/219 cam and AFR 195 heads makes over 400hp. Can run low 12's.

Add 33 cubic inches to that and make a 383 with same stuff as above, the 383 will make more power and torque, and thus run faster. LOL
Thats a perfect example. You just proved the displacement argument. If you compare SIMILAR ENGINES. IE, same compression, same cam, same stlye induction, etc, the bigger cubes will win.

If you start boosting, boost them both. Same amount of boost. The bigger cubes will win. Its easy to hit a smaller motor with a lot of boost and then say "well you rule is crap cause I beat a smogged out 350 w/ 8:1 compression and a 2 barrel". Thats not how it works.


Quick Reply: cocky '78 running on 7



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:58 PM.