Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

valvetrain geometry issue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2007, 06:01 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
327???'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '82 Sport Coupe/'89 bird/'77 280z
Engine: 355/2.8/L28E(t)
Transmission: TH350/T5/4 spd
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42/3.54
valvetrain geometry issue

I am putting a 355 l98 sbc together with a comp magnum 270hr, oem replacement roller lifters, TFS 195's w/ the 1.46 dual valve spring option, and crane gold 1.6's.

My problem is that at the shortest recommended pushrod length(7.25") the rocker still rides on the outside of the valve stem, but when I shorten the pushrod to bring the travel to the center of the valve(6.9") the rocker is almost bottomed on the stud and the nut is so far down that i can't get the lock on.

the block is zero decked, the head gasket is not on now(should it be?) but is .041" thick, and the heads have not been milled. if you need any more info i will try to get it for you.

What should I do? Do I need longer valves?

I have pictures of how the rocker sits with the 7.25" pushrod if anyone wants.

Thanks!
Old 04-11-2007, 06:21 PM
  #2  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally Posted by 327???
the head gasket is not on now(should it be?)
Yes, it should be.
Old 04-11-2007, 08:02 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
327???'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '82 Sport Coupe/'89 bird/'77 280z
Engine: 355/2.8/L28E(t)
Transmission: TH350/T5/4 spd
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42/3.54
Re: valvetrain geometry issue

Originally Posted by five7kid
Yes, it should be.
ok, i thought so, but that won't solve the problem of the rocker basically bottoming out on the stud.
Old 04-11-2007, 09:01 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,428
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,381 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: valvetrain geometry issue

the rocker still rides on the outside of the valve stem
Of course it does. They're 1.6 ratio.

You do realize what "ratio" is, right? It's the length between the valve and stud, divided by the length between the push rod and the stud. You got 2 ways to increase that ratio above stock; lengthen the first distance, or shorten the second one. Most higher ratio rockers do some combo of the 2. You can't move the stud, and you can't move the valve itself; although you CAN move the CONTACT POINT outward, exactly as you observe, and you CAN offset the trunnion on the stud although that's not necessary on a SBC to get 1.6 ratio.

Don't worry about where on the valve stem the contact patch is. That's not what you set with push rod length.

Instead, choose your push rod length for the MINIMUM WIDTH pattern of the rocker tip on the valve stem. Least amount of sliding/rolling/side-load on the valve. That's the CORRECT way to select push rods.
Old 04-12-2007, 10:40 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
327???'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '82 Sport Coupe/'89 bird/'77 280z
Engine: 355/2.8/L28E(t)
Transmission: TH350/T5/4 spd
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42/3.54
Re: valvetrain geometry issue

Originally Posted by sofakingdom
Of course it does. They're 1.6 ratio.

You do realize what "ratio" is, right? It's the length between the valve and stud, divided by the length between the push rod and the stud. You got 2 ways to increase that ratio above stock; lengthen the first distance, or shorten the second one. Most higher ratio rockers do some combo of the 2. You can't move the stud, and you can't move the valve itself; although you CAN move the CONTACT POINT outward, exactly as you observe, and you CAN offset the trunnion on the stud although that's not necessary on a SBC to get 1.6 ratio.

Don't worry about where on the valve stem the contact patch is. That's not what you set with push rod length.

Instead, choose your push rod length for the MINIMUM WIDTH pattern of the rocker tip on the valve stem. Least amount of sliding/rolling/side-load on the valve. That's the CORRECT way to select push rods.
I was suggested lash caps on another board, but when i put an .080 spacer on top of the valve i still wasn't able to get the sweep right in the middle without a ridiculously short pushrod, right about then I began to think what you posted above.
Old 04-12-2007, 10:53 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,428
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,381 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: valvetrain geometry issue

Right...

Don't worry WHERE on the valve stem tip the rocker contacts; only on making the pattern AS NARROW AS POSSIBLE. That locates the half-lift point at the center of the rocker's arc; and minimizes side loading on the valve, which of course is what wears out the guides. It's usually better, if your "perfect" push rod length comes out in between 2 real-world lengths, to get the ones on the shorter side; that way, the extra side load occurs when all the forces are low, i.e. right as the valve comes off the seat; and when the forces are high, i.e. at full lift, the imperfection of the geometry is kept to a minimum.
Old 04-12-2007, 11:23 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
327???'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '82 Sport Coupe/'89 bird/'77 280z
Engine: 355/2.8/L28E(t)
Transmission: TH350/T5/4 spd
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42/3.54
Re: valvetrain geometry issue

Thanks!

i'm going to go see what length i come up with using your method.

Edit: with your method the recommended 7.25" pushrod(w/headgasket on) is almost perfect, .060 in either direction and the sweep starts to get wider.

Last edited by 327???; 04-12-2007 at 11:39 AM.
Old 04-12-2007, 12:20 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,428
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,381 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: valvetrain geometry issue

Sounds highly believable. Go for it!!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MM2Robinson
Electronics
39
10-01-2017 09:16 AM
nova983
European Region
6
11-02-2015 12:15 PM
TheTraut88
TPI
6
09-11-2015 05:16 AM
Fronzizzle
Electronics
3
09-08-2015 12:10 PM
Formula_88AE
Engine Swap
1
09-03-2015 01:47 PM



Quick Reply: valvetrain geometry issue



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 AM.