5800rpm=no more power
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 850
Likes: 14
From: Nebraska
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
5800rpm=no more power
First this is not a TPI engine.
Im running a modded HSR, 200cc alum. Toplines, and a XR282HR-110 Comp hyd. roller with R lifters (1/4 turn past zero lash) and 987 Comp springs. KB lightweight pistons, Scat rods, nodular crank, assy. balanced professionally. SLP 1 3/4" headers, 3in. exhaust. Stock distributor, MSD coil, module, etc. Stock fuel pump.
The problem is that the engine completely runs out of power at 5800rpm...no valve float or gradual loss of power...just no more go. As expected, it really begins to pull at 3500-4000, but it pulls very strong only to 5800, then stops. The fuel pressure does not drop when this happens. I am aware of the high-rpm shortcomings of hyd. cams, but Im not positive that this is the problem. Could the stock distributor be losing spark and hurting power? Is a 2 1/2" y-pipe too small and strangling the engine? Any ideas would be appreciated.
Im running a modded HSR, 200cc alum. Toplines, and a XR282HR-110 Comp hyd. roller with R lifters (1/4 turn past zero lash) and 987 Comp springs. KB lightweight pistons, Scat rods, nodular crank, assy. balanced professionally. SLP 1 3/4" headers, 3in. exhaust. Stock distributor, MSD coil, module, etc. Stock fuel pump.
The problem is that the engine completely runs out of power at 5800rpm...no valve float or gradual loss of power...just no more go. As expected, it really begins to pull at 3500-4000, but it pulls very strong only to 5800, then stops. The fuel pressure does not drop when this happens. I am aware of the high-rpm shortcomings of hyd. cams, but Im not positive that this is the problem. Could the stock distributor be losing spark and hurting power? Is a 2 1/2" y-pipe too small and strangling the engine? Any ideas would be appreciated.
#2
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 1
From: Tigard, Oregon
Car: '86 Berlinetta
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
just to get this started...
how long has it been since you did a tune-up? Looks like you have a fairly beefy setup there, but if you're still getting bad connection from the rotor to the terminals (or points or whatever they are in the dizzy cap) then you still wont be getting very good power output at higher RPM even with the other beefy components
Now I am craving beef
how long has it been since you did a tune-up? Looks like you have a fairly beefy setup there, but if you're still getting bad connection from the rotor to the terminals (or points or whatever they are in the dizzy cap) then you still wont be getting very good power output at higher RPM even with the other beefy components
Now I am craving beef
#3
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 850
Likes: 14
From: Nebraska
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
The engine (including everything on it except the distributor itself) has less than 1500 miles on it. The plugs all look good, the fuel filter is new
#5
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,873
Likes: 223
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
An HSR? Should be good well beyond 6,000rpm on a 350.
You said you have a stock coil, is it a possibility that it just can't keep up at those revs? I noticed a small improvement at higher rpm's when I put a MSD coil on my car. Granted, I don't have the ignition box, but the coil did help a bit on the top end.
You said you have a stock coil, is it a possibility that it just can't keep up at those revs? I noticed a small improvement at higher rpm's when I put a MSD coil on my car. Granted, I don't have the ignition box, but the coil did help a bit on the top end.
#6
Moderator
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
From: Nanticoke, Pa
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 406 CI
Transmission: Pete K 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:55
Is the tach accurate? If it is the factory tach it could be way off. If the car has cats they could contribute to that problem.
Last edited by Floor guy; 12-29-2004 at 09:57 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,873
Likes: 223
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
my bad, when I went through it i somehow mistook MSD coil, and Stock dizzy.
Wish I could tell you.
Wish I could tell you.
#10
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
From: Chander, Arizona USA
Car: 2006 Silverado 1500
Engine: 5.3L
Transmission: 4L60E
a stock HEI with MSD module and good coil will certainly hold it's own against one with an MSD box. sounds like you either have an advance problem in the distributor, a cam timing issue, or fuel issue. i'd check the a/f ratio on a wide band and check total timing with an advance light.
#11
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 850
Likes: 14
From: Nebraska
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
Do you mean the timing with the computer-control wire plugged in? The base (unplugged) timing is around 8* advanced. The cam was degreed (well, checked) when the engine was assembled. Oh yeah, Im also running LS1 (25lb?) injectors, and PCMforless programming.
Interesting. Do you think its a tuning issue? Possibly an issue with the programming?
or fuel issue. i'd check the a/f ratio on a wide band
#12
Stock fuel pump would be my target.
I had similar problem on my old L98, HOT cam, GMPP 'Vette heads after switching to an HSR. The Delco fuel pump had done well w/ the TPI and only revving to ~5600rpm, but it just couldn't keep up with the HSR and higher revving.
I diagnosed it by disconnecting and capping the fuel pressure regulator vacuum reference, connecting my fuel pressure gauge, taping the gauge face to my windshield, and going for a spin.
Sure enough at around 5000rpm WOT the fuel pressure would start dropping...the longer I held the gas open, the further it fell. Soon as I lifted, the gauge snapped right back.
I swapped in a Walbro GSS-340 high volume/high pressure in-tank pump and have had no further issues with fueling.
I had similar problem on my old L98, HOT cam, GMPP 'Vette heads after switching to an HSR. The Delco fuel pump had done well w/ the TPI and only revving to ~5600rpm, but it just couldn't keep up with the HSR and higher revving.
I diagnosed it by disconnecting and capping the fuel pressure regulator vacuum reference, connecting my fuel pressure gauge, taping the gauge face to my windshield, and going for a spin.
Sure enough at around 5000rpm WOT the fuel pressure would start dropping...the longer I held the gas open, the further it fell. Soon as I lifted, the gauge snapped right back.
I swapped in a Walbro GSS-340 high volume/high pressure in-tank pump and have had no further issues with fueling.
#13
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
I agree, take a fuel pressure gauge and tape it to your windshield and go for a drive and nail into it somewhere and see if it drops at WOT. If so, time to change the pump. Its probably starving the motor at those high rpms.
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
I still think an MSD/Crane box will help in the upper RPMs. It made a huge difference on my last car. I'm going to buy an MSD 6A one of these days again..
I had thought he said FP was okay, but then again, it may have just been a driveway test and not under load.
I had thought he said FP was okay, but then again, it may have just been a driveway test and not under load.
#15
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
He needs to check FP under WOT. I had the same problem my stock pump could not keep up with the LT1. Put in a Walbro 255 ltr/hr and hah, it can take anything I can throw at it now. I also suggest a accell or msd coil. Im running an accell and its great, it idles a lot smoother and it pulls strong at 5600 rpm.
#16
i had a similar problem with my car that it wouldnt rev past 5500 rpms.I installed a bigger fuel pump ...didnt fix it.So next i threw out the hei distributor and went msd everything....problem fixed.Now i can rev it to 7000 rpms no problem.
#17
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 850
Likes: 14
From: Nebraska
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
The ignition is all aftermarket except the distributor itself.
I have checked the FP under load, the reading (~40-45psi) does not drop when the power cuts out. This is what lead me to believe it was a problem with the distributor itself or possibly restrictive exhaust, or even just a drawback of a hydraulic valvetrain. Thanks for the ideas guys.
I have checked the FP under load, the reading (~40-45psi) does not drop when the power cuts out. This is what lead me to believe it was a problem with the distributor itself or possibly restrictive exhaust, or even just a drawback of a hydraulic valvetrain. Thanks for the ideas guys.
#18
Originally posted by formularpm
The ignition is all aftermarket except the distributor itself.
I have checked the FP under load, the reading (~40-45psi) does not drop when the power cuts out. This is what lead me to believe it was a problem with the distributor itself or possibly restrictive exhaust, or even just a drawback of a hydraulic valvetrain. Thanks for the ideas guys.
The ignition is all aftermarket except the distributor itself.
I have checked the FP under load, the reading (~40-45psi) does not drop when the power cuts out. This is what lead me to believe it was a problem with the distributor itself or possibly restrictive exhaust, or even just a drawback of a hydraulic valvetrain. Thanks for the ideas guys.
If you can, I'd reinstall the stock stuff one component at a time and re-test each time.
#19
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Originally posted by formularpm
The ignition is all aftermarket except the distributor itself.
I have checked the FP under load, the reading (~40-45psi) does not drop when the power cuts out. This is what lead me to believe it was a problem with the distributor itself or possibly restrictive exhaust, or even just a drawback of a hydraulic valvetrain. Thanks for the ideas guys.
The ignition is all aftermarket except the distributor itself.
I have checked the FP under load, the reading (~40-45psi) does not drop when the power cuts out. This is what lead me to believe it was a problem with the distributor itself or possibly restrictive exhaust, or even just a drawback of a hydraulic valvetrain. Thanks for the ideas guys.
#20
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
From: Chander, Arizona USA
Car: 2006 Silverado 1500
Engine: 5.3L
Transmission: 4L60E
Originally posted by formularpm
Do you mean the timing with the computer-control wire plugged in? The base (unplugged) timing is around 8* advanced. The cam was degreed (well, checked) when the engine was assembled. Oh yeah, Im also running LS1 (25lb?) injectors, and PCMforless programming.
Interesting. Do you think its a tuning issue? Possibly an issue with the programming?
Do you mean the timing with the computer-control wire plugged in? The base (unplugged) timing is around 8* advanced. The cam was degreed (well, checked) when the engine was assembled. Oh yeah, Im also running LS1 (25lb?) injectors, and PCMforless programming.
Interesting. Do you think its a tuning issue? Possibly an issue with the programming?
if you're running a pcm for less tune, why do you have the timing so far advanced? i'd look for K/R and yes, i'd check the a/f ratio. there could be a problem with going lean at that rpm. are you still running a maf?
#21
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 3
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Maybe the people who did the memcal put a rev limiter in the prom. It wouldn't be the first time I've seen that. Have your memcal scanned by someone and check that out.
#22
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 850
Likes: 14
From: Nebraska
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
Have you checked your valves? They may be a bit tight.
if you're running a pcm for less tune, why do you have the timing so far advanced?
are you still running a maf?
Maybe the people who did the memcal put a rev limiter in the prom. It wouldn't be the first time I've seen that. Have your memcal scanned by someone and check that out.
#23
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 3
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Originally posted by formularpm
Interesting. But if that were the case, would the engine attain the higher rpm at all? The engine will go to 7K+, it just makes zero power after ~5800.
Interesting. But if that were the case, would the engine attain the higher rpm at all? The engine will go to 7K+, it just makes zero power after ~5800.
You need to get a scan of the engine done while it is reving out. Wideband O2 reading would also be good.
With EFI engines, you need the right tools (scan tool & Wide band) to properly analyzing these engines. Everything else is just "a guessing game".
#24
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
From: Chander, Arizona USA
Car: 2006 Silverado 1500
Engine: 5.3L
Transmission: 4L60E
aside from having a good possibility of KR*, you may be maxing out the maf readings which will just lead to a lean condition up high.
#25
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 3
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Originally posted by zippy
aside from having a good possibility of KR*, you may be maxing out the maf readings which will just lead to a lean condition up high.
aside from having a good possibility of KR*, you may be maxing out the maf readings which will just lead to a lean condition up high.
If you lack a WB sensor (and don't wish to buy one), consider having a chassis dyno done as the majority of the good dynos take WB readings.
#26
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 850
Likes: 14
From: Nebraska
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
aside from having a good possibility of KR*, you may be maxing out the maf readings which will just lead to a lean condition up high.
Thanks for the responses guys, if I ever get the money Ill look into getting it on a dyno and getting some WB readings.
#28
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 3
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Originally posted by formularpm
Im not familiar with that term...what does KR* mean?
Thanks for the responses guys, if I ever get the money Ill look into getting it on a dyno and getting some WB readings.
Im not familiar with that term...what does KR* mean?
Thanks for the responses guys, if I ever get the money Ill look into getting it on a dyno and getting some WB readings.
As for money, I don't think you really have an option if you want your car to perform to it's potential. Also, if the MAF is indeed maxing and you are running lean, then you are seriously risking your engine. As the saying goes "You can pay a little now, or a LOT later...your choice".
#29
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,873
Likes: 223
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
I know when I datalog my MAF has the gm/sec listing. I'll have to look over an older log to see how much its pulling. You can do the same if you can get access to a laptop, and the cable.
#30
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 3
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Originally posted by Thirdgen89GTA
I know when I datalog my MAF has the gm/sec listing. I'll have to look over an older log to see how much its pulling. You can do the same if you can get access to a laptop, and the cable.
I know when I datalog my MAF has the gm/sec listing. I'll have to look over an older log to see how much its pulling. You can do the same if you can get access to a laptop, and the cable.
But you are very correct; the scan tool will indicate whether or not you are maxxing the MAF. (Though on certain bins, the max reading MAY only be 230-245. On some MAF bins, the eprom may limit the max gm/sec permitted at certain rpms and this usually needs to be tweaked in the eprom to hit 255). I am just mentioning this to make people aware that you MIGHT be maxing the MAF and it won't say "255".
This is why I also recommend this be done inconjunction with a WB reading...it's the only way to know for sure.
Aren't EFI cars fun?
#32
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 3
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Originally posted by Project
I have had problems with high RPM power when I advance timing over 5 degrees.
I have had problems with high RPM power when I advance timing over 5 degrees.
Sometimes, the best fix (other than a tear-down) seems to be to limit the amount of retard the knock sensor can permit when in WOT and use your ears instead.
#33
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 850
Likes: 14
From: Nebraska
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
As for money, I don't think you really have an option if you want your car to perform to it's potential. Also, if the MAF is indeed maxing and you are running lean, then you are seriously risking your engine. As the saying goes "You can pay a little now, or a LOT later...your choice".
On some engines, I have found the KRS to be the biggest problem in making power. It tends to pull a lot of timing out even before you even hear detonation while it seems to go deaf when it occurs.
Sometimes, the best fix (other than a tear-down) seems to be to limit the amount of retard the knock sensor can permit when in WOT and use your ears instead.
Sometimes, the best fix (other than a tear-down) seems to be to limit the amount of retard the knock sensor can permit when in WOT and use your ears instead.
But you are very correct; the scan tool will indicate whether or not you are maxxing the MAF. (Though on certain bins, the max reading MAY only be 230-245. On some MAF bins, the eprom may limit the max gm/sec permitted at certain rpms and this usually needs to be tweaked in the eprom to hit 255)
#34
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 3
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
I have not idea about PCMforLess, but my initial thoughts are "doubt it". Most of the things we are mentioning are NOT done by your typical eprom writer. Only guys who are deeply into eprom writing look at these things.
My thought would be to "hang around" the TGO Regional Board for your area and try and tag up with one of the local members that has all the proper equipment to scan your engine and tweak your eprom. LOTS of guys now can burn eproms. Burning eproms "via mail" just doesn't work well. You need someone to do it "hands on".
Once you have completed school, then you can consider getting into eprom burning yourself. The cost of the equipment is not expensive, it's more the "initial learning curve".
My thought would be to "hang around" the TGO Regional Board for your area and try and tag up with one of the local members that has all the proper equipment to scan your engine and tweak your eprom. LOTS of guys now can burn eproms. Burning eproms "via mail" just doesn't work well. You need someone to do it "hands on".
Once you have completed school, then you can consider getting into eprom burning yourself. The cost of the equipment is not expensive, it's more the "initial learning curve".
#35
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 850
Likes: 14
From: Nebraska
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
Thanks for all the help, glenn.
Ok, either that or DFI I suppose.
Once you have completed school, then you can consider getting into eprom burning yourself. The cost of the equipment is not expensive, it's more the "initial learning curve".
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post