Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

hows this cam look for my 383?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-09-2005, 11:43 PM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TraviZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodland, CA
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
hows this cam look for my 383?

230 int./244 exh. @ .050
Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.510
Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.540

its the comp 08-306-8 grind

112lsa

too much? too little? im new with 383's i hear they need a lil bigger cam to get the same powerband as a 350. whats your opinions? this is for a daily driver and strip car.
Old 12-10-2005, 02:27 AM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
11 Flat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do you know what the heads Flow? And what type are they?
Old 12-10-2005, 08:25 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
e-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: NJ
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 formula
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
I think the general rule is a cam will peak about 500RPM lower in a 383ci vs. a 350ci
Old 12-10-2005, 11:53 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TraviZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodland, CA
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
11 flat, the heads are about 258/190 @ .500 and 257/200 @ .600


e-man, i would need about a 230ish duration cam to get the rpm range up to the 2500-6000 range u think?
Old 12-11-2005, 12:33 AM
  #5  
Senior Member

 
izcain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Port Angeles, Wa
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1983 Camaro Z28
Engine: 584
Transmission: TSI Glide
Axle/Gears: Quick performance 9 inch
One thing that you need to be careful is when you run anything with over 480 or so lift you need to be careful and either run a smaller base circle cam or you need to clearance the rods since they will come into contact with the cam.
Old 12-11-2005, 12:51 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TraviZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodland, CA
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
never quite understood that, is it the lobes that would contact the rods?

and if so, would i be able to buy the cam, stuff it in the engine, bolt maybe just one rod to the crank and bolt up the timing chain, and get rotate the assembly to check for clearance?
Old 12-11-2005, 12:54 AM
  #7  
Senior Member

 
izcain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Port Angeles, Wa
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1983 Camaro Z28
Engine: 584
Transmission: TSI Glide
Axle/Gears: Quick performance 9 inch
not all the rods will contact the cam lobes only certain ones and I found that it is only with cams with upwards over 480-490 lift and anything above that. Machining of the sides of the rods for clearancing is a simple and effective thing and nce you do this you can run any size cam you choose.
Old 12-11-2005, 12:58 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TraviZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodland, CA
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
well i should check clearance before getting the assembly balanced correct? so that mean bolting it all togther snug and spinning the **** eh?
Old 12-11-2005, 12:52 PM
  #9  
Senior Member

 
izcain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Port Angeles, Wa
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1983 Camaro Z28
Engine: 584
Transmission: TSI Glide
Axle/Gears: Quick performance 9 inch
Most machine shops I have been to that build several 383 will know how much and where to machine the rods for clearancing if you tell them you would like that done. Im sure they can clearance them all and then balance the entire assembly before you have to install everything.
Old 12-11-2005, 12:57 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TraviZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodland, CA
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
ok ill talk to them first.
Old 12-12-2005, 01:03 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
11 Flat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would use something with a little less exhaust duration.
Old 12-12-2005, 01:29 PM
  #12  
Moderator

 
Apeiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Originally posted by TraviZ
and if so, would i be able to buy the cam, stuff it in the engine, bolt maybe just one rod to the crank and bolt up the timing chain, and get rotate the assembly to check for clearance?
You'll need to check more than just one rod, some cylinders are more prone to interference than others. Preferrably, you'd test-fit the entire assembly checking for clearance everywhere before having it balanced.

I put a fairly similar cam (XR282) into a 383 recently. There were solid hits on several cylinders. Grinding on the rod bolts wouldnt' have been enough to make it work.
Old 12-12-2005, 02:08 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Grinding on the rod bolts wouldnt' have been enough to make it work.
You'd need to get the rotating assembly rebalanced after that anyway right? I mean, if grinding the rod bolts would have worked, you'd need to rebalance it anyway right? may as well let the machine shop do it all eh?
Old 12-12-2005, 03:15 PM
  #14  
Moderator

 
Apeiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Well, if you take a very small amount of material off the rod bolts it wouldn't be such a big deal, but if it's anything substantial it should be rebalanced.

There's really no reason the machine shop has to do the clearancing, they'd be doing it the same way you would. To clearance things properly can involve a lot of trial-fitting, which can get time consuming. I'd rather do it myself than pay someone for it. As long as you eliminate clearance problems before it's balanced you avoid nasty surprises.
Old 12-12-2005, 03:47 PM
  #15  
Junior Member
 
Speedocrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eatontown NJ
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Monte Carlo
Engine: soon to be 383
Transmission: TH-350
I jsut assembled a 383 stroker myself. I used the Scat stroker rods. I had a stock set of 5.7 rods to use w/ ARP bolts. I sold them and used the $$ from that buy the Scat rods. I'm not sure what it would have cost to get the stockers reworked but i think i came out around the same $$. They use a bolt that goes into the body of the rod instead of a bolt and a nut. If you pick up "how to build max performance SBC on a budget" by David Vizard they go into detail of how much must be removed from the shoulder of the rod bolt.
Old 12-12-2005, 03:54 PM
  #16  
Moderator

 
Apeiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Those are "cap screws" on your new rods, instead of "rod bolts". Cap screw rods can offer a lot more clearance than a stock rod.

In my case, I was using stock rods with ARP bolts that were already clearanced, and there still was no way they were going to work. I used a set of Eagle H beam cap screw rods and have lots of room now. The downside was that the H beams needed more clearance work at the oil pan rails and cylinder bottoms.

A small base-circle cam may avoid all these problems, or it may not. The only way to know for sure is to try it.
Old 12-12-2005, 04:41 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
Speedocrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eatontown NJ
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Monte Carlo
Engine: soon to be 383
Transmission: TH-350
Ape; I knew what they were called, I paid for them. I was just tryig to give a better description of how they looked.

You are 100% correct "Cap Screw" is the correct term. How much lift does that cam have? When i set mine up i was 1 tooth off and ran it 345 degrees around before it hit anything. I was LIVID untill i realized that i was an idoit. Thought i paid extra for the special rods and they still wouldnt clear. My cam only has .455" & I dont suspect i'll run into any problems once i uprgade to a Voodoo series with .489" lift. Time will tell.

-Steve
Old 12-12-2005, 04:53 PM
  #18  
Moderator

 
Apeiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
The lift of the cam doesn't mean all that much when it comes to rod clearance. The lobes are at about the same height regardless of the lift. The duration and ramp profile have more of an effect on clearance.
Old 12-12-2005, 10:08 PM
  #19  
Supreme Member
 
Streetiron85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700 R4
Preassembly is the time consuming and costly part of clearancing the rods. Supposedly, some shops have enough experience with strokers to do it without the preassembly. But I personally don't trust the engine builders in my town to do something like that, so I always feel better about pre assembling an engine myself.
I did it by getting a used rod bearing that is the right size, and one cyl at a time, checked for clearance against the cam and the block as well.
First do the crank all by itself and see that it spins freely. Then with the cam in place take the pistons and rod assys, and try them out in their respective holes. Number the pistons so they'll go back where they came from.
The used rod bearing is so that you don't chew up a new one by moving it 8 times.
Bushed rods are a big help too, that way you can take them apart for balancing after clearancing.
I like preassembly, cause it's a good way to be sure the job is done right.
Cleaning the engine yourself with the cam bearings out is a good idea too. Especially if you're getting someone elses block, and you don't know where it's been. Most shops don't brush out the oil passages, they just boil it out and let it go at that.
I've discovered that by leaving things to chance, the likelyhood of something going wrong is greatly increased.
With a hi-$$ motor that has forged parts, I'd leave as little to chance as possible.
Old 12-12-2005, 10:36 PM
  #20  
Moderator

 
Apeiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
I keep a few extra sets of bearings around for that kind of thing.
Old 12-13-2005, 12:37 AM
  #21  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TraviZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodland, CA
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
i have these eagle forged rods with the arp bolts, that have really small heads on them that have been ground from the factory for clearancing it looks like. this should help yes?
Old 12-13-2005, 12:24 PM
  #22  
Moderator

 
Apeiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
It may help, but it may still not be enough. The only way to know for sure is to mock it up.
Old 12-13-2005, 01:01 PM
  #23  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (15)
 
Tibo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Desert
Posts: 5,025
Received 76 Likes on 66 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: 383 single plane efi
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73s
I would get a cam with more intake. I would get a singel pattern cam for those heads and your good exhaust. As long as you don't get into nitrous The single pattern will usually beat the dual pattern.
Old 12-13-2005, 02:31 PM
  #24  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TraviZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodland, CA
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
do u have any single pattern recomendations?

my valves are 2.08/1.6 so the extra lift on the exhaust may be benificiary because of the extra then standard sized valve.

or what if i just put 1.6's on my intake side that would be .544/540 lift.
Old 12-13-2005, 02:44 PM
  #25  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Free Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11
That's an old camshaft design. I'm using it in my 355. So yes, get a bigger one.
Old 12-13-2005, 10:12 PM
  #26  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TraviZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodland, CA
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
u guys say a single pattern, so show me one that would work for me.
Old 12-14-2005, 09:10 AM
  #27  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Free Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11
What gear, transmission, heads and intake are you running?
Old 12-14-2005, 12:05 PM
  #28  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TraviZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodland, CA
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
3.42
700r4
canfield 64cc 190cc heads-aluminum
stealthram
Old 12-14-2005, 12:42 PM
  #29  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Free Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11
According to chevy hi-performance mag, they flow tested the heads and they maxed out just over .500 lift. Do you have other flow numbers for them? If not then I wouldn't get a cam w/ more than 525 lift. W/ no power adder a single pattern cam will work fine, although you can't go to crazy on teh dur. b/c of the 3.42 rear. I'd pic somthing between the 236-244 range. obviously 236 being the lower performing but matching better w/ the heads and gear. The HSR likes more dur. and flow numbers close to 270cfm or more. Although this would req. more rear gear and a higher stall. Hell, the 236 would like a bigger stall as well. The choice is up to you. How far do you want to take the car?
Old 10-29-2007, 10:53 PM
  #30  
Member
 
stevo the torpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: maryland
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 maro
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 373 locker
Re: hows this cam look for my 383?

i had to clear 2 rods off and i have a 383 234/234 dur and 488/488 lift maybe a 16th of an inch not much at all only thing is throw a hot cam and crank and it will hit
Old 10-30-2007, 12:23 AM
  #31  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
LilJayV10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Evansville,IN,USA
Posts: 2,025
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' T/A, 00' Firehawk
Engine: 406 Roller
Transmission: TH700R4 w/2800 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi
Re: hows this cam look for my 383?

I put a 288XR cam in my 406 w/ 5.7 rods. I used stock rods w/ ARP bolts. I had to grind on every rod. If I had used cap screw rods I don't think 'i would have had a problem.
Old 10-30-2007, 02:40 AM
  #32  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TraviZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodland, CA
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
Re: hows this cam look for my 383?

Bringing back the dead eh?

cap screws are cool for cams, my new (second) 383 I'm building, I used a regular base circle cam, 236/248 duration. 560ish lift. and the rods cleared it just fine, eagle H beams to be precise. unfortunately the cap screws now contact the bottom of my cylinders, so more grinding is necessary.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nervous2
LSX and LTX Parts
8
03-10-2016 09:49 PM
theurge
TPI
7
08-21-2015 12:46 PM
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
08-20-2015 09:36 PM
86White_T/A305
LTX and LSX
0
08-17-2015 12:16 AM
Fronzizzle
Electronics
2
08-09-2015 01:15 PM



Quick Reply: hows this cam look for my 383?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 AM.