Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2007, 01:49 AM
  #51  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

I'd want to know all the numbers you used to calculate the 11:1, and how you got each number, before trusting you have an 11:1 engine. 64cc heads doesn't get you there unless you're using domed pistons, and you said you have flat tops, so something doesn't add up.

No change in hell you're going to run an 11:1 engine on 87 octane, 92 minimum, with a big cam. But I don't really think you've got 11:1, 10:1 if you've decked the block a bit, but I still want proof.

The compxe274 is a proven winner. With the ballpark compression you've got, that's still what i'd pick. That's enough cam that you won't enjoy daily driving it, but you CAN. With anything bigger it'd be next to impossible. (next to, as in "good lord do you really want to drive that thing again today?!? Bus seems great...")
Old 05-29-2007, 09:38 AM
  #52  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

I dont know how I'm going to get 11:1....that is just what my valve guy said. He said with the World Sportsman 2 64cc heads with .40 flat top pistons thats what I'd run
Old 05-29-2007, 11:31 AM
  #53  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Ok, then that's BS.

Are you currently building the engine now? Measure the deck height, and get the valve relief size from those pistons.
Use this calc;
http://kb-silvolite.com/calc.php?action=comp

I'm seeing 9.7:1 using numbers that i'm guessing you'd have. Unless you've modified something (decked the block), then this is most likely what you're at.

That's assuming a 1.56" compression height, it could actually be less.
Attached Thumbnails Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?-cr.jpg  
Old 05-29-2007, 01:07 PM
  #54  
Supreme Member

 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,111
Received 52 Likes on 49 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

I hope your "valve guy" is a little more precise in doing your valve job than he is at calculating an engines compression ratio. He is way off.
Sonix has pretty well nailed it for ya.

If you follow my previous recomendations for setting up the cam in the motor and setting up the timing, carb power valve, rear gearing and torque converter selection, it will run very well at the track and drive well on the street.
You cannot change the LSA of a camshaft once it is made. The LSA is the distance in degrees of the intake and exhaust lobe of one cylinders cam lobes. (in your cams case 108deg )You can advance or retard the cam timing of a camshaft by moveing the camshaft in the motor relative to the crankshaft. By doing this you can fine tune how the motor will run with a particular camshaft. (enahance the low end of the usable rpm range or enhance the top end.) Advancing a camshaft in a motor makes the timing points occur earlier (most important is the intake valve closing point) Earlier intake valve closing helps build cylinder pressure early and enhance low top mid range torque. It has a small effect on the top end power.
Your cr is just right for premimum pump gas. But, I would dial in the camshaft you bought as I described before, to optimise the overall performance. You do not need a new cam unless you won't be buying a high stall converter and high ratio rear gearing. Or do not want a "rough idle cam".
Your cr is not too high. The stuff you bought can work very well for you once dialed in. Its up to you to do the "dialing in".

Last edited by F-BIRD'88; 05-29-2007 at 01:43 PM.
Old 05-29-2007, 01:38 PM
  #55  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Yeah the guy is "shady" at what he does but good at it if that makes sense lol

Well thanks a lot for the help everyone, I am probably gonna look into another cam when money comes around

Last edited by stevenb; 05-29-2007 at 01:42 PM.
Old 05-29-2007, 01:49 PM
  #56  
Supreme Member

 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,111
Received 52 Likes on 49 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Originally Posted by stevenb
Yeah the guy is "shady" at what he does but good at it if that makes sense lol

Well thanks a lot for the help everyone, I am probably gonna look into another cam when money comes around
Good at, being shady?......
Read my post again. If you want to build a motor that will do what you stated you wanted to achieve before, then you have the right camshaft and the right compression ratio (for pump gas). You just need to take care of the details.
Old 05-30-2007, 11:41 PM
  #57  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

So I cannot use regular unleaded with a cr of around 9.5ish:1?
Old 05-31-2007, 01:10 AM
  #58  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

That's dicey. Maybe.
Pump gas, as F-bird is talking about is 91-92 octane. 94 if you're lucky and can find it. He means you don't have to run 110 octane race fuel.

87 octane is for boats and trucks, it has no place in the high performance community for the most part. A few exceptions for TBI motors, etc. Wave goodbye to it and forget about it.
Old 05-31-2007, 05:11 AM
  #59  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
F-Body Demon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Nashville
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Open headers will make it nice and choppy
Old 05-31-2007, 11:25 PM
  #60  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

Originally Posted by Sonix
That's dicey. Maybe.
Pump gas, as F-bird is talking about is 91-92 octane. 94 if you're lucky and can find it. He means you don't have to run 110 octane race fuel.
Doesn't Sunoco have 94 oct?
Old 06-01-2007, 01:59 AM
  #61  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

I guess, you got Sunoco near you? There's only one place in my city that I know of that has 94 octane, and it's kinda far, (maybe 15kms away).
Old 06-01-2007, 09:55 AM
  #62  
Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 357 swap
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

It is about two miles from my house
Old 06-02-2007, 01:32 PM
  #63  
Supreme Member

 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,111
Received 52 Likes on 49 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Re: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?

In Ontario, (Canada) Sunoco "Ultra" is 94 minimum Octane. Used to be called "Gold" Good for 10.5:1 compression . on many small blocks. A little less on BBC's Some people, not all with aluminum heads get away with 11:1. 10:1 cr works very well.

Sunoco does not give a "maximum recomended compression ratio limit" that this fuel is good for. They simply state that as long as your car does not ping, detonate or knock,or run on using this fuel with proper ignition timing and AFR , your fine using it.
It's up to you to determine the octane requirement of your specific motor and driving style.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TreDeClaw
Theoretical and Street Racing
11
06-22-2021 08:21 PM
camaro71633
Tech / General Engine
39
09-01-2015 10:24 AM
db057
Tech / General Engine
4
08-22-2015 08:17 PM
Bradsaundry
TPI
7
08-12-2015 12:34 AM



Quick Reply: Cam Specs good or bad for rough, choppy idle?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 AM.