dodge stealth vs. lg4
#1
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, RI
Car: 1986 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: LG4 305
Transmission: T5
dodge stealth vs. lg4
how fast is the average dodge stealth, i heard they come with AWD and Twin Turbo set ups on 3.0L v-6's.... that's really fast isn't it? especially compared to my low 15 second LG4.... any thoughts on how a race like this would turn out?
#2
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
From: delaware
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 305 TBI (LO3)
Transmission: 5 speed manual
The stealths had 3 engine options, all V6...one had 166 hp (slow as dirt) another with 222 (slightly less slow but could take an LG4 i think) and then the turbo model which has 300 something hp I believe which you should watch out for...
#3
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: Schaumburg, Illinois
Engine: slowtacular L03 305
Transmission: slushem 700r4
OK the VR-4 (turbo'd v6) is the only one you have to really look out for. The other two are fwd and under powered for the cars huge weight (the vr-4 is even kinda slow, especially off the line). You don't need to worry about the first two (low 15's should take a reasonibly well driven 222hp version). If one falls behind and then takes off after about 20mph or so, then that would deffinantly be a vr-4.
#6
not trying to jack the thread but dont want to make one soo similar to urs. my buudy's buying/bought a tyrbo AWD steath 5 spd and wants to race me as soon as he gets it. im a stock L98. whats ur guys take on the future race?
#7
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: CANADA!!!
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 305 L69
Transmission: 5 spd
the turbo model which has 300 something hp I believe which you should watch out for..
not exactly true!........a good buddy of mine has an lg4 5 spd and we raced some old school buds in a stealth R/T from about a 20 roll and walked it up to about 100!......no jokes all my bud has is hedders and hooker catback....no cat and a k&n!.....depends on ur mods and his but i have seena turbo stealth go very quick off the line....race him from a roll and u should have a better chance.
as for the l98 i think you will win unless hes pushin high psi.
as for the l98 i think you will win unless hes pushin high psi.
Trending Topics
#8
I think an L98 will take it. More torque, less weight, shouldn't have any problem off the line, even if it does have AWD. might start pulling later on, but I think you'll take it.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 784
Likes: 1
From: New Mexico
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28 5.7 G92
Engine: L98 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi G80
I've never seen the 300 horse ones but my friend with a celica can run even with a stealth with the good v6220+ hp. My friend has in take and exhaust. It will be close if your auto and I think you'll win if your 5-sp.
#10
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Tx
Car: '89 RS
Engine: LT4
Transmission: 700R4
Guranteed that the stealth\3000 GT VR4 models with the turbo's with the AWD and AWD turning abilities... if it's just a drag race from a stop he willl rip you a new one off the line- no joke I've seen a stock AWD Subaru WRX STI kill a lingenfelter stage 2 vette off the line... yes the vette won but, that vette ain't no 15 second car... I think if you take him from a rolling start.. say around 20.. to 25 mph and ease into it and not mash the accelerator you can take him in the long run.. But no doubt he's going to pull on you hard until you get to your power-band.... I could go on about how to aproach this race but with the odds against you... from a rolling start you can take him... it will be close but I think you'll take him...
#12
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 4
From: Northern CA.
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH400 4,000 stall
Axle/Gears: Currie 9", 4.56 gears
I've driven the 166 hp model and it's just a dog off the line. Also rode in a friend of mine's 3000 GT VR4 with some mods done to it, that thing was crazy Sold that and he got a Viper, even more crazy ride in that hehehe. 140+ mph on the front straight at Thunderhill in Willows.
#13
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NJ & SJU in Philly
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: carb 305 LG4
Transmission: TH700-R4
If it's the R/T, he will get you from a stop if he can launch it (and depending on your gears). Even if you go from a roll, the twin turbo will get you. From a roll, the lower hp ones could get you too. Use your torque to your advantage. As for an L98; go from a stop, and launch hard. Should be close, but the farther the race, the less of a chance you have. Sounds like you have some good gears Dingley, because your stock 1/4 mile time is damn fast for an LG4. That is in the LB9 or L69 range.
~Matt
~Matt
#19
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 851
Likes: 14
From: Nebraska
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
(the vr-4 is even kinda slow, especially off the line).
Should be close, but the farther the race, the less of a chance you have.
#20
"Bottom line, an RT TT Stealth will run about a mid 14, so yes it will probably beat a 15sec car."
Not to be a jerk or anything, but the Stealth TT will run 13's easy...My brother has a stock '91 Stealth TT and it runs a 13.5...high 13's with granny shifts.
As for top end, he can run with an LS1...So prepared to get raped.
As for the comment "no joke I've seen a stock AWD Subaru WRX STI kill a lingenfelter stage 2 vette off the line"
Apparently the dude drivin the vette can't drive
With as much HP as lingerfelters vetts put out, you have all the hp and tq you need to jump out of the hole and beat any AWD car.
AWD is very good on the street, but remember when it comes down to it, rear wheel is still king. Less weight, and less friction in the front.
-Mace
Not to be a jerk or anything, but the Stealth TT will run 13's easy...My brother has a stock '91 Stealth TT and it runs a 13.5...high 13's with granny shifts.
As for top end, he can run with an LS1...So prepared to get raped.
As for the comment "no joke I've seen a stock AWD Subaru WRX STI kill a lingenfelter stage 2 vette off the line"
Apparently the dude drivin the vette can't drive
With as much HP as lingerfelters vetts put out, you have all the hp and tq you need to jump out of the hole and beat any AWD car.
AWD is very good on the street, but remember when it comes down to it, rear wheel is still king. Less weight, and less friction in the front.
-Mace
#21
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Tx
Car: '89 RS
Engine: LT4
Transmission: 700R4
Ok maybe you're just retarded, AWD = more traction = better off the line. A corvette is light weight yes.... but any type of AWD car with 300+ HP will kill any type of RWD car off the line... Yea the vette cought up to him quick but the fact that a small car like that can do that is amazing...
It's not about the car it's all about the driver...
It's not about the car it's all about the driver...
#22
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Rochester Hills, MI
Car: '91 Firebird
Engine: 408 SBC
Transmission: T5
Originally posted by Bitchin89RS
Ok maybe you're just retarded, AWD = more traction = better off the line. A corvette is light weight yes.... but any type of AWD car with 300+ HP will kill any type of RWD car off the line... Yea the vette cought up to him quick but the fact that a small car like that can do that is amazing...
It's not about the car it's all about the driver...
Ok maybe you're just retarded, AWD = more traction = better off the line. A corvette is light weight yes.... but any type of AWD car with 300+ HP will kill any type of RWD car off the line... Yea the vette cought up to him quick but the fact that a small car like that can do that is amazing...
It's not about the car it's all about the driver...
Oh yeah, that's right, they are RWD!
You obviously do not understand of the concept of weight transfer. Upon acceleration, the weight is transfered from the front of the vehicle to the rear. Hence, why a RWD vehicle is optimum for drag cars - traction.
That "any type AWD car with 300+ HP will kill any type of RWD car off the line" comment is laughable.
#23
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 851
Likes: 14
From: Nebraska
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
Not to be a jerk or anything, but the Stealth TT will run 13's easy...My brother has a stock '91 Stealth TT and it runs a 13.5...high 13's with granny shifts.
As for top end, he can run with an LS1...So prepared to get raped.
#24
Originally posted by Bitchin89RS
Ok maybe you're just retarded, AWD = more traction = better off the line. A corvette is light weight yes.... but any type of AWD car with 300+ HP will kill any type of RWD car off the line... Yea the vette cought up to him quick but the fact that a small car like that can do that is amazing...
It's not about the car it's all about the driver...
Ok maybe you're just retarded, AWD = more traction = better off the line. A corvette is light weight yes.... but any type of AWD car with 300+ HP will kill any type of RWD car off the line... Yea the vette cought up to him quick but the fact that a small car like that can do that is amazing...
It's not about the car it's all about the driver...
I'm glad atleast wingnut understands.
-Mace
#25
Originally posted by formularpm
I said about mid 14s, Ive seen them run high 14s and high 13s, it depends on the driver/conditions and many other variables (even among the cars themselves), youre ignorant if you think all Stealth TTs will run 13s easily.
I said about mid 14s, Ive seen them run high 14s and high 13s, it depends on the driver/conditions and many other variables (even among the cars themselves), youre ignorant if you think all Stealth TTs will run 13s easily.
It your orignal post you said nothing of mid 13's, you just stated mid 14's. I understand that the driver is a very important variable in racing, street or drag. What I meant by my comment is that the stealth TT is easily capable of running mid 13's. Either way, I think we are agreeing on the same thing.
BTW, when you call bs can you atleast give a decent argument on why you called bs...Thanks
#26
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 851
Likes: 14
From: Nebraska
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
The reason is simple. Its highly unlikely that a 300hp car putting 200hp to the ground and suffering from parasitic AWD on the top end will keep up with a top end monster LS1, especially when most LS1s are known to put out 280-310hp to the wheels.
#27
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Tx
Car: '89 RS
Engine: LT4
Transmission: 700R4
Ok you know what... F*ck you guys... I throw one possibilty out and I get f*cking smashed from every person on the board.... you guys were cool until you guys f*cking critizied every possibilty i've ever thrown out.... f*ck you guys and this board!
#28
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo Co
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
Originally posted by Bitchin89RS
Ok you know what... F*ck you guys... I throw one possibilty out and I get f*cking smashed from every person on the board.... you guys were cool until you guys f*cking critizied every possibilty i've ever thrown out.... f*ck you guys and this board!
Ok you know what... F*ck you guys... I throw one possibilty out and I get f*cking smashed from every person on the board.... you guys were cool until you guys f*cking critizied every possibilty i've ever thrown out.... f*ck you guys and this board!
Ive raced them at the track on equal ground, no problem taking them. Granted my setup makes a bit more power and uaually I drive better. On the street Ive taken a Subaru WRX like he had a tow line attached, havent a clue if it was STI or what ever bull crap the X**'s wanna put in thier cars. I know mine was faster.
You dont know until you race and probably will never know until all is said and done.
#29
Originally posted by Bitchin89RS
Ok you know what... F*ck you guys... I throw one possibilty out and I get f*cking smashed from every person on the board.... you guys were cool until you guys f*cking critizied every possibilty i've ever thrown out.... f*ck you guys and this board!
Ok you know what... F*ck you guys... I throw one possibilty out and I get f*cking smashed from every person on the board.... you guys were cool until you guys f*cking critizied every possibilty i've ever thrown out.... f*ck you guys and this board!
#30
Originally posted by Bitchin89RS
Ok you know what... F*ck you guys... I throw one possibilty out and I get f*cking smashed from every person on the board.... you guys were cool until you guys f*cking critizied every possibilty i've ever thrown out.... f*ck you guys and this board!
Ok you know what... F*ck you guys... I throw one possibilty out and I get f*cking smashed from every person on the board.... you guys were cool until you guys f*cking critizied every possibilty i've ever thrown out.... f*ck you guys and this board!
Dang boy...Sorry I made you cry. Like A88GTANotchback said, we weren't out to get you. I was just defending myself on your comment on calling me a retard...If you can't take it, don't hand it out.
-Mace
#31
Originally posted by formularpm
The reason is simple. Its highly unlikely that a 300hp car putting 200hp to the ground and suffering from parasitic AWD on the top end will keep up with a top end monster LS1, especially when most LS1s are known to put out 280-310hp to the wheels.
The reason is simple. Its highly unlikely that a 300hp car putting 200hp to the ground and suffering from parasitic AWD on the top end will keep up with a top end monster LS1, especially when most LS1s are known to put out 280-310hp to the wheels.
In Sport Compact Car magazine, they dyno'ed both the STI and WRX stock. The drivetrain loss for each was 15% to 17%. Now your saying that the Stealth TT has a 33% drivetrain loss? This cannot be right. I know that they are not the same cars, but since nither of us have a dyno sheet of a Stealth TT, the WRX and STI, which was also rated at 300HP, is the closet we have.
I went to 3si.org and people there said it was more of a 22% drivetrain loss.
Also, on a car weighing 3800lbs, IF it was only putting down 200HP to the ground, there is no way it could do a low 14 second 1/4 to a high 13 second 1/4, and top out at around 160mph, tested by car and driver magazine in '91. Maybe the car was just underrated at 300hp?
Either way, I never said it would beat an LS1. Just incase anyone misunderstood, I said it can keep UP with an LS1, that doesn't mean it would beat one. As for the comment, "prepared to get raped" I was referring to the dude in the LG4.
-Mace
Last edited by need4speedb4c; 11-08-2003 at 10:58 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post