Retorquing head bolts -- one thermal cycle?
#1
TGO Supporter
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Tucson, Arizona USA
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1987 Z28 Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 5-speed
Retorquing head bolts -- one thermal cycle?
Aluminum heads on a rebuilt engine. Fired the engine up and ran it up to temperature (about 200 degrees). Let it cool down afterwards. Is one thermal cycle enough before getting dirty again to retorque the head bolts? Or should I cycle it a couple more times?
I am using head gaskets that do not require retorquing, but I plan on checking the torque anyways (can sleep better knowing they are all uniformly torqued). I also have a friend who just fired up a fresh engine with aluminum heads and he drove it about 25 miles before checking the head bolts. He said FIVE were slightly loose. So I figure I should check.
I am using head gaskets that do not require retorquing, but I plan on checking the torque anyways (can sleep better knowing they are all uniformly torqued). I also have a friend who just fired up a fresh engine with aluminum heads and he drove it about 25 miles before checking the head bolts. He said FIVE were slightly loose. So I figure I should check.
#2
Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hmm.. I was wondering the same thing.. I just had my engine rebuilt.. haven't put it in yet.. but I now have edelbrock aluminum heads and I was looking at the instructions that came with them and they say to bring it up to temp and then after cooling to retorque.. if this is so that means I have to remove valve covers to get to the bolts right?
#3
TGO Supporter
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Tucson, Arizona USA
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1987 Z28 Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 5-speed
Valve covers, rockers AND exhaust manifolds. It's a lot of work to get to the bolts but I would rather be safe and sorry, especially with aluminum heads. So if your Edelbrock instructions say one thermal cycle is sufficient, I won't do any different. Any more opinions?
Willie
Willie
#4
Supreme Member
Hmmn, never used Al heads, but never re-torqued castiron ones.
My personal opinion would be that it's not needed...I don't think the factory is doing it..not just GM, but think of all the Al headed engines out there now. They seem to be okay.
My personal opinion would be that it's not needed...I don't think the factory is doing it..not just GM, but think of all the Al headed engines out there now. They seem to be okay.
#5
Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
apparently there some gaskets that do not require retorque.. I don't know what type the builder used on mine.. I know they are baby blue color if that means anything as far as brand /type..
Trending Topics
#8
Originally posted by JeffC1500TBI
any other opinions?
any other opinions?
#9
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Loveland, OH, US
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Manufacturers turn out millions of cars every year with aluminum heads, and not a single one gets retorqued after its initial run-in... think about it... would you, as a mfr, design your new cars such that the very first thing your customer had to do the first time he drove it was to turn back around and take it back to the dealer and have them tear it down far enough to tighten a bunch of bolts at your expense? I don't think so.
You'll be fine, if it was assembled correctly, to the right torque, on every bolt; i.e. after the first time of going around the engine and tightening to spec, if the builder went back around the torque sequence again and checked to make sure that every bolt was still at spec. That's all that the factories do, and they all seem to get by without too much trouble.
You'll be fine, if it was assembled correctly, to the right torque, on every bolt; i.e. after the first time of going around the engine and tightening to spec, if the builder went back around the torque sequence again and checked to make sure that every bolt was still at spec. That's all that the factories do, and they all seem to get by without too much trouble.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One vote Nay....
A sealant was used on the threads of the cylinder head bolts (or should have been ). That torque was established with a "wet" sealant. Now the sealant has dried after a thermal cycle. I believe that the dried sealant would give false torque readings. Plus you have a chance of breaking the seal and causing coolant to leak into the engine.
#12
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The State of Hockey
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 24X LS1 PCM
Transmission: TH700R4, 4200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1
Originally posted by madmax
Fel-Pro
No retorque needed. Ive never done a retorque with head bolts on a SBC. Studs and other engines is another story entirely.
Fel-Pro
No retorque needed. Ive never done a retorque with head bolts on a SBC. Studs and other engines is another story entirely.
#13
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Elizabeth, Colorado
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '94 Corvette
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
I thought it came down to the bolts. In fact I did a head job on a quad 4, and the new bolts stated that these are TTY or torque to yield bolts, and do not need re-torquing.
BTW: I never re-torqued the head bolt in the past, then again I never recycled the bolts either(this might be a valid point to re-torque).
Ron
BTW: I never re-torqued the head bolt in the past, then again I never recycled the bolts either(this might be a valid point to re-torque).
Ron
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm doing 11.01 at 122 with recycled head bolts (this is with 13.5 to 1 pistons). No head gasket failure.
I do find that 1 out of ten bolts have detectable stretch.
I do find that 1 out of ten bolts have detectable stretch.
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by ronterry
In fact I did a head job on a quad 4, and the new bolts stated that these are TTY or torque to yield bolts, and do not need re-torquing.
In fact I did a head job on a quad 4, and the new bolts stated that these are TTY or torque to yield bolts, and do not need re-torquing.
I have seen some bolts that the mfg. recommends retorque because the bolts sometimes need it, besides the head or gasket needing it.
#16
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Elizabeth, Colorado
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '94 Corvette
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
So far what I've learned on this post is: If your loosing sleep then do it, but If you've done your fair share of head bolts / valve lash for the season there's a lot of reasons & testimonials not to.
Ron
Ron
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
evilstuie
Tech / General Engine
22
01-09-2020 08:29 PM
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
04-25-2016 09:21 PM
355tpipickup
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
08-25-2015 12:54 AM