valvetrain geometry issue
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '82 Sport Coupe/'89 bird/'77 280z
Engine: 355/2.8/L28E(t)
Transmission: TH350/T5/4 spd
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42/3.54
valvetrain geometry issue
I am putting a 355 l98 sbc together with a comp magnum 270hr, oem replacement roller lifters, TFS 195's w/ the 1.46 dual valve spring option, and crane gold 1.6's.
My problem is that at the shortest recommended pushrod length(7.25") the rocker still rides on the outside of the valve stem, but when I shorten the pushrod to bring the travel to the center of the valve(6.9") the rocker is almost bottomed on the stud and the nut is so far down that i can't get the lock on.
the block is zero decked, the head gasket is not on now(should it be?) but is .041" thick, and the heads have not been milled. if you need any more info i will try to get it for you.
What should I do? Do I need longer valves?
I have pictures of how the rocker sits with the 7.25" pushrod if anyone wants.
Thanks!
My problem is that at the shortest recommended pushrod length(7.25") the rocker still rides on the outside of the valve stem, but when I shorten the pushrod to bring the travel to the center of the valve(6.9") the rocker is almost bottomed on the stud and the nut is so far down that i can't get the lock on.
the block is zero decked, the head gasket is not on now(should it be?) but is .041" thick, and the heads have not been milled. if you need any more info i will try to get it for you.
What should I do? Do I need longer valves?
I have pictures of how the rocker sits with the 7.25" pushrod if anyone wants.
Thanks!
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '82 Sport Coupe/'89 bird/'77 280z
Engine: 355/2.8/L28E(t)
Transmission: TH350/T5/4 spd
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42/3.54
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,428
Received 1,811 Likes
on
1,381 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: valvetrain geometry issue
the rocker still rides on the outside of the valve stem
You do realize what "ratio" is, right? It's the length between the valve and stud, divided by the length between the push rod and the stud. You got 2 ways to increase that ratio above stock; lengthen the first distance, or shorten the second one. Most higher ratio rockers do some combo of the 2. You can't move the stud, and you can't move the valve itself; although you CAN move the CONTACT POINT outward, exactly as you observe, and you CAN offset the trunnion on the stud although that's not necessary on a SBC to get 1.6 ratio.
Don't worry about where on the valve stem the contact patch is. That's not what you set with push rod length.
Instead, choose your push rod length for the MINIMUM WIDTH pattern of the rocker tip on the valve stem. Least amount of sliding/rolling/side-load on the valve. That's the CORRECT way to select push rods.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '82 Sport Coupe/'89 bird/'77 280z
Engine: 355/2.8/L28E(t)
Transmission: TH350/T5/4 spd
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42/3.54
Re: valvetrain geometry issue
Of course it does. They're 1.6 ratio.
You do realize what "ratio" is, right? It's the length between the valve and stud, divided by the length between the push rod and the stud. You got 2 ways to increase that ratio above stock; lengthen the first distance, or shorten the second one. Most higher ratio rockers do some combo of the 2. You can't move the stud, and you can't move the valve itself; although you CAN move the CONTACT POINT outward, exactly as you observe, and you CAN offset the trunnion on the stud although that's not necessary on a SBC to get 1.6 ratio.
Don't worry about where on the valve stem the contact patch is. That's not what you set with push rod length.
Instead, choose your push rod length for the MINIMUM WIDTH pattern of the rocker tip on the valve stem. Least amount of sliding/rolling/side-load on the valve. That's the CORRECT way to select push rods.
You do realize what "ratio" is, right? It's the length between the valve and stud, divided by the length between the push rod and the stud. You got 2 ways to increase that ratio above stock; lengthen the first distance, or shorten the second one. Most higher ratio rockers do some combo of the 2. You can't move the stud, and you can't move the valve itself; although you CAN move the CONTACT POINT outward, exactly as you observe, and you CAN offset the trunnion on the stud although that's not necessary on a SBC to get 1.6 ratio.
Don't worry about where on the valve stem the contact patch is. That's not what you set with push rod length.
Instead, choose your push rod length for the MINIMUM WIDTH pattern of the rocker tip on the valve stem. Least amount of sliding/rolling/side-load on the valve. That's the CORRECT way to select push rods.
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,428
Received 1,811 Likes
on
1,381 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: valvetrain geometry issue
Right...
Don't worry WHERE on the valve stem tip the rocker contacts; only on making the pattern AS NARROW AS POSSIBLE. That locates the half-lift point at the center of the rocker's arc; and minimizes side loading on the valve, which of course is what wears out the guides. It's usually better, if your "perfect" push rod length comes out in between 2 real-world lengths, to get the ones on the shorter side; that way, the extra side load occurs when all the forces are low, i.e. right as the valve comes off the seat; and when the forces are high, i.e. at full lift, the imperfection of the geometry is kept to a minimum.
Don't worry WHERE on the valve stem tip the rocker contacts; only on making the pattern AS NARROW AS POSSIBLE. That locates the half-lift point at the center of the rocker's arc; and minimizes side loading on the valve, which of course is what wears out the guides. It's usually better, if your "perfect" push rod length comes out in between 2 real-world lengths, to get the ones on the shorter side; that way, the extra side load occurs when all the forces are low, i.e. right as the valve comes off the seat; and when the forces are high, i.e. at full lift, the imperfection of the geometry is kept to a minimum.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '82 Sport Coupe/'89 bird/'77 280z
Engine: 355/2.8/L28E(t)
Transmission: TH350/T5/4 spd
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42/3.54
Re: valvetrain geometry issue
Thanks!
i'm going to go see what length i come up with using your method.
Edit: with your method the recommended 7.25" pushrod(w/headgasket on) is almost perfect, .060 in either direction and the sweep starts to get wider.
i'm going to go see what length i come up with using your method.
Edit: with your method the recommended 7.25" pushrod(w/headgasket on) is almost perfect, .060 in either direction and the sweep starts to get wider.
Last edited by 327???; 04-12-2007 at 11:39 AM.
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post