'89 TTA vs. '94 ZR1 vs. '02 Z06
#51
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
the TTA in stock form is low 13's both those vettes should be in the 12's. Now once you start playing the modding game all my $$ is on the TTA
#53
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
The 5 car lengths probably shouldn't have been a full 5, because I think the guy in the TTA let off at the end because he knew he was going to lose anyway.
But still deep inside I kind of liked to see the N/A Vette's beat the Forced Induction F-body, but then I remembered how much more a Vette costs .
Later, Garrett
But still deep inside I kind of liked to see the N/A Vette's beat the Forced Induction F-body, but then I remembered how much more a Vette costs .
Later, Garrett
#54
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Originally posted by CamaroFreak406
The 5 car lengths probably shouldn't have been a full 5, because I think the guy in the TTA let off at the end because he knew he was going to lose anyway.
But still deep inside I kind of liked to see the N/A Vette's beat the Forced Induction F-body, but then I remembered how much more a Vette costs .
Later, Garrett
The 5 car lengths probably shouldn't have been a full 5, because I think the guy in the TTA let off at the end because he knew he was going to lose anyway.
But still deep inside I kind of liked to see the N/A Vette's beat the Forced Induction F-body, but then I remembered how much more a Vette costs .
Later, Garrett
#55
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
Yea I know my turbo-charged 350 is freakin' amazing. If boost on a 1.6 honda is amazing just multiply that by 3.5625 and that's how much fun my 5.7 ElCamino is.
Later, Garrett
Later, Garrett
#57
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
Ya seriously I have one. The thing is that I need to put on an Electric Fuel pump, a Blow off Valve, and a Fuel Pressure regulator before I can run it on the street. But I still take it out for the occational run around the block now and then.
No I don't claim the 550 RWHP I would atually be happy with anything over 350HP (never had it dynoed yet). Just a stock 70's truck 350 with 40K on it. No intercooler, just lots of massive boost.
Maybe I can get some pic's for you guys.
Later, Garrett
No I don't claim the 550 RWHP I would atually be happy with anything over 350HP (never had it dynoed yet). Just a stock 70's truck 350 with 40K on it. No intercooler, just lots of massive boost.
Maybe I can get some pic's for you guys.
Later, Garrett
#59
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Originally posted by Snake32v
That sounds nice as hell. Yea, would def love some engine shots! And get a HKS SSQ BOV, they are awsome and thats what I'm going to be running.
That sounds nice as hell. Yea, would def love some engine shots! And get a HKS SSQ BOV, they are awsome and thats what I'm going to be running.
#61
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by Snake32v
I think all blow off valves are import brands.
I think all blow off valves are import brands.
#65
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Originally posted by Snake32v
LOL I don't even wanna know what they sound like/look like!
LOL I don't even wanna know what they sound like/look like!
There's no affiliation with the Group. They do make some potent turbo chargers, which find their way into Mercedes, BMWs, and Porsches.
#67
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
Yea it's ******* but it works. Here's another shot.
#68
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
OK Just one more, this would be the perfect sleeper car if it wasn't for the damn noise the turbo puts out (very, very, loud whistle)
Later, Garrett
Later, Garrett
#70
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
Yea but I can't install a roots supercharger as cheap as this turbo. Plus old tractors and industrial trucks are filled with cheap turbo's.
Later, Garrett
Later, Garrett
#71
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Originally posted by CamaroFreak406
Yea but I can't install a roots supercharger as cheap as this turbo. Plus old tractors and industrial trucks are filled with cheap turbo's.
Later, Garrett
Yea but I can't install a roots supercharger as cheap as this turbo. Plus old tractors and industrial trucks are filled with cheap turbo's.
Later, Garrett
#72
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
I realize this, however boost is boost. If I can get 10psi at 1500 rpm's rather than having to wait until 3000 rpm's I'm cool with that. Seriously that turbo boosts 10psi real low. So why wouldn't you want the boost as soon as you an get it.
Ok but still dollar for dollar, this car will take just about everything out there. I mean come on what is even close to this dollar for dollar. Oh Yea here is a pic of the car/truck the turbocharger is in, a freakin' sleeper, who would think a turbocharged 350 would live in this beast?
Later, Garrett
Ok but still dollar for dollar, this car will take just about everything out there. I mean come on what is even close to this dollar for dollar. Oh Yea here is a pic of the car/truck the turbocharger is in, a freakin' sleeper, who would think a turbocharged 350 would live in this beast?
Later, Garrett
#73
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Originally posted by CamaroFreak406
I realize this, however boost is boost. If I can get 10psi at 1500 rpm's rather than having to wait until 3000 rpm's I'm cool with that. Seriously that turbo boosts 10psi real low. So why wouldn't you want the boost as soon as you an get it.
Ok but still dollar for dollar, this car will take just about everything out there. I mean come on what is even close to this dollar for dollar. Oh Yea here is a pic of the car/truck the turbocharger is in, a freakin' sleeper, who would think a turbocharged 350 would live in this beast?
Later, Garrett
I realize this, however boost is boost. If I can get 10psi at 1500 rpm's rather than having to wait until 3000 rpm's I'm cool with that. Seriously that turbo boosts 10psi real low. So why wouldn't you want the boost as soon as you an get it.
Ok but still dollar for dollar, this car will take just about everything out there. I mean come on what is even close to this dollar for dollar. Oh Yea here is a pic of the car/truck the turbocharger is in, a freakin' sleeper, who would think a turbocharged 350 would live in this beast?
Later, Garrett
If you have most of your boost at the lower rpms, you won't have as great of acceleration if you had a turbo that didn't spool up until 3000 rpm or so. Since an El Camino is truck like, the turbo is just fine.
#74
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: In the corner of my mind!
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 TTA #1240
Engine: 3.8 SFI turbo
Transmission: 2004r
Axle/Gears: 3.27
For $10 the TTA would've had a better showing and should've stuck it to the vettes.
1. $7.47 1gal. of Xylene.
2. 1.89 adj. wastegate mod.
I'd like to see how mine fares against that duo. I've only seen one C5 and he didn't wanna play after by 1-2 sideways shift.
1. $7.47 1gal. of Xylene.
2. 1.89 adj. wastegate mod.
I'd like to see how mine fares against that duo. I've only seen one C5 and he didn't wanna play after by 1-2 sideways shift.
#75
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Originally posted by PETE
For $10 the TTA would've had a better showing and should've stuck it to the vettes.
1. $7.47 1gal. of Xylene.
2. 1.89 adj. wastegate mod.
I'd like to see how mine fares against that duo. I've only seen one C5 and he didn't wanna play after by 1-2 sideways shift.
For $10 the TTA would've had a better showing and should've stuck it to the vettes.
1. $7.47 1gal. of Xylene.
2. 1.89 adj. wastegate mod.
I'd like to see how mine fares against that duo. I've only seen one C5 and he didn't wanna play after by 1-2 sideways shift.
#76
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: In the corner of my mind!
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 TTA #1240
Engine: 3.8 SFI turbo
Transmission: 2004r
Axle/Gears: 3.27
That is what the adj wastegate mod does. Turn the actuator rod in and you get more boost. The other way is a $29 kit which is two lengths of vaccum line and a bleeder valve(creates a vaccum leak). It will not let the diaphram see all the pressure causing it to boost higher to get the wastegate to operate.
Really no need for a controller. I run 15 psi on the street and right now it fluctuates between 18-20 psi on the track. For under $1000 the TTA can be made to have just as much top end as the ZR1.
I'm also one that thinks cars were made to be driven. And yes if I had a GNX I would probably rack up the miles on it too. What are you gonna do hang on to it until it rots away or keep it as a part of history(that is what history books are for).
Really no need for a controller. I run 15 psi on the street and right now it fluctuates between 18-20 psi on the track. For under $1000 the TTA can be made to have just as much top end as the ZR1.
I'm also one that thinks cars were made to be driven. And yes if I had a GNX I would probably rack up the miles on it too. What are you gonna do hang on to it until it rots away or keep it as a part of history(that is what history books are for).
#77
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Motor City born and raised
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Know what sucks? About 3 years ago a black guy i knew that hung out at the street races had a GNX with 18" gold daytons and nitrous and 4 15" subs in the trunk. The car had every option and at the time had 100,000 miles on it.
Wonder what ever happened to the car? I haven't seent he guy in almost 2 years.
Wonder what ever happened to the car? I haven't seent he guy in almost 2 years.
#78
Supreme Member
Originally posted by PETE
For $10 the TTA would've had a better showing and should've stuck it to the vettes.
1. $7.47 1gal. of Xylene.
2. 1.89 adj. wastegate mod.
For $10 the TTA would've had a better showing and should've stuck it to the vettes.
1. $7.47 1gal. of Xylene.
2. 1.89 adj. wastegate mod.
#79
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: In the corner of my mind!
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 TTA #1240
Engine: 3.8 SFI turbo
Transmission: 2004r
Axle/Gears: 3.27
No actually most of the stuff on there came with the car! I've spent a little on suspension and some tuning. The last 2 owners threw cash at this thing and it never went as fast as it could. When i first got it it ran high 13's. Really crappy chip.
As for not hanging with a stock ZR1's have you ever looked at their claimed et's 12.7-12.9 @112-114 mph with a professional driver. Some slicks and a 1.6 60' and I'll have 11's.
Hey come down to NJ and I'll show you what my car is all ABOOT!
As for not hanging with a stock ZR1's have you ever looked at their claimed et's 12.7-12.9 @112-114 mph with a professional driver. Some slicks and a 1.6 60' and I'll have 11's.
Hey come down to NJ and I'll show you what my car is all ABOOT!
Last edited by PETE; 11-24-2002 at 09:25 PM.
#80
Supreme Member
Originally posted by PETE
Some slicks and a 1.6 60' and I'll have 11's.
Some slicks and a 1.6 60' and I'll have 11's.
How do you like your spohn lcas and panhard rod?
Last edited by iroc22; 11-24-2002 at 12:59 PM.
#81
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: In the corner of my mind!
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 TTA #1240
Engine: 3.8 SFI turbo
Transmission: 2004r
Axle/Gears: 3.27
I've noticed it is a little tighter with the suspension stuff on there. The car doesn't skip when hitting a bump around turns it lifts and then plants itself again.
As for slicks you are right I probably wouldn't run dr's on the street. Even without them it would be a close race....
As for slicks you are right I probably wouldn't run dr's on the street. Even without them it would be a close race....
#82
Supreme Member
Originally posted by PETE
As for not hanging with a stock ZR1's have you ever looked at their claimed et's 12.7-12.9 @112-114 mph with a professional driver.
As for not hanging with a stock ZR1's have you ever looked at their claimed et's 12.7-12.9 @112-114 mph with a professional driver.
#83
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: In the corner of my mind!
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 TTA #1240
Engine: 3.8 SFI turbo
Transmission: 2004r
Axle/Gears: 3.27
It really is a shame that we have people on this forum like myself. No wonder this site has become the laughing stock of the web. There are some great guys on here, but I guess there has to be guys like me on this site to make it interesting. Hey IROC 22 If you lived close I'd rent you a ZR1 for the day and embarrASS myself. Oh wait I already have with my silly comments.
Nice that you took the liberty of editing my posts, because if you didn't I could get myself banned around here.
Nice that you took the liberty of editing my posts, because if you didn't I could get myself banned around here.
Last edited by iroc22; 11-24-2002 at 11:03 PM.
#84
I don't understand whats going on here. If you PETE or w/e have a 12.7 E.T. in your sig and you claim the ZR1 can run a 12.7 E.T. why are you two bitching about which one can run faster? Clue me in on whats going on here...
#85
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: In the corner of my mind!
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 TTA #1240
Engine: 3.8 SFI turbo
Transmission: 2004r
Axle/Gears: 3.27
I said claimed et's of 12.7-12.9 for the ZR1. Most guys will not run as quick as some of the published times in a road test. I've seen times on new Vettes break in to the 11's, most guys wont duplicate that for one reason or another.
Last edited by PETE; 11-24-2002 at 09:30 PM.
#86
Supreme Member
stock on stock, zo6 and zr1 rape the TTA all night long
zo6 a little quicker than the zr1
zo6 a little quicker than the zr1
#87
Originally posted by PETE
I said claimed et's of 12.7-12.9 for the ZR1. Most guys will not run as quick as some of the published times in a road test. I've seen times on new Vettes break in to the 11's, most guys wont duplicate that for one reason or another.
I said claimed et's of 12.7-12.9 for the ZR1. Most guys will not run as quick as some of the published times in a road test. I've seen times on new Vettes break in to the 11's, most guys wont duplicate that for one reason or another.
#88
Supreme Member
there are several simple reasons that magazine test results are generally faster than the times people pull down at the tracks with the same vehicles....
for example, the motor trend test driver is arguably one of the best drivers in the world. this guy beats on cars all day every day. hes also probably driven more different cars than anyone else in the world.
so for your average driver, add 2 or 3 tenths (on the average) to the results you see in the magazine, then...
when a magazine tests a car (for the most part) they rent track time......when you rent track time it includes application of traction compound (generously for the mags) at least at most track....and when the tracks do their street nights they normally do not put down traction compound. (i know they dont at NED) so you can add another tenth or 2 for that.
for example, the motor trend test driver is arguably one of the best drivers in the world. this guy beats on cars all day every day. hes also probably driven more different cars than anyone else in the world.
so for your average driver, add 2 or 3 tenths (on the average) to the results you see in the magazine, then...
when a magazine tests a car (for the most part) they rent track time......when you rent track time it includes application of traction compound (generously for the mags) at least at most track....and when the tracks do their street nights they normally do not put down traction compound. (i know they dont at NED) so you can add another tenth or 2 for that.
#89
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: In the corner of my mind!
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 TTA #1240
Engine: 3.8 SFI turbo
Transmission: 2004r
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Maybe I should've clarified my self a little better. My posts were directed at IROC 22's comment on how a 12.7 et TTA wont hang with a ZR1 that's all. I was just comparing my numbers with numbers that have been published for a ZR1 with a better driver than almost anybody on the street. Sorry for the confusion..
#90
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Kona, Hawaii / Redlands, CA
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91' RS
Engine: Built 355
Transmission: Probuilt 700r4
Some ZR1's are...
faster than the Z06.....
SOME.
Go check out the link on this board that I posted to the Red ZR1..
BONE stock 1994 ZR1 = 11.89 e.t.
I don't know about a Z06 runnin' that #.
I think high 12's for the Zr1 is a misconception.
A TTA ( stock ) doesn't stand a chance against either of these cars.
SOME.
Go check out the link on this board that I posted to the Red ZR1..
BONE stock 1994 ZR1 = 11.89 e.t.
I don't know about a Z06 runnin' that #.
I think high 12's for the Zr1 is a misconception.
A TTA ( stock ) doesn't stand a chance against either of these cars.
#91
Originally posted by PETE
Maybe I should've clarified my self a little better. My posts were directed at IROC 22's comment on how a 12.7 et TTA wont hang with a ZR1 that's all. I was just comparing my numbers with numbers that have been published for a ZR1 with a better driver than almost anybody on the street. Sorry for the confusion..
Maybe I should've clarified my self a little better. My posts were directed at IROC 22's comment on how a 12.7 et TTA wont hang with a ZR1 that's all. I was just comparing my numbers with numbers that have been published for a ZR1 with a better driver than almost anybody on the street. Sorry for the confusion..
#92
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: In the corner of my mind!
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 TTA #1240
Engine: 3.8 SFI turbo
Transmission: 2004r
Axle/Gears: 3.27
TTA's aren't great on the top end unless you do some work. A good 4.1L v6 instead of the 3.8 would definately help make the power up top. a .025 overbore gets you to 4.00 with a 3.400 stroke as opposed to the 3.800/3.400. Good luck finding them though.
#94
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by CrazyHawaiian
If you lack top end with a turbo then you're not tuning your setup properly.
If you lack top end with a turbo then you're not tuning your setup properly.
#95
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Changing Tires
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: too many ...
Well, my opinion:
It shouldnt matter what the RPM limit is. When I look at 'top end', I dont look at RPM's or peak HP/TQ figgures ... I look at the dyno sheet and see what the powerband looks like. You can tell from a dyno sheet if a car is setup for low end or top end.
What matters is when the power comes on and when it runs out. Cars with a low redline can be built for top end. It depends on how it is tuned. Compare the dyno sheets from a L98 with a TPI intake to a L98 with a StealthRam/SuperRam intake. The TPI is a low end power design, while the StealthRam/SuperRam is a high end design. The RPM redline pretty much stays the same but the power comes on and ends at different points of the powerband. Compare a car making 300hp @ 8500 rpm to a car making 300hp @ 5500. Would the car making 300hp @ 8500 win because he's revving higher?
My SVO is a good example. It redlines at 5500 rpm. It has plenty of top end power. Boost comes on around 2500 rpm and pulls strong to 5500. Peak power is around 5000 rpm, so thats where I shift. And its not some crazy SOHC or DOHC design either. Good old fashioned pushrod. If you're loosing power on the top end with a turbo then you're doing something wrong. Do you loose boost? What does your A/F ratio look like? Sounds like a tuning issue. Boost should come on in the later part of your powerband and hold strong to the end.
What I didnt take into account in my original post (was directed at Monkie) was the drivetrain. The tranny and rearend setup would have alot to do with how the car performs on the top end in a real world setting. I think Monkie is right. The ZR1 has superior top end gearing.
It shouldnt matter what the RPM limit is. When I look at 'top end', I dont look at RPM's or peak HP/TQ figgures ... I look at the dyno sheet and see what the powerband looks like. You can tell from a dyno sheet if a car is setup for low end or top end.
What matters is when the power comes on and when it runs out. Cars with a low redline can be built for top end. It depends on how it is tuned. Compare the dyno sheets from a L98 with a TPI intake to a L98 with a StealthRam/SuperRam intake. The TPI is a low end power design, while the StealthRam/SuperRam is a high end design. The RPM redline pretty much stays the same but the power comes on and ends at different points of the powerband. Compare a car making 300hp @ 8500 rpm to a car making 300hp @ 5500. Would the car making 300hp @ 8500 win because he's revving higher?
My SVO is a good example. It redlines at 5500 rpm. It has plenty of top end power. Boost comes on around 2500 rpm and pulls strong to 5500. Peak power is around 5000 rpm, so thats where I shift. And its not some crazy SOHC or DOHC design either. Good old fashioned pushrod. If you're loosing power on the top end with a turbo then you're doing something wrong. Do you loose boost? What does your A/F ratio look like? Sounds like a tuning issue. Boost should come on in the later part of your powerband and hold strong to the end.
What I didnt take into account in my original post (was directed at Monkie) was the drivetrain. The tranny and rearend setup would have alot to do with how the car performs on the top end in a real world setting. I think Monkie is right. The ZR1 has superior top end gearing.
Last edited by CrazyHawaiian; 11-26-2002 at 05:36 PM.
#96
Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Anderson, IN
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 Cutlass
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200-4R
A good 4.1L v6 instead of the 3.8 would definately help make the power up top. a .025 overbore gets you to 4.00 with a 3.400 stroke as opposed to the 3.800/3.400. Good luck finding them though.
that's not true at all, buick 3.8's are low end torque motors, they don't scream to 7-8K rpms, they only pull up to around 5000-5200...
#97
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by Greasemonkey
Unless its a Stage....
Unless its a Stage....
Crazy, the buick 3.8 isn't a top end motor, its much like a TPI with its power curve..
#98
Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Anderson, IN
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 Cutlass
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200-4R
Crazy, the buick 3.8 isn't a top end motor, its much like a TPI with its power curve..