Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Underdrive pulleys....worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2006 | 06:56 PM
  #1  
YenkoST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
From: GA
Car: '90 C1500
Engine: SBC MPFI
Transmission: 4L80e
Axle/Gears: 4.30
Underdrive pulleys....worth it?

Looking at some underdrive March Power/Amp series pulleys. Question is, are they worth it? All the pulleys are smaller than the stock units correct? Anybody got any track times or dyno numbers with it. Thanks for the help.
Old 02-14-2006 | 08:57 PM
  #2  
GuitarJunki17's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton
Car: 1990 IROCZ Camaro
Engine: 350 4bbl, 200cc Heads, 270hr Cam
Transmission: 700R4 w/ Trans-Go shift kit.
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt Posi
Re: Underdrive pulleys....worth it?

Originally posted by YenkoST
Looking at some underdrive March Power/Amp series pulleys. Question is, are they worth it? All the pulleys are smaller than the stock units correct? Anybody got any track times or dyno numbers with it. Thanks for the help.
I read an article on ChevyHiPerformance.com about these (too lazy to look it up, but it's on there) and they got a dyno proven 15hp on a fox body stang, which leads me to believe that you might see simliar results on a car like ours. They also did tests with other cars and found it to knock off a 1/10 of the 1/4 mile, and about 1.5mph. If you can pick up a used set for cheap, then it's a steal imo.
Old 02-14-2006 | 09:02 PM
  #3  
TTOP350's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 11,922
Likes: 930
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
they work! make sure they are made out of aluminum for the most bang for your buck..... less weight.. if the alt pully is bigger than your stock pulley dont use it if your just driving around a lot.. your batt will be dead fast .. I run the SLP crank pulley only..

Last edited by TTOP350; 02-14-2006 at 09:45 PM.
Old 02-14-2006 | 10:58 PM
  #4  
YenkoST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
From: GA
Car: '90 C1500
Engine: SBC MPFI
Transmission: 4L80e
Axle/Gears: 4.30
yea, well, i have a 383 HSR, heads, cam, so, you think they will help out more than a stock engine?
Old 02-14-2006 | 11:32 PM
  #5  
GuitarJunki17's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton
Car: 1990 IROCZ Camaro
Engine: 350 4bbl, 200cc Heads, 270hr Cam
Transmission: 700R4 w/ Trans-Go shift kit.
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt Posi
Originally posted by YenkoST
yea, well, i have a 383 HSR, heads, cam, so, you think they will help out more than a stock engine?
Hmm, well, since you are making substantially more amounts of power than a stock engine, your results may not be as good as a stock motor. The thing with pullies is that the accessories are a drag on the motor, so all you are really doing is freeing up lost horsepower. Since your engine puts that amount of power out, it leads me to believe that it's not having a hard time turning those accessories to begin with, meaning your gains wont be as noticeable.

That is just my theory though, lets see what some of the other guys think.
Old 02-14-2006 | 11:38 PM
  #6  
Julie Bergman's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: In the sticks near Woodland,CA, USA
Car: 91 Formula WS6
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: five speed
I just got these particular March pulleys (GM amp series) for my 136k mile LB9 5spd Formula and at the same time did 1.6 Summit roller tip rockers and new valvesprings. Hello! Definitely perked up the car.
Old 02-15-2006 | 03:38 PM
  #7  
90CamaroTBI's Avatar
Senior Member

 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
From: Waldorf, MD
Car: 91 Formula, 89 IROC
Engine: LB9, LB9
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi 2.73, Posi 2.73
What is the difference between the power/amp set and just the regular set. If I do not have a huge stereo, would I need the power/amp ones? I am guessing they modify them for big stereos and do not let as much power loose as the regular march underdrive pulleys.
Old 02-15-2006 | 03:45 PM
  #8  
Julie Bergman's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: In the sticks near Woodland,CA, USA
Car: 91 Formula WS6
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: five speed
I have the regular March pulleys on my 3rd gen road race car - it does not have to run headlights, tunes, etc. Your street car does, and I think March designed these pulleys for street cars. I have head too many complaints from folks using the regular ones about headlights dimming, etc. I am very happy with the amp series on my street car.
Old 02-15-2006 | 06:30 PM
  #9  
a mack6's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh & Allentown PA
Car: 1992 Z28 (Heritage Edition)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi
Sean, March CLAIMS that with the Power and Amp series you will have full power at idle (whether you want to believe that or not is up to you). For street use, it would probably be better to go with the power and amp series just to be safe. Or you could go with the ASD underdrive pulleys which tell you at exactly what RPMs you get a full charge (750 RPM, 900 RPM, 1000 RPM, etc.)

Also, to the thread starter... there was an article on gmhightechperformance where they put March power and amp pullies, an edelbrock catback, and a jet chip on a 5.7 TBI chevy truck and it gained 21 RWHP. I know the SBC chevy trucks are alittle different than our f-bodies but catbacks dont yield much, and everyone who uses a off the shelf chip seems to get slower, so that leads me to believe that the pullies were responsible for a good portion of that.

EDIT: It seems they added an intake to that truck as well. So that might be some of the gain right there. But i would still think the UD were atleast 5 HP of that gain...

Last edited by a mack6; 02-15-2006 at 06:39 PM.
Old 02-15-2006 | 08:30 PM
  #10  
90CamaroTBI's Avatar
Senior Member

 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
From: Waldorf, MD
Car: 91 Formula, 89 IROC
Engine: LB9, LB9
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi 2.73, Posi 2.73
So I guess you get better power from the regular pullies, but the power/amp series dont give as much power, but make it safe for the street.
Old 02-15-2006 | 09:14 PM
  #11  
techno101's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 502
Likes: 1
From: Leesville, LA
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: Modified 350 TPI
Transmission: Modified 700 R4
Axle/Gears: Posi 3.42
I have a March Power set on my 305 TBI, its a crank pulley and an alt. pulley. The crank pulley is significantly smaller than stock, very light too. The alt. pulley is larger than stock but is twice as heavy as stock. To make for the difference I guess.
At and idle of 700 rpm I have a voltage of 12 volts, and can push a 1000 watt amp with no problem. I really noticed a difference shifting into 2 second gear also. I like mine, hope this helps.
Old 02-15-2006 | 09:19 PM
  #12  
Fast355's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,134
Likes: 429
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
On my G20s 305, I used a crank pulley from a 4.3 astro that bolted on fine and was about 5" in diameter compared to the stock 305s near 7". The lights dim slightly at idle, but I don't have any charging problems at idle either. Dual A/C, stereo, electric fans, etc, but I have a 130 amp alternator. There is a noticeable power difference, especially on a Hot summer day with the A/C on, fuel economy improved some as well especially with the A/C on.
Old 02-15-2006 | 09:30 PM
  #13  
90CamaroTBI's Avatar
Senior Member

 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
From: Waldorf, MD
Car: 91 Formula, 89 IROC
Engine: LB9, LB9
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi 2.73, Posi 2.73
So either way with either set ill gain just as much?
Old 02-16-2006 | 11:32 AM
  #14  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,784
Likes: 385
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
another chevy high performance or w/e magazine picked up some rwhp on a LT1 with the pulleys.. i dont recall how much overall but i think it was close to 10 if not over that on a mustang dyno.

dyno'd 218 stock... with catback, maf sensor tuning, cai intake, and pulleys, (could be something else but i dont have the article here with me) but those mods were good for a total of over 260rwhp on a mustang dyno
Old 02-16-2006 | 02:25 PM
  #15  
V8 Slayer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 909
Likes: 1
From: New York
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: TH-700-R4
Yeah well... Hotrod magazines also dynoed the "Tornado" and said it increased horsepower...Dont believe everything you read...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
grngryoutmyway
LTX and LSX
325
10-18-2016 05:48 PM
bigjay89gta
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
12
10-15-2015 08:04 AM
italiano67
Tech / General Engine
1
09-22-2015 08:42 AM
Navy8125
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
10
08-22-2015 07:13 PM



Quick Reply: Underdrive pulleys....worth it?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:06 AM.