Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Factory HP for a SB400??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2002, 07:19 PM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
 
Keith27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Conroe,TX
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Factory HP for a SB400??

Does anybody know the factory HP for a 1970 Sb400??
Old 01-18-2002, 07:56 PM
  #2  
jms
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
 
jms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Gamaliel, KY USA
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
The 1970 2 barrel carbed 400 small-block was factory rated at 265 horsepower (4400 rpm) with 400 ft lbs torque (at 2400 rpm) with 9.0:1 compression.

1971 400---255 horsepower (4400 rpm), 390 ft lbs torque (2400 rpm) with 8.5:1 compression.

1972 400---(Ratings method changed to that used today)---170 horsepower (3400 rpm), 325 ft lbs torque (2000 rpm) with 8.5:1 compression ratio.

1973 400---150 horsepower (3200 rpm), 295 ft lbs torque (2000 rpm), 8.5:1 compression ratio.

All according to my 1977 Chiltons Manual.
jms
Old 01-18-2002, 08:13 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member
 
87transam5.7tpi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hey JMS how did the rating change exactly?
Old 01-18-2002, 08:22 PM
  #4  
jms
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
 
jms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Gamaliel, KY USA
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
The factories (around 1972) started rating their engines with the normal accessories versus the earlier method of rating them with no power-draining accessories (such as power steering, air, smog pumps).

Basically the "newer" ratings were closer to actual than the earlier ones.

However, also about this time period, government regulations, concerning smog and lead pollution, were phasing out leaded gas and the factories were lowering compression ratios to try and accomodate unleaded gas.

I was there. Very sad for the new cars but used muscle cars were VERY cheap.

Would you have given $1,500 for a 375 horse-396 1969 SS Camaro?

jms
Old 01-18-2002, 09:44 PM
  #5  
Moderator
TGO - 10 Year Member
 
AlkyIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 17,169
Likes: 0
Received 136 Likes on 114 Posts
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Don't forget that back in 1972, minimum wage was also $1.60/hour.
Old 01-18-2002, 09:44 PM
  #6  
SSC
Supreme Member

 
SSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Pueblo Co
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
Originally posted by jms
Would you have given $1,500 for a 375 horse-396 1969 SS Camaro?
jms
Yes, Yes I would have.
SSC
Old 01-18-2002, 10:33 PM
  #7  
Member

Thread Starter
 
Keith27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Conroe,TX
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thankz for the info JMS.
I can get a 400sb longblock from work for 1200.00.
Im plannin on pulling out the 150000 mile LO3 in a few months and im not sure what engine to use yet.
But im for-sure going from TBI to carb.

Thanks again for the info
Peace
Old 01-18-2002, 10:34 PM
  #8  
jms
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
 
jms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Gamaliel, KY USA
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
LOL on the minimum wage.

I was a sophomore in '72 and working at a Baskin-Robbins in Lawton, Oklahoma.

Going through OLD papers the other day and found a pay-stub showing I was getting $1.00 per hour! Somebody owes me some money!

But, back on the subject. NOBODY pays attention to the stock 400 ratings because they don't stay stock very long.

A little known tip (used when I was dirt-tracking and in a 2-barrel limited class) is the 2-barrel intake off the 400 had bigger passages than the other small-blocks' 2-barrel intakes. As if anyone today would keep the cast-iron 2-barrel intake.
jms
Old 01-19-2002, 02:12 AM
  #9  
Supreme Member
 
Ions91Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Warner Robins, Ga
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
1200.00$ seems a little high, might want to check around first.
Old 01-19-2002, 06:11 AM
  #10  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (31)
 
Pat Hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Roy,UT USA
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
All I gotta say about small blocks 400's is AWESOME TORQUE!! I dropped one in a thrashed 77 Camaro with a stock TH350 and 2.73 gears, and I could powerbrake it all the way into drive while standing perfectly still. If you like a torquey motor, you could drag the local church down the road with a healthy 400!
Old 01-19-2002, 10:33 AM
  #11  
Supreme Member
 
RB83L69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Loveland, OH, US
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Don't concern yourself with the factory's ratings, they are meaningless at best, and since you'll be throwing away the garbage they put on them for heads and cam and intake, yours will be different (hopefully higher).

The minimum wage thing makes me remember about 73, I was working a construction job making the awesome retainer of $2.47½ / hr., which was more than anybody else I knew. Too bad the project came to an end, and I went to work at Kroger for $1.80

I had a 400 for about a decade in my 83 but pulled it when I moved to CA. Now I'm getting transferred to OH, so back in it goes!!! Much better than what's in the car now (a weenie 305 at 265 HP & 340 ft-lbs according to the chassis dyno).
Old 01-19-2002, 11:40 AM
  #12  
Member

Thread Starter
 
Keith27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Conroe,TX
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ion the 1200.00 INCLUDEZ the core charge. Have you priced longblocks, 1200 aint bad!!
Old 01-19-2002, 01:31 PM
  #13  
Member
 
Eighty5TransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
only paid 175 for my 400
Old 01-19-2002, 03:25 PM
  #14  
Member
 
GOLD85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Winnipeg,Manitoba,Canada
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
paid $200 for mine
Old 01-19-2002, 08:42 PM
  #15  
Member

Thread Starter
 
Keith27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Conroe,TX
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wouldnt put a 200.00 motor in my car!
But Im sure ya'll put out a little more cash to GET it running.
Old 01-20-2002, 10:54 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member
 
87transam5.7tpi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I got my 400 block for $50 thats the long block, it needed to be rebuilt(like I wouldn't do that anyway)
Old 01-21-2002, 10:55 AM
  #17  
Supreme Member
 
85transamtpi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Chitown
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dont know if I would spend 1200 bucks on a 400 longblock, when I can buy a used motor and rebuild for much less money. Then I get to choose the parts I want...and you know what they say "The only way to know something is done right is to do it yourself". When I was at school we got a few "ready to install" longblocks (for instruction purpose), and when we took them apart, we found that they were out of spec in more than one place. Would you put that in your car? Wouldnt you want to save some money anyway?

-peace
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
armybyrd
Carburetors
3
10-20-2015 03:57 AM
Galaxie500XL
Suspension and Chassis
2
10-01-2015 01:05 PM



Quick Reply: Factory HP for a SB400??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 PM.