gm crate engine 350/290
04-10-2012, 07:07 PM
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: shearstown newfoundland canada
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Axle/Gears: 373
gm crate engine 350/290
hi just wondering what anyone thoughts are about the gm crate engine 350/290 hp i was going to rebuild the original 305 ho to put back into my 83 camaro but for just a small little more money this engine has goten my attention , my friend just bought one for his cutless so i looked it over the threaded hole in on left side of the blockfor the manual trans linkage pivot and the starter holes are staight the same as mine and it is a two piece rear engine oil seal engine so it looks as if my 153 flywheel will bolt on any info or has anyone used this engine and does anyone know what color the engine in third gen camaros is as this block comes black or should i go ahead and repaint orange thanks sheldon
04-11-2012, 01:00 AM
#2
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elmwood Park, NJ
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 84 Trans AM
Engine: Goodwrench 350 Crate motor
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: gm crate engine 350/290
It's a good motor for the price. I have the 260 hp version. The only thing different between the two is the cam. If you are buying it brand new then the price difference between the two motors does not justify getting the 290 hp version. You can put a better cam in it yourself for less.
That being said, these are low compression motors. Expect to replace the heads to get anything past 300 hp. In fact the compression sucks so much you'll probably loose bottom end if you cam it too much.
PS. They only get the rated HP with headers, free flowing exhaust and intake manifold. HP rating is at the crank.
That being said, these are low compression motors. Expect to replace the heads to get anything past 300 hp. In fact the compression sucks so much you'll probably loose bottom end if you cam it too much.
PS. They only get the rated HP with headers, free flowing exhaust and intake manifold. HP rating is at the crank.
04-11-2012, 07:04 AM
#3
Senior Member
iTrader: (-1)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Siloam Springs AR.
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1998 Trans/Am, 1989 RS Camaro
Engine: LS1, LQ9 6.0
Transmission: 4L60E, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 2.73
Re: gm crate engine 350/290
It's a good motor for the price. I have the 260 hp version. The only thing different between the two is the cam. If you are buying it brand new then the price difference between the two motors does not justify getting the 290 hp version. You can put a better cam in it yourself for less.
That being said, these are low compression motors. Expect to replace the heads to get anything past 300 hp. In fact the compression sucks so much you'll probably loose bottom end if you cam it too much.
PS. They only get the rated HP with headers, free flowing exhaust and intake manifold. HP rating is at the crank.
That being said, these are low compression motors. Expect to replace the heads to get anything past 300 hp. In fact the compression sucks so much you'll probably loose bottom end if you cam it too much.
PS. They only get the rated HP with headers, free flowing exhaust and intake manifold. HP rating is at the crank.
04-11-2012, 08:48 PM
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Not in Kansas anymore
Posts: 7,734
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
11 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: gm crate engine 350/290
1975 Vette L48 ; 165Hp ( 205Hp from the optional Hi-Po L82 version
)http://www.corvetteactioncenter.com/...5/75specs.html
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
03-05-2017 06:37 PM
