Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2007, 04:42 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

I bought a cam last week and I was told it wasn't very good for what im lookin for. I think you all know what I mean by the rough choppy idle sound. I've heard it be referred to as a cat purring haha. Well my specs are....


DUR @ .50 244(INT) 244(EXH)
VALVE LIFT .510(INT) .510(EXH)
LOBE SEP 107(INT) 109 (EXH)
LASH HOT HYD.

B=16=07

So is this what I'm lookin for or not? Thanks!
Old 05-10-2007, 05:34 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
customblackbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: northern New Jersey
Posts: 4,655
Received 57 Likes on 40 Posts
Car: 87 TA clone
Engine: 70/70 Turbo 5.3 LS
Transmission: bullet proof 2004R
Axle/Gears: ford 8.8, 3.55 gears
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

the lob is not great, then again i dont kno much about cams but i kno that the lobe shouldnt be lower than 112...so 112 to 114 is pretty good. i think the lobe is wats making it choppy
Old 05-10-2007, 05:43 PM
  #3  
Moderator

 
Apeiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

It would help to know what kind of engine this is going into.
Old 05-10-2007, 06:09 PM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

350 carb
Old 05-10-2007, 06:16 PM
  #5  
Moderator

 
Apeiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Roller or flat tappet? What heads?
Old 05-10-2007, 06:17 PM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

World Sportsman 2 heads, not sure about being a roller or not but I would assume it isnt?
Old 05-10-2007, 07:03 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
xpndbl3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orland Park, IL
Posts: 13,622
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

rough choppy idle is due to a bigger cam with a closer LSA like a 106. Which means big compression, big gears, big stall and not as streetable as a more mild cam. Choppy idle means spinning the motor to the moon typically as well.
Old 05-10-2007, 07:07 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
327???'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '82 Sport Coupe/'89 bird/'77 280z
Engine: 355/2.8/L28E(t)
Transmission: TH350/T5/4 spd
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42/3.54
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Originally Posted by stevenb
World Sportsman 2 heads, not sure about being a roller or not but I would assume it isnt?
what year block? type of intake? carb size? stall size? rear gear? vehicle weight? intended use?

all those things are important to picking a cam.
Old 05-10-2007, 07:07 PM
  #9  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Well if I have 107 and 109 is that close? My compressions should be around 9-9.5:1 with my flat top pistons I assume.
Old 05-10-2007, 07:10 PM
  #10  
TGO Supporter

 
Air_Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

A cam with 244* @ .050 is a pretty big cam for any 350. That will definitely give you the rough idle you are looking for, if thats all you are after. The XE274 I have in my 350 definitely has some lope, although not "rough"... its only 230/236 degrees @ .050. I hope you have alot of compression in that engine (11:1+) if you plan on actually driving the car with that engine, because if you are just putting it into a basically stock, low compression 350 (like under 10:1), then its going to be a total pig and probably won't be very fast.

Those Sportsman heads are pretty good heads, 200cc intakes and 64cc chambers if they are like mine. I haven't used my Sportsmans yet, but they should work quite well with my XE274 and 10:1-ish compression. You'll need quite a bit more compression than me to get the most out of that big 'stick though.

A local guy I know, who is also on this board, uses a solid roller cam with similar duration specs (although around .620 lift) and a 108 LSA in a 406" engine, 11:1 compression, and it goes like a raped ape. But all the extra cubic inches and compression in his 406ci tames that cam down ALOT compared to what it would behave like in a 350ci engine, and its still got a pretty 'lumpy' idle.

I'd be sure you know what you are getting into with a cam that big in a little 350ci engine. Its not even going to start making power untill 3500 rpms, so I hope you'd have an intake and exhaust that will support power to at least 6500 rpm, and a bottom end that can handle that kind of rpm. If this is just for a street car, you'd probably be happier with something in the 220-230 degree (at .050") unless this engine is being built to match that cam.
Old 05-10-2007, 07:15 PM
  #11  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Well the pistons I have are true flat tops(.40) with 4 valve release. Is that good enough or is there other things that make up compression?
Old 05-10-2007, 10:04 PM
  #12  
TGO Supporter

 
Stekman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Bore, stroke, head gasket diameter and thickness, cc's of the combustion chamber, piston volume, and deck clearance is what creates a static compression ratio.

Who makes the cam? What kind of cam is it?
Old 05-10-2007, 11:36 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Yea, i'm thinking it's the edelbrock RPM cam, but the straight pattern version. Ie, nice slow ramps that'll make it a dismal performer. 244/.510" lift seems oddly familiar eh?
Except that has a 108LSA doesn't it? Hmm...

flat tops with 64cc heads will give you pretty close to 10:1 CR, depending on head gasket and if the block is decked, but those don't have a gigantic effect on it. (also the pistons if they're 1.54" Comp height or 1.56", which kinda goes along with the block being decked or not.) I'd say you're in the high 9's, 9.7 range or so. But if I were you i'd want to know what it was EXACTLY, if it was my motor.
Old 05-11-2007, 03:07 PM
  #14  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

It is not an edelbrock RPM cam, the brand is engine pro
It is a flat tippet cam btw and it is a 78 357 with an edelbrock alum intake witha holley 750 double pumper carb

Last edited by stevenb; 05-11-2007 at 03:10 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 05-11-2007, 03:48 PM
  #15  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Yea, same thing though. It just has two of the exhaust lobes from the edelbrock RPM cam. Ugh.
Old 05-12-2007, 12:26 AM
  #16  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

So in conclusion...rough choppy idle or no?
Old 05-12-2007, 01:43 AM
  #17  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Oh yea.

But not necessarily in a good way. It may not perform as good as possible, but choppy idle is indeed what you'll have
Old 05-12-2007, 10:59 AM
  #18  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

What do you recommend to get it to perform good?
Old 05-12-2007, 05:18 PM
  #19  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
xpndbl3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orland Park, IL
Posts: 13,622
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

look at the comp XE lineup or the lunati voodoo lineup
Old 05-12-2007, 06:08 PM
  #20  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Originally Posted by xpndbl3
look at the comp XE lineup or the lunati voodoo lineup
'zactly.
Old 05-12-2007, 11:26 PM
  #21  
Supreme Member

 
BadSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 1,390
Received 79 Likes on 65 Posts
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

This is about as big as you'll want to go that will perform decent and give you the chop you want and have decent brakes. It's a 226/226 on a 106 spread (102I and 110E).
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...2&autoview=sku

The XE cam will make more power,,, but I don't think one matched for your combination will give you that old school "hear each cylinder fire" type "chop" your looking for.

The 244/244 -108 (107I and 109E) will give you a more of a rough idle than a "chop" and you'll have little to no brakes with your compression and cubes. As said earlier,, it'll take a while to get up on the cam and be very sluggish until you do.

Actually,,, the 218/218 - 106 (below) would probably be a better choice for overall performance,, and idled down a little lower than "normal" would give you the rat-a-tat sound idling through the parking lots. You just won't be able to stab the throttle off the lower than normal idle or it could stall out,, or go dead on you,, brakes might be a little hairy also idled low. Idled "right",, it would have more chop than most,,, decent brakes,,, and have extremely good response between 2600 and 5000 rpm.
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...2&autoview=sku
Old 05-13-2007, 11:54 AM
  #22  
Supreme Member

 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,111
Received 52 Likes on 49 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Originally Posted by stevenb
What do you recommend to get it to perform good?
Steve: this cam is a fairly big street racer/ bracket racer Saturday night bad boy cam. It will have a rough idle and low(er) manifold vacuum.
I recomend you install this cam slightly more advanced than normal for best results. the "107 and 109" refers to the intake and exhaust lobe position.
It indicates that the cam is ground on a 108LSA and advanced in the motor by 1 deg. i would advance it further by about 4 to 5deg. Now the intake C/L is on 103deg. this will enhance the overall usable power in your street driven motor with plenty of top end. It will be very responsive with this little bit of additional advance dialed in during the install.
I would also modify the distributor advance by locking out the mechanical advance and set your timing at 34-36deg at idle. this big cam requires this much initial timing. Unless you do this mod the throttle responce will be not so good.
I would also replace the power valve (holley) or metering rod power step spring ( Qjet or Edelbrock) to a light 4.5" rated. this will ensure the carb idles correctly with the big cams reduced intake manifold vacuum.
Anythiong you can do to improve cylinder head flow is a bonus. Sportsman heads respond very well to simple port clean up and valve guide boss contouring. Major hogging is not required.
A performer RPM or a Vic Jr intake will both work very well.

This cam likes rpm. it will want a 4.10:1 (or more) rear gear and a 3500rpm stall converter (10") This cam requires a better than stock valve spring. An affordable Lunati 73943 or Comp 981 spring set at mininum. If your sportsmans alrady have the medium sized performance 1.44" diameter valve springs installed you should be good to go.
This cam needs an exhaust system that can breath. 1-5/8" or 1-3/4" long tube headers and 2.5" dual exhaust with dual hi flow mufflers is best.
Really likes open headers and collector extensions at the track.
This is how you set up the motor to work with this cam. Follow these guidelines and it will work very well for you. It will have a rough but steady 900rpm idle speed once warmed up. Power brakes will probabily be marginal but not unmanagable because of the reduced manifold vacuum at idle. A vacuum reseviour canister helps.

Last edited by F-BIRD'88; 05-13-2007 at 12:15 PM.
Old 05-14-2007, 01:54 PM
  #23  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Originally Posted by F-BIRD'88
Steve: this cam is a fairly big street racer/ bracket racer Saturday night bad boy cam. It will have a rough idle and low(er) manifold vacuum.
I recomend you install this cam slightly more advanced than normal for best results. the "107 and 109" refers to the intake and exhaust lobe position.
It indicates that the cam is ground on a 108LSA and advanced in the motor by 1 deg. i would advance it further by about 4 to 5deg. Now the intake C/L is on 103deg. this will enhance the overall usable power in your street driven motor with plenty of top end. It will be very responsive with this little bit of additional advance dialed in during the install.
I would also modify the distributor advance by locking out the mechanical advance and set your timing at 34-36deg at idle. this big cam requires this much initial timing. Unless you do this mod the throttle responce will be not so good.
I would also replace the power valve (holley) or metering rod power step spring ( Qjet or Edelbrock) to a light 4.5" rated. this will ensure the carb idles correctly with the big cams reduced intake manifold vacuum.
Anythiong you can do to improve cylinder head flow is a bonus. Sportsman heads respond very well to simple port clean up and valve guide boss contouring. Major hogging is not required.
A performer RPM or a Vic Jr intake will both work very well.

This cam likes rpm. it will want a 4.10:1 (or more) rear gear and a 3500rpm stall converter (10") This cam requires a better than stock valve spring. An affordable Lunati 73943 or Comp 981 spring set at mininum. If your sportsmans alrady have the medium sized performance 1.44" diameter valve springs installed you should be good to go.
This cam needs an exhaust system that can breath. 1-5/8" or 1-3/4" long tube headers and 2.5" dual exhaust with dual hi flow mufflers is best.
Really likes open headers and collector extensions at the track.
This is how you set up the motor to work with this cam. Follow these guidelines and it will work very well for you. It will have a rough but steady 900rpm idle speed once warmed up. Power brakes will probabily be marginal but not unmanagable because of the reduced manifold vacuum at idle. A vacuum reseviour canister helps.
Thanks a lot for your help.

I have upgraded to stiffer springs already. How do you lower the degree of the LSA? I bought a pair of Hooker Shorty Pro Comp headers also. Are you saying I should swap this carb for an edelbrock or qjet?
Old 05-14-2007, 08:04 PM
  #24  
Member
 
rjt76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: maine
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 iroc z
Engine: vortec 383
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 moser 12 bolt true trac
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

lsa is ground into the cam i believe.
Old 05-14-2007, 08:16 PM
  #25  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Yes, it's ground into the cam. See my primer if you want some info on cams
https://www.thirdgen.org/sbc-camshafts-primer


F-bird was just saying that with either cam, you'll have to tune it, since it'll have less vacuum at idle than stock, and you don't want it to kick onto the power system too early and flood the engine and make it bog like crazy.
Old 05-14-2007, 08:32 PM
  #26  
Senior Member

 
jjlabinski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: my garage
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84 firebird T/A
Engine: shinny 350
Transmission: slush box L65
Axle/Gears: round ones "3.73"
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

all your power will be at the top end. you will not have torque off the line with the set up you are contemplating.
Old 05-14-2007, 08:37 PM
  #27  
Supreme Member
 
SpitotRs305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 vortec
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: not the best not the worst
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

thats what the big stall and tall gears are for...
Old 05-15-2007, 12:04 PM
  #28  
Supreme Member

 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,111
Received 52 Likes on 49 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Originally Posted by stevenb
Thanks a lot for your help.

I have upgraded to stiffer springs already. How do you lower the degree of the LSA? I bought a pair of Hooker Shorty Pro Comp headers also. Are you saying I should swap this carb for an edelbrock or qjet?
The LSA stays the same (108deg)
It's ground into the cam and cannot be changed.
According to your info the cam is advanced 1deg (107in C/L 109ex C/L ) I advise advancing it a little further by about 4 to 5deg { intake on 103 C/L ex on 113C/L } . You can advance a cam in a motor by using a cam gear offset bushing set. This involves drilling out the 3 cam bolt holes oversize. Drilling out the cam dowel pin hole in the cam gear oversize then installing a offset bushing on the cam dowel pin in the cam gear dowel pin hole.
Installin the offset in one direction will retard the cam. The other direction will advance the cam. No offset at all and the cam stays in The position ground in by the manufaturer.
A cam gear bolt locking plate is then used to lock the bolts and retain the offset bushing in the cam gear.
You use a degree wheel on the crank and a dial indicator on the lifter edge to find the cam's opening and closing timing points @.050" lifter rise to determine wether it is "straight up", "advanced" or "retarded" in the motor relative to the crankshaft position. You adjust the position of the cam in the motor using the cam gear offset bushings (availiable in a set) Advancing the cam increases the lower end of the torque curve. (This does not turn a big cam into a small cam. It does adjust or bias the cams nature to the lower end of its power band (3000 to 6000 rpm) to maximize overall torque. It only compromises peak horsepower a little but. Overall usable torque is much more important.

Shorty headers are better than nothing but this motor (with this cam) should have long tube headers.

I'm not telling you to use any particular carb. I'm telling you what you need to modify in any carb to run a big cam like this one.

I'd change the headers, not the carb. What carb do you have?

Last edited by F-BIRD'88; 05-15-2007 at 12:17 PM.
Old 05-16-2007, 08:37 PM
  #29  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Holley 750 double pumper
Old 05-17-2007, 10:36 AM
  #30  
Supreme Member

 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,111
Received 52 Likes on 49 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Originally Posted by stevenb
Holley 750 double pumper
that will work great.
Old 05-17-2007, 01:59 PM
  #31  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Originally Posted by F-BIRD'88
The LSA stays the same (108deg)
It's ground into the cam and cannot be changed.
According to your info the cam is advanced 1deg (107in C/L 109ex C/L ) I advise advancing it a little further by about 4 to 5deg { intake on 103 C/L ex on 113C/L } . You can advance a cam in a motor by using a cam gear offset bushing set. This involves drilling out the 3 cam bolt holes oversize. Drilling out the cam dowel pin hole in the cam gear oversize then installing a offset bushing on the cam dowel pin in the cam gear dowel pin hole.
Installin the offset in one direction will retard the cam. The other direction will advance the cam. No offset at all and the cam stays in The position ground in by the manufaturer.
A cam gear bolt locking plate is then used to lock the bolts and retain the offset bushing in the cam gear.
You use a degree wheel on the crank and a dial indicator on the lifter edge to find the cam's opening and closing timing points @.050" lifter rise to determine wether it is "straight up", "advanced" or "retarded" in the motor relative to the crankshaft position. You adjust the position of the cam in the motor using the cam gear offset bushings (availiable in a set) Advancing the cam increases the lower end of the torque curve. (This does not turn a big cam into a small cam. It does adjust or bias the cams nature to the lower end of its power band (3000 to 6000 rpm) to maximize overall torque. It only compromises peak horsepower a little but. Overall usable torque is much more important.

Shorty headers are better than nothing but this motor (with this cam) should have long tube headers.

I'm not telling you to use any particular carb. I'm telling you what you need to modify in any carb to run a big cam like this one.

I'd change the headers, not the carb. What carb do you have?
So if I do not alter my cam and/or LSA, am I going to lose horsepower and torque? If so, how much?
Old 05-17-2007, 03:17 PM
  #32  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,511
Received 1,862 Likes on 1,418 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

am I going to lose horsepower and torque?
Probably. How much, would depend on what cam you have now. If you picked it the same way, probably not too much. If it's a good cam, maybe alot.

Maybe a better idea, if it really makes any difference what it runs like, would be to put in a more sensible cam, and get one of these. http://www.vroombox.com/vroombox/
Old 05-17-2007, 06:00 PM
  #33  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Right now I am currently rebuilding the block, and there was no cam in it
Old 05-18-2007, 02:43 PM
  #34  
Supreme Member

 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,111
Received 52 Likes on 49 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Originally Posted by stevenb
So if I do not alter my cam and/or LSA, am I going to lose horsepower and torque? If so, how much?
What is the problem with following my guideline above and set it up as outlined?
It's not that hard.
Old 05-19-2007, 12:12 AM
  #35  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

I am just making sure I know everything thats good/bad and that I fully understand
Old 05-28-2007, 10:18 PM
  #36  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

UPDATE UPDATE UPDATE


So...I had a guy do a valve job for me over the weekend because I needed valve guides cut...and the World Sportsman 2 heads are 64cc heads and I will be running 11:1 compression, and I thought before that I would be running 9.5:1 so I was wrong. Any new thoughts?
Old 05-28-2007, 10:34 PM
  #37  
Supreme Member
 
SpitotRs305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 vortec
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: not the best not the worst
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

go bigger with the cam
Old 05-28-2007, 10:39 PM
  #38  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Bigger valve lift? How come?
Old 05-28-2007, 10:43 PM
  #39  
Supreme Member
 
SpitotRs305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 vortec
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: not the best not the worst
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

not lift duration/lsa bleed off some of the compression 11:1 is a little high for pump gas. but not so bad with Al heads so really it will be a compromise
Old 05-28-2007, 10:46 PM
  #40  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Can i stick with regular or do I have to switch to premium?
Old 05-28-2007, 10:47 PM
  #41  
Supreme Member
 
SpitotRs305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 vortec
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: not the best not the worst
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

i would be running premium in that engine to be safe you might get away with a mid grade

but that depends on a lot of factors i mean you might have detonation with premium depending on altitude, engine temps, timing ,quench, piston shape, combustion chaimber condition... it is hard to say for sure
Old 05-28-2007, 10:51 PM
  #42  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

So are you saying that I have good enough compression but still need a better LSA for what I'm looking for?
Old 05-28-2007, 11:01 PM
  #43  
Supreme Member
 
SpitotRs305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 vortec
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: not the best not the worst
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

the term LSA refers to Lobe seperation angle... basicaly it refers to exh/intake over lap... the amount of time both valves are open at the same time... this is ok because of exhaust scavanging where the flow of exhaust out of the heads will actually be pulling intake air into the cylinder to completely expel all exhaust gases...

a longer duration cam will help drop you Dynamic compression ratio... dynamic is really the important one not just static. dynamic takes into acount the intake valve closeing event which is when the cylinder actually starts to see compression... the longer the intake valve is open the further the piston is in its travel up the bore before the valve is closed effectivly droping the CR of the engine by not allowing the engine to compress its total swept volume
Old 05-28-2007, 11:07 PM
  #44  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

can you give me an example of a good duration I'm looking for?
Old 05-28-2007, 11:09 PM
  #45  
Supreme Member
 
SpitotRs305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 vortec
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: not the best not the worst
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

but as for an actual cam i would look at the XE282... depending on what you are planing on doing with the car... but that cam might be to big but i think the xe274 will be a little to small for pump gas
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...8&autoview=sku
Old 05-28-2007, 11:13 PM
  #46  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

I dont have high hopes and dreams for this car just trying to make a decently beefy street car which I may take to the track a few times
Old 05-28-2007, 11:16 PM
  #47  
Supreme Member
 
SpitotRs305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 vortec
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: not the best not the worst
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

do you plan to run it on the street often?
Old 05-28-2007, 11:21 PM
  #48  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Yes everyday until winter then I switch to my truck and when it gets nice Ill bring her out again
Old 05-28-2007, 11:23 PM
  #49  
TGO Supporter

 
Stekman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

How are you getting 11:1 cr?
Old 05-29-2007, 12:25 AM
  #50  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
85Firebird350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worcester
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1984 Firebird T/A
Engine: 406sbc
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

I dont know too much about engines being that I'm only 18 but that compression ratio seems a little high to me. My 383 stroker with 11cc domed SRP high compression pistons, with a .040" head gasket. is yielding a 11.8:1 CR. with 76cc heads. So 11:1 seems kinda high for that setup to me.


Quick Reply: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 AM.