engine build questions
#1
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New York
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 camaro base coupe
Engine: 305 LO3
Transmission: gm 700-r4
engine build questions
My father introduced this casting # 3970010, 350, 4 bolt main block to me when i was around the age of 12. Being young, stupid, and an aspiring gear head, i decided to install the pistons myself, after struggling with the rings, it was finally time to pop the psitons in, and thats what i did. 8 years later I have decided to do it right. This morning i yanked all the pistons and rods out and this is what i found on only 1 of the rod journals (look at attachments) to scratches that go about half way around the journal, and one tiny nick next to them. My dumbass self obviously wasnt to worried about cleanliness 8 years ago.
My question is can this be machined out, or should i buy a new crank?
And how do i know which piston/connecting rods go in which cylinder? They are aftermarket pistons that are only marked for the front of the engine. And stock gm rods, neither seem to be marked.
My question is can this be machined out, or should i buy a new crank?
And how do i know which piston/connecting rods go in which cylinder? They are aftermarket pistons that are only marked for the front of the engine. And stock gm rods, neither seem to be marked.
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,463
Received 1,839 Likes
on
1,399 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: engine build questions
Mic it; if it's .010" under, it'll turn one more time. Otherwise get another.
Pistons/rods should all be the same, in theory; except for there being rights and lefts. If they're not marked, and they're mixed up now, then not much to do, but to take the plunge and do it.
Pistons/rods should all be the same, in theory; except for there being rights and lefts. If they're not marked, and they're mixed up now, then not much to do, but to take the plunge and do it.
#3
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Cave City Ar.
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 T/A
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: engine build questions
My advice on the rods is take them to a machine shop and have them resized. You dnt have to do this, but I like knowing they're not egg shaped. I have a set of number stamps that I use for this. I stamp the rod and the cap ( drivers side being 1,3,5,7 and passengers side 2,4,6,8) and then have them resized, then you'll always know where they go back.
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,873
Received 898 Likes
on
589 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: engine build questions
Have the bottom end balanced while your there.
I would use a engraver on the rods instead of stamping them. Most of the pro engine builders do that because the stamp causes stress points and a out of round condition. (if done b4 the resizing)
I would use a engraver on the rods instead of stamping them. Most of the pro engine builders do that because the stamp causes stress points and a out of round condition. (if done b4 the resizing)
Last edited by TTOP350; 02-13-2013 at 09:04 PM.
#5
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New York
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 camaro base coupe
Engine: 305 LO3
Transmission: gm 700-r4
Re: engine build questions
Im gonna pull the crank, the rod bearings that i already used, were.010 under so if they take another .010 off the rod journal im guessing i will need .020 under rod bearings correct?
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,463
Received 1,839 Likes
on
1,399 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: engine build questions
I wouldn't worry too much about stamping while the engine is assembled... the crank will prevent the rods from seeing any significant distorting force.
Now, while it's NOT assembled, is a whole other matter.
Yes, .020" under is correct. That's about as far as a crank can go, since the surface hardening only goes just so deep.
Now, while it's NOT assembled, is a whole other matter.
Yes, .020" under is correct. That's about as far as a crank can go, since the surface hardening only goes just so deep.
#7
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New York
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 camaro base coupe
Engine: 305 LO3
Transmission: gm 700-r4
Re: engine build questions
now that im thinking about it wouldnt it be safer to just use a new crank? If i was to use a new crank could i then use standard size main and rod journal bearings?
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,463
Received 1,839 Likes
on
1,399 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: engine build questions
Depends on what you're building... might not make any difference at all, might be stupid to re-use what you've got. All depends.
Just the bearings being a "repair" size rather than "stock", is not in and of itself an issue most of the time.
I'd say in most cases like this, if you have to ask, it probably won't matter if you freshen it up and re-use it.
Just the bearings being a "repair" size rather than "stock", is not in and of itself an issue most of the time.
I'd say in most cases like this, if you have to ask, it probably won't matter if you freshen it up and re-use it.
#9
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New York
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 camaro base coupe
Engine: 305 LO3
Transmission: gm 700-r4
Re: engine build questions
Can anyone recommend a budget piston set? I have no details on these pistons and the only numbers stamped on them is b567
#11
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,873
Received 898 Likes
on
589 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: engine build questions
I have 2 ask, you did take the lifters out??
Is there a mech fuelpump on the motor?? If so the fuel pump pushrod is holding it in.
Is there a mech fuelpump on the motor?? If so the fuel pump pushrod is holding it in.
#12
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New York
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 camaro base coupe
Engine: 305 LO3
Transmission: gm 700-r4
Re: engine build questions
Its out now, no there is nothing on the block just the cam was in the block, i had to put the timng gear on it and tap the teeth to get it to rotate, really tight for some reason.
#13
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,873
Received 898 Likes
on
589 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: engine build questions
Ouch, it should spin freely. Was it a new cam? It could be bent, rare but it does happen.
#14
Re: engine build questions
If your doing a performance rebuild EVERYTHING is hinged off c/r's.The SCR's,DCR's,cam choices,intake and exhaust.Quench should be set at .040,so technically head gasket choices could be dictated by that.Where you set the deck height is in no small part done off the stacked parts method to achieve the target .040 quench.
You see it is the combination of the sum total of small things and the attention to details that makes a huge difference.
You see it is the combination of the sum total of small things and the attention to details that makes a huge difference.
#15
Re: engine build questions
I didn't say this and should have.Today's gas requires a SCR no greater than 9.5 with cast iron heads and a DCR no greater than 8.5.With aftermarket aluminum heads you can increase that alittle less than 1 point.
#19
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Cave City Ar.
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 T/A
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: engine build questions
When you take your parts to the machine shop ask what kind of master rebuild kits they can get you. The machine shop I use has really competitive prices on those things.
#20
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New York
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 camaro base coupe
Engine: 305 LO3
Transmission: gm 700-r4
Re: engine build questions
hey guys whats a good compression ratio to shoot for? Im trying to decide on pistons and its all a bit overwhelming with all the decisions out there?
#21
Re: engine build questions
Come on Rick.Read my post.I already answered your question .I can't give you 50 yrs of hot rodding in short form,but there is a ton of good info in that post and IF you want to do it right this time,well..............
Last edited by 1gary; 02-14-2013 at 09:20 PM.
#22
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New York
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 camaro base coupe
Engine: 305 LO3
Transmission: gm 700-r4
Re: engine build questions
Sorry gary, somehow i missed your post, thanks for the info.
Im trying to identify this camshaft:
after 1st journal EP1
before 2nd journal: C3, D3 on opposite side
after 2nd: B0, 03 on opposite side
after 4th journal: CWC
googles not helping too much lol, if anybody has any idea about this cam please let me know.
also i believe these pistons are badger pistons, I sent them email (not sure if they are even open any more).
the only markings on them are B567, if anyone has info its greatly appreciated.
Im trying to identify this camshaft:
after 1st journal EP1
before 2nd journal: C3, D3 on opposite side
after 2nd: B0, 03 on opposite side
after 4th journal: CWC
googles not helping too much lol, if anybody has any idea about this cam please let me know.
also i believe these pistons are badger pistons, I sent them email (not sure if they are even open any more).
the only markings on them are B567, if anyone has info its greatly appreciated.
Last edited by ricklovin93; 02-15-2013 at 07:01 AM.
#23
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,463
Received 1,839 Likes
on
1,399 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: engine build questions
None of those #s will tell anything about the cam.
CWC is a company that makes blanks; they make the majority of em. Just about everybody grinds cams on that brand of core.
The other #s are dates, shift codes, etc. that were cast into the care when it was made. Might mean something to CWC; tells nothing at all about stuff like, who ground it (Comp, Crane, GM, Melling, whoever), what the lift & duration are, and so on. Only #s that would tell anything about that, will be stamped in the ends. If there's no #s there, only way you'll find out anything about it, is to measure it. If you'll mic an intake lobe and an exhaust lobe in the "height" direction and the "width" direction and post that, we might be able to guess at it a little bit.
Badger makes "rebuilder" cast pistons. Usually low-budget, just-get-the-job-done kind of stuff, to put construction vans back on the road and such. You can look at em yourself and tell if they're flat-top or dished, how deep the dish is, etc.; looking em up in some catalog isn't going to tell you any more than you can learn by just measuring the parts themselves.
CWC is a company that makes blanks; they make the majority of em. Just about everybody grinds cams on that brand of core.
The other #s are dates, shift codes, etc. that were cast into the care when it was made. Might mean something to CWC; tells nothing at all about stuff like, who ground it (Comp, Crane, GM, Melling, whoever), what the lift & duration are, and so on. Only #s that would tell anything about that, will be stamped in the ends. If there's no #s there, only way you'll find out anything about it, is to measure it. If you'll mic an intake lobe and an exhaust lobe in the "height" direction and the "width" direction and post that, we might be able to guess at it a little bit.
Badger makes "rebuilder" cast pistons. Usually low-budget, just-get-the-job-done kind of stuff, to put construction vans back on the road and such. You can look at em yourself and tell if they're flat-top or dished, how deep the dish is, etc.; looking em up in some catalog isn't going to tell you any more than you can learn by just measuring the parts themselves.
#25
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,463
Received 1,839 Likes
on
1,399 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: engine build questions
Sounds like yerbasic mystery cam
If I was the betting kind, I'd almost bet it will turn out to be a 929 copy
What do the lobes measure?
If I was the betting kind, I'd almost bet it will turn out to be a 929 copy
What do the lobes measure?
#26
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New York
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 camaro base coupe
Engine: 305 LO3
Transmission: gm 700-r4
Re: engine build questions
are the first two lobes intake? if so intake lobe height measure 1.555 and exhaust lobe height measure 1.575
with an intake base circle of 1.260 and an exhaust base circle of 1.290
this makes lift approximately:
intake: .295
exhaust: .285
with an intake base circle of 1.260 and an exhaust base circle of 1.290
this makes lift approximately:
intake: .295
exhaust: .285
Last edited by ricklovin93; 02-16-2013 at 09:51 AM.
#27
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,463
Received 1,839 Likes
on
1,399 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: engine build questions
First 2 lobes are exhaust... look at a head, exh valves are at the ends
Looks like the lift is about .420" / .442"
Not the 929; but an almost equally generic cam
An old generic grind, widely available from dozens of sources
For example
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-1102
http://www.amotion.com/mla.html#20
http://www.melling.com/LinkClick.asp...I%3d&tabid=632 p 48
http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive_...chevy_sb.shtml
And on and on and on
Not particularly of any special "value"
Looks like the lift is about .420" / .442"
Not the 929; but an almost equally generic cam
An old generic grind, widely available from dozens of sources
For example
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-1102
http://www.amotion.com/mla.html#20
http://www.melling.com/LinkClick.asp...I%3d&tabid=632 p 48
http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive_...chevy_sb.shtml
And on and on and on
Not particularly of any special "value"
#28
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New York
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 camaro base coupe
Engine: 305 LO3
Transmission: gm 700-r4
Re: engine build questions
This is practically a stock-ish spec cam then, not much of a power maker.
#29
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,463
Received 1,839 Likes
on
1,399 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: engine build questions
Exactly; it's just about a tweeeeek ahead of the 929. Most often referred to as "The RV Cam". If you ever see somebody say those words, that's most likely the one they're talking about.
Those generic cams come in steps:
A REALLY LAME one you hardly ever see, 194°/204°
"The RV Cam", 204°/214°
"The Mild Cam", 214°/224°
Another one without a common nickname, 224°/234°
"The RPM Cam", 234°/244°
Those generic cams come in steps:
A REALLY LAME one you hardly ever see, 194°/204°
"The RV Cam", 204°/214°
"The Mild Cam", 214°/224°
Another one without a common nickname, 224°/234°
"The RPM Cam", 234°/244°
Last edited by sofakingdom; 02-16-2013 at 10:27 AM.
#30
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New York
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 camaro base coupe
Engine: 305 LO3
Transmission: gm 700-r4
Re: engine build questions
that cams a no go then, i need some lumpy-ness. Cam choice will wait until i get the bottom end put together
#31
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,873
Received 898 Likes
on
589 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: engine build questions
Exactly; it's just about a tweeeeek ahead of the 929. Most often referred to as "The RV Cam". If you ever see somebody say those words, that's most likely the one they're talking about.
Those generic cams come in steps:
A REALLY LAME one you hardly ever see, 194°/204°
"The RV Cam", 204°/214°
"The Mild Cam", 214°/224°
Another one without a common nickname, 224°/234°
"The RPM Cam", 234°/244°
Those generic cams come in steps:
A REALLY LAME one you hardly ever see, 194°/204°
"The RV Cam", 204°/214°
"The Mild Cam", 214°/224°
Another one without a common nickname, 224°/234°
"The RPM Cam", 234°/244°
#32
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,463
Received 1,839 Likes
on
1,399 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: engine build questions
Iunno... not a member of the series described above, to my knowledge
Call it whatever you like. "Ma'am" if that pleases you.
Call it whatever you like. "Ma'am" if that pleases you.
#33
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,873
Received 898 Likes
on
589 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: engine build questions
Around here we just call it potato patato potato patato potato....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Terrell351
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
06-13-2021 01:13 PM