Stacking head gaskets to lower comp ratio?
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Car: 79 Mustang
Engine: Vortec 350
Transmission: TH350
Stacking head gaskets to lower comp ratio?
This may be a crazy theory but I have heard some people talk about stacking two head gaskets on top of each other to try and lower compression. I have never heard anyone say they ever tried it or that they have been succesful in doing this. I know I can buy thicker head gaskets but can't get any good info on which ones work the best and hold together the best, Plus I have a STACK of about 20 Fel-Pro head gaskets. My comp is about 9.5 right now and I would like to see it closer to 8.5. By the way this is a L31 (Vortec) motor with a blow through turbo carb setup.
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 2
From: Muskego, WI
Car: 1985 Trans Am
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70
On a turbo engine I would think the last thing you'd want to do is use 2 gaskets. That would be an invitation to a problem. Many people who use boost have enough problems with blowing out head gaskets.
#3
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 6
From: New Boston, IL, USA
Car: '90 Formula 350
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt S/S 700-R4 & ACT 9" Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23
Hot Rod awhile back did have a company that was making spacers for the head gaskets. LOL, they used one to go from a 11+ to 9ish compression. They required special chemical cut on the block though.
Another thing to mention is when you mess with your spacing it can actually cause more problems than good. It can actually increase your chances of getting spark knock even with a lower compression. If I can I'll try pulling the quote of the Corky Bell book about this later tonight.
Another thing to mention is when you mess with your spacing it can actually cause more problems than good. It can actually increase your chances of getting spark knock even with a lower compression. If I can I'll try pulling the quote of the Corky Bell book about this later tonight.
#4
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Car: 79 Mustang
Engine: Vortec 350
Transmission: TH350
I have read about all the effects of thicker gaskets on quench and what not but, must people say that on a boosted engine quech is not as important because the air in the cylinder is so much more dense than on a NA motor. Plus my pistons have a round dish that takes up almost the complete top of the piston so I don't have a quench area anyways.....
#7
Moderator
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,174
Likes: 140
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Copper gaskets are a pain to seal. I had some for a while on my o-ringed block and I couldn't get the coolent leaks stopped. Even using Hylomar didn't work.
Trending Topics
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 892
Likes: 0
From: Mo.
Car: Z/28
Engine: 355
Transmission: Turbo 400
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Try Cometic gaskets. They will make custom head gaskets different thicknesses to order ( www.cometic.com).
hope this helps
hope this helps
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 6
From: New Boston, IL, USA
Car: '90 Formula 350
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt S/S 700-R4 & ACT 9" Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23
Thanks RWB____s!
You just saved me a whole lot of looking for that name. Yeah that's the company that offers the head gasket spacers.
You just saved me a whole lot of looking for that name. Yeah that's the company that offers the head gasket spacers.
#12
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 801
Likes: 1
From: st. Petersburg, Fla
Car: 83 Z28
Engine: vortec 305 for now
Transmission: 5 speed
Before you laugh too loud at stacking gaskets, the factory Mopar Chevy and I think Ford as well used to do this in the early 60's.
#13
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,871
Likes: 24
From: Mass
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
This procedure was done in thelatest issue of Engine Masters. They basicaly tested the effects of changing the CR to see if there was any HP gain of loss. They stacked a totalof 4 head gaskets to go from the 11.0:1 to 8.0:1.They lost 60hp doing this. They used Milidon dead soft copper gaskets.They also O ringed the block. They also had to stack multiple intake gaskets since rasiing the heads ould end up misaligning the bolt holes.
.
.
#14
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 52
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
If you were to intergrate a water/alcohol injection system into your turbo project you would not have to lower the compression ratio or retard the timing near as much.
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (-1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 2
From: SE Michigan
Car: Bright Red 91 GTA
Engine: CARBED LT4
Transmission: MK6
Originally posted by BOTTLEDZr28
This procedure was done in thelatest issue of Engine Masters. They basicaly tested the effects of changing the CR to see if there was any HP gain of loss. They stacked a totalof 4 head gaskets to go from the 11.0:1 to 8.0:1.They lost 60hp doing this. They used Milidon dead soft copper gaskets.They also O ringed the block. They also had to stack multiple intake gaskets since rasiing the heads ould end up misaligning the bolt holes.
.
This procedure was done in thelatest issue of Engine Masters. They basicaly tested the effects of changing the CR to see if there was any HP gain of loss. They stacked a totalof 4 head gaskets to go from the 11.0:1 to 8.0:1.They lost 60hp doing this. They used Milidon dead soft copper gaskets.They also O ringed the block. They also had to stack multiple intake gaskets since rasiing the heads ould end up misaligning the bolt holes.
.
holy crap did you see that 727 cube monster!!!
#16
Moderator
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,174
Likes: 140
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
It would probably be easier to pull the heads and hog out the combustion chambers with a die grinder to make them bigger. That would lower your compression ratio.
#17
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
I would be against staking of the head gaskets myself. no proof on it but it seems like others have said an invite to disaster.
also even on a boosted motor with those denser mixtures you still need quench in there if you want to get decent octane tolerance and resistance to detonation.
this way you get a nice good flame front rather then some choppy lame *** flame front like a motor with little to no quench area is going to give you.
also even on a boosted motor with those denser mixtures you still need quench in there if you want to get decent octane tolerance and resistance to detonation.
this way you get a nice good flame front rather then some choppy lame *** flame front like a motor with little to no quench area is going to give you.
#18
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 16
From: Bowdon, GA.
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
quench means ALOT no matter if it's a 7.5:1 stock engine, or a 6000 hp blown top fuel drag engine.
The benifits from a tight quench height is great. You gain power, you gain compression, and you fight away detonation
With 2 engines, built the same, the same compression, only diff one had a wide (add number of your pick) .060" quench and the other one has a .030-.045" quench height.
I bet you money, the one with the wide quench will need more octane, or less timing that the tight quench engine, to keep it out of detonation.
Then you come to stacking gaskets.. Well more gaskets there, more rish you run of one of them not sealing, blowing, etc
With boost, head sealing is a major thing. With higher levels of boost, you can lift the heads up off the block, if you don't run studs. Thats with very high boost levels though. My point to is is, if high boost can do that, well mild boost could find its way through a stack of gaskets
The benifits from a tight quench height is great. You gain power, you gain compression, and you fight away detonation
With 2 engines, built the same, the same compression, only diff one had a wide (add number of your pick) .060" quench and the other one has a .030-.045" quench height.
I bet you money, the one with the wide quench will need more octane, or less timing that the tight quench engine, to keep it out of detonation.
Then you come to stacking gaskets.. Well more gaskets there, more rish you run of one of them not sealing, blowing, etc
With boost, head sealing is a major thing. With higher levels of boost, you can lift the heads up off the block, if you don't run studs. Thats with very high boost levels though. My point to is is, if high boost can do that, well mild boost could find its way through a stack of gaskets
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
04-25-2016 10:21 PM
NinjaNife
Tech / General Engine
27
08-23-2015 12:49 PM