grinding valve stems
#3
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
david vizard did a breakdown of flow gains, based on different things done to a valve. one was chucking it up in your drill, and running it against a grinding wheel, or even grinding wheel in a die grinder (I think you'd need a vise, or 4 hands for that...)
it showed to be worthwhile... but then again, be careful...
I could scan the article if there was interest.
but wait, grinding valve stems, (like the shank?) or grinding the valve head? (like the tulip?)
it showed to be worthwhile... but then again, be careful...
I could scan the article if there was interest.
but wait, grinding valve stems, (like the shank?) or grinding the valve head? (like the tulip?)
#4
"like the shank" ...I'm considering buying undercut valves, but I have a bunch I could work on myself... I'm wondering if there's any reason that it wouldn't be safe to grind down the stem myself.
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700 R4
The reason it wouldn't be safe is because the valve head could pop off while your engine is running.
Less expensive valves like OEM replacement are made by welding the head to the stem. Most of the better ones are 1 pc.
By grinding into a weld like that, you would be seriously compromising the integrity of it.
Unless you really know what you're doing, the risk wouldn't be worth the payoff.
Less expensive valves like OEM replacement are made by welding the head to the stem. Most of the better ones are 1 pc.
By grinding into a weld like that, you would be seriously compromising the integrity of it.
Unless you really know what you're doing, the risk wouldn't be worth the payoff.
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Originally posted by Sonix
david vizard did a breakdown of flow gains, based on different things done to a valve. one was chucking it up in your drill, and running it against a grinding wheel, or even grinding wheel in a die grinder (I think you'd need a vise, or 4 hands for that...)
it showed to be worthwhile... but then again, be careful...
I could scan the article if there was interest.
david vizard did a breakdown of flow gains, based on different things done to a valve. one was chucking it up in your drill, and running it against a grinding wheel, or even grinding wheel in a die grinder (I think you'd need a vise, or 4 hands for that...)
it showed to be worthwhile... but then again, be careful...
I could scan the article if there was interest.
Originally posted by Streetiron85
The reason it wouldn't be safe is because the valve head could pop off while your engine is running.
Less expensive valves like OEM replacement are made by welding the head to the stem. Most of the better ones are 1 pc.
By grinding into a weld like that, you would be seriously compromising the integrity of it.
Unless you really know what you're doing, the risk wouldn't be worth the payoff.
The reason it wouldn't be safe is because the valve head could pop off while your engine is running.
Less expensive valves like OEM replacement are made by welding the head to the stem. Most of the better ones are 1 pc.
By grinding into a weld like that, you would be seriously compromising the integrity of it.
Unless you really know what you're doing, the risk wouldn't be worth the payoff.
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
ask and ye shall receive.
directory
I only scanned his test on the intake, (the start of the exhaust is on the last page.)
The part I noticed the most, was a stock valve, hand ground with a slight back radius on it, (Mod 3), picked up a max of 10CFM @.2" lift, and 0 at max lift. So good for the medium lift areas.
mod4 was to do a 30* backcut on a machine. That actually lost flow at the top lift.... He backs up a lot of his claims with flow bench results, and nifty pictures. The only downside to vizard, is when he describes "new" or "cutting edge" parts, they're 10yrs old by now....
directory
I only scanned his test on the intake, (the start of the exhaust is on the last page.)
The part I noticed the most, was a stock valve, hand ground with a slight back radius on it, (Mod 3), picked up a max of 10CFM @.2" lift, and 0 at max lift. So good for the medium lift areas.
mod4 was to do a 30* backcut on a machine. That actually lost flow at the top lift.... He backs up a lot of his claims with flow bench results, and nifty pictures. The only downside to vizard, is when he describes "new" or "cutting edge" parts, they're 10yrs old by now....
Trending Topics
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,461
Received 1,839 Likes
on
1,399 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
As cheap as the real thing is, designed and made correctly by a company you can actually trust (no experimenting with the possibility of dropping pieces of material into your cylinders that won't compress!!!!), why bother?
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...AN%2D10776%2D8
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...AN%2D10765%2D8
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...AN%2D10776%2D8
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...AN%2D10765%2D8
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
drptop70ss
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
3
10-04-2015 09:44 PM
355tpipickup
Tech / General Engine
9
09-13-2015 11:35 PM