58mm Throttle Body Vs 1300 Monoblade
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Norfolk, Virginia
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: 406
Transmission: A4
58mm Throttle Body Vs 1300 Monoblade
Ok I'm running a 406 with ported AFR heads and a 58mm throttle body have any of you went from a 58mm to a 1300 and had any improvement.Also why do the LS1 use 75mm throttle bodys stock and even larger when modded and here I'm using a 58mm with a 406 I'm thinking it would perform better with the 1300,what you guys think?
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,489
Received 1,854 Likes
on
1,413 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
IIRC a dual 58mm flows about 1100 CFM.
A 400 at 100% VE and 7000 RPM flows about 800CFM.
Instinct tells me, you'll get more bang for the buck and the trouble, someplace else.
All that increasing the TB size will do, is make the car harder to drive at low throttle openings; because just a small movement of the huge TB will result in such a gigantic increase in air flow.
A 400 at 100% VE and 7000 RPM flows about 800CFM.
Instinct tells me, you'll get more bang for the buck and the trouble, someplace else.
All that increasing the TB size will do, is make the car harder to drive at low throttle openings; because just a small movement of the huge TB will result in such a gigantic increase in air flow.
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lower Salford, PA
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.3L Victor EFI
Transmission: Tremec TKO 600
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"/4.11 Trac-Lok
Depends alot on the rpm your engine is operating at. You can measure the vacuum in the plenum at max rpm & WOT & then compare to atmospherical pressure, if it's the same or close you don't need it. LS1's have a single 75mm TB, you have a dual 58mm. Area wise, you have slightly more than a single 75mm.
#4
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Norfolk, Virginia
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: 406
Transmission: A4
Originally posted by sofakingdom
IIRC a dual 58mm flows about 1100 CFM.
A 400 at 100% VE and 7000 RPM flows about 800CFM.
Instinct tells me, you'll get more bang for the buck and the trouble, someplace else.
All that increasing the TB size will do, is make the car harder to drive at low throttle openings; because just a small movement of the huge TB will result in such a gigantic increase in air flow.
IIRC a dual 58mm flows about 1100 CFM.
A 400 at 100% VE and 7000 RPM flows about 800CFM.
Instinct tells me, you'll get more bang for the buck and the trouble, someplace else.
All that increasing the TB size will do, is make the car harder to drive at low throttle openings; because just a small movement of the huge TB will result in such a gigantic increase in air flow.
#5
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Norfolk, Virginia
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: 406
Transmission: A4
Originally posted by Ricktpi
LS1's have a single 75mm TB, you have a dual 58mm. Area wise, you have slightly more than a single 75mm.
LS1's have a single 75mm TB, you have a dual 58mm. Area wise, you have slightly more than a single 75mm.
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,886
Received 904 Likes
on
593 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
They are 2 58mm blades...
I have been running a stock T-body since 91..
its a bit modified tho.. I took it apart bord it to 52mm then cut the center out an boom i made my own mono blade...
I have run it on several diff motors in my car from a 305 all the way to 454 small blocks and it worked just fine on all of them...
DID NOT hurt drivability at all
BTW it flows 1200 cfm by itself
if its on a 305 it will only flow enough for that motor no more no less
on a bigger motor it will flow more
no majic or vodo there
will you get big hp increase with a big t-body on a small motor prolly not
but if you go from a stock t-body to a big 1 on a big motor you will gain power....
I have been running a stock T-body since 91..
its a bit modified tho.. I took it apart bord it to 52mm then cut the center out an boom i made my own mono blade...
I have run it on several diff motors in my car from a 305 all the way to 454 small blocks and it worked just fine on all of them...
DID NOT hurt drivability at all
BTW it flows 1200 cfm by itself
if its on a 305 it will only flow enough for that motor no more no less
on a bigger motor it will flow more
no majic or vodo there
will you get big hp increase with a big t-body on a small motor prolly not
but if you go from a stock t-body to a big 1 on a big motor you will gain power....
Last edited by TTOP350; 02-14-2006 at 09:18 PM.
#7
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
502 Ram Jet crate engine:
"Description:
"The ... Ram Jet 502 crate engine from GM Performance Parts makes 510 horsepower at 5500 RPM and 550 ft-lbs of torque at 4500 RPM. GM engineers and Pro Mod racer Harold Martin combined together to design the unique large plenum Ram Jet intake that produces the broad torque curve using only a L98 throttle body assembly." (emphasis added)
Yep, need a lot of TB to make power. . .
Admittedly, slightly different system than your run-of-the-mill TPI, but hopefully the point made.
"Description:
"The ... Ram Jet 502 crate engine from GM Performance Parts makes 510 horsepower at 5500 RPM and 550 ft-lbs of torque at 4500 RPM. GM engineers and Pro Mod racer Harold Martin combined together to design the unique large plenum Ram Jet intake that produces the broad torque curve using only a L98 throttle body assembly." (emphasis added)
Yep, need a lot of TB to make power. . .
Admittedly, slightly different system than your run-of-the-mill TPI, but hopefully the point made.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,886
Received 904 Likes
on
593 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
yep....
I put a bigger t-body on one of those and picked up over 20rwhp and with a better cam picked up 80 more
GM leaves a ton of power on the table
I put a bigger t-body on one of those and picked up over 20rwhp and with a better cam picked up 80 more
GM leaves a ton of power on the table
#9
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
On my stock 350 i noticed a inprovment in power by just changing from a stock TB to a 58mm BBK TB. Now i have a superram which is made to accept the 58mm TB. WOW
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,489
Received 1,854 Likes
on
1,413 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
The LS1 TB is a single bore, 75m; the 58 dual is ..... surprise .... dual 58mm bores. Nearly 20% more bore area. 4418 sq mm vs 5284 sq mm.
You will only get more power from a flow type of mod like a TB, if the thing you're changing is the restriction in your system. If the restriction is elsewhere, it will accomplish nothing; because the system as a whole will still flow the same amount. Otherwise, all you'll accomplish by increasing the size of the TB, is to create the effect of the twitchy throttle I mentioned.
I still think the dual 58 is plenty for a 400, and that you won't make any significant improvement with changes right there. It already flows all that the motor can use.
You will only get more power from a flow type of mod like a TB, if the thing you're changing is the restriction in your system. If the restriction is elsewhere, it will accomplish nothing; because the system as a whole will still flow the same amount. Otherwise, all you'll accomplish by increasing the size of the TB, is to create the effect of the twitchy throttle I mentioned.
I still think the dual 58 is plenty for a 400, and that you won't make any significant improvement with changes right there. It already flows all that the motor can use.
#11
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,784
Likes: 0
Received 93 Likes
on
78 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, LT1
Transmission: TKX, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.23
Re: 58mm Throttle Body Vs 1300 Monoblade
Originally posted by MR. KIDD
Ok I'm running a 406 with ported AFR heads and a 58mm throttle body have any of you went from a 58mm to a 1300 and had any improvement.Also why do the LS1 use 75mm throttle bodys stock and even larger when modded and here I'm using a 58mm with a 406 I'm thinking it would perform better with the 1300,what you guys think?
Ok I'm running a 406 with ported AFR heads and a 58mm throttle body have any of you went from a 58mm to a 1300 and had any improvement.Also why do the LS1 use 75mm throttle bodys stock and even larger when modded and here I'm using a 58mm with a 406 I'm thinking it would perform better with the 1300,what you guys think?
So whats your MAP readings at WOT throughout the RPM band?
I've experimented with a few different setups, various throttle bodies, etc.
-- Joe
#12
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lower Salford, PA
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.3L Victor EFI
Transmission: Tremec TKO 600
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"/4.11 Trac-Lok
Originally posted by MR. KIDD
Would you mind explaining that because it seems like your saying that each blade is 58mm I have never measured one but I don't think they are. so what am I missing?
Would you mind explaining that because it seems like your saying that each blade is 58mm I have never measured one but I don't think they are. so what am I missing?
75mm (radius 37.5mm) 37.5 x 37.5 x 3.14 (pi) = 4415.625 sq. mm.
58 (radius 29mm) 29 x 29 x 3.14 (pi) = 2640.74 sq. mm.
4415.625 sq. mm < 2640.74 sq. mm x 2 (5281.48)
#13
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: NJ/PA
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Many
Transmission: Quite a few
yeah, to answer the question of why the LS motors are not as sensitive, the ones that are cable operated (and not drive by wire) use a progressive cable pull, looks like a snail shell, far from the center line of the throttle shaft closed, and near the center at WOT. It changes the percent opening at throttle to percent opening at your foot relationship, so it 'slows' the throttle opening to allow greater control. the later LT1 engines and later TBI engines have this as well.
I also concur on making sure you need the larger blades, making sure the other restrictions are improved before moving above 52mm.
I also concur on making sure you need the larger blades, making sure the other restrictions are improved before moving above 52mm.
#14
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Norfolk, Virginia
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: 406
Transmission: A4
Originally posted by Ricktpi
Since we know the area of a circle is: pi x radius squared
75mm (radius 37.5mm) 37.5 x 37.5 x 3.14 (pi) = 4415.625 sq. mm.
58 (radius 29mm) 29 x 29 x 3.14 (pi) = 2640.74 sq. mm.
4415.625 sq. mm < 2640.74 sq. mm x 2 (5281.48)
Since we know the area of a circle is: pi x radius squared
75mm (radius 37.5mm) 37.5 x 37.5 x 3.14 (pi) = 4415.625 sq. mm.
58 (radius 29mm) 29 x 29 x 3.14 (pi) = 2640.74 sq. mm.
4415.625 sq. mm < 2640.74 sq. mm x 2 (5281.48)
#15
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Norfolk, Virginia
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: 406
Transmission: A4
Re: Re: 58mm Throttle Body Vs 1300 Monoblade
Originally posted by anesthes
Lots of interesting responses to this thread. heh
So whats your MAP readings at WOT throughout the RPM band?
I've experimented with a few different setups, various throttle bodies, etc.
-- Joe
Lots of interesting responses to this thread. heh
So whats your MAP readings at WOT throughout the RPM band?
I've experimented with a few different setups, various throttle bodies, etc.
-- Joe
#16
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Norfolk, Virginia
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: 406
Transmission: A4
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tony Walch
[B]
I have been running a stock T-body since 91..
its a bit modified tho.. I took it apart bord it to 52mm then cut the center out an boom i made my own mono blade...
I have run it on several diff motors in my car from a 305 all the way to 454 small blocks and it worked just fine on all of them...
BTW it flows 1200 cfm by itself
Do you have pictures of it and how did you flow test it?
[B]
I have been running a stock T-body since 91..
its a bit modified tho.. I took it apart bord it to 52mm then cut the center out an boom i made my own mono blade...
I have run it on several diff motors in my car from a 305 all the way to 454 small blocks and it worked just fine on all of them...
BTW it flows 1200 cfm by itself
Do you have pictures of it and how did you flow test it?
#17
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,784
Likes: 0
Received 93 Likes
on
78 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, LT1
Transmission: TKX, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.23
Re: Re: Re: 58mm Throttle Body Vs 1300 Monoblade
Originally posted by MR. KIDD
Mine is a Maf car.
Mine is a Maf car.
-- Joe
#18
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,886
Received 904 Likes
on
593 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
[QUOTE]Originally posted by MR. KIDD
[B]
I dont have pics but I need to get some put up...
Tested on a flow bench @ a well known shop in the STLouis area
I also made a 4" maf but never finished tuning with it .. due to customer cars that needed work..
Here is a link to some of my cars pics
http://www.team3rdgen.com/modules.ph...view_album.php
[B]
Originally posted by Tony Walch
I have been running a stock T-body since 91..
its a bit modified tho.. I took it apart bord it to 52mm then cut the center out an boom i made my own mono blade...
I have run it on several diff motors in my car from a 305 all the way to 454 small blocks and it worked just fine on all of them...
BTW it flows 1200 cfm by itself
Do you have pictures of it and how did you flow test it?
I have been running a stock T-body since 91..
its a bit modified tho.. I took it apart bord it to 52mm then cut the center out an boom i made my own mono blade...
I have run it on several diff motors in my car from a 305 all the way to 454 small blocks and it worked just fine on all of them...
BTW it flows 1200 cfm by itself
Do you have pictures of it and how did you flow test it?
I dont have pics but I need to get some put up...
Tested on a flow bench @ a well known shop in the STLouis area
I also made a 4" maf but never finished tuning with it .. due to customer cars that needed work..
Here is a link to some of my cars pics
http://www.team3rdgen.com/modules.ph...view_album.php
Last edited by TTOP350; 02-16-2006 at 08:43 AM.
#19
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,489
Received 1,854 Likes
on
1,413 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
What MAF is on your car? How much does it flow? More than 1100 CFM or whatever? If not, the MAF is your restriction, not the TB; you could put a 6" diameter TB on it, and not one more molecule of air will be able to get into the engine than with the one you've got.
That's whay I don't think changing the TB will give yo more power.
That's whay I don't think changing the TB will give yo more power.
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,886
Received 904 Likes
on
593 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
I have a stock gutted MAF.. I know they dont flow as much as the big T-body by far..
It does show a big gain when I put the big T-Body on. Y? I dont know either, but it picks up a few tenths at the track and several hp on our rwhp dyno... and it doesnt lie.... tooo much LOL
my motor is far from stock 4++ cubes
on a stock 350 with LTRs it picked up around 3-4 hp not setting the world on fire but hey it was a improvement..
It does show a big gain when I put the big T-Body on. Y? I dont know either, but it picks up a few tenths at the track and several hp on our rwhp dyno... and it doesnt lie.... tooo much LOL
my motor is far from stock 4++ cubes
on a stock 350 with LTRs it picked up around 3-4 hp not setting the world on fire but hey it was a improvement..
#21
Tony, I know this thread is a few months old, and I was searching on a monoblade TB, and this came up. Not to be off topic, but I looked at your pics, and it funny, that the one with the girl has the most views of any of them.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Terrell351
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
06-13-2021 01:13 PM
mdtoren
Tech / General Engine
0
08-16-2015 05:45 PM