HO or not
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Car: 1988 Camaro (Z28 Clone)
Engine: 305 4bbl roch
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
HO or not
i bought an 88 Sport Coupe, that origonally had a v6 in it, it had a 305 dropped in it a while ago, how can i tell if its a HO, its got a roch 4bbl, headers, Mild cam (apparently so im told, but i dont believe it), is there any way of telling if it is or not?
#2
Moderator
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 97
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: HO or not
The L69 305 HO, IIRC, was only available through 86. Check the vin number for a G (the common LG4 305 is H).
JamesC
JamesC
#3
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: Kansas, where the wind howls
Car: 84 Z28 H.O. w/Megasquirt II
Engine: semi-stock L69
Transmission: T-5 non W/C
Axle/Gears: 3.73 open
Re: HO or not
Pistons.
The HO's had flat-tops to bump compression and the rest had valve reliefs/dishes. Only way to know for sure unless you have the vin from the original car.
I guess you could pull the camshaft out and measure it, because it could tell you as well. Unless it's suspect to be non-stock.
The HO's had flat-tops to bump compression and the rest had valve reliefs/dishes. Only way to know for sure unless you have the vin from the original car.
I guess you could pull the camshaft out and measure it, because it could tell you as well. Unless it's suspect to be non-stock.
#4
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Car: 1988 Camaro (Z28 Clone)
Engine: 305 4bbl roch
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: HO or not
the thing is i dont have any idea where that engine came from, or what its out of origonally. All i know is that its a GM 5.0L (i sais it at the back of the block beside the distibutor), and the mechanic told me that there was a spot for an EGR valve so its probably from a late 70`s to mid 80`s GM
#5
Moderator
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 97
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: HO or not
Oops, my bad. I thought you were discussing the car itself, not simply the engine. There's a thread in the FAQ section that discusses the HO. You might take a peek there.
JamesC
JamesC
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: HO or not
If you can pull a plug and find a way to look at the piston, you could tell if it's dished or flat top. Teeny camera? Good flashlight and mirror and SHARP eyes?
A dial indicator on the rocker arm could tell you lift of the cam. That'll ballpark it for you at least.
Might as well just assume it's a 145HP 1982 305 LG4 and go from there as far as mods go.
Computer controlled quadrajet on it or non?
A dial indicator on the rocker arm could tell you lift of the cam. That'll ballpark it for you at least.
Might as well just assume it's a 145HP 1982 305 LG4 and go from there as far as mods go.
Computer controlled quadrajet on it or non?
#7
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 36
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Not good enough, guys. Lo-po LG4's got flat top pistons in '85 & '86.
Basically, assume it's not an HO. '83-'85 were the main years for the HO, the chance of it being an L69 is pretty much slim, and moot. If the cam has been changed and headers added, that's 95% of the difference between a lo-po and HO.
The FAQ thread tells all about "fixing" your 305, HO or no. Air cleaner is about the only thing left (I'll bet it has an open element air cleaner on it now, right?). Don't even start talking about putting flat top pistons in it - it doesn't make that much difference, and if you're going that far, it's time to find a 350 shortblock.
Basically, assume it's not an HO. '83-'85 were the main years for the HO, the chance of it being an L69 is pretty much slim, and moot. If the cam has been changed and headers added, that's 95% of the difference between a lo-po and HO.
The FAQ thread tells all about "fixing" your 305, HO or no. Air cleaner is about the only thing left (I'll bet it has an open element air cleaner on it now, right?). Don't even start talking about putting flat top pistons in it - it doesn't make that much difference, and if you're going that far, it's time to find a 350 shortblock.
Last edited by five7kid; 03-26-2007 at 06:21 PM.
Trending Topics
#9
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,556
Likes: 1,885
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: HO or not
A smarter way to go about this, would be to figure out what you would do differently, depending on what motor it is.
Given that the biggest differences between the LG4 and the L69 were the cam (which has now been changed), the exhaust (which probably isn't either one, but rather is something completely else), the gears (which you don't have), the electric fan vs the clutch fan (which you're probably using whatever came in the car), and the dual-snorkel air cleaner if it came in a Camaro (which I'm assuming you don't have), then whether your motor was born as whichever one is probably not relevant now.
And if it makes no difference, then it doesn't matter, and is a waste of time and bandwidth trying to figure out.
Given that the biggest differences between the LG4 and the L69 were the cam (which has now been changed), the exhaust (which probably isn't either one, but rather is something completely else), the gears (which you don't have), the electric fan vs the clutch fan (which you're probably using whatever came in the car), and the dual-snorkel air cleaner if it came in a Camaro (which I'm assuming you don't have), then whether your motor was born as whichever one is probably not relevant now.
And if it makes no difference, then it doesn't matter, and is a waste of time and bandwidth trying to figure out.
#10
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Car: 1988 Camaro (Z28 Clone)
Engine: 305 4bbl roch
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: HO or not
there is no computer in the car, its all mechanical, the comp was removed and the engine was dropped in it
#13
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 9
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: HO or not
Why does it matter if some marketing drone behind a desk attached a meaningless "H.O." designation to the engine in its previous application?
#14
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,128
Likes: 429
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: HO or not
This is the stock 305 shortblock in my 1983 G20 van at about 240K miles with the heads pulled off. Yes it was converted to TBI and hence the wiring mess. The pistons are obviously flat-top, so before it is shouted out that only the L69s had the Flat-top pistons, think again. The cam was also a "929" from a 350, not the tiny LG4 POS. You can easily see why the heads are off in the first picture, the steel shim head gaskets litterally rusted away around the water passages. New head gaskets, ported the heads, changed the springs, and off it went.
#15
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,556
Likes: 1,885
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: HO or not
The "castin numbers" are the same for the LG4 and the L69. Won't tell you anything.
You're not listening... at the point your motor is at, THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE between the LG4 and the L69, except in case it's an early LG4, in which case it's got low compression. Everything else that would make it one or the other, IS GONE. So, not only would it be a totally useless bit of meaningless worthless trivia even if it still applied; now, it's to the point that it makes no difference whatsoever, because any difference that there would have been, has been erased. All you have left are the parts (the castings) that the 2 motors had in common.
And of course, sounds like you've got a computer-controlled carb with no computer, which is guaranteed to run poor; and maybe a computer-controlled distributor as well, which is even worse for how it runs. You've got no "centrifugal" or "vacuum" advance, if it's the stock dist, because those functions used to be supplied by the computer but are now missing.
You're not listening... at the point your motor is at, THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE between the LG4 and the L69, except in case it's an early LG4, in which case it's got low compression. Everything else that would make it one or the other, IS GONE. So, not only would it be a totally useless bit of meaningless worthless trivia even if it still applied; now, it's to the point that it makes no difference whatsoever, because any difference that there would have been, has been erased. All you have left are the parts (the castings) that the 2 motors had in common.
And of course, sounds like you've got a computer-controlled carb with no computer, which is guaranteed to run poor; and maybe a computer-controlled distributor as well, which is even worse for how it runs. You've got no "centrifugal" or "vacuum" advance, if it's the stock dist, because those functions used to be supplied by the computer but are now missing.