oh no..
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, East Tennessee
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1996 Camaro RS
Engine: v6
oh no..
a friend of mine just bought a new mazda protege5, only has 500 miles on it.
well, the other night, she let me drive it....... and i.... enjoyed it...
SOMEONE HELP ME!
-fly
well, the other night, she let me drive it....... and i.... enjoyed it...
SOMEONE HELP ME!
-fly
#2
Supreme Member
I've got one too. It's my everyday drive now and it's a $hitload of fun. Handling out of the box is very good and it has excellent road feel. The best part is...it's soooo damn cheap to run! Gas/maintenance is a joke!
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
Vroom Vroom !!!
Not a big deal to enjoy imports, Hell even I like to drive Lamborghini's . Just as long as it's not R ICE.
Later, Garrett
Not a big deal to enjoy imports, Hell even I like to drive Lamborghini's . Just as long as it's not R ICE.
Later, Garrett
Last edited by CamaroFreak406; 11-20-2002 at 05:25 PM.
Trending Topics
#9
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, East Tennessee
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1996 Camaro RS
Engine: v6
Originally posted by Steve89GTA
No turbo model available (yet)
No turbo model available (yet)
no its not a turbo, it has a 130hp stock.
yes theres is a protege thats turbo charged, 170 stock out of a 2.0l.. not bad
-fly
#11
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, East Tennessee
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1996 Camaro RS
Engine: v6
#14
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by Snake32v
Wish I had a cheap car that is better on gas mileage than my RX-7 is. That thing kills me in gas.
how much do those cost? Is there any used ones or is it a new model?
Wish I had a cheap car that is better on gas mileage than my RX-7 is. That thing kills me in gas.
how much do those cost? Is there any used ones or is it a new model?
how the hell does it kill you on gas??????
those things should get at least 20 city and 25 hwy
if not better
even WITH A LEAD FOOT
unless you keep it above 3800rpms then the second injectors kick in and when you floor it the 5th and 6th intake runners open up giving you more port volume and more time that the intake port is open mean more air and FUEL go through there
but still..... it shouldn't be that bad
#15
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
not much for them on look but I still think they don't look that bad........
wouldn't mind one that way I could tear my rx7 apart
port the block 3mm apex seals, t-88 turbo, 720cc injectors up front and 1600cc in back (what would those be in lbs/hr??), 3 1/2 inch pipe comming of the turbo into dual 3 inch pipes out the back, coil ovre setup with 375f/225r spring rates and some kyb AGX dampers, a mariah motorworks body kit sans the wing, haltech stand along ECU and 20-25lbs of boost
got a guess on 1/4 miles times with that setup?
wouldn't mind one that way I could tear my rx7 apart
port the block 3mm apex seals, t-88 turbo, 720cc injectors up front and 1600cc in back (what would those be in lbs/hr??), 3 1/2 inch pipe comming of the turbo into dual 3 inch pipes out the back, coil ovre setup with 375f/225r spring rates and some kyb AGX dampers, a mariah motorworks body kit sans the wing, haltech stand along ECU and 20-25lbs of boost
got a guess on 1/4 miles times with that setup?
#17
Buddy I have owned a TurboII and a Non turbo and I know rotory engines do not get good gas mileage. BTW 20 in the city isn't good. Its better than what my weekend car gets but its still not good. The only thing good about the 2nd gen RX-7 (non performance wise) is the low insurance cost.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
Sorry guys but I can't let this go on any longer, The rotary engine was one of the most performance driven engine's ever built. The turbo versions were just amazing, if they were to have the cubic inch displacement that the domestics have there wouldn't be a race car that didn't have one. I'm not a big fan of imports but the rotary (Wankel) engine is one the most revolutionary high performance engines ever built or even thought up.
Later, Garrett
Later, Garrett
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
I kind of figured you where but I wasn't sure about Monkie, oh sorry I mean Snake32v. He sounded serious. But maybe he is just trying to start an arguement? him no, just given you shi t Monkie, oh did it again sorry Snake32v .
Later, Garrett
Later, Garrett
#22
Originally posted by CamaroFreak406
Sorry guys but I can't let this go on any longer, The rotary engine was one of the most performance driven engine's ever built. The turbo versions were just amazing, if they were to have the cubic inch displacement that the domestics have there wouldn't be a race car that didn't have one. I'm not a big fan of imports but the rotary (Wankel) engine is one the most revolutionary high performance engines ever built or even thought up.
Later, Garrett
Sorry guys but I can't let this go on any longer, The rotary engine was one of the most performance driven engine's ever built. The turbo versions were just amazing, if they were to have the cubic inch displacement that the domestics have there wouldn't be a race car that didn't have one. I'm not a big fan of imports but the rotary (Wankel) engine is one the most revolutionary high performance engines ever built or even thought up.
Later, Garrett
#23
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by VLich
Actually, I think 12sMustang is right - when it comes to (fuel) efficiency, the rotary engine is a ****-poor design.
Actually, I think 12sMustang is right - when it comes to (fuel) efficiency, the rotary engine is a ****-poor design.
yes they failed back in the early 70's and had the gas hog tax put on them...
when I get mine in good running order I can get up to 30-35 hwy on 22-25 city
maybe there are better out there but still not **** poor as you make it sound
oh and I have pictures of a rotary they made that was about as tall as a man if not taller then one
guess it saw use......
but then again who knows how large the rad was
if they had a 5.7L rotary I'm sure it could be used without having that large of a rotary but there is no need for one that large.... a 20b would be just fine
Last edited by rx7speed; 11-23-2002 at 05:25 PM.
#24
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by Snake32v
Actually if they had the cubic inch of a domestic there wouldn't be a radiator big enough to keep it cool. And what are you talking about "can't let this go on any longer"? 12sMustang said it sucked, he was joking. I said it got **** poor gas mileage, IT DOES. No one said anything about the rotory engine getting sucky performance. So I dunno what you "can't let go on anylonger". I mean I don't think anyone on this board would say that a Turbo II and a 3rd Gen RX-7 suck power wise. Now gas mileage and reliability are another story.
Actually if they had the cubic inch of a domestic there wouldn't be a radiator big enough to keep it cool. And what are you talking about "can't let this go on any longer"? 12sMustang said it sucked, he was joking. I said it got **** poor gas mileage, IT DOES. No one said anything about the rotory engine getting sucky performance. So I dunno what you "can't let go on anylonger". I mean I don't think anyone on this board would say that a Turbo II and a 3rd Gen RX-7 suck power wise. Now gas mileage and reliability are another story.
hey there reliability isn't that bad.... well unless you get a thirdgen then.... you need to change a few things....
#26
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ithaca NY
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 Mustang
Transmission: T5
what makes it **** poor
yes they failed back in the early 70's and had the gas hog tax put on them...
when I get mine in good running order I can get up to 30-35 hwy on 22-25 city
maybe there are better out there but still not **** poor as you make it sound
yes they failed back in the early 70's and had the gas hog tax put on them...
when I get mine in good running order I can get up to 30-35 hwy on 22-25 city
maybe there are better out there but still not **** poor as you make it sound
The rotary will also have to turn faster than an engine with more torque to get the same subjective performance.
The specifications for the new engine in the rx8 sound quite nice - it will be intersting to see how reliability and gas milage turn out.
In my opinion the rotary is a great engine for a race car or a small aircraft, but a lousy choice for a street car - where pollution and fuel efficiency are larger concerns.
#29
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by Snake32v
Thats what I'm talking about. And the Turbo II need quite a bit TLC too.
Thats what I'm talking about. And the Turbo II need quite a bit TLC too.
they tend to be more reliable then a gen 3 though
had a guy around here who blew his on 18 psi with 150k miles on it using the stock turbo.... wonder why he blew it but it prolly had quite a few miles left on it if he upgraded the turbo and the fuel a little more
oh and quit using the TMIC
#30
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by VLich
The rotary engine typically has a larger combustion chamber surface area to volume ratio than a piston engine. This gives the rotary a lower thermal efficiency, especially when coupled with the aluminum rotor housing.
The rotary will also have to turn faster than an engine with more torque to get the same subjective performance.
The specifications for the new engine in the rx8 sound quite nice - it will be intersting to see how reliability and gas milage turn out.
In my opinion the rotary is a great engine for a race car or a small aircraft, but a lousy choice for a street car - where pollution and fuel efficiency are larger concerns.
The rotary engine typically has a larger combustion chamber surface area to volume ratio than a piston engine. This gives the rotary a lower thermal efficiency, especially when coupled with the aluminum rotor housing.
The rotary will also have to turn faster than an engine with more torque to get the same subjective performance.
The specifications for the new engine in the rx8 sound quite nice - it will be intersting to see how reliability and gas milage turn out.
In my opinion the rotary is a great engine for a race car or a small aircraft, but a lousy choice for a street car - where pollution and fuel efficiency are larger concerns.
true they are behind because of the thermal sh<x>it but they still make good road going cars I would say.
polution isn't a worry with where I am at and gas milage I worry about but I'm not going to bitch about the milage I get, and it beats the 10mpg I was getting out of my 71 camaro.
as for torque you can set them up... though generally with a small turbo setup or one that is using ball bearings to have low end torque as well.... though still yes a v8 motor would do just as well if not better for low end though...... why do you think a rotary has 4.10 stock
they up there down sides though..... and if you dont know how to tune them well you will find out that a rotary is not very good at hadnling detonation as a piston motor is. and fuel they can be made to use little fuel but with more power comes more fuel. most of the ppl here running 300-450hp at the wheels are getting about 12-15mpg city and maybe 18-20 hwy
part of the reason I'm going to miss my N/A but with BOOOOOOOOOOOSSSTTTTT!!!! I can do with a loss of gas milage though being I'm not going to get into bigger injectors yet or anything I should still get about the smae milage as long as I stay off the throttle
#31
Originally posted by rx7speed
oh and quit using the TMIC
oh and quit using the TMIC
Anyways a Turbo II will run alot hotter than a N/A so there for you have to worry about over heating more, burning up wires, etc. I have known alot of people that have OWNED a 3rd gen RX-7 and have heard their horror stories about not having the money to keep them up. The Turbo II and 3rd gen RX-7 are AWSOME performance cars, but no thanks I like a car that I don't have to worry about ****ing me over this week or the next.
#32
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by Snake32v
The what?
Anyways a Turbo II will run alot hotter than a N/A so there for you have to worry about over heating more, burning up wires, etc. I have known alot of people that have OWNED a 3rd gen RX-7 and have heard their horror stories about not having the money to keep them up. The Turbo II and 3rd gen RX-7 are AWSOME performance cars, but no thanks I like a car that I don't have to worry about ****ing me over this week or the next.
The what?
Anyways a Turbo II will run alot hotter than a N/A so there for you have to worry about over heating more, burning up wires, etc. I have known alot of people that have OWNED a 3rd gen RX-7 and have heard their horror stories about not having the money to keep them up. The Turbo II and 3rd gen RX-7 are AWSOME performance cars, but no thanks I like a car that I don't have to worry about ****ing me over this week or the next.
they do run a little hotter but the problem with the thirdgen as far as heat is they tried to cram way to much f<x>ucking sh<x>it into one motor bay that the heat just has no place to go.....
time to get rid of the twin turbo or at least the dual stage turbo setup so you get rid of all the vac lines and go with a haltech....
would love to own one but too much work needs to be done to make it all work right
TMIC= top mount intercooler
FMIC=front mount "
#33
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
I like driving new cars. Funny thing is that the more I drive a new car, the more I really miss driving my thirdgen. Of course driving around in a new Vette really makes me want to sell my soul to the devil to get one. I think I will always be more of an old school man, even though I am still new school.
#35
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: CR, IA
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91
Engine: 427 with dual stage fogger
Transmission: TH400 with 2.75 1st
Axle/Gears: 4.11 moser 35 splines
Well
I have a budy building a rotary it is the equivalent of a 1.3 liter. Where's the pistons. He is doing a special j porting to it, also he is polishing the intake runners. He showed me the design and made everything very understandable from the engine stand point. Its amazing that one can make so much power and be so light. Those ecentric shafts are funky looking. He is going to use nitrous and make it mad scarey for top speed.
Also I have driven Mazda protege's and I'm not much impressed.
Also I have driven Mazda protege's and I'm not much impressed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
darrell_43748
History / Originality
5
07-23-2011 11:07 PM