Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Packaging mistake on King Engine bearings part

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2010, 03:28 AM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
dimented24x7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Packaging mistake on King Engine bearings part

I bought a set of king engine bearings awhile back, and the rod bearings have a chamfer for cranks with large radius journals. I have a standard stock cast iron crank, which doesnt need the chamfers. But, they sent me two sets of upper rod bearings, so when installed, the chamfer for the lower half of the rod bearing is on the inboard side of the rod. The other side of the bearing is the same as a stock one, so it doesnt cause any interference issues. Can I still run these like this? Cant return them, and Im running out of cash to finish the build.

I cant see it causing any problems using them, but is there any possible issue to running them like this?
Old 10-29-2010, 11:45 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
xch3no2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 K3500 Fleetside
Engine: RAT *tbi* EBL
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: 3.73-Dana 60
Re: Packaging mistake on King Engine bearings part

Hmm, boy I gotta tell ya that makes me uncomfortable.
Not something I would do on a customers build.
For my own it would depend on the severity of service, ease of access & if it is to be the only DD.
IOW I might try it in a pinch on my own non critical build, any other & I need the right parts.

Issues are, top shell on the bottom if any grooving, & parting line mismatch (could affect oil sling, create tiny tight or hot spot).

Thats all that comes to mind right now, these engines are very forgiving when built & operated conservatively.
Old 10-29-2010, 08:37 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
dimented24x7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Re: Packaging mistake on King Engine bearings part

Originally Posted by xch3no2
Issues are, top shell on the bottom if any grooving, & parting line mismatch (could affect oil sling, create tiny tight or hot spot).
FWIW, both the top and bottom shells for a SBC are the same before machining with a chamfer on one side for the radius. My concern is that the chamfer already decreases the footprint of the bearing, and possibly having them on both sides could reduce it even farther by allowing the oiling at the outer edges of the bearings to break down.
Old 10-30-2010, 12:03 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
xch3no2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 K3500 Fleetside
Engine: RAT *tbi* EBL
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: 3.73-Dana 60
Re: Packaging mistake on King Engine bearings part

Ya Imma tryin, to say mostly the same thing, groove alignment & oil control, how big of a chamfer are the bearings cut for?
Old 10-30-2010, 01:08 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
dimented24x7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Re: Packaging mistake on King Engine bearings part

Decent size, at least 3-4% of the bearings footprint is reduced by the chamfer. I guess Im going to have to bite the bullet and buy another set. They better send me both halves this time around...
Old 10-30-2010, 06:49 PM
  #6  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
1986Z28OWNER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 1979 Malibu
Engine: Blown LSx
Transmission: T56 Magnum
Axle/Gears: 9"/wavetrac/35's/3.70
Re: Packaging mistake on King Engine bearings part

If its a packaging mistake wont they take them back?
Old 10-30-2010, 07:50 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
dimented24x7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Re: Packaging mistake on King Engine bearings part

Actually, I think summit packaged them using king as a supplier. I bought them a LONG time ago as the summit in-house brand, and the reciept is long gone, so, theyre mine, now. It didnt occur to me at the time to check to seee that the chamfer is in the right place. The boxes where just white and unlabeled.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hectre13
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
12-11-2023 08:14 AM
Vintageracer
Camaros for Sale
12
01-10-2020 05:33 PM
Azrael91966669
DIY PROM
25
06-20-2017 04:04 AM
bradleydeanuhl
DFI and ECM
4
08-12-2015 11:48 AM
1nastygta
Firebirds for Sale
2
08-08-2015 07:38 PM



Quick Reply: Packaging mistake on King Engine bearings part



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:39 AM.