Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2008 | 08:31 PM
  #1  
camarosource's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 846
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver BC
Car: Custom 1992 Camaro Z28 25th Anniver
Engine: 5.7L V8 350 L98 TPI
Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

1992 Camaro Z28 350 TPI with CompCam 08-300-8 mild step up 1 cam.

I am thinking of upgrading to 1.6 full bearing. Engine was recently rebuilt. Springs are brand new, new replacement 1.5 stock type rockers.

Wanting to upgrade to Scorpion Pro Aluminum 1.6ratio Full bearing, self-aligning rockers.

I have mixed comments on times to install, prices, and what has to be changed. Some say YES other say NO.. which is it?

1. Stock valve covers on now, do I really have to buy new higher ones? I'm being told you have to because they are full bearing and the size of the bearing creates clearence issues under the stock cover. If roller tip with no bearing fulcrum, then the stock covers would be fine.

2. Being told by mechanic it's a 4-5 hours job. 4 hours avg. 5 hours as he may have to disconnect the AC to get better access? 5 hours?

3. Total cost quoted.

- Before Dyno
- Cost of the scorpion self-aligning 1.6 alumin. rockers
- Install
- Being told I have to get new valve covers as they won't clear
- new gaskets
- After Dyno

$1100 canadian.

That sound right??
Old 08-07-2008 | 08:57 PM
  #2  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,779
Likes: 376
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

may need valve covers if the poly lock style. i had roller tip 1.6's and no problems. when i bought the pro mag full rollers with polylocks, they are alot taller. i dont know for sure but its probly a better bet to get new covers

the job only took me about 2 hrs to get it all together. i worked on it one evening for alittle, got one side done then did the other the next day. think it was about a 2 hr job taking my time. did one at a time, cranking the motor over by hand. its easy process just take your time with it and set preload correctly and tighten the locks well. it should not take 4-5 hrs for anyone who knows what they are doing... getting the valve covers off is the hardest part
Old 08-07-2008 | 09:34 PM
  #3  
Supervisor42's Avatar
Supreme Member

 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 3
From: Arab, Alabama
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

You did ask for coments...
2 hours is right for a carb engine in a "clean" engine compartment.
I think he's right on the money with the 4-5 hours if your engine looks like this:


and he evacuates and recharges the A/C.
I would skip the dyno sessions before and after.
The only thing worse than spending $900 to gain 10 horsepower, is spending another $200 for a piece of paper proving that's all you gained...
Full-roller rockers save horsepower on cams with very high lift and are nothing but a headache for the street/mild engines and a waste of money.
If you do decide to do it, be sure and get some real pretty valve covers so you can point to them and say "that's where the awsome rockers are".
My .
Attached Thumbnails Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.-p5160009.jpg  

Last edited by Supervisor42; 08-07-2008 at 10:37 PM. Reason: the picture gods are not cooperating.
Old 08-07-2008 | 09:53 PM
  #4  
86z/92rs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Car: 86Z/92 RS Camaro
Engine: 357 vortec finished. need tuning
Transmission: Still works
Axle/Gears: need 3.73
Re: Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

Tall valve cover will be needed for those rockers and as far as labor that is about right. There are mechanic on this forum that could do it faster but for your application, I would have the shop do the work if only for the waranty/guarantee. As “Supervisor42”” stated, I would hate to spend that much money for minimal gains. Maybe a set of exhaust headers would probably be the better way to go.
Old 08-07-2008 | 10:55 PM
  #5  
Supervisor42's Avatar
Supreme Member

 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 3
From: Arab, Alabama
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

Originally Posted by 86z/92rs
... Maybe a set of exhaust headers would probably be the better way to go.
Here's another HINT!
Old 08-07-2008 | 11:42 PM
  #6  
camarosource's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 846
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver BC
Car: Custom 1992 Camaro Z28 25th Anniver
Engine: 5.7L V8 350 L98 TPI
Re: Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

actually I already have exhaust flowmaster, dual hi flo cats and headers.
Old 08-08-2008 | 12:40 AM
  #7  
camarosource's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 846
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver BC
Car: Custom 1992 Camaro Z28 25th Anniver
Engine: 5.7L V8 350 L98 TPI
Re: Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

The first (before) dyno was actually a dyno I've been meaning to get as I have a dyno done before I had a custom chip programmed and tuned to the car but not after. So this dyno would be the aftermath of the chip, and a before for the rockers.
Old 08-12-2008 | 06:34 PM
  #8  
camarosource's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 846
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver BC
Car: Custom 1992 Camaro Z28 25th Anniver
Engine: 5.7L V8 350 L98 TPI
Re: Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

I'm happy with the results.. Ended up costing $300 less as due to the SMOG system installed, the full roller rockers could not be installed as there was no room to fit the higher valve covers without permanently removing the smog system from the car. As a result we ended up installing the CompCam Magnum 1.6 self-aligning roller tipped.

There seemed to be many mixed opinions on whether or not I WOULD or would not notice anything from the upgrade..

Well let me tell you... WOW! What a difference! Exhaust is more throaty, throttle response is so touchy! even harder to NOT chirp the wheels at a dead stop by mistake! Ended up saving $300 because due to my SMOG setup, the higher covers won't fit, so we had to go CompCam Magnum Roller (tip) instead. Definately LOVE the difference!!

Dyno seems to back up my assuptions as it indicates an additional 11 RW-HP and 18 RW-TQ.. And with that little amount added, what a difference in feel. The throttle is MUCH more touchy now.. Definately improved throttle response.
Old 08-12-2008 | 06:43 PM
  #9  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,779
Likes: 376
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

so thats 11whp 18wtq with rockers and a chip? thats good gains... i didnt see much from my L98 with 1.6's but i was running alot leaner than normal and still made more power so i would say 1.6 rockers on stock/mild L98's is an effective mod
Old 09-01-2008 | 01:51 PM
  #10  
kooga's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Westcoast Sweden
Car: Camaro IROC-Z 89
Engine: 28xxx miles
Transmission: TH700
Axle/Gears: 2.77 BW
Re: Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...6&autoview=sku

Is this the rollers you installed? And you are still able to use your original valve covers?
Old 09-01-2008 | 03:40 PM
  #11  
camarosource's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 846
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver BC
Car: Custom 1992 Camaro Z28 25th Anniver
Engine: 5.7L V8 350 L98 TPI
Re: Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

Yes those appear to be the ones installed now.
Old 09-02-2008 | 04:13 PM
  #12  
camarobird92's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, OK
Car: 95 Z28, 92 Camarobird
Engine: 410 rearwheel hp LT1, TBI 305
Transmission: 4L60E, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.11's, Whatever BS GM put in it
Re: Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

I have these on my 95 LT1. They fit under stock valve covers.
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...6&autoview=sku
Old 09-02-2008 | 05:14 PM
  #13  
Fast355's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,128
Likes: 429
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

Originally Posted by Supervisor42
You did ask for coments...
2 hours is right for a carb engine in a "clean" engine compartment.
I think he's right on the money with the 4-5 hours if your engine looks like this:



Full-roller rockers save horsepower on cams with very high lift and are nothing but a headache for the street/mild engines and a waste of money.
If you do decide to do it, be sure and get some real pretty valve covers so you can point to them and say "that's where the awsome rockers are".
My .
My engine looks like this and I put roller rockers on it in under 2 hrs time. That included removing the a/c compressor as well.

Name:  101_1397.jpg
Views: 91
Size:  140.2 KB

I will also say that they are IMO 100% worth it even for a street engine. I noticed the difference immediately. Even the idle note changed slightly more deep. I had to add more fuel almost everywhere, especially at the higher MAP end due to increased air flow. My rockers fit under a set of stock covers that had been lightly trimmed at the contact points.
Old 09-02-2008 | 05:57 PM
  #14  
Supervisor42's Avatar
Supreme Member

 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 3
From: Arab, Alabama
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

Originally Posted by Fast355
My engine looks like this and I put roller rockers on it in under 2 hrs time. That included removing the a/c compressor as well... My rockers fit under a set of stock covers that had been lightly trimmed at the contact points.
We were talking about full-roller rockers. If you got full rollers under those covers, you need to post a pic so people will stop throwing away their money on aftermarket valve covers that don't have a damn filler cap to pour oil into the engine.
(I checked, sure enough, out of 218, only 6 had a filler (and 2 of those didn't include a CAP!))
I think we should take up a collection to get you a 3rd gen body to play with. I have yet to see someone have so much fun with a TPI in a van. (love the burnout video) I'd bet with an F-body you would build something very impressive.
Old 09-02-2008 | 06:47 PM
  #15  
Fast355's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,128
Likes: 429
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

Originally Posted by Supervisor42
We were talking about full-roller rockers. If you got full rollers under those covers, you need to post a pic so people will stop throwing away their money on aftermarket valve covers that don't have a damn filler cap to pour oil into the engine.
(I checked, sure enough, out of 218, only 6 had a filler (and 2 of those didn't include a CAP!))
Get the narrow body, self aligning, full roller rockers and they will clear the stock covers with a slight trim to any impeding internal bracing. I had none. The pushrod holes in the stock GM Goodwrench 187 casting 305 swirl ports that are on my engine were even big enough to keep the pushrods from rubbing. I also ran the same 1.6:1 full roller rockers on my Goodwrench 350 TBI with the same results. I have more than one set of these rockers and will take a picture when I get home this evening just to confirm we are on teh same page.

Originally Posted by Supervisor42
I think we should take up a collection to get you a 3rd gen body to play with. I have yet to see someone have so much fun with a TPI in a van. (love the burnout video) I'd bet with an F-body you would build something very impressive.
Alot of people build impressive 3rd gens. I would almost rather put something impressive in one of the early 80s disco style Malibu's or one of the equivalent GM Clones.
Old 09-02-2008 | 07:15 PM
  #16  
Supervisor42's Avatar
Supreme Member

 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 3
From: Arab, Alabama
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

Originally Posted by Fast355
... just to confirm we are on the same page...
THESE are the Scorpion Pro Aluminum rockers he was going to put on in his original post.

For $1100 canadian.
(a bargain for a 12 hp increase I'm told)
Old 09-02-2008 | 07:31 PM
  #17  
mesterz2889's Avatar
Member

 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: TN
Re: Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

Old 09-02-2008 | 07:53 PM
  #18  
Fast355's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,128
Likes: 429
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

Originally Posted by Supervisor42
THESE are the Scorpion Pro Aluminum rockers he was going to put on in his original post.

For $1100 canadian.
(a bargain for a 12 hp increase I'm told)
I wouldn't spend more than $150.00 parts and labor, but thats because I would do the labor.
Old 09-02-2008 | 08:50 PM
  #19  
Supervisor42's Avatar
Supreme Member

 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 3
From: Arab, Alabama
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.

Originally Posted by Fast355
I wouldn't spend more than $150.00 parts and labor, but thats because I would do the labor.
So would you say these <LINK>

for $340 that CAMAROBIRD92 put on his car are "100% worth it even for a street engine"?
I like the oil hole for the roller...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hectre13
Car Audio
26
03-03-2022 05:38 PM
Damon
Tech / General Engine
8
09-26-2015 04:29 PM
TX-SleeperC5
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
09-24-2015 03:13 PM
BWilcox
Tech / General Engine
1
09-20-2015 12:19 PM



Quick Reply: Comments - 1.5 -1.6 rockers.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 PM.